Atypical asthma in children who present with isolated chest tightness: risk factors and clinical features

Research progress on the pathogenesis of chest tightness variant asthma characterized by chest tightness

Chest tightness variant asthma (CTVA) is an atypical form of asthma with chest tightness as the sole or predominant symptom. The underlying receptors for chest tightness are bronchial C-fibers or rapidly adapting receptors. The nerve impulses are transmitted via the vagus nerve and processed in different regions of the cerebral cortex. Chest tightness is associated with sensory perception, and CTVA patients may have heightened ability to detect subtle changes in lung function, but such sensory perception is unrelated to respiratory muscle activity, lung hyperinflation, or mechanical loading of the respiratory system. Airway inflammation, pulmonary ventilation dysfunction (especially involving small airways), and airway hyperresponsiveness may underlie the sensation of chest tightness. CTVA patients are prone to comorbid anxiety and depression, which share similar central nervous system processing pathways with dyspnea, suggesting a possible neurological basis for the development of CTVA. This article examines the recognition and mechanisms of chest tightness, and explores the pathogenesis of CTVA, focusing on its association with airway inflammation, ventilation dysfunction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and psychosocial factors.

The diagnostic value of bronchial provocation testing combined with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in children with chest tightness-variant asthma (CTVA)

BACKGROUND

Chest tightness-variant asthma (CTVA) is a novel atypical asthma characterized by chest tightness as the sole or primary symptom.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of bronchial provocation testing combined with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in the diagnosis of CTVA in children.

METHODS

This study included 95 children aged 6-14 years with chest tightness as the sole symptom, with a duration of symptoms exceeding 4 weeks. All subjects underwent FeNO measurement, pulmonary function testing, and bronchial provocation testing using the Astograph method. Subjects with positive bronchial provocation testing were classified as the CTVA group, while those with negative results served as the non-CTVA control group.

RESULTS

The lung function of children in both groups was normal. The FeNO level in the CTVA group was (22.35 ± 9.91) ppb, significantly higher than the control group (14.85 ± 5.63) ppb, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The value of FeNO in diagnosing CTVA was analyzed using an ROC curve, with an area under the curve of 0.073 (P < 0.05). The optimal cutoff point for diagnosing CTVA using FeNO was determined to be 18.5 ppb, with a sensitivity of 60.3 % and specificity of 77.8 %. There was a negative correlation between FeNO and Dmin as well as PD15 (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

FeNO can serve as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for CTVA, with the optimal cutoff point for diagnosing CTVA being 18.5 ppb. However, FeNO is not a specific diagnostic marker for CTVA and should be used in conjunction with bronchial provocation testing to enhance its diagnostic value.