Eosinophil cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in early childhood wheezing: is it predictive of future asthma?

Au nanorod assembly for sensitive SERS detection of airway inflammatory factors in sputum

In this paper, we demonstrate a surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) biosensor based on the self-assembly of gold nanorods (AuNRs) for the specific detection of airway inflammatory factors in diluted sputum. The AuNR surface was modified with an antibody that was able to specifically recognize an airway inflammatory factor, interleukin-5 (IL-5), so that a end-to-end self-assembly system could be obtained, resulting in an order of magnitude amplification of the Raman signal and greatly improved sensitivity. Meanwhile, the outer layer of the biosensor was coated with silicon dioxide, which improved the stability of the system and facilitated its future applications. When the detected concentration was in the range of 0.1-50 pg/mL, the SERS signal generated by the sensor showed a good linear relationship with the IL-5 concentration. Moreover, it had satisfactory performance in diluted sputum and clinical subjects with asthma, which could achieve sensitive detection of the airway inflammatory factor IL-5. Overall, the developed biosensor based on the SERS effect exhibited the advantages of rapid and sensitive detecting performance, which is suitable for monitoring airway inflammatory factors in sputum.

Risk factors for recurrent wheezing after bronchiolitis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether there was an association between certain factors in patients with bronchiolitis and recurrent wheezing in childhood.

METHOD

In 2021 we tracked children hospitalized for bronchiolitis at Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital in 2017. The patients were classified into recurrent wheezing group (RWG) and non-recurrent wheezing group (NRWG). Possible risk factors including maternal age, school-age siblings, allergic history, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, atopic family history, severity of the condition, duration of hospitalization, nasopharyngeal secretions culture, blood eosinophil counts, FeNO and skin prick test were compared between the two groups. Continuous variables were analyzed by independent sample t-test for normal distribution and Mann-Whitney U-test for non-normal distribution. Categorical variables were tested using chi-square tests. Multifactor analysis was conducted by stepwise logistics regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total 167 participants were included, of which 26 and 141 were in RWG and NRWG respectively. In RWG children represented higher maternal age (P = 0.02) and greater probability of allergic history, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, atopic family history (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0,3.7, 7.8, 10.9 respectively, P < 0.01). However, school-age siblings, severity of the condition, duration of hospitalization, blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and skin prick test results seemed unrelated to recurrent wheezing. In the subgroup analysis of nasopharyngeal secretion culture, there were more Moraxella catarrhalis-positive in RWG(P = 0.043). Atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis and atopic family history were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent wheezing.

CONCLUSION

Some children with bronchiolitis will develop recurrent wheezing, and the risk factors are allergic history, Moraxella catarrhalis infection or colonization, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis and atopic family history; the latter three are independent risk factors.

Blood Eosinophils for Prediction of Exacerbation in Preschool Children With Recurrent Wheezing

BACKGROUND

Although clinical features of type 2 inflammation have been associated with poorer longitudinal outcomes in preschool children with recurrent wheezing, it remains difficult to predict which children are at highest risk for poor outcomes during a routine clinical encounter.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that prespecified cut points of blood eosinophil counts would predict exacerbation and treatment response outcomes in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and that prediction could be improved with the addition of a second biomarker.

METHODS

Data from 3 clinical trials of 1,074 preschool children aged 12 to 71 months with recurrent wheezing were merged. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any exacerbation during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the annualized rate of wheezing exacerbations and the occurrence of any exacerbation requiring hospitalization. Exploratory analyses focused on exacerbation outcomes, offline exhaled nitric oxide concentrations, and caregiver-reported asthma control scores after inhaled corticosteroid treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Each blood eosinophil cut point was associated with increased odds of exacerbation, higher exacerbation rates, and greater hospitalization occurrence in preschool children with recurrent wheezing. However, outcome detection was improved in children with more elevated blood eosinophil counts. Addition of a second biomarker of type 2 inflammation improved outcome detection and was further associated with an improved response to initiation of daily inhaled corticosteroids in exploratory analyses. However, the specificity of blood eosinophils was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Although validation studies are warranted, blood eosinophil cut points may be useful for clinical assessment and future studies of exacerbation and treatment response in preschool children with recurrent wheezing.

Benefits and risks of bronchoalveolar lavage in severe asthma in children

Background

Although bronchoscopy can be part of the exploration of severe asthma in children, the benefit of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is unknown. The present study aimed to decipher whether systematic BAL during a flexible bronchoscopy procedure could better specify the characteristics of severe asthma and improve asthma management.

Material and methods

The study took place in two departments of a university hospital in Paris. Children who underwent flexible bronchoscopy for the exploration of severe asthma between April 2017 and September 2019 were retrospectively included.

Results

In total, 203 children were included, among whom 107 had a BAL. BAL cell count was normal in most cases, with an increasing number of eosinophils with age, independently from the atopic status of the patients. Compared with bronchial aspiration only, BAL increased the rate of identified bacterial infection by 1.5. Nonatopic patients had more bacterial infections (p<0.001). BAL induced a therapeutic modification only for azithromycin and omalizumab prescriptions. The practice of a BAL decreased bronchoscopy tolerance (p=0.037), especially in the presence of tracheobronchial malacia (p<0.01) and when performed in a symptomatic patient (p=0.019).

Discussion and conclusion

Although BAL may provide interesting information in characterising severe asthma, in most cases its impact on the patient's management remains limited. Moreover, BAL can be poorly tolerated and should be avoided in the case of tracheobronchial malacia or current asthma symptoms.

Bronchoalveolar lavage can help characterise severe asthma in children. However, it can be poorly tolerated and, in most cases, its impact on the patient's management remains limited.https://bit.ly/39XOlMt

Biologic Treatments for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder

The global COVID-19 pandemic has brought respiratory disease to the forefront of public health, but asthma prevalence has been rising globally for decades. Asthma is mediated by errant immune activation and airway remodeling, but the influences of environment, nutrition, and comorbidities (e.g., asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder-overlap [ACO]) are still poorly understood. Even as a new generation of biologic-based treatments offer better airway control and reductions in mortality, a lack of prophylactic treatments and mechanistic understanding complicates efforts to prevent pathogenesis. This review will explicate and synthesize current knowledge on the effect of ACO and biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab) on pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis.