Percutaneous transcatheter embolization in arterial injuries of the lower limbs

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular therapy versus open surgical repair for the traumatic lower extremity arterial injury

OBJECTIVE

For traumatic lower extremity artery injury, it is unclear whether it is better to perform endovascular therapy (ET) or open surgical repair (OSR). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ET versus OSR for traumatic lower extremity artery injury.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for studies. Cohort studies and case series reporting outcomes of ET or OSR were eligible for inclusion. Robins-I tool and an 18-item tool were used to assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome was amputation. The secondary outcomes included fasciotomy or compartment syndrome, mortality, length of stay and lower extremity nerve injury. We used the random effects model to calculate pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies with low or moderate risk of bias were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that patients who underwent ET had a significantly decreased risk of major amputation (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85; I2=34%) and fasciotomy or compartment syndrome (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.50, I2 = 14%) than patients who underwent OSR. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding all-cause mortality (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.75-1.64, I2 = 31%). Patients with ET repair had a shorter length of stay than patients with OSR repair (MD=-5.06, 95% CI -6.76 to -3.36, I2 = 65%). Intraoperative nerve injury was just reported in OSR patients with a pooled incidence of 15% (95% CI 6%-27%).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular therapy may represent a better choice for patients with traumatic lower extremity arterial injury, because it can provide lower risks of amputation, fasciotomy or compartment syndrome, and nerve injury, as well as shorter length of stay.

Utility of computed tomography angiography in traumatic lower limb injury: Review of clinical impact in level 1 trauma centre

INTRODUCTION

CT angiography (CTA) is efficient and accurate in detecting lower limb vascular injury in the setting of trauma (1-6). Less clear is the in-practice correlation between appropriate indications for these examinations and subsequent clinical impacts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All CT leg angiography acquired from January 2016 through April 2019 were reviewed via retrospective search. Studies not acquired for trauma were excluded. Imaging and reports were reviewed to assess for vascular injury. Electronic medical records were reviewed to assess the presence or absence of classical 'hard' or 'soft' signs of vascular injury and whether vascular intervention was undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 347 lower limb injuries were identified in 273 men and 74 women. Mean age was 41.5 years ranging from 15-95 years. 268 cases were fractures with 177 open injuries. 301 of injuries were secondary to blunt trauma, 31 penetrating injury occurred and 15 cases were ascribed to blast/gunshot injury. 74 (21.3%) studies were deemed to have a positive finding of vascular injury, 249 (71.8%) were reported as negative and 24 (6.9%) were indeterminate. Of the cases with positive findings, 26 underwent intervention (7.4% of all patients undergoing CTA). No patients with negative CTA required intervention, while three (3, 0.8% of total) with indeterminate findings required intervention. Where there were no clinical signs (absence of any hard or soft signs) 249 CTA's were performed and none required any form of intervention.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of clinical signs of vessel injury, CT angiography is unlikely to demonstrate vascular injury requiring intervention in the setting of lower limb trauma.

Endovascular treatment with Viabahn stent-grafts for arterial injury and bleeding at the visceral arteries: initial and midterm results

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the initial and midterm efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) using Viabahn stent-graft (SG) for arterial injury and bleeding (AIB) at the visceral arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with visceral AIB who underwent EVT using Viabahn between January 2017 and February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Technical success, clinical success, peripheral organ ischemia, peri-procedural complications, bleeding-related mortality, 30-day mortality, neck length, re-bleeding, endoleaks, and patency of the SGs at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were evaluated.

RESULTS

EVT using Viabahn was performed in 14 patients (mean age: 68.6 years; 12 males) and 15 arteries. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. The rates of peripheral organ ischemia, peri-procedural complications, bleeding-related mortality, and 30-day mortality were all 0%. The mean neck length was 9.9 mm. No endoleaks or re-bleeding occurred during the follow-up (mean: 732 days). The SG patency was confirmed after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in 78.6%, 78.6%, 78.6%, and 56.1% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

EVT using Viabahn for AIB at the visceral arteries was safe and effective. SG occlusions without ischemia often occurred after 12 months.

[Interventional management of peripheral vascular injuries : From the exclusion indication to the procedure of first choice]

BACKGROUND

Approximately one third of all traumatic peripheral artery injuries affect the upper extremities, while two thirds involve the arteries of the lower extremities. Historically, these injuries were treated by open surgical repair. Nowadays, interventional treatment, such as embolization or stent grafting are increasingly used to treat peripheral artery injuries.

