Dura-splitting versus a combined technique for Chiari malformation type I complicated with syringomyelia

Foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation type I - UK surgical practice

Background: Symptomatic Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) is a common condition in Neurosurgery. Surgery involves hindbrain decompression and restoration of CSF flow through different surgical approaches. No Class 1 evidence exists to suggest the superiority of any of the surgical techniques.Aims: To investigate current surgical practice for symptomatic CM1 patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the willingness to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing different surgical techniques.Methods: An electronic survey was sent to consultant members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and the British Chiari-Syringomyelia Group. The questions covered pre-operative and intra-operative management, presence of equipoise/uncertainty in optimal technique and willingness to participate in an RCT.Results: 98 responses were received. 67% operate on adults. 30% on adult and paediatric patients. There is variation in routine pre-operative use of: ICP monitoring (18%), flexion/extension x-rays (16%), venography (20%) and ophthalmology assessment (26%). 18% of neurosurgeons would not offer foramen magnum decompression when the presenting symptom is only refractory cough/sneeze headache. 15% routinely perform bony decompression alone in adults vs 8% in children. In 68% of adult cases, durotomy is performed routinely (46% of them leave the dura open, 54% perform a type of duroplasty) and 16% routinely resect the cerebellar tonsils. Only 17% leave the dura open in children. The most common indicators for durotomy are syringomyelia and intra-operative ultrasound findings. 61% believe there is equipoise/uncertainty in the optimal strategy for decompression and would be willing to participate in an RCT. Comments also mention the heterogeneity of CM1 and that treatment should be tailored to each patient.Conclusion: There is wide variation in pre- and intra-operative management of CM1 patients in the UK and the majority of neurosurgeons would be willing to participate in an RCT comparing bony decompression alone vs dural opening with/without duroplasty.

Outcome evaluation of decompression surgery combined with cerebellar tonsillectomy compared without cerebellar tonsillectomy for Chiari type I malformation patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention is an important treatment option to improve the prognosis for Chiari type I malformation (CM-I) patients. However, there is no consensus about surgical strategies. The article intends to evaluate the effect of decompression combined with or without cerebellar tonsillectomy in the treatment of CM-I.

METHOD

Following PRISMA's principles, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases and references to relevant articles were searched to include only original articles on decompression combined with or without cerebellar tonsillectomy in CM-I patients. Through meta-analysis, the data on clinical improvement, radiological improvement, and complications were pooled.

RESULTS

Nine articles, including 399 CM-I patients undergoing decompression alone and 343 undergoing decompression with cerebellar tonsillectomy, meet the inclusion standard. In comparison, the improvement rate of clinical symptoms or signs in patients with cerebellar tonsillectomy is higher and statistically significant (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95; P = 0.006). However, decompression with cerebellar tonsillectomy is also significantly higher in the incidence of postoperative complications (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.80; P = 0.002). No statistical difference is discovered between the two groups in the improvement rate of syringomyelia (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.57-1.03; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although decompression with cerebellar tonsillectomy is superior than decompression alone in clinical improvement for CM-I patients, it also faces a higher risk of postoperative complications. The reduction of syringomyelia in the two groups can be considered equally effective without significant differences. In the future, the results of the research require multicenter and large-scale randomized controlled trials to verify in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42022321750 (PROSPERO).

Comparison between Dura-Splitting Technique with Duraplasty in Symptomatic Patients with Chiari Malformation Type I: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There are many surgical procedures for CIM patients, posterior fossa decompression with fibrous band excision, with additional duraplasty, or syringosubdural shunt for syringomyelia related CIM. Prospective studies have been carried out but yet no conclusion, on which one is the best option. The objective of this study was to assess qualitatively the outcome of posterior fossa decompression with dura-splitting (PFDDS) technique compared to posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDDP) for treating CIM patients. AIM: This study aimed to give us a preference while conducting surgery in a patient with Chiari malformation type I (CIM) between posterior fossa decompression with incision of the fibrous band of the dura (dura-splitting/DS) technique and duraplasty (DP) technique. METHODS: The analysis conducted using PRISMA flowchart with PICO framework (Patient: Chiari malformation type I patient over preschool age; Intervention: Dura-splitting; Comparison: Duraplasty; and Outcome: Complication rate, length of stay, reoperation rate, syrinx reduction, symptomatic improvement, and operation time) and already registered for meta-analysis study with database searching from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar that following inclusion criteria: (1) Original study; (2) study that compares DS and DP in CM- I; and (3) patient age over preschool age. RESULTS: A review of five included studies involving 458 patients met the inclusion criteria, in which 319 patients treated with DS surgery and 139 for DP surgery for this study. Significantly DS technique correlated lower rate of complication (RR = 0.20; p < 0.0001), shorter length of stay (MD = −3.53; p = 0.0002), and shorter operation time (MD = −58.59; p = 0.0004). No significant differences in reoperation rate (RR = 1.90; p = 0.22), symptom improvement (RR = 1.12; p = 0.44), and syrinx reduction (RR = 1.11; p = 0.56) were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fossa decompression using the DS technique is associated with a lower rate of complication, shorter length of stay, and shorter operation time. However, no significant differences were found in the reoperation rate, symptom improvement, and syringomyelia reduction between these two techniques.

Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior fossa decompression (PFD), posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) in Chiari malformation type I (CMI). Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning (FTS), syringosubarachnoid shunting (SSS), and syringoperitoneal shunting (SPS) in CMI.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were screened for English-language studies published from inception until August 11, 2020. A total of 3593 studies were identified through the searching process. Fifteen cohort studies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No studies concerning FTS, SSS, and SPS were found eligible. Therefore, only PFD, PFDD, and PFDRT were compared. PFDD showed significantly higher incidence of complications (relative risk [RR], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.64) cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.33-40.78) and neurologic deficit (RR, 8.76; 95% CI, 2.08-36.90) than did PFD. Both PFDD and PFDRT achieved higher syringomyelia improvement (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 and RR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15-1.51, respectively) and greater clinical improvement (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.10-1.39 and RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.44, respectively) than did PFD. No differences were found between PFDD and PFDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

PFDD and PFDRT are superior to PFD, especially in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex, because of greater syringomyelia reduction and better clinical improvement. However, PFDD and PFDRT can be considered equally efficient. There is no evidence pleading in favor of SFT, SSS, and SPS over any PFD technique.

Posterior Fossa Decompression and Duraplasty with and without Arachnoid Preservation for the Treatment of Adult Chiari Malformation Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation compared with arachnoid dissection for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation type 1.

METHODS

Two reviewers (M.O.-G. and M.A.) performed a PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase literature search using the following terms: ("Chiari" OR "Chiari 1") AND ("duraplasty" OR "arachnoid preservation" OR "arachnoid spar∗" OR "posterior fossa surgery" OR "posterior fossa decompression" OR "foramen magnum decompression"). Studies assessing the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty for the treatment of patients aged >18 years with Chiari malformation type 1 were included. Case reports with <10 patients, editorials, and non-English studies were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 195 studies identified, 24 were included for meta-analysis. In the 1006 participants, there was no difference in postoperative clinical or radiologic improvement between the 2 techniques. Patients who underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty and arachnoid dissection had a greater prevalence of total complications (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.29 vs. 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05-0.14; Q = 6.47; P = 0.01) and cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (0.15, 95% CI, 0.10-0.22 vs. 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; Q = 4.88; P = 0.03) compared with arachnoid preservation. Furthermore, the prevalence of reoperation in the arachnoid dissection group was 25 times greater than in the arachnoid preservation group (0.08, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10 vs. 0.003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; Q = 10.73; P > 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation is a beneficial technique to treat Chiari malformation type 1 and reduces the risk of complications, particularly cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and the rate of reoperation.

Outcomes of Dura Splitting Decompression Versus Posterior Fossa Decompression With Duraplasty in the Treatment of Chiari I Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the definitive treatment option for symptomatic Chiari malformation I (CMI), but there is no clear consensus as to the preferred surgical method. This study aimed to quantitatively assess and compare the effect and safety of dura splitting decompression (DSD) and posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) in treating patients with CMI.

METHODS

A literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted. References from January 1990 to September 2020 were retrieved. We only included papers containing original data, comparing the use of DSD and PFDD in CMI patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 relevant studies were identified, wherein 443 patients treated for CMI by DSD were compared with 261 patients treated by PFDD. No difference was observed between PFDD and PFD in terms of clinical improvement (P = 0.69), syringomyelia improvement (P = 0.90), or reoperation (P = 0.22). DSD was associated with shorter operation durations (P = 0.0007), shorter length of stay (P = 0.0007), and shorter overall postoperative complications (P < 0.0001) (especially cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leak [P = 0.005], meningitis [P = 0.002], and pseudomeningocele [P = 0.002]), as compared with PFDD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that dura splitting decompression has clinical and syringomyelia improvement outcomes comparable to posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty. Compared with PFDD, DSD not only significantly shortened the operation time and length of stay, but also significantly reduced the overall complication rate, especially those related to incidence of CSF-related complications. More evidence from advanced multicenter studies are needed to require to validate the findings.

