Routine radiographs one day after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion are neither necessary nor cost-effective

Post-operative Use of Cervical Orthoses for Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries - a Survey-based Analysis at German Spine Care Centres

INTRODUCTION

There are no evidence-based recommendations for the post-operative treatment and application of soft or rigid cervical collars after operative treatment of injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. Cervical collars can restrict peak range of motion and serve as a reminder to the patient. However, they can also cause pressure ulcers. The aim of this online-based survey among German spine centres was to gain an overview of post-operative treatment and the application of soft or rigid cervical collars after surgical treatment of injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online-based survey was conducted among 59 spine centres certified by the German Spine Society. It comprised seven items and the option of adding remarks in the form of open-ended responses.

RESULTS

The return rate was 63% (37 out of 59). Of the 37 analysed spine centres, 51% routinely apply a cervical collar post-operatively, 27% apply a soft and 16% a rigid cervical collar, 8% sequentially apply first a rigid and later a soft cervical collar. Less than half of the spine centres (43%) routinely use no cervical collar. Rigid collars are applied for more than 6 weeks and soft collars up to 6 weeks at some spine centres. Standardised post-operative treatment plans are common. The selection of the post-operative treatment plan depends primarily on the type of injury and method of operation and partly on patient age and bone quality. The satisfaction of German spine centres with the current handling of post-operative treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries is high.

DISCUSSION

The post-operative treatment of injuries of the subaxial cervical spine at German spine centres is heterogeneous, and the evidence on advantages and disadvantages of the post-operative application of cervical collars is insufficient. Planning and implementation of randomised controlled clinical trials in subaxial cervical spine injuries is challenging.

Clinical Utility of Routine Postoperative Imaging in Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Following spinal fusion surgery, routine imaging is often obtained in all patients regardless of clinical presentation. Such routine imaging may include x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging studies in both the immediate postoperative period and after discharge. The clinical utility of this practice is questionable. Our goal is to assess the existing literature for evidence of impact on clinical care from routine radiographic surveillance following spinal fusion.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid databases was performed for studies investigating postoperative imaging following spinal fusion surgery. Studies were analyzed for imaging findings and rates of change in management due to imaging.

RESULTS

In total, the review identified 9 studies that separated data by unique patient or by unique clinic visits. The 4 studies reporting per-patient data totaled 475 patients with 328 (69%) receiving routine imaging. Among these, 28 (8.5%) patients had abnormal routine findings with no patients having a change to their clinical course. Of the 5 studies that reported clinic visit data, 3119 patient visits were included with 2365 (76%) clinic visits accompanied by imaging. Across these 5 studies, 146 (6.2%) visits noted abnormal imaging with only 12 (0.5%) subsequent management changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis found that routine imaging after spinal fusion surgery had no direct benefit on clinical management. The utility of baseline imaging for long-term comparison and medicolegal concerns were not studied and remain up to the provider's judgment. Further research is necessary to identify optimal imaging criteria following spinal fusion surgery.

Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.

METHODS

A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.

RESULTS

A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.

Routine In-Hospital Radiographs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: Neither Necessary nor Cost-Effective?

Background

Despite a paucity of evidence or literature to support routine in-hospital post-operative radiographs (POXR) of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery, it remains accepted practice. Most spinal surgeons consider it part of their standard post-operative routine for ACDF despite nearly always documenting a ’satisfactory intra-operative image’ at the end of the operation. With an increasing financial pressure on NHS resources, our investigations should be clinically justified and evidence-based.

Purpose

To evaluate whether a post-operative radiograph of the cervical spine before discharge is either clinically justified or cost-effective in patients who have undergone an ACDF, despite having satisfactory intra-operative imaging.

