Goal-setting and attainment in prolonged disorders of consciousness – development of a structured approach

Exploring the goals and outcomes of adults with severe acquired brain injury participating in an extended inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit in Australia

PURPOSE

To explore the rehabilitation goals and evaluate goal attainment outcomes of people with severe acquired brain injury (ABI), and investigate the relationship between goal engagement and goal attainment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mixed-methods cohort study with twenty-nine adults with severe ABI in Australia. Demographic data, goal statements and pre-post program Goal Attainment Scale scores as well as Goal Engagement Scale scores were collected. Goals were coded using inductive content analysis and categorised by ICF component and domain. Goal attainment within ICF categories was described and compared using descriptive statistics. Pre-post program change in goal attainment was evaluated using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and correlations between goal engagement and attainment was explored using Spearman's (rho).

RESULTS

94% of 320 goals were categorised as ICF Activity and Participation. There was significant improvement in goal attainment between admission and discharge (z=-0.47, p < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between goal engagement and goal attainment however there was a positive association between engagement in goal setting at admission and discharge.Conclusions: This interdisciplinary, inpatient rehabilitation program underpinned by key-worker facilitated person-centred, role-based goal setting resulted in goal attainment in chosen goals, which were primarily activity and participation-focused.

A pilot rating system to evaluate the quality of goal attainment scales used as outcome measures in rehabilitation

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for writing person-centred approach evaluation scales that can be used as an outcome measure in clinical or research settings in rehabilitation. To be used in a research setting, it requires a high methodological quality approach. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and reliability of the GAS quality rating system, to ensure that GAS scales used as outcome measures are valid and reliable. Secondary objectives were: (1) to compare goal attainment scores' reliability according to how many GAS levels are described in the scale; and (2) to explore if GAS scorings are influenced by who scores goal attainment. The GAS scales analysed here were set collaboratively by 57 cognitively impaired adults clients and their occupational therapist. Goals had to be achieved within an inpatient one-month stay, during which clients participated in an intervention aimed at improving planning skills in daily life. The GAS quality rating system proved to be feasible and reliable. Regarding GAS scores, interrater reliability was higher when only three of the five GAS levels were described, i.e., "three milestone GAS" (0.74-0.92), than when all five levels were described (0.5-0.88), especially when scored by the clients (0.5 -0.88).

Characteristics of goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aims to map the literature on goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation, exploring their characteristics, target users and supporting evidence to inform practice and future research in this area.

METHODS

We completed a comprehensive search of four databases to identify relevant articles on tools for goal setting in rehabilitation. We followed Arkey and O'Malley's scoping review process to guide article selection, data extraction and data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 165 studies that reported on 55 different goal-setting tools, including tools for goal selection and goal documentation (n = 31), goal setting and intervention planning (n = 15), and for measuring the quality of the goal-setting process (n = 9). Over half of the tools were primarily designed for use in rehabilitation of physical disabilities (n = 32). Some tools fell under multiple sub-categories based on their characteristics as follows: 22 framework tools, 12 interview tools, 9 outcome measurement tools for goal achievement, 6 outcome measurement tools for goal quality and 25 documentation tools. The majority of goal-setting instruments targeted goals at the level of activity and participation (n = 51) and aimed to facilitate a client-centred or shared decision-making approach to rehabilitation planning (n = 46).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a comprehensive overview of existing goal-setting tools, highlighting their characteristics, target users and identified needs. These findings can enhance practitioners' awareness of the range of goal-setting tools available and can enable more effective utilization of these tools in clinical practice. Further research should investigate how clinicians can combine multiple tools to deliver goal setting.

Patient-reported goal achievements after pelvic floor muscle training versus pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse. A randomised controlled trial

