The treatment of systemic candidiasis in neonates with oral fluconazole

Invasive candidiasis and candidaemia in neonates and children: update on current guidelines

Invasive candidiasis (IC) and candidaemia are leading causes of infectious morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised paediatric patients and those admitted to intensive care units. Despite improvements in diagnosis, prevention and treatment, both mortality rates and the economic burden of disease still remain high. To address this issue, several international societies and organisations have proposed guidelines for the management of IC/candidaemia in both neonates and children. In this article, we review current recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the European Conference on Infection in Leukaemia, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and the German Speaking Mycological Society/Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy for the management and prevention of IC/candidaemia in children and neonates.

Safety of fluconazole in paediatrics: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the safety of fluconazole in neonates and other paediatric age groups by identifying adverse events (AEs) and drug interactions associated with treatment.

METHODS

A search of EMBASE (1950-January 2012), MEDLINE (1946-January 2012), the Cochrane database for systematic reviews and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1982-2012) for any clinical study about fluconazole use that involved at least one paediatric patient (≤17 years) was performed. Only articles with sufficient quality of safety reporting after patients' exposure to fluconazole were included.

RESULTS

We identified 90 articles, reporting on 4,209 patients, which met our inclusion criteria. In total, 794 AEs from 35 studies were recorded, with hepatotoxicity accounting for 378 (47.6 %) of all AEs. When fluconazole was compared with placebo and other antifungals, the relative risk (RR) of hepatotoxicity was not statistically different [RR 1.36, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.87-2.14, P = 0.175 and RR 1.43, 95 % CI 0.67-3.03, P = 0.352, respectively]. Complete resolution of hepatoxicity was achieved by 84 % of patients with follow-up available. There was no statistical difference in the risk of gastrointestinal events of fluconazole compared with placebo and other antifungals (RR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.12-5.60, P = 0.831 and RR 1.23, 95 %CI 0.87-1.71, P = 0.235, respectively). There were 41 drug withdrawals, 17 (42 %) of which were due to elevated liver enzymes. Five reports of drug interactions occurred in children.

CONCLUSION

Fluconazole is relatively safe for paediatric patients. Hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity are the most common adverse events. It is important to be aware that drug interactions with fluconazole can result in significant toxicity.

Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we stand after 15 years?

Candida spp. are responsible for most of the fungal infections in humans. Available since 1990, fluconazole is well established as a leading drug in the setting of prevention and treatment of mucosal and invasive candidiasis. Fluconazole displays predictable pharmacokinetics and an excellent tolerance profile in all groups, including the elderly and children. Fluconazole is a fungistatic drug against yeasts and lacks activity against moulds. Candida krusei is intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, and other species, notably Candida glabrata, often manifest reduced susceptibility. Emergence of azole-resistant strains as well as discovery of new antifungal drugs (new triazoles and echinocandins) have raised important questions about its use as a first line drug. The aim of this review is to summarize the main available data on the position of fluconazole in the prophylaxis or curative treatment of invasive Candida spp. infections. Fluconazole is still a major drug for antifungal prophylaxis in the setting of transplantation (solid organ and bone marrow), intensive care unit, and in neutropenic patients. Prophylactic fluconazole still has a place in HIV-positive patients in viro-immunological failure with recurrent mucosal candidiasis. Fluconazole can be used in adult neutropenic patients with systemic candidiasis, as long as the species identified is a priori susceptible. Among non-neutropenic patients with candidaemia fluconazole is one of the first line drugs for susceptible species. Cases reports and uncontrolled studies have also reported its efficacy in the setting of osteoarthritis, endophthalmitis, meningitis, endocarditis and peritonitis caused by Candida spp. among immunocompetent adults. In paediatrics, fluconazole is a well tolerated and major prophylactic drug for high-risk neonates, as well as an alternative treatment for neonatal candidiasis. Importantly 15 years after its introduction in the antifungal armamentarium, fluconazole is still a first line treatment option in several cases of invasive candidiasis. Its prophylactic use should however be limited to selected high-risk patients to limit the risk of emergence of azole-resistant strains.

Antifungal chemotherapeutics

This review addresses trends in outcome and risk factors for invasive fungal infections, current antifungal agents and new therapeutic strategies. Current prospects for new therapies rest upon caspofungin, the first of a new class of antifungal molecules, the echinocandins, and new extended-spectrum azoles, voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole. Approval by the Food and Drug Administration of the USA and the European Medicine Agency was given in 2001-2002 to voriconazole and caspofungin. Voriconazole clearly demonstrated a decrease in mortality in invasive aspergillosis and fusariosis fungal infections.

