The effect of the revised WHO classification on the incidence of grade II meningioma

Meningioma recurrence: Time for an online prediction tool?

Background

Meningioma, the most common brain tumor, traditionally considered benign, has a relatively high risk of recurrence over a patient's lifespan. In addition, with the emergence of several clinical, radiological, and molecular variables, it is becoming evident that existing grading criteria, including Simpson's and World Health Organization classification, may not be sufficient or accurate. As web-based tools for widespread accessibility and usage become commonplace, such as those for gene identification or other cancers, it is timely for meningioma care to take advantage of evolving new markers to help advance patient care.

Methods

A scoping review of the meningioma literature was undertaken using the MEDLINE and Embase databases. We reviewed original studies and review articles from September 2022 to December 2023 that provided the most updated information on the demographic, clinical, radiographic, histopathological, molecular genetics, and management of meningiomas in the adult population.

Results

Our scoping review reveals a large body of meningioma literature that has evaluated the determinants for recurrence and aggressive tumor biology, including older age, female sex, genetic abnormalities such as telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation, CDKN2A deletion, subtotal resection, and higher grade. Despite a large body of evidence on meningiomas, however, we noted a lack of tools to aid the clinician in decision-making. We identified the need for an online, self-updating, and machine-learning-based dynamic model that can incorporate demographic, clinical, radiographic, histopathological, and genetic variables to predict the recurrence risk of meningiomas.

Conclusion

Although a challenging endeavor, a recurrence prediction tool for meningioma would provide critical information for the meningioma patient and the clinician making decisions on long-term surveillance and management of meningiomas.

Spheno-Orbital Meningioma - Treatment Outcomes and Factors Influencing Recurrence

PURPOSE

To determine treatment outcomes, recurrence rates, and predictors of recurrence, to inform future therapeutic approaches for spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOM).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of SOM treated from 1990 to 2021 was conducted with comprehensive neuro-ophthalmologic follow-up at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). Recurrence requiring reintervention was defined clinically as worsening of visual acuity, visual field defect, or ocular motility after an initial period of stabilization or 6 months of improvement following treatment, or radiologically as either a regrowth with an increase in tumor size by 20% at the site of previous growth or a new region of tumor growth.

RESULTS

In total 46 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 106 months (range 1-303). Dictated by the phenotype of the disease, patients underwent either gross- (50%), near- (17%), or subtotal resection (26%). Removal of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) was performed in 52% of patients. Nine patients (20%) required an enucleation or exenteration. Radiotherapy was employed at some point of treatment in 50% of cases. Inherited cases (24%) were referred to CUMC for treatment following 1 or more recurrences. The total recurrence rate, including inherited cases, was 54%, occurring at a mean interval of 43 months. The recurrence rate of patients treated solely at CUMC was 40%, occurring at a mean interval of 41 months. A subset of patients (32%) had 2 or more recurrences. Histopathology at the first surgery was WHO grade I (87%) and II (13%) and at the final surgery was WHO grade I (74%), II (21%), and III (4%). A subset of grade I tumors that received radiotherapy (35%) evolved to a higher grade or developed multiple recurrences without a change in histologic grade I. Grade II tumors and treatment with radiotherapy increased the odds of recurrence. Removal of the ACP and gross total resection decreased the odds of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Due to the routinely long interval to tumor recurrence, lifelong surveillance of patients with SOM is prudent. ACP resection and gross total resection, where possible, reduce tumor recurrence and the need for further treatment. Radiotherapy should be reserved for higher-grade meningiomas and select grade I tumors.

De Novo Skull Base Atypical Meningioma: Incidence and Outcome

Objective  Atypical meningiomas are uncommon in skull base practice and present a management challenge. We aimed to review all de novo atypical skull base meningioma cases within a single unit to analyze presentation and outcome. Methods  A retrospective review of all patients undergoing surgery for intracranial meningioma identified consecutive cases of de novo atypical skull base meningioma. Electronic case records were analyzed for patient demographics, tumor location and size, extent of resection, and outcome. Tumor grading is based on the 2016 WHO criteria. Results  Eighteen patients with de novo atypical skull base meningiomas were identified. The most common tumor location was the sphenoid wing in 10 patients (56%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 13 patients (72%) and subtotal resection (STR) in 5 patients (28%). There was no tumor recurrence recorded in patients who had undergone GTR. Patients with tumors >6 cm were more likely to undergo a STR as opposed to a GTR ( p  < 0.01). Patients who had undergone a STR were more likely to have postoperative tumor progression and be referred for radiotherapy ( p  = 0.02 and <0.01, respectively). On multiple regression analysis, tumor size is the only significant factor correlating with overall survival ( p  = 0.048). Conclusion  The incidence of de novo atypical skull base meningioma is higher in our series than currently published data. Tumor size was a significant indicator for patient outcome and extent of resection. Those undergoing a STR were more likely to have tumor recurrence. Multicenter studies of skull base meningiomas with associated molecular genetics are needed to guide management.

