Performance of Bio-Occlusive Dressing as Barrier Protection from Presurgical Chlorhexidine Skin Preparation

Continuous Corneal Endothelial Damage by Chlorhexidine Alcohol Used for Disinfection in Nonophthalmic Surgery

PURPOSE

To report a case of corneal endothelial damage caused by alcohol-containing chlorhexidine gluconate (CG-A) and its progression over time.

METHODS

This was a case report.

RESULTS

A 22-year-old man underwent neurosurgery under general anesthesia. CG-A (1%) was used for disinfection after the application of corneal protection tape. Postoperatively, the patient presented with hyperemia and swelling of the left conjunctiva and was referred to our department. Initial examination revealed left corneal epithelial erosion and corneal edema, which improved on postoperative day 14. The corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) was 3,345 cells/mm 2 on day 14, decreased rapidly to 2,090 cells/mm 2 on day 42, and slowly reduced to 1,122 cells/mm 2 on day 168. Thereafter, no decrease in ECD was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CG formulations can lead to a persistent decrease in ECD over several months, even after improvement of acute corneal edema.

Review: Perspective on ocular toxicity of presurgical skin preparations utilizing Chlorhexidine Gluconate/Hibiclens/Chloraprep

Background:

Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG), Hibiclens (4% CHG with 4% Isopropyl Alcohol Detergent), and Chloraprep (i.e. labeled CHG-based solutions), utilized as preoperative surgical preparatory solutions may all cause severe oculotoxicity and ototoxicity. Alternatively, 10% Povidone-Iodine (PI) solutions without detergent demonstrate minimal toxic effects on the eyes and ears.

Methods:

Based on studies from 1984 to 2021, we compared the safety/efficacy of CHG-based versus PI-based solutions utilized for presurgical skin preparation near the cornea/eyes and ears (i.e., predominantly for cranial or cervical spine surgery).

Results:

Some studies documented that even minimal exposure (i.e., “splash risk”) during face/neck skin preparation with CHG-based solutions could result in irreversible corneal injury and ototoxicity. Within minutes to hours, CHG-based non-detergent solutions posed the risks of; corneal epithelial edema, anterior stromal edema, conjunctival chemosis, bullous keratopathy, and de-epithelialization. Notably, even occlusive dressings like Tegaderm could not protect against CHG penetration. Alternatively, PI-based solutions posed no to minimal ocular and/or ototoxicity, while often demonstrating comparable protection against surgical site infections (SSI).

Conclusion:

Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG), Hibiclens, and Chloraprep (i.e. CHG-based solutions) are often used as skin preparations near the face/eyes/spine (i.e., particularly anterior/posterior cervical procedures). However, if these solutions come in contact with the eyes, corneal irritation, abrasions, and even blindness may result. Alternatively, PI non-detergent solutions demonstrate safety/minimal oculotoxicity/ototoxicity, while frequently showing comparable efficacy against SSI.

Review, analysis, and education of antiseptic related ocular injury in the surgical settings

Preoperative skin antiseptic preparation is the gold standard for prevention of surgical infection. However, improper use of antiseptics may lead to severe ocular damage. Currently, the most common surgical antiseptics can be divided into aqueous-based and alcohol-based disinfectants, with chlorhexidine and iodine/iodophors being the two major components. Chlorhexidine has a persistent antimicrobial effect and is resistant to neutralization by blood or organic products in surgical wounds. Nevertheless, due to its toxicity to the ears, meninges, and eyes, application of chlorhexidine should be prohibited in these surgical fields. Iodine/iodophor is better tolerated by the ocular surface and is the recommended antiseptic for ophthalmic or head and neck surgeries close to the periocular area. Alcohol is less pricey and has a rapid antiseptic effect, though its desiccating effect and flammability restrict the use in mucosal or laser surgeries. The single or combined use of these antiseptics may inadvertently induce severe ocular damage, especially during time-consuming head and neck surgeries with prone, hyperextension, or lateral tilt positions, or surgeries under general anesthesia. Apart from the choice of antiseptics, appropriate selection and attachment of bio-occlusive dressings are key to avoiding antiseptic-related ocular injuries. In this review, we provided a comprehensive summary of the characteristics of antiseptics used in surgical settings and the possible mechanisms and outcomes of antiseptic-related ocular injuries. The prevention, diagnosis, and acute management of these complications were also discussed.