Risk Assessment and the Impact of Point of Contact Intervention Following Emergency Department Presentation with a Fall

Moving the needle on fall prevention: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network scoping review and consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Although falls are common, costly, and often preventable, emergency department (ED)-initiated fall screening and prevention efforts are rare. The Geriatric Emergency Medicine Applied Research Falls core (GEAR-Falls) was created to identify existing research gaps and to prioritize future fall research foci.

METHODS

GEAR's 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders included patients, geriatricians, ED physicians, epidemiologists, health services researchers, and nursing scientists. We derived relevant clinical fall ED questions and summarized the applicable research evidence, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The highest-priority research foci were identified at the GEAR Consensus Conference.

RESULTS

We identified two clinical questions for our review (1) fall prevention interventions (32 studies) and (2) risk stratification and falls care plan (19 studies). For (1) 21 of 32 (66%) of interventions were a falls risk screening assessment and 15 of 21 (71%) of these were combined with an exercise program or physical therapy. For (2) 11 fall screening tools were identified, but none were feasible and sufficiently accurate for ED patients. For both questions, the most frequently reported study outcome was recurrent falls, but various process and patient/clinician-centered outcomes were used. Outcome ascertainment relied on self-reported falls in 18 of 32 (56%) studies for (1) and nine of 19 (47%) studies for (2).

CONCLUSION

Harmonizing definitions, research methods, and outcomes is needed for direct comparison of studies. The need to identify ED-appropriate fall risk assessment tools and role of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel persists. Multifactorial interventions, especially involving exercise, are more efficacious in reducing recurrent falls, but more studies are needed to compare appropriate bundle combinations. GEAR prioritizes five research priorities: (1) EMS role in improving fall-related outcomes, (2) identifying optimal ED fall assessment tools, (3) clarifying patient-prioritized fall interventions and outcomes, (4) standardizing uniform fall ascertainment and measured outcomes, and (5) exploring ideal intervention components.

Providing fall prevention services in the emergency department: Is it effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of fall prevention services initiated in the emergency department (ED) to support patients after discharge.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Analysis of pooled data used random-effects modelling with results presented as a risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified (n = 4,018). The proportion of older adults who fell did not differ between the intervention and control groups (RR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-1.06, I² 68%, P = 0.28). There was a significant (P = 0.01) reduction in the monthly rate of falling (RR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, I² 93%), fall-related injuries (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88, I² 0%, P = 0.001), and hospital admissions (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90, I² 0%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

ED fall prevention services did not significantly reduce the proportion of older adults who had future falls. However, multifactorial intervention significantly reduced fall-related injuries and hospital admissions with low heterogeneity.

Fatores de risco associados à queda em pacientes internados na clínica médica-cirúrgica

Resumo Objetivo Identificar os fatores de risco associados à quedas em pacientes internados na clínica médica-cirúrgica. Métodos Estudo analítico e descritivo com abordagem quantitativa realizado de junho a setembro de 2017 em hospital público de grande porte da região norte do estado do Ceará-Brasil. A amostra foi de 155 pacientes e a coleta ocorreu por meio de instrumento estruturado dividido em cinco partes: a) Dados Clínico-Epidemiológicos; b) Aplicação do Mini-mental; c) Aplicação da Escala de queda de Morse; d) Aplicação do índice de Katz; e) Diagnóstico de Enfermagem “Risco de Quedas”. Para análise estatística, foi considerado erro amostral de 5%. Resultados Dos 155 pacientes, 41,2% (64) possuíam diagnóstico clínico e 58,8% (91) eram pacientes traumatológicos. Foi identificado correlação estatisticamente para ocorrência de quedas entre dias de internamento (p=0,07), Mini exame mental (p=0,048) e Katz (p=0,017) para os pacientes clínicos enquanto que os pacientes traumatológicos apresentam associação positiva para ocorrência de quedas nas variáveis idade (p=0,028) e Katz (p=0,037). Conclusão Os principais fatores de risco identificados foram: uso de dispositivos auxiliares, história de quedas, estar em pós-operatório, dificuldade na marcha, força diminuída nas extremidades, equilíbrio prejudicado, mobilidade física prejudicada, cenário pouco conhecido e material antiderrapante insuficiente no banheiro.

Multifactorial falls prevention programmes for older adults presenting to the emergency department with a fall: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To determine whether multifactorial falls prevention interventions are effective in preventing falls, fall injuries, emergency department (ED) re-presentations and hospital admissions in older adults presenting to the ED with a fall.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Data sources

Four health-related electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched (inception to June 2018).

Study selection

RCTs of multifactorial falls prevention interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults ( ≥ 60 years) presenting to the ED with a fall with quantitative data on at least one review outcome.

Data extraction

Two independent reviewers determined inclusion, assessed study quality and undertook data extraction, discrepancies resolved by a third.

Data synthesis

12 studies involving 3986 participants, from six countries, were eligible for inclusion. Studies were of variable methodological quality. Multifactorial interventions were heterogeneous, though the majority included education, referral to healthcare services, home modifications, exercise and medication changes. Meta-analyses demonstrated no reduction in falls (rate ratio = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.05), number of fallers (risk ratio = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.18), rate of fractured neck of femur (risk ratio = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.25), fall-related ED presentations (rate ratio = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.16) or hospitalisations (rate ratio = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.89) with multifactorial falls prevention programmes.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls or hospital utilisation in older people presenting to ED following a fall. Further research targeting this population group is required.