The efficacy of preoperative MRI features in the diagnosis of meningioma WHO grade and brain invasion

Objective

The preoperative MRI scans of meningiomas were analyzed based on the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System (CNS) Guidelines, and the efficacy of MRI features in diagnosing WHO grades and brain invasion was analyzed.

Materials and methods

The data of 675 patients with meningioma who underwent MRI in our hospital from 2006 to 2022, including 108 with brain invasion, were retrospectively analyzed. Referring to the WHO Guidelines for the Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors (Fifth Edition 2021), 17 features were analyzed, with age, sex and meningioma MRI features as risk factors for evaluating WHO grade and brain invasion. The risk factors were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis, and their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting WHO grades and brain invasion were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that sex, tumor size, lobulated sign, peritumoral edema, vascular flow void, bone invasion, tumor-brain interface, finger-like protrusion and mushroom sign were significant for diagnosing meningioma WHO grades, while these features and ADC value were significant for predicting brain invasion (P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the lobulated sign, tumor-brain interface, finger-like protrusion, mushroom sign and bone invasion were independent risk factors for diagnosing meningioma WHO grades, while the above features, tumor size and ADC value were independent risk factors for diagnosing brain invasion (P < 0.05). The tumor-brain interface had the highest efficacy in evaluating WHO grade and brain invasion, with AUCs of 0.779 and 0.860, respectively. Combined, the variables had AUCs of 0.834 and 0.935 for determining WHO grade and brain invasion, respectively.

Conclusion

Preoperative MRI has excellent performance in diagnosing meningioma WHO grade and brain invasion, while the tumor-brain interface serves as a key factor. The preoperative MRI characteristics of meningioma can help predict WHO grade and brain invasion, thus facilitating complete lesion resection and improving patient prognosis.

Advances in Molecular Biological and Translational Studies in World Health Organization Grades 2 and 3 Meningiomas: A Literature Review

The treatment of World Health Organization (WHO) grades 2 and 3 meningiomas remains difficult and controversial. The pathogenesis of high-grade meningiomas was expected to be elucidated to improve treatment strategies. The molecular biology of meningiomas has been clarified in recent years. High-grade meningiomas have been linked to NF2 mutations and 22q deletion. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and TERT promoter mutations are independent prognostic factors for WHO grade 3 meningiomas. In addition to 22q loss, 1p, 14p, and 9q loss have been linked to high-grade meningiomas. Meningiomas enriched in copy number alterations may be biologically invasive. Furthermore, several new comprehensive classifications of meningiomas have been proposed based on these molecular biological features, including DNA methylation status. The new classifications may have implications for treatment strategies for refractory aggressive meningiomas because they provide a more accurate prognosis compared to the conventional WHO classification. Although several systemic therapies, including molecular targeted therapies, may be effective in treating refractory aggressive meningiomas, these drugs are being tested. Systemic drug therapy for meningioma is expected to be developed in the future. Thus, this review aims to discuss the distinct genomic alterations observed in WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas, as well as their diagnostic and therapeutic implications and systemic drug therapies for high-grade meningiomas.

Clinical and pathological impact of an optimal assessment of brain invasion for grade 2 meningioma diagnosis: lessons from a series of 291 cases

Brain invasion has not been recognized as a standalone criterion for atypical meningioma by the WHO classification until 2016. Since the 2007 edition suggested that meningiomas harboring brain invasion could be classified as grade 2, brain invasion study was progressively strengthened in our center, based on a strong collaboration between neurosurgeons and neuropathologists regarding sample orientation and examination. Practice changes were considered homogeneous enough in 2011. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of gross practice change on the clinical and pathological characteristics of intracranial meningiomas classified as grade 2.The characteristics of consecutive patients with a grade 2 meningioma surgically managed before (1998-2005, n = 125, group A) and after (2011-2014, n = 166, group B) practices changed were retrospectively reviewed.Sociodemographical and clinical parameters were comparable in groups A and B, and the median age was 62 years in both groups (p = 0.18). The 5-year recurrence rates (23.2% vs 29.5%, p = 0.23) were similar. In group A, brain invasion was present in 48/125 (38.4%) cases and was more frequent than in group B (14/166, 8.4%, p < 0.001). In group A, 33 (26.4%) meningiomas were classified as grade 2 solely based on brain invasion (group A_SBI), and 92 harbored other grade 2 criteria (group A_OCA). Group A_SBI meningiomas had a similar median progression-free survival compared to groups A_OCA (68 vs 80 months, p = 0.24) and to A_OCA and B pooled together (n = 258, 68 vs 90 months, p = 0.42).An accurate assessment of brain invasion is mandatory as brain invasion is a strong predictor of meningioma progression.

