Small airway inflammation is associated with residual airway hyperresponsiveness in Th2-high asthma

Clinical implications of concentration of alveolar nitric oxide in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough

Asthma is an important cause of subacute cough. The concentration of alveolar nitric oxide (CANO) is a sensitive inflammatory indicator in peripheral airways, and it has received much less attention than the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO₅₀). The main objective of this study was to explore the correlation between CANO and clinical parameters in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough, which might promote understanding of the clinical utility of CANO in these special patient populations. 155 patients with subacute cough were included consecutively, of which 25 were diagnosed as asthmatic. Data for demographic characteristics, FeNO₅₀, CANO, baseline spirometry, bronchial provocation test (or bronchodilation test) and response dose ratio (RDR) were collected. Differences between the asthmatic and non-asthmatic groups were analyzed. Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to evaluate the correlation between FeNO₅₀, CANO and other clinical parameters. In patients with subacute cough, baseline CANO values did not differ between asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients (4.4(1.3, 11.4) versus 4.0(2.1, 6.8) ppb,P> 0.05). Besides, CANO exhibited a stronger association with pulmonary function parameters when compared with FeNO₅₀. For asthmatic subacute cough, CANO was inversely correlated with FEV₁/FVC (ρ= -0.69,P< 0.01) and small airway parameters including MEF25 (ρ= -0.47,P< 0.05) and MMEF (ρ= -0.45,P< 0.05). For non-asthmatic subacute cough, CANO was inversely correlated with MEF25 (ρ= -0.19,P< 0.05) and RDR (ρ= -0.21,P< 0.05). In subacute cough, asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients had similar values of baseline CANO. In both asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough, CANO exhibited a stronger association with pulmonary function parameters when compared with FeNO₅₀. A low CANO value in non-asthmatic subacute cough corresponded to a higher value of RDR, which implied a stronger tendency towards airway responsiveness.

Sex Hormones and Lung Inflammation

Inflammation is a characteristic marker in numerous lung disorders. Several immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, eosinophils, as well as T and B lymphocytes, synthetize and release cytokines involved in the inflammatory process. Gender differences in the incidence and severity of inflammatory lung ailments including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary fibrosis (PF), lung cancer (LC), and infectious related illnesses have been reported. Moreover, the effects of sex hormones on both androgens and estrogens, such as testosterone (TES) and 17β-estradiol (E2), driving characteristic inflammatory patterns in those lung inflammatory diseases have been investigated. In general, androgens seem to display anti-inflammatory actions, whereas estrogens produce pro-inflammatory effects. For instance, androgens regulate negatively inflammation in asthma by targeting type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and T-helper (Th)-2 cells to attenuate interleukin (IL)-17A-mediated responses and leukotriene (LT) biosynthesis pathway. Estrogens may promote neutrophilic inflammation in subjects with asthma and COPD. Moreover, the activation of estrogen receptors might induce tumorigenesis. In this chapter, we summarize the most recent advances in the functional roles and associated signaling pathways of inflammatory cellular responses in asthma, COPD, PF, LC, and newly occurring COVID-19 disease. We also meticulously deliberate the influence of sex steroids on the development and progress of these common and severe lung diseases.

Narrative Review: how long should patients with cough variant asthma or non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis be treated?

The causes of chronic cough can be categorized into eosinophilic and noneosinophilic disorders, and approximately 30% to 50% of people with chronic cough have eosinophilic airway inflammation, the presence of which can be confirmed by sputum eosinophilia or elevated exhaled nitric-oxide levels. Cough variant asthma (CVA) is a phenotype of asthma which lacks wheezing or dyspnea, and consistently one of the most common causes of chronic cough worldwide. CVA and non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB) shares common feature such as chronic dry cough, eosinophilic inflammation, and development of chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) and asthma in a subset of patients. The distinctive characteristic of these conditions is the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness in CVA but not in NAEB. Coughing is responsive to bronchodilators such as beta-agonists in CVA, but such feature has not been clarified in NAEB. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the first-line treatment, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are also effective, in patients with both CVA and NAEB. This review will give an outline of clinical and physiological features, and prognosis and its determinants of CVA and EBNA. Further, the rationale and evidence, despite limited, for the need of long-term treatment will be discussed. The development of airway remodeling due to mechanical stress to the airways exerted by long-standing coughing will also be discussed.