Effects of intravitreal moxifloxacin and dexamethasone in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis

Intravitreal triple therapy with vancomycin, ceftazidime, and moxifloxacin for bacterial endophthalmitis: A Twelve-year experience

PURPOSE

Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance in endophthalmitis have been reported. This study examines outcomes of triple therapy with intravitreal vancomycin, ceftazidime, and moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis.

METHODS

Retrospective, consecutive series of all patients treated with abovementioned intravitreal antibiotics from January 2009 to June 2021. Percentages of eyes attaining greater than or equal to 20/200 and 20/50 Snellen visual acuities and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

112 eyes met inclusion criteria. 63 of 112 eyes (56%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/200 during follow-up, with 39 (35%) returning to at least 20/50. In subgroup analysis, 23 of 24 (96%) eyes with post-cataract endophthalmitis obtained ≥ 20/200 acuity and 21 of 24 (88%) obtained ≥ 20/50 acuity during follow-up. There were no cases of macular infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal moxifloxacin (160 µg/0.1 mL) was well tolerated as an adjunct to vancomycin and ceftazidime for bacterial endophthalmitis. Use of this novel combination offers several theoretical advantages compared to standard therapy with two antibiotics, including expanded gram-negative coverage and potential synergy, and may be particularly valuable in geographies where the local antibiogram supports empiric use. Further study is merited to verify the safety and efficacy profile.

A prospective multicentre randomized placebo-controlled superiority trial in patients with suspected bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract surgery on the adjuvant use of intravitreal dexamethasone to intravitreal antibiotics

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine whether intravitreal dexamethasone as an adjuvant to intravitreal antibiotics is beneficial in the treatment of suspected bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.

METHODS

Randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial in three tertiary referral centres in the Netherlands. Patients with suspected bacterial endophthalmitis within 6 weeks after cataract surgery were eligible. A diagnostic vitreous biopsy was taken for culture, and patients received intravitreal injections of 400 μg dexamethasone (without preservatives) or placebo, in addition to 0.2 mg vancomycin and 0.05 mg gentamicin. The vancomycin and dexamethasone or placebo injections were repeated once at day 3 or 4. Primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 year.

RESULTS

Between 1 November 2004 and 1 March 2014 (excluding two interruptions totalling 20 months), 324 eligible patients presented. A total of 167 patients (81 dexamethasone, 86 placebo) were available for the intention-to-treat analysis. Biopsies of 114 patients (68%) were culture-positive. Final BCVA did not differ between the dexamethasone and the placebo group (logMAR 0.31 ± 0.58 versus 0.27 ± 0.50; p = 0.90), nor did the number of patients with final vision of no light perception (LP, 7 versus 13). Pain, corneal oedema, the absence of a red fundus reflex on presentation, LP on presentation and culture of virulent pathogens from biopsy were statistically significantly associated with an unfavourable visual outcome.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal dexamethasone without preservatives as an adjuvant to intravitreal antibiotics does not improve visual acuity (VA) in patients treated for suspected bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.

Modeling intraocular bacterial infections

Bacterial endophthalmitis is an infection and inflammation of the posterior segment of the eye which can result in significant loss of visual acuity. Even with prompt antibiotic, anti-inflammatory and surgical intervention, vision and even the eye itself may be lost. For the past century, experimental animal models have been used to examine various aspects of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of bacterial endophthalmitis, to further the development of anti-inflammatory treatment strategies, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and efficacies of antibiotics. Experimental models allow independent control of many parameters of infection and facilitate systematic examination of infection outcomes. While no single animal model perfectly reproduces the human pathology of bacterial endophthalmitis, investigators have successfully used these models to understand the infectious process and the host response, and have provided new information regarding therapeutic options for the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis. This review highlights experimental animal models of endophthalmitis and correlates this information with the clinical setting. The goal is to identify knowledge gaps that may be addressed in future experimental and clinical studies focused on improvements in the therapeutic preservation of vision during and after this disease.

Unexpected Roles for Toll-Like Receptor 4 and TRIF in Intraocular Infection with Gram-Positive Bacteria

Inflammation caused by infection with Gram-positive bacteria is typically initiated by interactions with Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). Endophthalmitis, an infection and inflammation of the posterior segment of the eye, can lead to vision loss when initiated by a virulent microbial pathogen. Endophthalmitis caused by Bacillus cereus develops as acute inflammation with infiltrating neutrophils, and vision loss is potentially catastrophic. Residual inflammation observed during B. cereus endophthalmitis in TLR2(-/-) mice led us to investigate additional innate pathways that may trigger intraocular inflammation. We first hypothesized that intraocular inflammation during B. cereus endophthalmitis would be controlled by MyD88- and TRIF-mediated signaling, since MyD88 and TRIF are the major adaptor molecules for all bacterial TLRs. In MyD88(-/-) and TRIF(-/-) mice, we observed significantly less intraocular inflammation than in eyes from infected C57BL/6J mice, suggesting an important role for these TLR adaptors in B. cereus endophthalmitis. These results led to a second hypothesis, that TLR4, the only TLR that signals through both MyD88 and TRIF signaling pathways, contributed to inflammation during B. cereus endophthalmitis. Surprisingly, B. cereus-infected TLR4(-/-) eyes also had significantly less intraocular inflammation than infected C57BL/6J eyes, indicating an important role for TLR4 in B. cereus endophthalmitis. Taken together, our results suggest that TLR4, TRIF, and MyD88 are important components of the intraocular inflammatory response observed in experimental B. cereus endophthalmitis, identifying a novel innate immune interaction for B. cereus and for this disease.

Antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of moxifloxacin on rat retinal ganglion cells

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of moxifloxacin on cultured rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC5).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rat retinal ganglion cells were exposed to various concentration of moxifloxacin (5-1500 μg/mL). For antiproliferative properties, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) test was performed. Cellular cytotoxicity was assessed by using the Live/Dead viability/cytotoxicity assay and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy after 24 and 72 h of incubation, respectively.

RESULTS

Neither cytotoxic nor antiproliferative effect of moxifloxacin was observed below 50 μg/mL on RGC5 cells after 24 and 72 h of incubation. At higher concentrations of moxifloxacin (150 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 1500 μg/mL (p < 0.001)) the number of viable cells and the proliferation rate of RGC5 were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a dose-dependent cytotoxic and antiproliferative effect of moxifloxacin on RGC5. Therefore, intracameral application of moxifloxacin should be used cautiously in patients with increased risk of retinal ganglion cells damage, particularly in glaucoma patients.

Severe bacterial endophthalmitis: towards improving clinical outcomes

Endophthalmitis is an infection and inflammation of the interior of the eye that can result in significant vision loss. This infection occurs as a result of the seeding of organisms into the interior of the eye following surgery (postoperative), trauma (post-traumatic) or an infection in another site in the body (endogenous). The general rate of endophthalmitis has remained steady over the past several years. However, the increased use of intraocular injections to treat various degenerative and inflammatory ocular diseases, in addition to the already large and growing number of invasive ocular surgeries, may increase the opportunities in which organisms can gain access to the eye. In most cases of endophthalmitis, useful vision can be retained if proper treatment is instituted. However, in severe cases of bacterial endophthalmitis, blindness often occurs despite treatment. This article summarizes information on endophthalmitis epidemiology, treatment issues and current regimens, and recent experimental and clinical efforts to improve the outcome of severe and blinding forms of bacterial endophthalmitis.

Efficacy of Intravitreal Levofloxacin 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution in Treating Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Endophthalmitis on a Rabbit Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal levofloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution as treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa endophthalmitis in a rabbit model.

DESIGN

This is a parallel randomized experimental study.

METHODS

Twenty-six New Zealand white rabbits were enrolled. P. aeruginosa was inoculated intravitreally on the right eyes of all rabbits, which were further categorized into 2 groups, the treatment group (Group A) receiving 0.1 mL intravitreal injection levofloxacin 0.5% 24 hours after inoculation and the control group (Group B), which had 0.1 mL intravitreal aqua destilata (placebo). Clinical observation of the eyes in each group was performed on the first until the sixth day after the inoculation using clinical grading scale. On the sixth day, the eyes were examined for microbiological and histopathologic evaluations.

RESULTS

The total clinical grading scores of each group were similar 24 hours after P. aeruginosa inoculation (P > 0.05). The total clinical grading scores of Group A on the sixth day and the difference in total clinical scores on the first and the sixth day were shown to be significantly lower than that of Group B (P < 0.05). Microbiological analysis revealed that there was a lower bacterial count in Group A (mean = 1.18 ± 0.93 logCFU/0.1 mL) compared with Group B (mean = 4.09 ± 1.51 logCFU/0.1 mL), and the histopathologic scores of both groups were also significantly different (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal levofloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution at 0.1 mL dose appeared to be effective in treating P. aeruginosa endophthalmitis in rabbits.

Bacterial endophthalmitis in the age of outpatient intravitreal therapies and cataract surgeries: host-microbe interactions in intraocular infection

Bacterial endophthalmitis is a sight threatening infection of the interior structures of the eye. Incidence in the US has increased in recent years, which appears to be related to procedures being performed on an aging population. The advent of outpatient intravitreal therapy for management of age-related macular degeneration raises yet additional risks. Compounding the problem is the continuing progression of antibiotic resistance. Visual prognosis for endophthalmitis depends on the virulence of the causative organism, the severity of intraocular inflammation, and the timeliness of effective therapy. We review the current understanding of the pathogenesis of bacterial endophthalmitis, highlighting opportunities for the development of improved therapeutics and preventive strategies.

Antiinflammatory effect of low-level laser therapy on Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis in rabbits

A rabbit model of endophthalmitis was established to evaluate the antiinflammatory effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an adjunct to treatment for Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis. Rabbits were randomly divided into three groups to receive intravitreal injections into their left eye: group A received 0.5 mg vancomycin (100 μl), group B received 0.5 mg vancomycin + 0.2 mg dexamethasone (100 μl), and group C received 0.5 mg vancomycin (100 μl) and continuous wave semiconductor laser irradiation (10 mW, λ = 632 nm) focused on the pupil. Slit lamp examination and B-mode ultrasonography were conducted to evaluate the symptoms of endophthalmitis. Polymorphonuclear cells and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in aqueous fluid were measured at 0 h, and 1, 2, 3, 7 and 15 days. A histology test was conducted at 15 days. B-mode ultrasonography and histology revealed that groups B and C had less inflammation than group A at 15 days. Groups B and C had fewer polymorphonuclear cells and lower levels of TNF-α in aqueous fluid than group A at 2, 3 and 7 days (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups B and C (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups A, B and C at 15 days (P > 0.05). As an adjunct to vancomycin therapy to treat S. epidermidis endophthalmitis, LLLT has an antiinflammatory effect similar to that of dexamethasone.

Adjunctive intravitreal dexamethasone in the treatment of acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery

Purpose

Controversy exists regarding the use of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) as an anti-inflammatory adjunct to intravitreal antibiotics in patients with acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. The purpose of this project was to evaluate our experience regarding the effect of adjunctive IVD use on visual outcomes in such patients.

Design

Retrospective, comparative case series.

Methods

Study population: Patients treated for acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery from 1995–2004. Intervention: In addition to standard intravitreal antibiotic treatment, some patients also received a single adjunctive injection of IVD. Primary outcome measures: Median visual acuity at last follow-up and percentage of patients achieving a ≥3-line improvement in visual acuity. Secondary outcome measures: Inflammatory index scoring, including amount of cell and flare, height of hypopyon, and presence of fibrin as a function of time after treatment.

