Evaluation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness by monitoring of transcutaneous oxygen tension and arterial oxygen saturation during methacholine challenge in asthmatic children

Methacholine challenge test by wheezing and oxygen saturation in preschool children with asthma

Methacholine challenge test (MCT) performed with spirometry is a commonly used test to evaluate bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in children. However, preschoolers do not usually collaborate.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the usefulness of MCT through clinical evaluation (wheezing auscultation and decreased pulse arterial oxygen saturation [SpO2]) in recurrent wheezing preschoolers with asthma, in comparison to healthy controls.

METHODS

We performed the MCT (modified Cockroft method) on healthy and on asthmatic preschoolers. The end point was determined by the presence of wheezing in the chest and/or tracheal auscultation (PCw) and/or a decrease in SpO2 of ≥5 from the baseline value (PCSpO2). Maximal methacholine concentration was 8 mg/ml.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 65 children: 32 healthy and 33 asthmatic children. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. The median methacholine doses for PCw and for PCSpO2 were significantly lower among asthmatic than healthy children: 0.5 mg/ml (0.25-0.5 mg/ml) vs. 2 mg/ml (1-4 mg/ml), respectively, p<0.001; and 0.25 mg/ml (0.25-0.5 mg/ml) and 2 mg/ml (0.5-4 mg/ml), respectively, p<0.001. The best cut-off point of PCw was observed at a methacholine concentration of 0.5 mg/ml (AUC=0.72 [95% CI=0.66-0.77]), its sensitivity was 91%, specificity 43%, PPV 16% and NPV 98%. For PCSpO2 the best cut-off point was a methacholine concentration of 1 mg/ml (AUC=0.85 [95% CI 0.81-0.89]), with sensitivity of 80%, specificity 74%, PPV 49%, and NPV 92%. There were no adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

MCT using clinical parameters such as wheezing auscultation and SpO2 measurement could be a useful and safe test to confirm BHR among preschoolers.

Comparison of phenotypes of childhood wheeze and cough in 2 independent cohorts

BACKGROUND

Among children with wheeze and recurrent cough there is great variation in clinical presentation and time course of the disease. We previously distinguished 5 phenotypes of wheeze and cough in early childhood by applying latent class analysis to longitudinal data from a population-based cohort (original cohort).

OBJECTIVE

To validate previously identified phenotypes of childhood cough and wheeze in an independent cohort.

METHODS

We included 903 children reporting wheeze or recurrent cough from an independent population-based cohort (validation cohort). As in the original cohort, we used latent class analysis to identify phenotypes on the basis of symptoms of wheeze and cough at 2 time points (preschool and school age) and objective measurements of atopy, lung function, and airway responsiveness (school age). Prognostic outcomes (wheeze, bronchodilator use, cough apart from colds) 5 years later were compared across phenotypes.

RESULTS

When using a 5-phenotype model, the analysis distinguished 3 phenotypes of wheeze and 2 of cough as in the original cohort. Two phenotypes were closely similar in both cohorts: Atopic persistent wheeze (persistent multiple trigger wheeze and chronic cough, atopy and reduced lung function, poor prognosis) and transient viral wheeze (early-onset transient wheeze with viral triggers, favorable prognosis). The other phenotypes differed more between cohorts. These differences might be explained by differences in age at measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the same method to 2 different cohorts, we consistently identified 2 phenotypes of wheeze (atopic persistent wheeze, transient viral wheeze), suggesting that these represent distinct disease processes. Differences found in other phenotypes suggest that the age when features are assessed is critical and should be considered carefully when defining phenotypes.

Utility of cough response during hypertonic histamine challenge in diagnosing asthma

Airway responses to bronchial provocation tests are traditionally assessed with spirometry which necessitates considerable patient co-operation. It has been shown that coughing during bronchial provocation tests is related to the degree of bronchoconstriction which, in turn, is independent of patient co-operation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of coughing induced by the hypertonic histamine challenge in the differential diagnosis of asthma in a clinically relevant patient population. The study population consisted of 25 healthy volunteers, 30 asthmatics, and 82 non-asthmatic subjects with respiratory symptoms due to other diseases. Hypertonic histamine solution was administered with ultrasonic nebuliser with the challenges being videotaped. The cough response was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the final histamine concentration administered (CCR). The geometric mean (95% CI) of CCR for asthmatics was 302 (166-562) coughs per mg/ml, for the symptomatic controls 29.5 (20.0-43.7) coughs per mg/ml (p<0.001) and for the healthy controls 6.61 (3.02-14.5) (p<0.001) coughs per mg/ml. According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off point for logCCR was 2.22, with the specificity and sensitivity to detect asthma among symptomatic subjects being 86% and 70%. Cough response to hyperosmolar challenge may be useful in the differential diagnosis of airway diseases.