1
|
Urbanschitz L, Bensler S, Merat S, Lenz CG, Eid K. How Should We Grade Cervical Disk Degeneration? A Comparison of Two Popular Classification Systems. Spine Surg Relat Res 2021; 5:347-351. [PMID: 34966859 PMCID: PMC8668218 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite being originally developed for the evaluation of lumbar disk degeneration, the Pfirrmann classification has emerged as the most popular classification system for cervical disk degeneration. However, with the Suzuki classification, a new classification system that is specifically tailored for the evaluation of cervical disk disease was introduced. In this study, we aim to evaluate differences in inter- and intraobserver reliability of both classifications in a head-to-head comparison. Methods In total, we have evaluated 120 cervical disks within 40 patients via magnetic resonance imaging according to the Pfirrmann and Suzuki classification. The degree of disk degeneration was evaluated by two independent musculoskeletal radiologists. After 6 months, the classification was reassessed to evaluate the intraobserver reliability. The inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were then calculated using Cohen's kappa. Results The inter- and intraobserver reliability provided a significant agreement between all ratings in Pfirrmann as well as the Suzuki classification (p>0.001). The interobserver reliability was determined to be fair in both the Suzuki classification (κ=0.290) and the Pfirrmann classification (κ=0.265). The intraobserver reliability was substantial in the Suzuki classification (κ=0.798), while it was almost perfect in the Pfirrmann classification (κ=0.858). Conclusions Although not designed for the evaluation of cervical disk degeneration, the Pfirrmann classification yielded equal inter- and higher intraobserver reliability. Both classification systems are viable options for the grading of cervical disk degeneration. While the Pfirrmann classification has the advantage of being better established, the Suzuki classification may be clinically superior due to a better representation of cervical disk degeneration and the consideration of disk bulging for the classification of cervical disk degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Urbanschitz
- Department of Spine Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Bensler
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Merat
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | | | - Karim Eid
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu Y, Fan P, Xu X, Jiang F, Zhang W, Yin X, Liu H, Wang P, Wang Y. [Study of modified subcutaneous lumbar spine index as a predictor for short-term effectiveness in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2021; 35:878-885. [PMID: 34308597 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore the value of modified subcutaneous lumbar spine index (MSLSI) as a predictor for short-term effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Methods Between February 2014 and October 2019, 450 patients who were diagnosed as LDD and received single-segment TLIF were included in the study. Based on the MSLSI measured by preoperative lumbar MRI, the patients were sorted from small to large and divided into three groups ( n=150). The MSLSI of group A was 0.11-0.49, group B was 0.49-0.73, and group C was 0.73-1.88. There was no significance in gender, age, disease duration, diagnosis, surgical segment, and improved Charlson comorbidity index between groups ( P>0.05). There were significant differences in the subcutaneous adipose depth of the L 4 vertebral body and body mass index (BMI) between groups ( P<0.05). The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, length of incision, drainage tube placement time, drainage volume on the 1st day after operation, drainage volume on the 2nd day after operation, total drainage volume, antibiotic use time after operation, walking exercise time after operation, hospital stay, the incidences of surgical or non-surgical complications in the three groups were compared. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between MSLSI and BMI, and partial correlation analysis was used to study the relationship between MSLSI, BMI, improved Charlson comorbidity index, subcutaneous adipose depth of the L 4 vertebral body and complications. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of SLSI and MSLSI in predicting the occurrence of complications after TLIF in treatment of LDD. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, length of incision, antibiotic use time after operation, walking exercise time after operation, drainage tube placement time, drainage volume on the 1st day after operation, drainage volume on the 2nd day after operation, and total drainage volume between groups ( P>0.05). The amount of intra-operative blood loss in group C was higher than that in groups A and B, and the hospital stay was longer than that in group B, with significant differences ( P<0.05). Surgical complications occurred in 22 cases (14.7%), 25 cases (16.7%), and 39 cases (26.0%) of groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence between groups ( χ 2=0.826, P=0.662). The incidences of nerve root injury and wound aseptic complications in group C were higher than those in groups A and B, and the incidence of nerve root injury in group B was higher than that in group A, with significant differences ( P<0.05). There were 13 cases (8.7%), 7 cases (4.7%), and 11 cases (7.3%) of non-surgical complications in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with no significant difference ( χ 2=2.128, P=0.345). There was no significant difference in the incidences of cardiovascular complications, urinary system complications, central system complications, and respiratory system complications between groups ( P>0.05). There was a correlation between MSLSI and BMI in 450 patients ( r=0.619, P=0.047). Partial correlation analysis showed that MSLSI was related to wound aseptic complications ( r=0.172, P=0.032), but not related to other surgical and non-surgical complications ( P>0.05). There was no correlation between BMI, improved Charlson comorbidity index, subcutaneous adipose depth of the L 4 vertebral body and surgical and non-surgical complications ( P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of MSLSI was 0.673 (95%CI 0.546-0.761, P=0.025), and the AUC of SLSI was 0.582 (95%CI 0.472-0.693, P=0.191). Conclusion MSLSI can predict the short-term effectiveness of TLIF in treatment of LDD. Patients with high MSLSI suffer more intra-operative blood loss, longer hospital stay, and higher incidence of nerve root injury and postoperative incision complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhu Xu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Pan Fan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Xuanfei Xu
- Department of Nulear Medicine, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Xiangjie Yin
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Hang Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Peiyang Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| | - Yuntao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China.,Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|