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the current state of interventional treatment options for injuries of peripheral arteries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Selective literature review on the current state of interventional management of peripheral artery injuries.

RESULTS

Although scarce, the available data confirm the efficacy of interventional techniques for managing peripheral artery injuries; however, despite improvements in treatment techniques and interventional devices, not all patients are equally well suited for endovascular or open surgical treatment. Consequently, a multidisciplinary decision on the best treatment has to be made on a case by case basis.

CONCLUSION

According to the promising clinical data, interventional treatment should be considered more often. Diagnostic algorithms need to be adapted accordingly.

Life and Limb: Current Concepts in Endovascular Treatment of Extremity Trauma

Traumatic injury is the leading cause of death worldwide in younger patient populations and extremity trauma with associated vascular injury accounts for many trauma-related deaths. Iatrogenic injury is also a common cause of extremity vascular trauma and the incidence of iatrogenic injury will likely increase as endovascular techniques continue to become more ubiquitous. For many vascular injuries involving the extremities, surgical repair is viewed as the standard of care. Historically, endovascular techniques did not play a role in the treatment of these vascular injuries, rather they were utilized only as part of the diagnostic assessment; however, there is an increasing trend toward endovascular management of extremity vascular trauma. No validated, widely implemented algorithm to select patients for endovascular intervention exists. Transcatheter techniques, however, play an important role in the management of these patients. For arterial injuries, embolization can be used to rapidly achieve hemostasis if the vessel can be sacrificed. More advanced endovascular techniques such as stent-graft placement may be best employed in the context of isolated, proximal extremity injuries, although there is increasing literature supporting the use of advanced techniques for more distal arterial injuries. The management of peripheral venous trauma remains controversial; however, there is growing data describing successful endovascular management of some peripheral venous injuries. The purpose of this article is to review extremity vascular trauma, concepts of injury triage, endovascular techniques, and intraprocedural considerations.

Successful superselective embolization with n-butyl cyanoacrylate for hemorrhage from superficial femoral artery branches following blunt trauma: Three case reports

INTRODUCTION

In blunt traumatic superficial femoral arterial (SFA) injuries, hemorrhage from the branches without injury to the main artery is rare, but can lead to serious complications, such as compartment syndrome affecting the clinical outcomes. Although open surgical repair has been the standard approach to peripheral vascular injuries, endovascular treatment has become more refined and is now an alternative to open surgery, which potentially involves lower morbidity and mortality rates. However, management of arterial injuries, especially when they involve simple bleeding from small branches of the main artery, can be challenging, and the best treatment options for such injuries remains controversial.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Three cases suffered blunt trauma that resulted in hemorrhage from branches of the SFA.

DIAGNOSIS

All patients underwent selective angiography, which demonstrated active extravasation from branches of the SFA.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients were treated using embolization with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA).

OUTCOMES

A post-embolization angiography demonstrated successful hemostasis, with no complications.

CONCLUSION

Superselective catheterization using a coaxial technique with a 5-F curved catheter and the smallest caliber microcatheter, and using a permanent liquid embolic agent, such as NBCA, increases the success rate of embolization for cases of hemorrhage from SFA branches.

Diagnostic workup and endovascular treatment of popliteal artery trauma

Although management paradigms for certain arterial trauma, such as aortic injuries, have moved towards an endovascular approach, the application of endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial injuries continues to be debated. In the realm of peripheral vascular trauma, popliteal arterial injuries remain a devastating condition with significant rates of limb loss. Expedient management is essential and surgical revascularization has been the gold standard. Initial clinical assessment of vascular injury is aided by readily available imaging techniques such as duplex ultrasonography and high resolution computed tomographic angiography. Conventional catheter based angiography, however, remain the gold standard in the determination of vascular injury. There are limited data examining the outcomes of endovascular techniques to address popliteal arterial injuries. In this review, we examine the imaging modalities and current approaches and data regarding endovascular techniques for the management popliteal arterial trauma.

Emergent Endovascular Treatment of Penetrating Trauma: Solid Organ and Extremity

Penetrating injuries can result in acute or subacute arterial injuries of the solid organs or extremities. Although most penetrating injuries are managed conservatively, some patients require endovascular or surgical treatment. Often, the best method for management is controversial and the level of urgency for clinical decision-making is high. Once the decision has been made to intervene, the operator must also determine the best embolization material and technique to use. Not unfrequently, these decisions are made during the course of the procedure. There are numerous embolization agents, each of which serves a very specific purpose, depending on the clinical scenario. Within this article, we will review endovascular treatment indications, contraindications, and endovascular techniques for the treatment of penetrating trauma of the solid organs or extremities.

