Peripheral auditory dysfunction secondary to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of literature

Clinical experiences, current approaches, opinions and awareness of healthcare professionals regarding the audio-vestibular consequences of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional online survey study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences, current approaches, opinions and awareness of healthcare professionals (HCPs) caring for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) regarding the audio-vestibular consequences.

DESIGN/SETTING

Cross-sectional online survey study.

PARTICIPANTS

HCPs with experience of caring for adults with TBI, who were not ENT (ear nose throat) specialists or audiologists.

METHODS

The study was conducted from May 2022 to December 2022. The online survey consisted of 16 closed and open-text questions in English and Turkish about clinical experience, current approaches and awareness of audio-vestibular consequences following TBI. Frequencies of responses to closed questions and associations between variables were analysed using SPSS V.28. Open-text responses were summarised in Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

Seventy HCPs participated from 17 professions and 14 countries, with the majority from the UK (42.9%). HCPs stated that 'some' to 'all' of their patients had auditory problems such as 'inability to understand speech-in-noise' (66%), 'tinnitus' (64%), 'hyperacusis' (57%) and balance problems such as 'dizziness' (79%) and 'vertigo' (67%). Usually, HCPs asked about the balance status of patients at appointments and when they observed dizziness and/or balance disorder they used screening tests, most commonly finger-to-nose (53%). For auditory impairments, HCPs preferred referring patients with TBI to audiology/ENT services. However, 6% of HCPs felt that audio-vestibular conditions could be ignored on referral because patients with TBI struggled with many impairments. Additionally, 44% would suggest hearing aids to patients with TBI with hearing loss 'if they would like to use' rather than 'definitely'.

CONCLUSIONS

Many audio-vestibular impairments are observed by HCPs caring for patients with TBI. The assessment and intervention opinions and awareness of HCPs for these impairments vary. However, non-expert HCPs may not be aware of negative consequences of untreated audio-vestibular impairments following TBI. Therefore, developing a simple framework for screening and indications of audio-vestibular impairments for referral may be helpful for non-audiological specialists regularly seeing these patients.

A cross-sectional survey of non-specialist Australian audio-vestibular clinical practice for traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

This study explored non-specialist audiological clinical practice in the context of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and whether such practices incorporated considerations of TBI-related complexities pertaining to identification, diagnosis and management of associated auditory and vestibular disturbances.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional online survey exploring clinical practice, TBI-related training and information provision was distributed to audiologists across Australia via Audiology Australia and social media. Fifty audiologists, 80% female and 20% male, participated in this study. Years of professional practice ranged from new graduate to more than 20 years of experience.

RESULTS

Clear gaps of accuracy in knowledge and practice across all survey domains relating to the identification, diagnosis and management of patients with auditory and/or vestibular deficits following TBI were evident. Further, of the surveyed audiologists working in auditory and vestibular settings, 91% and 86%, respectively, reported not receiving professional development for the diagnosis and management of post-traumatic audio-vestibular deficits.

CONCLUSION

Inadequate resources, equipment availability and TBI-related training may have contributed to the gaps in service provision, influencing audiological management of patients with TBI. A tailored TBI approach to identification, diagnosis and management of post-traumatic auditory and vestibular disturbances is needed.

A Scoping Review of Auditory Dysfunction After Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this scoping review was to gain an understanding of the evidence available on auditory dysfunction after childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) and identify limitations, clinical implications, and future directions for speech-language pathology and audiology practice and research.

METHOD

This scoping review of the literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of eight articles met inclusion for this scoping review. All studies were observational studies (n = 4 with controls, n = 4 without controls). Age at injury, injury severity, time postinjury, and age at time of study varied across the included studies. Three major topics related to childhood TBI were addressed among the included studies: (a) prevalence of auditory dysfunction (n = 5), (b) functional outcomes and biological markers related to auditory processing (n = 2), and (c) clinical presentation of auditory dysfunction (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the particular lack of experimental evidence related to risk and protective factors and assessment and management strategies related to auditory dysfunction after childhood TBI. There is a major need for more research and research of higher rigor to be conducted with individuals who experienced a childhood TBI to support audiologists' and speech-language pathologists' evidence-based decision making to improve long-term functional outcomes for children with TBI.

