Compassion, communication, and the perception of control: a mixed methods study to investigate patients' perspectives on clinical practices for alleviating distress and promoting empowerment during awake craniotomies

Patient perception and satisfaction in awake burr hole trepanation under local anesthesia for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma

Evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) will be one of the most common neurosurgical procedures in the future in the increasingly aging societies. Performing cranial surgery on awake patients may place a psychological burden on them. Aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological distress of patients during awake CSDH relief. Patients with awake evacuation of CSDH via burr hole trepanation were included in our monocentric prospective study. Patient perception and satisfaction were measured using standardized surveys 3-5 days and 6 months after surgery. Among other questionnaires, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression and the Impact of Event Scale, were used to quantify patients' stress. A total of 50 patients (mean age 72.9 years (range 51 - 92)) were included. During surgery, 28 patients reported pain (mean 4.1 (SD 3.3)). Postoperatively, 26 patients experienced pain (mean 2.7 (SD 2.6)). Patients' satisfaction with intraoperative communication was reported with a mean of 8.3 (SD 2.1). There was a significant negative correlation between intraoperatively perceived pain and satisfaction with intraoperative communication (p = 0.023). Good intraoperative communication during evacuation of CSDH in awake patients is associated with positive patient perception and correlates with pain reduction.

Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Associated With Awake Craniotomy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Awake craniotomy (AC) enables real-time monitoring of cortical and subcortical functions when lesions are in eloquent brain areas. AC patients are exposed to various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stressors, which might affect their mental health.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review to better understand stress, anxiety, and depression in AC patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to April 20, 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-seven records were identified that fit our inclusion and exclusion criteria for screening. Overall, 24 articles consisting of 1450 patients from 13 countries were included. Sixteen studies (66.7%) were prospective, whereas 8 articles (33.3%) were retrospective. Studies evaluated stress, anxiety, and depression during different phases of AC. Twenty-two studies (91.7%) were conducted on adults, and 2 studies were on pediatrics (8.3 %). Glioma was the most common AC treatment with 615 patients (42.4%). Awake-awake-awake and asleep-awake-asleep were the most common protocols, each used in 4 studies, respectively (16.7%). Anxiety was the most common psychological outcome evaluated in 19 studies (79.2%). The visual analog scale and self-developed questionnaire by the authors (each n = 5, 20.8%) were the most frequently tools used. Twenty-three studies (95.8%) concluded that AC does not increase stress, anxiety, and/or depression in AC patients. One study (4.2%) identified younger age associated with panic attack.

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, AC does not cause an increase in stress, anxiety, and depression; however, the psychiatric impact of AC should not be underestimated.

Patient-reported intraoperative experiences during awake craniotomy for brain tumors: a scoping review

Awake craniotomy (AC) is a neurosurgical procedure that may be used to excise tumors located in eloquent areas of the brain. The techniques and outcomes of AC have been extensively described, but data on patient-reported experiences are not as well known. To determine these, we performed a scoping review of patient-reported intraoperative experiences during awake craniotomy for brain tumor resection. A total of 21 articles describing 534 patients were included in the review. Majority of the studies were performed on adult patients and utilized questionnaires and interviews. Some used additional qualitative methodology such as grounded theory and phenomenology. Most of the evaluation was performed within the first 2 weeks post-operatively. Recollection of the procedure ranged from 0 to 100%, and most memories dealt with the cranial fixation device application, cranial drilling, and intraoperative mapping. All patients reported some degree of pain and discomfort, mainly due to the cranial fixation device and uncomfortable operative position. Most patients were satisfied with their AC experience. They felt that participating in AC gave them a sense of control over their disease and thought that trust in the treatment team and adequate pre-operative preparation were very important. Patients who underwent AC for brain tumor resection had both positive and negative experiences intraoperatively, but overall, majority had a positive perception of and high levels of satisfaction with AC. Successful AC depends not only on a well-conducted intraoperative course, but also on adequate pre-operative information and patient preparation.