Spreading depolarization occurs in repeating, recognizable, patient-specific patterns after human brain injury

GluA1-Shank3 interaction decreases in response to chronic neuronal depolarization

Interactions between AMPA receptors and synaptic scaffolding proteins are key regulators of synaptic receptor density and, thereby, synapse strength. Shank3 is one such scaffolding protein with high clinical relevance, as genetic variants and deletions of this protein have been linked to autism spectrum disorder. Shank3 acts as a master regulator of the postsynaptic density of glutamatergic synapses, interacting with ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors and cytoskeletal elements to modulate synaptic structure. Notably, Shank3 has been shown to interact directly with the AMPAR subunit GluA1, and Shank3 knockout animals show deficits in AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission. In this study, we sought to characterize the stability of GluA1-Shank3 interaction in response to chronic stimuli using a highly sensitive and specific proximity ligation assay. We found that GluA1-Shank3 interactions decrease in response to prolonged neuronal depolarization induced by elevated extracellular potassium, and that this reduced interaction is blocked by NMDA receptor antagonism. These results firmly establish the close interaction of GluA1 and Shank3 in cortical neurons in vitro, and that this select interaction is subject to modulation by depolarization.

Is the Human Touch Always Therapeutic? Patient Stimulation and Spreading Depolarization after Acute Neurological Injuries

Touch and other types of patient stimulation are necessary in critical care and generally presumed to be beneficial. Recent pre-clinical studies as well as randomized trials assessing early mobilization have challenged the safety of such routine practices in patients with acute neurological injury such as stroke. We sought to determine whether patient stimulation could result in spreading depolarization (SD), a dramatic pathophysiological event that likely contributes to metabolic stress and ischemic expansion in such patients. Patients undergoing surgical intervention for severe acute neurological injuries (stroke, aneurysm rupture, or trauma) were prospectively consented and enrolled in an observational study monitoring SD with implanted subdural electrodes. Subjects also underwent simultaneous video recordings (from continuous EEG monitoring) to assess for physical touch and other forms of patient stimulation (such as suctioning and positioning). The association of patient stimulation with subsequent SD was assessed. Increased frequency of patient stimulation was associated with increased risk of SD (OR = 4.39 [95%CI = 1.71-11.24]). The overall risk of SD was also increased in the 60 min following patient stimulation compared to times with no stimulation (OR = 1.19 [95%CI = 1.13-1.26]), though not all subjects demonstrated this effect individually. Positioning of the subject was the subtype of stimulation with the strongest overall effect on SD (OR = 4.92 [95%CI = 3.74-6.47]). We conclude that in patients with some acute neurological injuries, touch and other patient stimulation can induce SD (PS-SD), potentially increasing the risk of metabolic and ischemic stress. PS-SD may represent an underlying mechanism for observed increased risk of early mobilization in such patients.