The aim was to assess the achievement by self-determined goals in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) participants receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared to vaginal pessary. Forty participants with POP stage II to III were randomly allocated to pessary or PFMT. Participants were asked to list up 3 goals they expected from treatment. Thai version of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR) were completed at 0 and 6-week period. At 6-week post-treatment, they were asked if their goals had been achieved. The totally achieved goals in the vaginal pessary group were 70% (14/20) significantly higher than PFMT group at 30% (6/20) (p = 0.01). The mean ± SD of the post-treatment P-QOL score in the vaginal pessary group was significantly lower than the PFMT group (13.90 ± 10.83 vs 22.04 ± 5.93, p = 0.01), but not different in all PISQ-IR subscales. Pessary treatment for POP yielded better total goal achievements and better quality of life than PFMT for POP treatment at a 6-week follow-up.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can severely affect the quality of life, causing physical, social, psychological, occupational, and/or sexual dysfunction. Individual patient goal setting and goal achievement scaling (GAS) offers a new method of patient-reported outcome measurement (PRO) in therapeutic success such as pessary or surgery in patient with POP. But there is no randomised controlled trial comparing pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) using GAS as the outcome measurement.What do the results of this study add? The results showed that women with POP stage II to III who received vaginal pessary had higher totally goal achievements and better quality of life than the women received the PFMT at 6-week follow up.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The information about the better goal achievements by using pessary can be used as the tools for counselling for patients with POP for selecting the choices for the treatment in the clinical setting.

Normalising interdisciplinary role-based goal setting in inpatient brain injury rehabilitation: reflections and recommendations of clinicians

PURPOSE

Person-centred goal setting with people with brain injury, by interdisciplinary teams has benefits including improved communication between patients, families and clinicians, person-centred care, and improved engagement in rehabilitation. Exploring the experiences of team members who have adopted interdisciplinary, person-centred goal setting may assist in understanding what is needed to implement this complex, core component of rehabilitation practice. This study explored experiences of clinicians working in an extended inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit about implementing a role-based goal planning approach within an interdisciplinary team.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 13 clinicians working at the rehabilitation unit explored their experiences about the cognitive participation and collective actions required to carry out the practice, with data analysed using inductive content analysis guided by Normalisation Process Theory.

RESULTS

Three primary themes were identified: putting the person at the centre, accepting the mind-shift to participation focused goals and working collaboratively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has elucidated some key processes that occurred and were necessary to carry out goal setting. A mind-shift towards holistic, participation-focussed goal setting was described as "unlearning" discipline-specific goal setting. Development and ownership by the team, acceptance of team members and willingness to share, and structured processes and resources were necessary.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONNormalising interdisciplinary role-based goal setting in multi-professional teams requires a mind-shift away from traditional, discipline-specific goal setting.Implementation of interdisciplinary, collaborative team goal setting within health service settings requires collective actions including collaborative working by team members, structured processes including organised time for collaborative team and family meetings, practical resources and training to support processes.Clinicians perceived the goal setting approach to put the person at the centre resulting in a deep understanding of the person, shared understanding, and motivation for rehabilitation.

Development of an assessment guide to evaluate meaningful outcomes for people living with dementia who are engaged in reablement programs

PURPOSE

Clinical practice guidelines for dementia recommend the provision of rehabilitative or reablement interventions that support functioning. This project sought to develop an assessment guide, centring on goal attainment scaling (GAS), for practitioners to measure attainment of meaningful outcomes for people living with dementia participating in reablement programs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To assist in guide development, two focus groups (people impacted by dementia [n = 10]) explored priority reablement goals. Two further focus groups (allied health practitioners [n = 11]) explored understanding and experience using GAS, opinions on what goals would be realistic, and how an assessment guide could best support practice.

RESULTS

The key focus group themes that emerged and which underpinned guide development were: 'what is possible'; 'who sets the goals'; 'practitioner perspectives on using GAS'. Leisure was a key goal priority for people impacted by dementia, and echoed by practitioners. The assessment guide is structured around three steps: choosing goals (using focus group derived Reablement Goal Lists); defining goals (using a new Dementia-specific SMART Framework); scoring goals (using GAS-Light).

CONCLUSIONS

Providing a structured approach to evaluation of reablement programs for people living with dementia could lead to more consistent service provision, improved outcomes and opportunities for benchmarking.Implications for RehabilitationDementia is a leading cause of disability in older people.Rehabilitative interventions such as reablement are recommended to support functioning in people living with dementia, but there is currently no consistent method of selecting and evaluating attainment of meaningful outcomes.This study describes the reablement goals identified by people impacted by dementia as being most important, along with allied health practitioner views on goal-setting and the use of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS).Study findings were used to develop a structured assessment guide employing three steps: choosing reablement goals; defining those goals using a new dementia-specific SMART Framework; and scoring goals using GAS-Light.A consistent approach to goal selection and evaluation of attainment for people impacted by dementia participating in reablement programs may lead to more effective rehabilitative interventions in this group.