Decomposition of leg movements during overground walking in individuals with traumatic brain injury

The NewGait Rehabilitative Device Corrects Gait Deviations in Individuals With Foot Drop

The purpose of this quasiexperimental study was to test the effects of wearing the NewGait rehabilitative device on walking abilities in individuals with foot drop. The study involved 16 participants with foot drops caused by stroke (11 participants), multiple sclerosis (one participant), and peripheral neuropathies (four individuals). During a single testing session, participants walked 12 m at their self-selected speed in four experimental conditions: walking without any orthotic device; walking while wearing a regular plastic posterior leaf ankle foot orthosis (AFO); walking with the NewGait device assisting ankle dorsiflexion only; and walking with the NewGait device assisting the hip, knee, and ankle joint motions. Body motions during walking were recorded using a 3D system for motion analysis and analyzed with a set of spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters and a gait decomposition index. The gait decomposition index indicated sagittal interjoint coordination in the three joint pairs (hip-knee, knee-ankle, and hip-ankle) of the paretic (foot drop) leg during walking and was validated in a previous study. Overall, wearing all three orthotic devices improved the gait velocity, ankle dorsiflexion, and foot clearance compared to gait trials in which no assistive devices were used. However, wearing the AFO significantly restricted the plantarflexion range of motion and decreased interjoint coordination as measured by joint decomposition. In contrast, the NewGait device altered the ankle plantarflexion motions but also increased coordinated movement (reduced the decomposition) in most lower-extremity joint pairs and conditions. Therefore, the NewGait rehabilitative device can be considered superior to a regular AFO in correcting gait deviations caused by foot drop.

Individuals with Chronic Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury Exhibit Decreased Neuromuscular Complexity During Gait

BACKGROUND

Synergy analysis provides a means of quantifying the complexity of neuromuscular control during gait. Prior studies have shown evidence of reduced neuromuscular complexity during gait in individuals with neurological disorders associated with stroke, cerebral palsy, and Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate neuromuscular complexity during gait in individuals who experienced a prior traumatic brain injury (TBI) that resulted in chronic balance deficits.

METHODS

We measured and analyzed lower extremity electromyographic data during treadmill and overground walking for 44 individuals with residual balance deficits from a mild-to-moderate TBI at least 1 year prior. We also tested 20 unimpaired controls as a comparison. Muscle synergies were calculated for each limb using non-negative matrix factorization of the activation patterns for 6 leg muscles. We quantified neuromuscular complexity using Walk-DMC, a normalized metric of the total variance accounted for by a single synergy, in which a Walk-DMC score of 100 represents normal variance accounted for. We compared group average synergy structures and inter-limb similarity using cosine similarity. We also quantified each individual's gait and balance using the Sensory Organization Test, the Dynamic Gait Index, and the Six-Minute Walk Test.

RESULTS

Neuromuscular complexity was diminished for individuals with a prior TBI. Walk-DMC averaged 92.8 ± 12.3 for the TBI group during overground walking, which was significantly less than seen in controls (100.0 ± 10.0). Individuals with a prior TBI exhibited 13% slower overground walking speeds than controls and reduced performance on the Dynamic Gait Index (18.5 ± 4.7 out of 24). However, Walk-DMC measures were insufficient to stratify variations in assessments of gait and balance performance. Group average synergy structures were similar between groups, although there were considerable between-group differences in the inter-limb similarity of the synergy activation vectors.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with gait and balance deficits due to a prior TBI exhibit evidence of decreased neuromuscular complexity during gait. Our results suggest that individuals with TBI exhibit similar muscle synergy weightings as controls, but altered control of the temporal activation of these muscle weightings.

Dual-Task Effects on Performance of Gait and Balance in People with Knee Pain: A Systematic Scoping Review

Dual-task paradigms have been increasingly used to assess the interaction between cognitive demands and the control of balance and gait. The interaction between functional and cognitive demands can alter movement patterns and increase knee instability in individuals with knee conditions, such as knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on the effects of dual-task on gait mechanics and balance in those individuals. This systematic scoping review aims to examine the impact of dual-task gait and standing balance on motor and cognitive performance in individuals with knee OA or ACL injury. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE electronic databases up until December 2019 was carried out. Inclusion criteria was limited to include dual-task studies that combined cognitive tasks performed simultaneously with gait or standing balance in individuals with knee OA or ACL injuries. In total, fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, nine articles examined dual-task effects on balance, and six articles reported the effects of dual-task on gait. The total number of individuals included was 230 individuals with ACL injuries, and 168 individuals with knee OA. A decline in gait and balance performance during dual-task testing is present among individuals with ACL injury and/or ACL reconstruction and knee OA. Further research is required, but dual taking assessment could potentially be used to identify individuals at risk of falling or further injury and could be used to develop targeted rehabilitation protocols. A variety of outcome measures have been used across the studies included, making comparisons difficult. The authors, therefore, recommend developing a standardized set of biomechanical balance variables.