Healthcare resource utilization, expenditures, and productivity in patients with asthma with and without allergies

Health care resource use and costs in patients with food allergies: a United States insurance claims database analysis

AIMS

Food allergies impose a large clinical and financial burden on patients and the health care system. However, little is known about the factors associated with health care resource use and costs. The aim of this study was to investigate health care resource use and costs in individuals with food allergies utilizing health care in the United States.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of insurance claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (indexed from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2022). All-cause and food allergy-related health care resource use, direct medical, and out-of-pocket costs for medical services were estimated for 12 months post-index using International Classification of Diseases [ICD] codes.

RESULTS

Of 355,520 individuals with food allergies continuously enrolled in a health insurance plan for ≥12 months pre- and post-index, 17% had a food allergy-related emergency department visit and 0.9% were hospitalized. The top patient characteristic associated with all-cause and food allergy-related hospitalizations, all-cause costs, and food allergy-related outpatient visit costs was a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Food allergy-related direct medical and out-of-pocket costs were high among patients with a food allergy-related visit. Out-of-pocket cost per patient per year for outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations had an estimated mean of $1631 for patients with food allergy-related visits, which is ∼11% of the total costs for these services ($14,395 per patient per year).

LIMITATIONS

Study limitations are primarily related to the nature of claims databases, including generalizability and reliance on ICD codes. Nevertheless, MarketScan databases provide robust patient-level insights into health care resource use and costs from a large, commercially insured patient population.

CONCLUSION

The health care resource use of patients with food allergies imposes a burden on both the health care system and on patients and their families, especially if patients had comorbidities.

EAACI position paper on the clinical use of the bronchial allergen challenge: Unmet needs and research priorities

Allergic asthma (AA) is a common asthma phenotype, and its diagnosis requires both the demonstration of IgE-sensitization to aeroallergens and the causative role of this sensitization as a major driver of asthma symptoms. Therefore, a bronchial allergen challenge (BAC) would be occasionally required to identify AA patients among atopic asthmatics. Nevertheless, BAC is usually considered a research tool only, with existing protocols being tailored to mild asthmatics and research needs (eg long washout period for inhaled corticosteroids). Consequently, existing BAC protocols are not designed to be performed in moderate-to-severe asthmatics or in clinical practice. The correct diagnosis of AA might help select patients for immunomodulatory therapies. Allergen sublingual immunotherapy is now registered and recommended for controlled or partially controlled patients with house dust mite-driven AA and with FEV1 ≥ 70%. Allergen avoidance is costly and difficult to implement for the management of AA, so the proper selection of patients is also beneficial. In this position paper, the EAACI Task Force proposes a methodology for clinical BAC that would need to be validated in future studies. The clinical implementation of BAC could ultimately translate into a better phenotyping of asthmatics in real life, and into a more accurate selection of patients for long-term and costly management pathways.

Interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control on work productivity and activity impairment: A cross-sectional study

Background: Symptomatic asthma and rhinitis negatively impact patients' work productivity and activity. However, little is known about the potential interaction effect of both asthma and rhinitis control on work productivity and activity impairment. Objective: This study aimed to explore whether there are interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control on work productivity and activity impairment in patients with asthma and with rhinitis. Methods: A total of 206 adult patients were prospectively recruited and were divided into four groups: both poorly controlled (BPC) n = 53), poorly controlled asthma (PCA) with controlled rhinitis (CR) (n = 38), well controlled asthma with uncontrolled rhinitis (n = 43), and both well controlled (BWC) (n = 72) based on the symptom control status of asthma and rhinitis. Work productivity loss and activity impairment, asthma control, and rhinitis control were assessed by using work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire: general health, the asthma control test, and the rhinitis control assessment test, respectively. General linear regression models were used to study the contribution of asthma control, rhinitis control, and the interaction effect on work productivity and activity impairment. Results: Work productivity loss was most frequently reported in patients in the BPC group. Compared with the patients in the BWC group, the patients in the PCA-CR group had significantly higher activity impairment and worse asthma-related quality of life (both p < 0.001). There were significant interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control, which accounted for the increase in presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment (all p < 0.001). Although differences in absenteeism were not significant among the groups, there was a significant interaction effect of control levels accounted for absenteeism (p = 0.035). Conclusion: Distinct interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control reflected a link between upper and lower airways, which indicated that rhinitis control and the interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control cannot be neglected during asthma management.