Randomized comparison between fluconazole and itraconazole for the treatment of candidemia in a pediatric intensive care unit: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

Candida bloodstream infections have shown an increase in hospitalized patients, especially those receiving intensive care. The effectiveness of various azoles, especially itraconazole, in treatment of candidemia has not been fully evaluated. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of enterally administered itraconazole vs. fluconazole in treatment of candidemia.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit of a referral and teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

Forty-three pediatric patients with candidemia,

INTERVENTION

Patients received either fluconazole (n = 22) or itraconazole (n = 21), about 10 mg/kg orally or through a gastric tube, and were monitored for clinical and mycological cure (sterile fungal blood culture), blood counts, and liver and renal functions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of two groups were comparable. The cure rate was similar in both the groups: itraconazole 17 of 21 (81%) and fluconazole 18 of 22 (82%). Crude mortality rate (itraconazole 9.5% and fluconazole 13.6%) was also comparable in two groups of patients. The frequency of electrolyte disturbance was very low and similar in both the groups. Blood urea, creatinine, liver enzymes, and serum bilirubin were not adversely affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole was as effective as fluconazole in nosocomial candidiasis in children receiving intensive care and was devoid of serious side effects.

Antifungals in systemic neonatal candidiasis

Fungal infections are common in the newborn period, especially among premature neonates, and are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Currently, three classes of antifungals are commonly used in the treatment of systemic fungal infections in neonates: the polyene macrolides (e.g. amphotericin B [deoxycholate and lipid preparations]); the azoles (e.g. fluconazole); and the fluorinated pyrimidines (e.g. flucytosine). The echinocandins (e.g. caspofungin and micafungin) are a newer class of antifungals which shows promise in this population.The available kinetic data on amphotericin B deoxycholate in neonates are derived from very small studies and exhibit considerable variability. There are no kinetic data available for the use of lipid preparations in this population and, again, much has been inferred from adult studies. The information available for flucytosine is also limited but appears similar to what is observed in adults. Fluconazole has the most neonatal pharmacokinetic data, which show slightly less variability than the other antifungals. Genomic factors which affect the metabolism of amphotericin B and fluconazole may explain some of the observed variability. Most of the data for the efficacy of antifungal drugs in neonates are derived from retrospective studies and case reports. The data for amphotericin B deoxycholate and flucytosine are limited. There are more data for the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and for fluconazole in this population. These support the use of these drugs in neonates, but because of their largely noncomparative nature they can not define the optimal dosage or duration of therapy. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is primarily nephrotoxic. It also induces electrolyte abnormalities and is to a lesser degree cardiotoxic. This toxicity in neonates appears similar to published data in older children and adults. While the lipid preparations of amphotericin B owe their existence to a presumed decrease in toxicity, the observed toxicity in neonates appears to be equal to that seen with the deoxycholate, although it should be noted that the lipid preparations are usually given at much higher dosages. Fluconazole toxicity appears to be milder and less frequent in this population than is seen with amphotericin B. In the final analysis, we do not have sufficient data to define the pharmacokinetic profiles, optimal dose or duration of therapy, or toxicity for any of these compounds in neonates. Further studies are necessary if the optimisation of antifungal therapy in this population is to continue.

Infections néonatales à Candida

Candida infections in newborns are classified, as bacterial ones, in early onset or maternofoetal infections and late onset diseases, primitive and nosocomial. Candida infections are responsible of less than 1% of early onset sepsis. Their diagnosis is facilitated by suggestive cutaneous lesions which can be associated or not with systemic infection. Candida nosocomial infections are the most frequent, 7% in premature infants < 1500 g; they are associated with a central venous catheter or with cutaneous infection in extremely low birth weight infants. C. albicans is the predominant species in maternofoetal infections, contrary to nosocomial ones where C. parapsilosis is predominant, 60%. Both species are sensitive to fluconazole. Amphotericin B and its lipidic derivative Ambisome is the reference drug. Because of its lower toxicity and simplicity of administration, fluconazole is preferable for sensitive species. Its prophylactic use in colonized premature infants has been recently proposed.

The use of fluconazole and itraconazole in the treatment of Candida albicans infections: a review

Candida albicans is responsible for most fungal infections in humans. Fluconazole is well established as a first-line management option for the treatment and prophylaxis of localized and systemic C. albicans infections. Fluconazole exhibits predictable pharmacokinetics and is effective, well tolerated and suitable for use in most patients with C. albicans infections, including children, the elderly and those with impaired immunity. Prophylactic administration of fluconazole can help to prevent fungal infections in patients receiving cytotoxic cancer therapy. The increasing use of fluconazole for the long-term prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent oral candidosis in AIDS patients has led to the emergence of C. albicans infections that are not responsive to conventional doses. Second-line therapy with a wider spectrum antifungal, such as itraconazole, should be sought if treatment with fluconazole fails. A solution formulation of itraconazole has recently been introduced to overcome the poor and variable absorption of its original capsule formulation. Efficacy and tolerability studies in HIV-positive or immunocompromised patients with C. albicans infections have shown that, although itraconazole solution is as effective as fluconazole, it is less well tolerated as first-line therapy. Itraconazole solution can be effective in AIDS patients with C. albicans infections that are non-responsive to fluconazole. No efficacy or tolerability data are available on the use of itraconazole solution in children or the elderly.