Head injury rehabilitation: the role of a neurotrauma clinic

Supporting self-management after traumatic brain injury: Codesign and evaluation of a new intervention across a trauma pathway

Background

Supported self‐management (SSM) is a recognized approach for people with long‐term conditions but, despite the prevalence of unmet needs, little is known about its role for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Objectives

To codesign an SSM intervention with people with TBI and evaluate feasibility of implementation through multidisciplinary staff across a trauma pathway.

Setting and participants

People who had previously been admitted to a Major Trauma Centre following TBI and family members participated in a series of codesign activities. Staff attended SSM workshops and used the intervention with patients in acute and rehabilitation settings.

Methods

We used Normalization Process Theory constructs to guide and interpret implementation. Knowledge, beliefs and confidence of staff in SSM were assessed through pre‐ and post‐training questionnaires, and staff, patients' and families' experiences were explored through semi‐structured interviews. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, and clinical measures were mapped against a matched sample.

Results

Codesigned resources were created and used within an SSM approach for which 110 staff participated in training. Evaluation demonstrated significant differences in staff SSM confidence and skills, following training. Qualitative evaluation revealed adoption by staff, and patients' and families' experiences of using the resources. Challenges included reaching staff across complex pathways to achieve collective implementation.

Conclusion

This is the first project to demonstrate feasibility of SSM for people after TBI starting in an acute trauma setting. Through an open approach to codesign with a marginalized group, the SSM resources were valued by them and held meaning and relevance for staff.

Neurotrauma - a multidisciplinary disease

Traumatic brain injury is one of the most important diseases of our time, both in terms of morbidity, mortality and economic loss. Public health policy is key to reducing its incidence. Integrated multidisciplinary clinical care is vital to minimise its morbidity and mortality.

Acute neurorehabilitation versus treatment as usual

Several clinical and government reviews have recommended specialised rehabilitation services for those recovering from neurological insult or neurosurgical intervention. Despite this, provision of 'rapid access'/acute neurorehabilitation units is extremely limited in the UK. In some areas, millions of people have no access to such facilities. Numerous articles have indicated that delayed access to neurorehabilitation in the acute recovery stage may worsen clinical outcomes and increase length of stay for patients. However, there has been a lack of studies directly comparing clinical outcomes between matched samples of patients in acute neurorehabilitation units versus patients receiving treatment-as-usual. In a study believed to be the first of its kind, this paper: (A) Describes the rationale and evidence base for acute neurorehabilitation. (B) Provides a comparison of clinical outcome scores Functional Independence Measure/Functional Assessment Measure (FIM-FAM) and also length of stay times for both of the aforementioned groups. The results show that all outcome areas except the 'communication' domain saw clinically and statistically significant improvements in the acute neurorehabilitation group. Length of stay was significantly reduced in the acute neurorehabilitation group. The case for reviewing the provision of acute neurorehabilitation units is now even more urgent and difficult to ignore.