'I had nothing. It's just life experience that helped me through that situation': Australian audiologists' perspectives on audiological clinical practice for traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

Australian Audiologists' perspectives on standard non-specialized clinical practice in the context of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) were examined, including the perceived barriers to optimal service provision.

DESIGN

A qualitative research design utilizing semi-structured interviews was conducted using purposive sampling. Nine participants were interviewed about their understanding of the impact of TBI on hearing and balance; identification, diagnosis and management of auditory and vestibular dysfunction following TBI; barriers to service delivery; training relating to complex clients (i.e., TBI); and awareness of referral pathways.

RESULTS

Three major themes, each with subthemes, were evident in the data. The major themes reflected general considerations of audiological professional culture and specific issues related to knowledge of TBI and clinical practice with patients. Analysis revealed that professional culture seemed to act as a contextual barrier and interacted with the perceived lack of TBI related knowledge to hinder optimal clinical practice in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Application of the biopsychosocial model, including interdisciplinary care in the management of patients with TBI, is needed. An improvement in theoretical and practical knowledge encompassing the wide-ranging effects of TBI is critical for the optimal audiological service delivery.

Frequency of peripheral vestibular pathology following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE

To establish the frequency of occurrence of peripheral vestibular dysfunction in adults who have sustained non-blast-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) as measured through the standard audiological vestibular test battery.

DESIGN

A systematic search of English language literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, hand-searching of reference lists and SCOPUS author search was conducted from January 1, 1990 to May 14, 2019.

STUDY SAMPLES

Twenty-three out of 417 originally identified articles were retained. TBI and peripheral vestibular findings were extracted and synthesised.

RESULTS

Quality appraisal using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) revealed Level 2b as the highest level of evidence. None of the primary studies explored vestibular deficits in acute settings, with data collected from tertiary institutions and in 20 of 23 studies retrospectively. Although retrospective studies provided important data, they fail to control for numerous threats to internal validity. BPPV was the most frequently identified peripheral vestibular deficit following TBI, diagnosed in 39.7% of 239 participants across six of 23 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective longitudinal research into comparative recovery trajectories in patients across TBI severity levels would provide additional information to guide clinical diagnosis, prognosis and management of this patient population.

Papesh M, Gallun FJ. A Questionnaire Survey of Current Rehabilitation Practices for Adults With Normal Hearing Sensitivity Who Experience Auditory Difficulties

Purpose A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect information from clinical audiologists about rehabilitation options for adult patients who report significant auditory difficulties despite having normal or near-normal hearing sensitivity. This work aimed to provide more information about what audiologists are currently doing in the clinic to manage auditory difficulties in this patient population and their views on the efficacy of recommended rehabilitation methods. Method A questionnaire survey containing multiple-choice and open-ended questions was developed and disseminated online. Invitations to participate were delivered via e-mail listservs and through business cards provided at annual audiology conferences. All responses were anonymous at the time of data collection. Results Responses were collected from 209 participants. The majority of participants reported seeing at least one normal-hearing patient per month who reported significant communication difficulties. However, few respondents indicated that their location had specific protocols for the treatment of these patients. Counseling was reported as the most frequent rehabilitation method, but results revealed that audiologists across various work settings are also successfully starting to fit patients with mild-gain hearing aids. Responses indicated that patient compliance with computer-based auditory training methods was regarded as low, with patients generally preferring device-based rehabilitation options. Conclusions Results from this questionnaire survey strongly suggest that audiologists frequently see normal-hearing patients who report auditory difficulties, but that few clinicians are equipped with established protocols for diagnosis and management. While many feel that mild-gain hearing aids provide considerable benefit for these patients, very little research has been conducted to date to support the use of hearing aids or other rehabilitation options for this unique patient population. This study reveals the critical need for additional research to establish evidence-based practice guidelines that will empower clinicians to provide a high level of clinical care and effective rehabilitation strategies to these patients.