Predictors of future exacerbations in a multi-ethnic Asian population with asthma

Asthma management with triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination to reduce the risk of exacerbation: an umbrella review compliant with the PRIOR statement

INTRODUCTION

According to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) should be considered as add-on therapy in patients with asthma that remains uncontrolled, despite treatment with medium-dose (MD) or high-dose (HD) inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations. In patients ≥ 18 years, LAMA may be added in triple combination with an ICS and a LABA. To date, the precise efficacy of triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination remains uncertain concerning the impact on exacerbation risk in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Therefore, an umbrella review was performed to systematically summarize available data on the effect of triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination on the risk of asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

An umbrella review has been performed according to the PRIOR statement.

RESULTS

The overall results obtained from 5 systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination reduces the risk of asthma exacerbation. HD-ICS showed a greater effect particularly in reducing severe asthma exacerbation, especially in patients with evidence of type 2 inflammation biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this umbrella review suggest an optimization of ICS dose in triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination, based on the severity of exacerbation and type 2 biomarkers expression.

Medication use in uncontrolled pediatric asthma: Results from the SysPharmPediA study

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled pediatric asthma has a large impact on patients and their caregivers. More insight into determinants of uncontrolled asthma is needed. We aim to compare treatment regimens, inhaler techniques, medication adherence and other characteristics of children with controlled and uncontrolled asthma in the: Systems Pharmacology approach to uncontrolled Paediatric Asthma (SysPharmPediA) study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

145 children with moderate to severe doctor-diagnosed asthma (91 uncontrolled and 54 controlled) aged 6-17 years were enrolled in this multicountry, (Germany, Slovenia, Spain, and the Netherlands) observational, case-control study. The definition of uncontrolled asthma was based on asthma symptoms and/or exacerbations in the past year. Patient-reported adherence and clinician-reported medication use were assessed, as well as lung function and inhalation technique. A logistic regression model was fitted to assess determinants of uncontrolled pediatric asthma.

RESULTS

Children in higher asthma treatment steps had a higher risk of uncontrolled asthma (OR (95%CI): 3.30 (1.56-7.19)). The risk of uncontrolled asthma was associated with a larger change in FEV₁% predicted post and pre-salbutamol (OR (95%CI): 1.08 (1.02-1.15)). Adherence and inhaler techniques were not associated with risk of uncontrolled asthma in this population.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that children with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were treated in higher treatment steps compared to their controlled peers, but still showed a higher reversibility response to salbutamol. Self-reported adherence and inhaler technique scores did not differ between controlled and uncontrolled asthmatic children. Other determinants, such as environmental factors and differences in biological profiles, may influence the risk of uncontrolled asthma in this moderate to severe asthmatic population.

Preventing unscheduled hospitalisations from asthma: a retrospective cohort study using routine primary and secondary care data in the UK (The PUSH-Asthma Study)-protocol paper

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease in children and adults. Asthma results in significant disease-related morbidity, healthcare costs and, in some cases, death. Despite efforts through implementation of national guidelines to improve asthma care, the UK has one of the highest asthma-related morbidity and mortality rates in the western world. New approaches are necessary to prevent asthma attacks in children and adults. The objectives of this study are to assess the association between demographic and clinical factors and asthma-related hospital admissions in children and adults, describe the epidemiology of asthma phenotypes among hospital attenders, and externally validate existing asthma risk prediction models.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a retrospective cohort study of children and adults with asthma. Data will be extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database, which holds anonymised primary care data for over 13 million actively registered patients and covers approximately 19% of the UK population. The primary outcome will be asthma-related hospital admissions. The secondary outcomes will be prescriptions of short courses of oral corticosteroids (as a surrogate measure for asthma exacerbations), a composite outcome measure including hospital admissions and prescriptions of short courses of oral corticosteroids and delivery of asthma care management following hospital discharge. The primary analysis will use a Poisson regression model to assess the association between demographic and clinical risk factors and the primary and secondary outcomes. Latent class analysis will be used to identify distinct subgroups, which will further our knowledge on potential phenotypes of asthma among patients at high risk of asthma-related hospital admissions. A Concordance statistic (C-statistic) and logistic regression model will also be used to externally validate existing risk prediction models for asthma-related hospitalisations to allow for the optimal model to be identified and evaluated provide evidence for potential use of the optimal performing risk prediction model in primary care.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the CPRD Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (reference number: 21_000512). Findings from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at national and international conferences.

