The medical observer in American football: a survey of use and efficacy

Effect of a new concussion substitute rule on medical assessment of head collision events in Premier League football

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilisation of additional permanent concussion substitutes (APCSs) and its efficacy with regards to rate and duration of medical assessment of head collision events (HCEs) in the 2020-2021 Premier League season. The present APCS rule allows players with a suspected concussion to be removed from a match without counting towards a team's allocated substitutions.

METHODS

Eighty Premier League matches, 40 prior to additional permanent concussion substitutes implementation (Pre-APCS) and 40 after (Post-APCS), were randomly selected and analysed by a team of trained reviewers for HCEs. Data on HCE incidence, rates of medical assessment, duration of medical assessment and return to play were collected for each match. Data for the Pre-APCS and Post-APCS groups were compared to analyse differences in assessment of HCEs.

RESULTS

During the 2020-2021 Premier League season, three APCSs were used. There were 38 HCEs identified in the Pre-APCS group (0.95 per match, 28.79 per 1000 athlete-hours of exposure) and 42 in the Post-APCS group (1.05 per match, 31.82 per 1000 athlete-hours of exposure). Incidence of HCEs (p=0.657), rates of medical assessment (23.7% Pre-APCS vs 21.4% Post-APCS; p=0.545) and duration of medical assessment (median 81 s Pre-APCS vs 102 s Post-APCS; p=0.466) did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of APCSs in the Premier League did not impact the rate or duration of medical assessement of HCEs. Despite the introduction of APCSs, the consensus protocols for HCE assessment were rarely followed. We recommend changes to APCS and its implementation that would be aimed at protecting player health.

Are you missing a concussion by watching American football? Video analysis of ball location in a Division 1 football program

OBJECTIVE

Action in a football game occurs quickly. Medical staff can miss a sport-related concussion (SRC) if they do not observe it directly. The objective of this study is to determine if SRCs occur more frequently at ball than away from ball during gameplay. Game-specific concussion statistics can enhance medical provider care of athletes.

METHODS

We used gameplay videos of an NCAA Division I football program to analyze SRCs and determine the primary tackler or ball handler during each concussion play. We compared the relative risk of SRCs for the primary ball handlers/tacklers to that of the other 10 players on the same team during that play.

RESULTS

Over 10 seasons, 26 SRCs occurred at ball for the primary ball handler/tackler position (0.22 SRCs/game) versus 16 away from ball (0.13 SRCs/game). The relative risk of an SRC according to exposure (at ball) vs. no exposure (away from ball) was 16.2 (CI 8.7-30.2, P < .05). Special teams had more SRCs away from ball than at ball, but this was not significant (relative risk 3.32, CI 0.90-12.3, P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides medical staff guidance to more efficiently identify in-game SRCs and supports evidence for rules changes.