Design

A retrospective review of 101 consecutive ACDF patients of radiographs performed before discharge, associated length of inpatient stay, and any complications involved.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 101 ACDF patients who had single or multi-level instrumentation for degenerative spinal disease from a single neurosurgical centre from all surgeons. Seventy-eight had an in-hospital post-operative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiograph, 23 did not. In 95 of these, it was documented that there was ‘satisfactory intra-operative imaging’ before the closure of skin, six lacked documentation of this. All patients had intra-operative imaging of completed instrumentation on the radiology system. Any post-operative complications were noted, and the length of hospital stay (LOS) was recorded. Six patients underwent ACDF following trauma, therefore leaving 95 elective cases. Study parameters also included: number of levels operated on, whether or not a plate was used with a cage, hospital costings for 2-view imaging and additional days of inpatient stay. 

Results

There was one out of our 101 patients where the post-operative radiograph confirmed unsatisfactory placement of metalwork and warranted a return to surgery. However, the decision to perform this x-ray was based purely on the deteriorating post-operative clinical picture. In the cohort that had POXR’s, the average length of stay was 66.7 hours. Without POXR, it was 21 hours. The additional cost to the trust of performing the in-hospital radiographs was calculated to be £71,523 per year.

Conclusion

In patients who undergo ACDF surgery with an uneventful post-operative course and have satisfactory intra-operative imaging, in-hospital post-operative radiographs serve no clinical purpose and delay discharge. This gives additional cost to the trust, unnecessary radiation exposure and occupies potential bedspace.

Immediate Postoperative Imaging Following Elective Lumbar Fusion Provides Little Clinical Utility

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review at a single institution of all adult patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spinal disease from 2013 to 2018. Reoperation rates and change in clinical management due to routine imaging findings were the primary outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate what effects immediate routine postoperative imaging has on the clinical management of patients following lumbar fusion surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The clinical utility of routine postoperative imaging following lumbar fusion surgery remains uncertain. Existing studies on the clinical utility of postoperative imaging in lumbar fusion patients have largely focused on imaging obtained post-discharge. We present a retrospective analysis that to our knowledge is the first study reporting on the clinical utility of routine imaging in lumbar fusion patients during the immediate postoperative period.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who had undergone elective lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disease from 2013 to 2018 by neurosurgeons across one regional healthcare system were retrospectively analyzed. Inpatient records and imaging orders for patients were reviewed. Routine immediate postoperative imaging was defined by any lumbar spine imaging prior to discharge in the absence of specific indications.

RESULTS

Analysis identified 115 patients who underwent elective lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disease. One-hundred-twelve patients received routine postoperative imaging. Routine imaging was abnormal in four patients (4%). There was one instance (<1%) where routine immediate postoperative imaging led to change in clinical management. Abnormal routine imaging was not associated with either reoperation or development of neurological symptoms postoperatively (P = 0.10), however, new or worsening neurologic deficits did predict reoperation (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

New neurologic deficit was the only significant predictor of reoperation. Routine imaging, whether normal or abnormal, was not found to be associated with reoperation. The practice of routine imaging prior to discharge following elective lumbar fusion surgery appears to provide little utility to clinical management.Level of Evidence: 3.

Evaluation of Benefit and Cost Utility of Immediate Postanesthesia Care Unit Radiographs to Predict Airway Compromise After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure that may be complicated by airway compromise postoperatively. This life-threatening complication may necessitate reintubation and reoperation. We evaluated the cost utility of conventional postoperative x-ray.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Studies have demonstrated minimal benefit in obtaining an x-ray on postoperative day 1, but there is some utility of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) x-rays for predicting the likelihood of reoperation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF between September 2013 and February 2017. Patients were dichotomized into those who received PACU x-rays and those who did not (control group). Primary outcomes were reoperation, reintubation, mortality, and health care costs.