Results

Twenty-six eyes were treated with and 38 eyes without adjunctive IVD. Median presenting visual acuity was Hand Motion in both groups. Median visual acuity at last follow-up measured 20/40 in the IVD group and 20/50 in the No-IVD group (p = 0.75). Seventy-three percent of patients in the IVD group and 82% of patients in the No-IVD group achieved a ≥3-line improvement in visual acuity (p = 0.42). No significant difference was detected between the IVD and No-IVD groups for any of the three measures of inflammation.

Conclusion

The use of IVD did not significantly improve the final median visual acuity, the chance of achieving a ≥3-line improvement in visual acuity, or the amount of intraocular inflammation. Based on these findings, and the possible detrimental effect of IVD on visual outcomes previously reported in the literature, the use of IVD does not appear to be warranted as a routine adjunctive treatment in postoperative endophthalmitis.

[Intracameral moxifloxacin: a safe option for endophthalmitis prophylaxis? In vitro safety profile for intraocular application]

BACKGROUND

Moxifloxacin (Vigamox), a 4th-generation fluoroquinolone, covers most isolates causing endophthalmitis. It is safe and effective for systemic and topical use; however, only very limited data are available on prophylactic intracameral administration to prevent endophthalmitis. This study investigated the safety of Vigamox for intracameral application in a cell-culture model.

METHODS

The endothelial toxicity of moxifloxacin (Vigamox) was evaluated in cultured human corneas. Primary human retinal pigment epithelium cells (RPEs), trabecular meshwork cells (TMCs), lens epithelium cells (LECs), and corneal endothelial cells (CECs) were treated with concentrations of Vigamox. Toxic effects were evaluated after 24 h (MTT assay and live-dead assay). By treating TMC, CEC, and RPE cells either with oxidative stress or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), the effects of moxifloxacin on cellular viability under conditions of inflammation were investigated.

RESULTS

No corneal endothelial toxicity could be detected after 30 days of treatment with moxifloxacin 500 microg/ml. Primary RPEs, TMCs, LECs, and CECs showed adverse effects on proliferation and viability only at concentrations higher than 150 microg/ml moxifloxacin. After preincubation with TNF-a, LPS, and IL-6 for 24 h and subsequent treatment with moxifloxacin at concentrations of 10-150 microg/ml for 24 h, no significant decrease in proliferation or viability was observed. H2O2 exposure did not increase cellular toxicity

CONCLUSION

Vigamox did not show significant toxicity on primary RPEs, TMCs, LECs, CECs, or human corneal endothelium at concentrations up to 150 microg/ml. The MIC90 of moxifloxacin for pathogens commonly encountered in endophthalmitis is known to be in the range of 0.25-2.5 microg/ml. Therefore, intracameral use of Vigamox at concentrations up to 150 microg/ml may be safe and effective for preventing endophthalmitis after intraocular surgery.

Endophthalmitis: Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, management, and perspectives

Endophthalmitis is a rare but sight-threatening complication that can occur after ocular surgery or trauma or as a consequence of systemic infection. To optimize visual outcome, early diagnosis and treatment are essential. Over recent decades, advances in hygienic standards, improved microbiologic and surgical techniques, development of powerful antimicrobial drugs, and the introduction of intravitreal antibiotic therapy have led to a decreased incidence and improved management of endophthalmitis. However, endophthalmitis still represents a serious clinical problem. This review focuses on current principles and techniques for evaluation and treatment of endophthalmitis. In addition, it addresses recent developments regarding antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of infectious endophthalmitis.

Intracameral moxifloxacin: in vitro safety on human ocular cells

PURPOSE

The fourth-generation fluoroquinolone, moxifloxacin, covers most gram-positive and gram-negative isolates causing endophthalmitis. It is safe and effective for systemic and topical use, but only limited data are available on prophylactic intracameral administration to prevent endophthalmitis. This study uses a cell culture model to investigate the safety of moxifloxacin for intracameral application.

