Health-related quality of life following cranioplasty - a systematic review

Daily life without cranial bone protection while awaiting cranioplasty: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Decompressive craniectomy is occasionally performed as a life-saving neurosurgical intervention in patients with acute severe brain injury to reduce refractory intracranial hypertension. Subsequently, cranioplasty (CP) is performed to repair the skull defect. In the meantime, patients are living without cranial bone protection, and little is known about their daily life. This study accordingly explored daily life among patients living without cranial bone protection after decompressive craniectomy while awaiting CP.

METHODS

A multiple-case study examined six purposively sampled patients, patients' family members, and healthcare staff. The participants were interviewed and the data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The cross-case analysis identified five categories: "Adapting to new ways of living," "Constant awareness of the absence of cranial bone protection," "Managing daily life requires available staff with adequate qualifications," "Impact of daily life depends on the degree of recovery," and "Daily life stuck in limbo while awaiting cranioplasty." The patients living without cranial bone protection coped with daily life by developing new habits and routines, but the absence of cranial bone protection also entailed inconveniences and limitations, particularly among the patients with greater independence in their everyday living. Time spent awaiting CP was experienced as being in limbo, and uncertainty regarding planning was perceived as frustrating.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a vulnerable group of patients with brain damage and communication impairments struggling to find new routines during a waiting period experienced as being in limbo. Making this period safe and reducing some problems in daily life for those living without cranial bone protection calls for a person-centered approach to care involving providing contact information for the correct healthcare institution and individually planned scheduling for CP.

Two-Stage Anatomic Myocutaneous Flap Dissection in Cranioplasty: Technical Nuances and Single-Surgeon Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Temporalis muscle management remains one of the most challenging aspects of cranioplasty, which accounts for considerable rates of dissection-related complications. Since 2019, the senior author has developed and consistently used a methodical, two-stage anatomic dissection technique to separate the scalp and temporalis muscle from the underlying brain. This technique is believed to facilitate dissection and minimize the risk of brain injury, while optimizing cosmetic outcomes.

METHODS

All patients who underwent cranioplasty between January 2019 and February 2023 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Charts were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients, 20 men and 9 women with a median age of 37 years (range 17-72), were identified. Indications for craniectomy were traumatic brain injury in 18 (62.1%), hemorrhagic stroke in five (17.2%), ischemic stroke in four (13.8%), and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in two (6.9%). Median precranioplasty modified Rankin Scale and Glasgow Coma Scale scores were 5 (range in series: 0-5) and 14 (range in series: 3-15), respectively. The median time to cranioplasty was 131 days (32-1717). Cranioplasty was technically successful in all patients, with a median operative time of 106 minutes (62-182). There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications occurred in three patients (10.3%): hemorrhagic brain contusion (n = 1), meningitis (n = 1), and seizure (n = 1). Of those, one patient (3.4%) died 2 weeks after surgery from suspected pulmonary embolism. After a median follow-up of 4 months (1-44), all 28 survivors have either remained clinically stable or exhibited neurological improvement. Cosmetic results were good or excellent in 27 (96.4%) and fair in one (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

Two-stage anatomic dissection of the scalp and temporalis muscle during cranioplasty can maximize surgical efficiency and result in excellent outcomes. Cranioplasty should be considered a low-risk, low-complexity neurosurgical procedure. Safe and efficient management of the temporalis muscle is key.