RESULTS

Eight-hundred and fifteen patients were included in our analysis: 558 had PACU x-rays; 257 did not. In those who received PACU x-rays, mean age was 53.7 ± 11.3 years, mean levels operated on were 2.0 ± 0.79, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.3 ± 6.9. In those who did not, mean age was 51.8 ± 10.9 years, mean levels operated on were 1.48 ± 0.65, and mean BMI was 29.9 ± 6.3. Complications in the PACU x-ray group were reintubation-0.4%, reoperation-0.7%, and death-0.3% (due to prevertebral swelling causing airway compromise). Complications in the control group were reintubation-0.4%, reoperation-0.8%, and death-0. There were no differences between groups with respect to reoperation (P = 0.92), reintubation (P = 0.94), or mortality (P = 0.49). The mean per-patient cost was significantly higher (P = 0.009) in those who received PACU x-rays, $1031.76 ± 948.67, versus those in the control group, $700.26 ± 634.48. Mean length of stay was significantly longer in those who had PACU x-rays (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Although there were no differences in reoperation, reintubation, or mortality, there was a significantly higher cost for care and hospitalization in those who received PACU x-rays. Further studies are warranted to validate the results of the presented study.Level of Evidence: 3.

Retrospective Data Analysis and Literature Review for a Development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Objective

While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are associated with shorter length of stay and improved outcomes in multiple surgical specialties, its application to spine surgery has been limited. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal procedure with a relative efficacy and safety profile that makes it suitable for the application of ERAS principles. Reviewing our outcomes and practice and incorporating evidence-based clinical studies, we propose the development of an ERAS pathway for ACDF.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of ACDF cases performed at a single institution by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2017. Primary outcome measures included length of stay, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. The 1- and 2-level and the 3- and 4-level groups were also each consolidated into a single cohort for comparison. A comprehensive review of evidence-based literature pertaining to ACDF was then performed. Best-practice recommendations derived from the literature were incorporated into the proposed ERAS protocol.

Results

In this series of 75 1-level, 77 2-level, 44 3-level and 20 4-level ACDF procedures, the average surgical time (minutes) was 68, 90, 118 and 141; length of stay (days) was 1, 1, 1.4, and 1.7; drain usage (%) was 1.3, 2.6, 13.6 and 10; and 30-day readmission rates (%) were 2.7, 3.9, 4.5, and 15, respectively. Combining the 1- and 2-level as a single group and 3- and 4-level as another cohort, the 3- and 4-level cohort had a significantly higher rate of drain usage and estimated blood loss (EBL) but there was not a difference in length-of-stay, complications or 30-day readmission rates.

Conclusions

Given the relative equivalent safety profile between 1- and 2-level as compared to 3- and 4-level ACDF, the proposed ERAS pathway can be applied to all patients, and not just restricted to 1-level or 2-level ACDF. Taking into account feasibility parameters as deduced from a review of institutional outcomes, this pathway can streamline same-day discharge and improve the patient experience. Its success will be predicated on an iterative improvement process deriving from optimal prospective outcome measurements.

Unplanned Immediate Return to Operating Room After Spine Surgery: Significance of Immediate Postoperative Radiographs

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis; single center data.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to look at the utility and relevance of immediate postoperative radiographs in providing vital information leading to immediate revision after spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Immediate postoperative radiographs are routinely obtained in the recovery room after spine surgery to verify the level, alignment of the spine, implant position, and the adequacy of the procedure. However, with the ability to utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy imaging for the same purpose, the requirement for immediate postoperative radiographs needs to be validated. The purpose of this study is to look at the utility and relevance of these postoperative radiographs in providing critical information that may warrant immediate intervention.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all spine surgeries (elective and emergent), performed at a single center from 2011 to 2016, was done and cases returning to operating room within 48 hours were identified. Indication of immediate revision was reviewed and utility of immediate postoperative radiographs in guiding immediate revision was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1804 elective and urgent spinal surgeries were performed by seven surgeons. Twenty-two patients returned to operating room within 48 hours of their index procedures. Of these 22 cases, only two patients were noted to have positive findings on recovery room radiographs. The findings of suboptimal spinal alignment or failed instrumentation led to the immediate revision in both cases. Both cases involved instrumentation at cervicothoracic region and intraoperative imaging provided only limited visualization.

CONCLUSION

Routine recovery room radiographs played a role in the decision to emergently return to the operating room in 0.10% (2/1804) cases at our institution. The potential benefit of immediate recovery room radiographs after spine surgery should be weighed against the added healthcare cost and patient discomfort associated with obtaining these radiographs routinely. Imaging may be delayed to a more elective time without any significant risk in majority of spine cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.