METHODS

Endothelial toxicity of moxifloxacin was evaluated in cultured human corneas. Possible toxic effects of moxifloxacin (10-750 microg/mL) in corneal endothelial cells (CEC), primary human trabecular meshwork cells (TMC), and primary human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells were evaluated after 24 hours and under conditions of oxidative and inflammatory stress by treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha, lipopolysaccharides, or interleukin-6. Toxicity was evaluated by tetrazolium dye reduction assay, and cell viability was quantified by a microscopic live-dead assay.

RESULTS

No corneal endothelial toxicity could be detected after 30 days of treatment with 500 microg/mL moxifloxacin. Concentrations up to 150 microg/mL had no influence on CEC, TMC, or RPE cell proliferation or on cell viability when administered for 24 hours. After preincubation with tumor necrosis factor alpha, lipopolysaccharides, or interleukin-6 for 24 hours and subsequent treatment with moxifloxacin at concentrations from 10 to 150 microg/mL for 24 hours, no significant decrease in proliferation or viability was observed. Hydrogen peroxide exposure did not increase cellular toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no significant toxicity for moxifloxacin on CEC, TMC, RPE cells, or human corneal endothelium for concentrations up to 150 microg/mL. The minimum inhibitory concentration of moxifloxacin to inhibit 90% of pathogens commonly encountered in endophthalmitis is known to be in the range of 0.25-2.5 microg/mL. Therefore, prophylactic intracameral use of moxifloxacin at concentrations up to 150 microg/mL may be safely used to prevent endophthalmitis after intraocular surgery.

[Advantages of corticosteroids in managing acute bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis]

Most studies show a trend toward a beneficial or at least neutral effect of associating corticosteroids and antibiotics. However, caution must be taken, with various factors considered: the type, virulence, and size of the inoculum, and the treatment chosen. Early intravitreal administration of 400 microg of dexamethasone seems to be beneficial in treating postoperative Staphylococcus epidermidis-related endophthalmitis. However, a large-scale prospective, randomized, controlled study is mandatory to gain evidence supporting steroid therapy in postoperative endophthalmitis.

Toward improving therapeutic regimens for Bacillus endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

Bacillus cereus causes the most virulent and refractory form of endophthalmitis. The authors analyzed the effectiveness of early treatment with vancomycin or gatifloxacin, with or without dexamethasone, for experimental B. cereus endophthalmitis.

METHODS

Rabbit eyes were injected intravitreally with 100 colony-forming units of B. cereus. At 2, 4, or 6 hours after infection, eyes were injected intravitreally with 0.1 mL gatifloxacin (0.3%), vancomycin (1.0%), either antibiotic plus dexamethasone, dexamethasone alone (1.0%), or PBS. Eyes were analyzed by electroretinography, bacterial quantitation, and antibiotic penetration analysis. Drug toxicity toward Müller cells, retinal pigment epithelium, and cones was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Eyes treated at 2 hours with vancomycin or gatifloxacin, with or without dexamethasone, maintained higher ERG amplitudes than the dexamethasone alone and PBS control groups. Eyes treated with antibiotic plus dexamethasone at 6 hours had reduced retinal function compared to antibiotic treatment alone. With the exception of vancomycin with or without dexamethasone at 6 hours, all antibiotic treatments sterilized eyes. Only gatifloxacin reached aqueous concentrations greater than the minimal inhibitory concentration for B. cereus when measured at 8 hours. Neither gatifloxacin nor vancomycin was toxic to retinal cells in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intravitreal injection of vancomycin or gatifloxacin improved the therapeutic outcome of B. cereus endophthalmitis. The addition of dexamethasone to antibiotic treatment did not provide a therapeutic benefit over antibiotics alone and appeared to reduce the antibiotic efficacy of vancomycin 6 hours after infection. In this model, delay in treatment past 6 hours significantly reduced the potential for salvaging useful vision.