The Severe Exercise Domain Amplitude: A Comparison Between Endurance Runners and Cyclists

Modeling the expenditure and reconstitution of distance above critical speed during two swimming interval training sessions

In swimming, the speed-time relationship provides the critical speed (CS) and the maximum distance that can be performed above CS (D′). During intermittent severe intensity exercise, a complete D′ depletion coincides with task failure, while a sub-CS intensity is required for D′ reconstitution. Therefore, determining the balance D′ remaining at any time during intermittent exercise (D'_BAL) could improve training prescription. This study aimed to 1) test the D'_BAL model for swimming; 2) determine an equation to estimate the time constant of the reconstitution of D' (τD′); and 3) verify if τD′ is constant during two interval training sessions with the same work intensity and duration and recovery intensity, but different recovery duration. Thirteen swimmers determined CS and D′ and performed two high-intensity interval sessions at a constant speed, with repetitions fixed at 50 m. The duration of passive recovery was based on the work/relief ratio of 2:1 (T2:1) and 4:1 (T4:1). There was a high variability between sessions for τD' (coefficient of variation of 306%). When τD′ determined for T2:1 was applied in T4:1 and vice versa, the D'_BAL model was inconsistent to predict the time to exhaustion (coefficient of variation of 29 and 28%). No linear or nonlinear relationships were found between τD′ and CS, possibly due to the high within-subject variability of τD'. These findings suggest that τD′ is not constant during two high-intensity interval sessions with the same recovery intensity. Therefore, the current D'_BAL model was inconsistent to track D′ responses for swimming sessions tested herein.

Sigmoidal VO2 on-kinetics: A new pattern in VO2 responses at the lower district of extreme exercise domain

The aim of the study was to analyse the VO₂ on-kinetics belonging to the work rates within the lower district of extreme exercise domain. Maximal O₂ utilisation and peak power outputs of eight well-trained cyclists were revealed by multisession trails. Critical threshold (CT) as the lower boundary of severe domain and aerobic limit power (ALP) as the upper boundary of severe domain were determined by multisession constant-load exercises. VO₂ on-kinetics over time were best fitted by multicomponent exponential models described by an initial concave-up response known as cardio-dynamic phase (τ = 18.2 ± 2.88 s; a = 1.56 ± 0.39 L·min^-1) before a primary concave-up phase (τ = 35.4 ± 12.4 s; a = 1.53 ± 0.36 L·min^-1), and then a slow component in two of the participants (τ = 80.8 ± 37 s; a = 0.47 ± 0.05 L·min^-1) or without a slow component in six of the participants during exercises performed at 50 W above the CT (R²≥0.96; SEE ≤ 0.24; p < 0.001). However, VO₂ on-kinetics over time belonging to exercises performed at 50 W above the ALP were best fitted by sigmoidal model (R²≥0.98; SEE ≤ 0.14; p < 0.001) in comparison with linear (R² = 0.37-0.66; SEE = 0.46-0.64; p < 0.01), or exponential functions (p> 0.05). Indeed, during those exercises, a short period of convex-up response (τ = 16.8 ± 3.1 s; a = 1.72 ± 0.39 L·min^-1) was determined just before a concave-up primary phase in VO₂ over time (τ = 24.6 ± 5.86 s; a = 1.31 ± 0.20 L·min^-1). It was shown that multicomponent exponential trend in VO₂ transformed into a sigmoidal shape, once the work rate exceeded the upper boundary of severe exercise domain.

Evaluating the suitability of supra-POpeak verification trials after ramp-incremental exercise to confirm the attainment of maximum O2 uptake

During exhaustive ramp-incremental cycling tests, the incidence of O₂ uptake (V̇o₂) plateaus is low. To verify the attainment of maximum V̇o₂ (V̇o_2max), it is recommended that a trial at a power output (PO) corresponding to 110% of the ramp-derived peak (PO_peak) is performed. It remains unclear whether verification trials set at this PO can be tolerated for long enough to allow attainment of V̇o_2max. Eleven recreationally trained individuals performed five ramp tests of varying slope (5, 10, 15, 25, and 30 W/min), each followed, in series, by two verification trials: the first at 110% PO_peak of the 25 W/min ramp and the second at 110% PO_peak attained in the preceding ramp test. Exercise duration of the first verification trial was on average 81 ± 15 s (CV = 9 ± 3%) versus 162 ± 32, 121 ± 24, 103 ± 15, and 73 ± 10 s for the second verification trials at 110% of PO_peak of the 5, 10, 15, and 30 W/min ramp tests, respectively (P < 0.05). Compared with the highest V̇o₂ recorded during ramp tests, V̇o₂ from the subsequent verification trials was not different for the 5, 10, and 15 W/min ramp tests (P > 0.05) but was lower for the 25 and 30 W/min ramp tests (P < 0.05). Verification trials at 110% PO_peak of rapidly incrementing ramp tests (i.e., 25 W/min) were not sustained for long enough to allow the attainment of V̇o_2max. With commonly used rapidly incrementing ramp tests engendering exhaustion within 8-12 min, verification trials less than PO_peak should be preferred as they can be sustained sufficiently long to allow the attainment of V̇o_2max.