Primary care diagnostic and treatment pathways in Dutch women with urinary incontinence

The inhibiting factors of adaptation to urinary incontinence in community-dwelling older adult women: A qualitative study

Urinary incontinence affects the physical, psychological, social and well-being of older adult women and requires adaptation. This study aimed to explain the inhibiting factors of adaptation to urinary incontinence in community-dwelling older adult women. A qualitative content analysis approach was adopted. Participants were 15 older women with urinary incontinence, three family members, and three healthcare team members. Data were collected by individual, in-depth semistructured interviews and analysed using the Graneheim and Lundman approach. The data analysis yielded the theme of neglecting urinary incontinence and the older adult, with four categories of "s silence-inducing beliefs", "worthlessness for the family", "non-adaptation of urban spaces", and "deficiencies in the healthcare service structure". Elucidating the inhibiting factors for older women's adaptation to urinary incontinence will lead to a change in the attitude of social policymakers and healthcare officials. This changes will then facilitate the establishment and adjustment of the necessary infrastructure to overcome these barriers.

Management of urinary incontinence in females by primary care providers: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To describe primary care provider (PCP) practices for the assessment and management of females with urinary incontinence (UI), and appraise these practices relative to recommendations made in high-quality clinical guidelines.

METHODS

Studies were searched in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science) from their respective inception dates to 6 March 2023. All studies describing UI evaluation and management practices used by PCPs for female patients were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected studies assessed their quality and extracted data. A narrative synthesis of included studies was performed to describe practices. Relevant evaluation and management practices were then compared to recommendations that were consistent across current high-quality UI guidelines. Pharmacotherapy, referrals, and follow-ups were reported descriptively only.

RESULTS

A total of 3475 articles were retrieved and, among those, 31 were included in the review. The majority reported a poor-moderate adherence to performing a pelvic examination (reported adherence range: 23-76%; based on eight studies), abdominal examination (0-87%; three studies), pelvic floor muscle assessment (9-36%; two studies), and bladder diary (0-92%; nine studies), while there was high adherence to urine analysis (40-97%; nine studies). For the conservative management of UI, studies revealed a poor-moderate adherence to recommendations for pelvic floor muscle training (5-82%; nine studies), bladder training (2-53%; eight studies) and lifestyle interventions (1-71%; six studies). Regarding pharmacotherapy, PCPs predominantly prescribed antimuscarinics (2-46%; nine studies) and oestrogen (2-77%; seven studies). Lastly, PCPs referred those reporting UI to medical specialists (5-37%; 14 studies). Referrals were generally made <30 days after diagnosis with urologists being the most sought out professional to assess and treat UI.

CONCLUSION

This review revealed poor-moderate adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations. While these findings reflect high variability in reporting, the key message is that most aspects of patient care for female UI provided by PCPs needs to improve.

The relation between usage of an eHealth intervention for stress urinary incontinence and treatment outcomes: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), though a prevalent condition among women, is undertreated in primary care. EHealth with pelvic floor muscle training is an evidence-based alternative to care-as-usual. It is unknown, however, how eHealth usage is related to treatment outcome, and this knowledge is required for general practitioners to implement eHealth in their practice. This study examines the relation between usage of eHealth for SUI and treatment outcomes by examining log data. Baseline factors were also explored for associations with treatment success.

METHOD

In this pre-post study, women with SUI participated in "Baasoverjeblaas.nl", a web-based intervention translated from the Swedish internet intervention "Tät®-treatment of stress urinary incontinence". Usage was based on log data and divided into three user groups (low, intermediate and high). Online questionnaires were sent before, after treatment and at six-months follow-up. The relation between usage and the primary outcome - treatment success (PGI-) - was studied with a binomial logistic regression analysis. Changes in the secondary outcomes - symptom severity (ICIQ-UI SF) and quality of life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) - were studied per user group with linear mixed model analysis.

RESULTS

Included were 515 users with a mean age of 50.5 years (12.0 SD). The majority were low users (n = 295, 57.3%). Treatment success (PGI-I) was reached by one in four women and was more likely in high and intermediate users than in low users (OR 13.2, 95% CI 6.1-28.5, p < 0.001 and OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.35-6.34, p = 0.007, respectively). Symptom severity decreased and quality of life improved significantly over time, especially among high users. The women's expected ability to train their pelvic floor muscles and the frequency of pelvic floor muscle exercises at baseline were associated with treatment success.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that usage of eHealth for SUI is related to all treatment outcomes. High users are more likely to have treatment success. Treatment success is more likely in women with higher expectations and pelvic floor muscle training at baseline. These findings indicate that general practitioners can select patients that would be more likely to benefit from eHealth treatment, and they can enhance treatment effect by stimulating eHealth usage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Landelijk Trial Register NL6570;  https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/25463 .