Preoperative Prediction of Intracranial Meningioma Grade Using Conventional CT and MRI

Objective

Preoperative diagnosis of tumor grade can assist in treatment-related decision-making for patients with intracranial meningioma. This study aimed to distinguish between high-grade and low-grade meningiomas using conventional CT and MRI.

Methodology

We retrospectively analyzed 173 consecutive patients with intracranial meningioma (149 low-grade and 24 high-grade tumors) who were treated surgically at the National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center from 2008 to 2020. Clinical and radiological features, including tumor doubling time (Td) and relative growth rate (RGR), were compared between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that symptomatic tumor (p=0.001), non-skull base location (p=0.006), irregular tumor shape (p=0.043), tumor heterogeneity (p=0.025), and peritumoral brain edema (p=0.003) were independent predictors of high-grade meningioma. In 53 patients who underwent surgery because of tumor progression, progression to symptoms (p=0.027), intratumoral heterogeneity (p<0.001), peritumoral brain edema (p=0.001), larger tumor volume (p=0.005), shorter Td (p<0.001), and higher RGR (P<0.001) were significantly associated with high-grade meningioma. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal Td and annual RGR cut-off values to distinguish high-grade from low-grade meningioma were 460.5 days and 73.2%, respectively (100% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity).

Conclusion

Based on our findings, conventional CT and MRI are useful methods to predict meningioma grades before surgery. High-grade lesions are associated with non-skull base location, irregular tumor shape, intratumoral heterogeneity, and peritumoral brain edema. High-grade meningioma should be suspected in tumors that exhibit Td <460.5 days or annual RGR >73.2% or those that develop intratumoral heterogeneity or surrounding brain edema on surveillance imaging.

Human TERT Promoter Mutations in Atypical and Anaplastic Meningiomas

Background: The role of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter mutations (pTERT) in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate their impact on the histologic diagnosis and prognosis in a retrospective series of 74 patients with atypical and anaplastic meningioma, including disease progression and relapse. A supplementary panel of 21 benign tumours was used as a control cohort. Materials and Methods: The mutation rate of the pTERT gene was assessed by Sanger sequencing. ATRX protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. The phenotypic and genotypic intra-tumour heterogeneity was studied in a sub-group of 12 cases using a Molecular Machines & Industries (MMI) CellCut laser microdissection (LMD) system. Results: pTERT mutations were detected in 12/74 (17.6%) malignant meningiomas. The mutation rate was significantly higher in anaplastic meningiomas (7/23, 30.4%) compared to atypical tumours (5/48, 10.4%) (p = 0.0443). In contrast, the mutation rate was < 5% in benign tumours. All pTERT mutant cases retained nuclear ATRX immunoreactivity. pTERT mutations were significantly associated with the histologic grade (p = 0.0443) and were adverse prognostic factors for anaplastic tumours (p = 0.06). Conclusion: We reported on the pTERT mutation spectrum in malignant meningiomas, supporting their use in the prognostic classification.

Associations of pathological diagnosis and genetic abnormalities in meningiomas with the embryological origins of the meninges

Certain driver mutations and pathological diagnoses are associated with the anatomical site of meningioma, based on which the meninges have different embryological origins. We hypothesized that mutations and pathological diagnoses of meningiomas are associated with different embryological origins. We comprehensively evaluated associations among tumor location, pathological diagnosis (histological type), and genetic alterations including AKT1, KLF4, SMO, POLR2A, and NF2 mutations and 22q deletion in 269 meningioma cases. Based on the embryological origin of meninges, the tumor locations were as follows: neural crest, paraxial mesodermal, and dorsal mesodermal origins. Tumors originating from the dura of certain embryologic origin displayed a significantly different pathological diagnoses and genetic abnormality ratio. For instance, driver genetic mutations with AKT1, KLF4, SMO, and POLR2A, were significantly associated with the paraxial mesodermal origin (p = 1.7 × 10⁻¹⁰). However, meningiomas with NF2-associated mutations were significantly associated with neural crest origin (p = 3.9 × 10^–12). On analysis of recurrence, no difference was observed in embryological origin. However, POLR2A mutation was a risk factor for the tumor recurrence (p = 1.7 × 10⁻², Hazard Ratio 4.08, 95% Confidence Interval 1.28–13.0). Assessment of the embryological origin of the meninges may provide novel insights into the pathomechanism of meningiomas.

Adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation following gross total resection for atypical meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on atypical meningioma (AM) underwent a gross total resection (GTR) remains unclear, showing conflicting results from various studies. The objective of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis for observational studies to determine the effect of adjuvant RT after GTR on local recurrence and survival outcomes compared to observation after GTR.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify comparative studies that reported outcomes of adjuvant RT versus observation for AM patients after GTR. Local recurrence rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities related to RT were considered as outcomes of interest. Differences between two cohorts were estimated by calculating odds ratios (OR) for LR rate and hazard ratios (HR) for survival outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for meta-analysis, using R version 4.0.3 software. Included studies were appraised with the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-Randomized Studies. Outcome ratios were combined with the Mantel–Haenszel method and the inverse variance-weighted method, appropriately.

Results

Data from 30 studies involving 2904 patients (adjuvant RT: n = 737; observation: n = 2167) were eventually included. Significant reduction of local recurrence rate was seen in the adjuvant RT cohort compare to that in the observation cohort (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36–0.68; p < 0.0001). Pooled HRs of PFS at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and > 5-year revealed that adjuvant RT was superior to observation. There was no significant difference in OS between the two cohorts during any period. Most toxicities were tolerable with grade 1 or 2. There was no documented grade 5 toxicity.

Conclusions

For AM patients who underwent GTR, evidence suggested that adjuvant RT could potentially decrease local recurrence and improve PFS better than observation.

The impact of authors' medical specialty on publication patterns and published results of adjuvant radiotherapy for WHO grade 2 meningiomas-a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant radiotherapy after gross total resection (GTR) of WHO grade 2 meningioma remains unclear, and conflicting results have been published. We hypothesized that authors' medical specialties could be associated with reported findings on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after GTR of WHO grade 2 meningiomas.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted in Embase and Medline databases, in addition to screening of all relevant bibliographies. Articles including patients aged 18 years or older, with histologically confirmed WHO grade 2 meningioma, were included. We extracted data on medical subspecialties using the author list. We registered study design, median follow-up, number of included patients, WHO classification in use, and years of study inclusion.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven relevant studies were identified, where 34 (92%) were retrospective cohort studies, two studies (5%) were systematic reviews, and one study (3%) was a meta-analysis. If the last author was a radiation-oncologist, the study was more likely to favor adjuvant radiotherapy, and if a neurosurgeon was last author, the study was more likely to not advocate adjuvant radiotherapy (p=0.009). There was no significant association between study result and whether the study was published in a neurosurgical or oncological journal (p=0.802). There was no significant difference in follow-up time, years of inclusion, or number of included patients between studies favoring or not favoring adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review of the literature, we found that if a radiation-oncologist was the last author of the study, the study was more likely to favor adjuvant radiotherapy after gross total resection of WHO grade 2 meningioma. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of a possible genealogy bias in the neuro-oncological literature.

Comparative Analysis of the MRI Characteristics of Meningiomas According to the 2016 WHO Pathological Classification

OBJECTS

To evaluate the performance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating diagnoses, operation methods and recurrence of meningiomas according to the World health organization (WHO) pathological classification.

METHODS

MRI characteristics of 127 meningioma patients were retrospectively analysed according to pathological results (WHO grade) and their association with Simpson's grades (resection) and recurrence.

RESULTS

The T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) signal intensity of WHO grade I meningiomas was slightly hypointense or isointense gray, while the T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal intensity was isointense or slightly hyperintense. The T1WI and T2WI signal intensity in WHO grade II and III meningiomas was isointense gray. The enhancement degree and patterns, lobulation, flowing voids, dural tail, maximum diameter, peritumoural oedema, ADC values and margin were significantly different between any 2 grades (P < 0.05). The ADC values were higher for WHO grade I tumors than for WHO grade II and III tumors (P < 0.001). Among all the analyzed characteriscs, ADC values, peritumoural oedema, and margin effectively predicted the diagnosis according to the WHO classification. The operation method and surgical resection were different between WHO grade Ⅰ and WHO grade Ⅱ/Ⅲ meningiomas (P < 0.05). The recurrence rate increased with tumor grade, but there was no statistical difference among the 3 types(P> 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

WHO grades and pathological subtypes of meningiomas can generally be determined based on their MRI characteristics. In addition, MRI provides significant guidance for the grading of surgical success and prognosis.