Outcomes of dura-splitting technique compared to conventional duraplasty technique in the treatment of adult Chiari I malformation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chiari malformation type I is a developmental abnormality with an array of surgical techniques introduced for the management of it. The most common technique is foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty. Dura-splitting technique as one of the non-dura-opening techniques is a less known procedure that spares the internal layer of the dura and can theoretically result in fewer complications compared to duraplasty. So, we performed a review of literature and meta-analysis on different clinical and radiological aspects of this technique and compared its outcomes to duraplasty. MOOSE guidelines were followed. A systematic search of three databases based on predefined search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria was performed. After quality assessment and data extraction by two authors, summarized data were presented in form of tables, and meta-analysis results were illustrated in forest plots. A review of 10 included studies consisting of 370 patients revealed significantly shorter operation duration and less intraoperative blood loss in the dura-splitting technique compared to duraplasty. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between these two techniques in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. Overall complication rate and incidence of CSF-related complications or infections were significantly in favor of the dura-splitting technique. Dura-splitting technique can be considered as a safe and effective surgical procedure for Chiari I malformation with comparable outcomes and fewer complications compared to duraplasty, although this interpretation is derived from retrospective observational studies and lack of a prospective clinical trial is evident.

Risk Factors Portending Extended Length of Stay After Suboccipital Decompression for Adult Chiari I Malformation

OBJECTIVE

For adult patients undergoing surgical decompression for Chiari malformation type I (CM-I), the patient-level factors that influence extended length of stay (LOS) are relatively unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of patient-baseline comorbidities, demographics, and postoperative complications on extended LOS after intervention after adult CM-I decompression surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample years 2010-2014 was performed. Adults (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of CM-I undergoing surgical decompression were identified. Weighted patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, LOS, disposition, and total cost were recorded. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio for risk-adjusted LOS.

RESULTS

A total of 29,961 patients were identified, 6802 of whom (22.7%) had extended LOS. The extended LOS cohort had a significantly greater overall complication rate (normal LOS, 10.6% vs. extended LOS, 29.1%; P < 0.001) and total cost (normal LOS, $14,959 ± $6037 vs. extended LOS, $25,324 ± $21,629; P < 0.001) compared with the normal LOS cohort. On multivariate logistic regression, black race, income quartiles, private insurance, obstructive hydrocephalus, lack of coordination, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and paralysis were all independently associated with extended LOS. Additional duraplasty (P = 0.132) was not significantly associated with extended LOS after adjusting for other variables. The odds ratio for extended LOS was 2.07 (95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.71) for patients with 1 complication and 9.47 (95% confidence interval, 5.86-15.30) for patients with >1 complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that extended LOS after adult CM-I decompression surgery may be influenced by multiple patient-level factors.

Outcomes and complications for individual neurosurgeons for the treatment of Chiari I malformation at a children's hospital

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications for individual surgeons at British Columbia Children's Hospital for the treatment of Chiari I Malformation (CMI) in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with CMI who had surgery from 1986 to 2015. We assessed the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scores (CCOS) and complication rates by surgeon.

RESULTS

Seventy patients, 38 males and 32 females, underwent posterior fossa decompression including 14 extradural and 56 intradural approaches. Syringomyelia was present in 74.3%. Most syringomyelia improved with no difference between intradural and extradural surgeries. After initial surgery, 13 patients (18.6%) had complications including 2/14 (14.3%) of extradural and 11/56 (19.6%) of intradural surgeries. Two patients required surgical intervention for complications whereas 11 had transient complications. The complication rate by surgeon ranged from 11 to 20% for extradural (2 surgeons only) and 10.5 to 40% for intradural surgeries (4 surgeons). The CCOS ranged from 12 to 15 for extradural and 6 to 16 for intradural. The CCOS ranges for surgeons 1 and 2 were 12-15 and 13-15 respectively for extradural. The CCOS ranges for surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 12-16, 6-15, 12-16, and 12-16 respectively for intradural. Thirteen patients had a second surgery for CMI. The final CCOS was good in 86% and moderate in 14%.

CONCLUSION

There was variability in surgeries performed at BCCH by different surgeons, with variations in CCOS and complication rates. This information is important during decision making, consent process, and for quality improvement.