Delayed reconfiguration of a non-emotional task set through reactivation of an emotional task set in task switching: an ageing study

To be or not to be flexible: A hierarchical model of affective flexibility in typical development and internalizing problems

Affective flexibility is defined as a complex executive function which enables individuals to successfully alternate between distinct emotional and non-emotional features of a given situation in order to attain a specific goal. A large body of research has focused exclusively on flexibility in a non-emotional context, although most of our interactions with our environment are emotionally satiated. Our main aim was to propose a hierarchical framework to describe this construct from a macro-level perspective to a more nuanced and micro-level perspective, including three different levels of affective flexibility: elementary, shifting, and generative. Next, we employed this hierarchical framework to examine the role played by affective flexibility in typical development and different forms of developmental psychopathology. Lastly, we discuss how this knowledge could inform future prevention and intervention programs aimed at reducing cognitive vulnerability to developmental psychopathology.

Effects of task switching and emotional stimuli on memory selectivity

It is not always easy to attend to task-relevant information and ignore task-irrelevant distractions. We investigated the impact of task switching and emotional stimuli on goal-oriented selective attention and subsequent recognition memory. Results from two experiments with different stimulus materials (words and images) found that the memory advantage of task-relevant information over task-irrelevant information (i.e. memory selectivity) was attenuated on task switch trials and emotional distractor trials. In contrast, task repetitions and emotional targets improved memory selectivity. These results suggest that both task switching and emotional distractors divert limited cognitive resources needed for selective attention and selective encoding. Emotional targets likely supported selective encoding through the process of attentional prioritisation of emotional stimuli. The effects of task switching and emotional stimuli did not interact, suggesting distinct mechanisms, although this conclusion remains tentative.

Motivation and emotional distraction interact and affect executive functions

Previous research on cool-hot executive function (EF) interactions has examined the effects of motivation and emotional distraction on cool EF separately, focusing on one EF component at a time. Although both incentives and emotional distractors have been shown to modulate attention, how they interact and affect cool EF processes is still unclear. Here, we used an experimental paradigm that manipulated updating, inhibition, and shifting demands to determine the interactions of motivation and emotional distraction in the context of cool EF. Forty-five young adults (16 males, 29 females) completed the go/no-go (inhibition), two-back (updating), and task-switching (shifting) tasks. Monetary incentives were implemented to manipulate motivation, and task-irrelevant threatening or neutral faces were presented before the target stimulus to manipulate emotional distraction. We found that incentives significantly improved no-go accuracy, two-back accuracy, and reaction time (RT) switch cost. While emotional distractors had no significant effects on overall task performance, they abolished the incentive effects on no-go accuracy and RT switch cost. Altogether, these findings suggest that motivation and emotional distraction interact in the context of cool EF. Specifically, transient emotional distraction disrupts the upregulation of control activated by incentives. The present investigation has advanced knowledge about the relationship between cool and hot EF and highlights the importance of considering motivation-emotion interactions for a fuller understanding of control.

How Task Set and Task Switching Modulate Perceptual Processes: Is Recognition of Facial Emotion an Exception?

In Part 1 we review task-switching and other studies showing that, even with time for preparation, participants' ability to shift attention to a relevant attribute or object before the stimulus onset is limited: there is a 'residual cost'. In particular, several brain potential markers of perceptual encoding are delayed on task-switch trials, compared to task-repeat trials that require attention to the same attribute as before. Such effects have been documented even for a process often considered 'automatic' - visual word recognition: ERP markers of word frequency and word/nonword status are (1) delayed when the word recognition task follows a judgement of a perceptual property compared to repeating the lexical task, and (2) strongly attenuated during the perceptual judgements. Thus, even lexical access seems influenced by the task/attentional set. In Part 2, we report in detail a demonstration of what seems to be a special case, where task-set and a task switch have no such effect on perceptual encoding. Participants saw an outline letter superimposed on a face expressing neutral or negative emotion, and were auditorily cued to categorise the letter as vowel/consonant, or the face as emotional/neutral. ERPs exhibited a robust emotional-neutral difference (Emotional Expression Effect) no smaller or later when switching to the face task than when repeating it; in the first half of its time-course it did not vary with the task at all. The initial encoding of the valence of a fixated facial emotional expression appears to be involuntary and invariant, whatever the endogenous task/attentional set.