Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent asthma education program for Head Start staff

Impact of a mobile-app assisted self-management educational intervention on the scores of asthma control test (ACT) questionnaire among young asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Mobile phone apps have reached almost all sectors of everyday modern human life, including health promotion and patient education intervention. Regarding asthma self-management programs, apps are considered to be a potential learning medium for patients with asthma, especially young patients, due to their effectiveness in improving patients' knowledge and, consequently, the level of asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the AsmaDroid® mobile app, as compared with conventional educational methods, as a self-management educational intervention tool for improving asthma control among young patients.

METHODS

To determine the app's effectiveness, the study involved 140 participants from various backgrounds and applied a quasi-experimental method using a two-group pretest and posttest with a control group design. Specifically, the treatment groups received the AsmaDroid® app as a learning medium, while the control groups used conventional methods (e.g., books, posters, videos, and social media). Before and after a 4-week intervention period, all the participants of both groups were asked to complete the Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The results of this study revealed a significant difference of +1.4 (p < 0.0001) in the pretest and posttest scores of the ACT questionnaire from the intervention group, while no difference was found in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, this study concluded that mobile app-assisted self-management educational intervention significantly improved the scores of the ACT questionnaire among young asthmatic patients.

Understanding decision-making and educational need in the management of pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: analysis of a US-based clinician survey

BACKGROUND

Asthma creates a substantial burden on the pediatric healthcare system, particularly by those with moderate-to-severe disease. As few studies have been published specific to clinician evaluation and management of this population, this analysis serves to begin to identify educational needs and potential clinical impact.

METHODS

We conducted a case-based survey of US general pediatric (n = 227), allergy (n = 158), and pediatric pulmonology (n = 70) clinicians to understand the current approach to management of pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

RESULTS

Results show inconsistencies in guideline adherence, identification of disease severity and control, referral practices, and knowledge of phenotypes, which may impact clinical decision making. While most clinicians refer to guidelines when managing pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, there is no preferred set, and they find the guidelines to be moderately useful. General pediatricians are more likely than specialists to have difficulty distinguishing control and severity and may not be familiar with the concept of asthma phenotype. Most surveyed pediatricians indicated they refer patients to a specialist, but did not always do so in the cases. Clinicians have little consensus on the best approach to manage patients with uncontrolled symptoms after optimized therapy. Many clinicians may have uncertainty about how elevated eosinophils or FeNO could affect patient management. Further, there may be gaps in incorporating parents and pediatric patients into shared decision-making in their care.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the needs of those managing patients with moderate-to-severe asthma is critical to developing effective continuing education activities to improve patient outcomes.

Effectiveness of a Home- and School-Based Asthma Educational Program for Head Start Children With Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease, with Black children experiencing worse morbidity and mortality. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of efficacious interventions in community settings that have the greatest likelihood of serving at-risk families.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a multilevel home- and school (Head Start)-based asthma educational program compared with a Head Start-based asthma educational program alone in improving asthma outcomes in children.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANT

This randomized clinical trial included 398 children with asthma enrolled in Head Start preschool programs in Baltimore, Maryland, and their primary caregivers. Participants were recruited from April 1, 2011, to November 31, 2016, with final data collection ending December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from March 18 to August 30, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Asthma Basic Care (ABC) family education combined with Head Start asthma education compared with Head Start asthma education alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Asthma control as measured by the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) score.

RESULTS

Among the 398 children included in the analysis (247 boys [62.1%]; mean [SD] age, 4.2 [0.7] years), the ABC plus Head Start program improved asthma control (β = 6.26; 95% CI, 1.77 to 10.75; P < .001), reduced courses of oral corticosteroids (β = -0.61; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.09; P = .02), and reduced hospitalizations (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.61; P < .001) during a 12-month period.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, combined family and preschool asthma educational interventions improved asthma control and reduced courses of oral corticosteroids and hospitalizations. Multilevel interventions implemented in community settings that serve low-income minority families may be key to reducing disparities in asthma outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01519453.