Development of muscle contractures and spasticity during subacute rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury: a prospective cohort study

Factors associated with joint contractures in adults: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

PURPOSE

The primary objective of the review was to collate the available evidence on factors associated with joint contractures in adults.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, and EMBASE. Studies that involved participants aged ≥18 and assessed joint contracture as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies against the eligibility criteria, performed data extraction, and assessed the quality of evidence. A narrative synthesis by domain and sub-domain was undertaken. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42019145079.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included in the review. Identified factors were broadly classified into three major domains: sociodemographic factors, physical factors, and proxies for bed confinement. Sociodemographic factors were not associated with joint contractures. Functional ability, pain, muscle weakness, physical mobility, and bed confinement provided the most consistent evidence of association with joint contractures. The evidence regarding the relationship between spasticity and joint contractures remains unclear. Other factors might be important, but there was insufficient evidence to make inferences.

CONCLUSIONS

The review identified and collated evidence on factors associated with joint contractures, which can be utilised to develop effective prevention and management strategies. Implications for rehabilitationClinical interventions based on the timely identification of risks related to joint contractures in vulnerable adults have the potential to prevent or ameliorate their development or progression.Quality and consistency of care for vulnerable adults would be enhanced by developing effective joint contracture prevention and rehabilitation strategies based on the evidence presented in this review.As many vulnerable adults are located in the community or non-acute care settings, strategies should target these loci of care.Structured risk assessments that can support non-physiotherapy staff working in these loci of care to identify risks related to joint contractures would provide an important resource for risk management.

Efficacy of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy and Intrathecal Baclofen Pump in the Management of Spasticity

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical indications and interventions provided in the management of spasticity have evolved significantly over time. Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps have been used to improve mobility, reduce lower extremity spasticity, and increase quality of life in patients with various diagnoses.

METHODS

Studies describing ITB and SDR outcomes in adult and pediatric patients were identified from Medline and Embase databases. Only publications between January 1990 to January 2021 were included. Combinations of search terms 'Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy', 'Selective Posterior Rhizotomy', 'functional posterior rhizotomy', 'intrathecal baclofen pump', and 'spasticity' were used. Only studies in English language and those that included parameters for lower extremity outcome (i.e., spasticity, ambulation) were included. Only studies describing follow-up 12 months or greater were included. Case reports, reviews without primary data, or inaccessible publications were excluded.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety publications between January 1990 to January 2021 were identified. Of these, 62 fit inclusion and exclusion criteria for a total of 1291 adult and 2263 patients. Etiologies in adult and pediatric populations varied substantially with multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, and trauma comprising the majority of causes for spasticity in adult patients. In pediatric patients, cerebral palsy was the predominant etiology of spasticity. While outcomes after SDR and ITB varied, both are effective for long-term tone reduction. SDR appeared to have a greater effect on function compared to baseline when comparing relatively similar subgroups. The complication rates for either intervention were significant; ITB had a much greater incidence of wound and hardware adverse events, whereas SDR was associated with a not insignificant incidence of new bladder or sensory deficit.

CONCLUSION

ITB and SDR have demonstrated efficacy and utility for tone reduction in a variety of conditions. The selection of a specific intervention may have a variety of determining features including the etiology of spasticity, age of patient, as well as balancing benefit and complication profiles of each technique. Appropriate patient selection is essential for providing optimal patient outcomes.