Asthma symptoms and respiratory infections in Malaysian students-associations with ethnicity and chemical exposure at home and school

Little is known on respiratory effects of indoor chemicals in the tropics. We investigated associations between asthma and respiratory infections in Malaysian students and chemical exposure at home and at school. Moreover, we investigated differences in home environment between the three main ethnic groups in Malaysia (Malay, Chinese, Indian). Totally, 462 students from 8 junior high schools in Johor Bahru participated (96% participation rate). The students answered a questionnaire on health and home environment. Climate, carbon dioxide (CO₂), volatile organic compounds (VOC), formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) were measured inside and outside the schools. Multilevel logistic regression was applied to study associations between exposure and health. Totally 4.8% were smokers, 10.3% had wheeze, 9.3% current asthma, and had 18.8% any respiratory infection in the past 3 months. Malay students had more dampness or mould (p < 0.001), more environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) (p < 0.001) and more cats (p < 0.001) at home as compared to Chinese or Indian students. Wheeze was associated with ethnicity (p = 0.02; lower in Indian), atopy (p = 0.002), current smoking (p = 0.02) and recent indoor painting at home (p = 0.03). Current asthma was associated with ethnicity (p = 0.001; lower in Chinese) and para-dichlorobenzene in classroom air (p = 0.008). Respiratory infections were related to atopy (p = 0.002), ethylbenzene (p = 0.02) and para-dichlorobenzene (p = 0.01) in classroom air. Para-dichlorobenzene is used in Asia against insects. In conclusion, chemical emissions from recent indoor painting at home can increase the risk of wheeze. In schools, para-dichlorobenzene can increase the risk of current asthma and respiratory infections while ethylbenzene can increase the risk of respiratory infections.

Uncontrolled asthma across GINA treatment steps 2 - 5 in a large US patient cohort

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in treatment, asthma remains uncontrolled in many patients, with increased risk of exacerbation and associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). We describe patient characteristics, exacerbations, asthma control, and HCRU using GINA treatment step (GS) as a proxy for asthma severity. .

METHODS

Using a large, US, health-claims database, 4 longitudinal cohorts of 517,738 patients in GS2-5, including a subgroup of patients with baseline eosinophil (EOS) counts, were analyzed retrospectively (study period 2010 - 2016). Index for each cohort was patients' first time entering the GS, determined by first claim of first regimen. Uncontrolled asthma was defined according to published criteria as a multi-dimensional measure that includes number of exacerbations. Key variables including, baseline characteristics, post-index exacerbations, and HCRU (all-cause and asthma-specific events) are summarized by descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was reported in 19.8% patients in GS2, 44.8% in GS3, 49.3% in GS4, and 58.6% in GS5. Annualized mean (SD) rates of exacerbation 12 months post-index generally increased across GS2-5 (0.26 [0.86], 0.32 [0.79], 0.36 [0.83], 0.29 [0.86], respectively). HCRU also increased with increasing GS, with higher HCRU among the uncontrolled cohort within each GS. In patients with EOS ≥300 cells/µL, uncontrolled asthma also increased with increasing GS (21.8%, 43.9%, 50.5%, 67.2% for GS2-5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This large database study provides real-world evidence of the substantial degree of uncontrolled asthma in US clinical practice across GS, supporting calls for better asthma management. Healthcare burden tends to increase with lack of control in all groups, highlighting the need for improved patient education, adherence, access, and treatment optimization.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Association between adherence and severe asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between adherence levels and severe asthma exacerbation.

DESIGN

A systematic search was performed from inception to November 2018 on the following databases: PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and case-control studies that investigated the impact of adherence to controller medications on severe asthma exacerbation were included in the analysis. Data extraction was undertaken by 2 reviewers, and all studies were assessed for their qualities using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCT and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and case-control studies. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Severe asthma exacerbation.

RESULTS

From 8061 articles, 8 studies were included in quantitative synthesis. The meta-analyses revealed that the odds of exacerbation among the patients with 80% or more adherence were lowered by 47% (odds ratio 0.53 [95% CI 0.42-0.66], P < 0.001) compared with less than 80%. When compared with less than 20% adherence, a 33% reduction in the odds (0.67 [0.53-0.86], P = 0.001) was associated with the patients achieving 50% or more, whereas a decrease in exacerbation was not associated with 20% to 49% adherence (0.94 [0.85-1.04], P = 0.22). In addition, a 2.4-fold increase in the odds (2.4 [2.1-2.7], P < 0.001) was associated with discontinuation of therapy.

CONCLUSION

The highest reduction in the odds of exacerbation was associated with patients achieving 80% or more adherence, and the odds also reduced among those with 50% or more adherence, whereas a substantial increase in exacerbation was associated with discontinuation of therapy.

Systematic Assessment of Difficult-to-Treat Asthma: Principles and Perspectives

Difficult-to-treat asthma affects a minority of adults and children with asthma but represents a challenging mix of misdiagnosis, multimorbidity, inadequate self-management, severe airway pathobiology, and treatment complications. Management of these patients extends beyond asthma pharmacotherapy, because multiple other patient-related domains need to be addressed as well. Such complexity can hinder adequate clinical assessment even when performed in specialist practice. Systematic assessment undertaken by specialized multidisciplinary teams brings a broad range of resources to bear on patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. Although the concept of systematic assessment is not new, practices vary considerably and implementation is not universal. Nevertheless, assessment protocols are already in place in several institutions worldwide, and outcomes after such assessments have been highly encouraging. This review discusses the rationale, components, and benefits of systematic assessment, outlining its clinical utility and the available evidence for improved outcomes. It describes a range of service configurations and assessment approaches, drawing examples from severe asthma centers around the world to highlight common essential elements. It also provides a framework for establishing such services and discusses practical considerations for implementation.