Pertrochanteric hip fracture: a "routine" fracture with a potentially devastating vascular complication

Vascular injuries in conjunction with low-energy geriatric hip fractures, although uncommon, can be life-threatening. Furthermore, vascular injuries are usually iatrogenic, related to malpositioning of percutaneous reduction aids, aberrant drilling, or poorly sized implants. The authors describe an older woman who had a low-energy pertrochanteric hip fracture. She was noted preoperatively to have an isolated decrease in hemoglobin of 4.7 g/dL in the 2.5 days before surgery. Fracture reduction was performed with closed and percutaneous techniques with the limb free-legged on a radiolucent flat-top table. On reduction of the distal fragment (which was translated proximal and medial), extremely brisk bleeding was noted from the fracture site. Vascular control was obtained with subvastus exposure through the fracture site to gain access to the medial aspect of the thigh. A pulsatile traumatic laceration in the profunda femoral artery was identified, and the ends were ligated. The fracture was then fixated internally. Careful analysis of preoperative imaging showed the distal fracture fragment in immediate proximity to the calcified profunda femoral artery, transecting it at the time of injury and resulting in the significant increase in hemoglobin noted preoperatively. This case is an unusual vascular injury associated with a very common geriatric fracture pattern. To the authors' knowledge, there are only 2 cases in the English language literature of acute vascular injury as a result of a proximal femur fracture fragment. Given the routine nature of geriatric hip fractures, the orthopedic surgeon must be familiar with the appropriate diagnosis and management of this major complication.

Penetrating injury to the buttock: an update

Clinical research on penetrating injury to the buttock is sparse and largely limited to case reports and clinical series. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed overview of literature of the topic and to propose a basic algorithm for management of penetrating gluteal injuries (PGI). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran, and CINAHL databases were employed. Thirty-seven papers were selected and retrieved for overview from 1,021 records. PGI accounts for 2-3 % of all penetrating injuries, with a mortality rate up to 4 %. Most haemodynamically stable patients will benefit from traditional wound care and selective non-operative management. When gluteal fascia injury is confirmed or suspected, a contrast-enhanced CT-scan provides the most accurate injury diagnosis. CT-scan-based angiography and endovascular interventions radically supplement assessment and management of patients with penetrating injury to the major buttock and adjacent extra-buttock arteries. Immediate life-saving damage-control surgery is indicated for patients with hypovolemic shock and signs of internal bleeding. A universal basic management algorithm is proposed. This overview shows that penetrating injury to the buttock should be regarded as a potential life-threatening injury, and therefore, patients with such injuries should be managed in trauma centres equipped with hybrid operating theatres for emergency endovascular and open surgery for multidisciplinary teams operating 24/7.

Evaluation and management of penetrating lower extremity arterial trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline

BACKGROUND

Extremity arterial injury after penetrating trauma is common in military conflict or urban trauma centers. Most peripheral arterial injuries occur in the femoral and popliteal vessels of the lower extremity. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma first published practice management guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of penetrating lower extremity arterial trauma in 2002. Since that time, there have been advancements in the management of penetrating lower extremity arterial trauma. As a result, the Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to develop updated guidelines.

METHODS

A MEDLINE computer search was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov). The search retrieved English language articles regarding penetrating lower extremity trauma from 1998 to 2011. References of these articles were also used to locate articles not identified through the MEDLINE search. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. The topics investigated were prehospital management, diagnostic evaluation, use of imaging technology, the role of temporary intravascular shunts, use of tourniquets, and the role of endovascular intervention.

RESULTS

Forty-three articles were identified. From this group, 20 articles were selected to construct the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

There have been changes in practice since the publication of the previous guidelines in 2002. Expedited triage of patients is possible with physical examination and/or the measurement of ankle-brachial indices. Computed tomographic angiography has become the diagnostic study of choice when imaging is required. Tourniquets and intravascular shunts have emerged as adjuncts in the treatment of penetrating lower extremity arterial trauma. The role of endovascular intervention warrants further investigation.

Value of percutaneous embolotherapy for the management of traumatic vascular limb injury

BACKGROUND

Arterial injuries to the extremities may result in severe hemorrhagic complications. Open surgical repair has been the standard of care for these patients, but endovascular management may be a valuable, less invasive alternative.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy and long-term durability of embolotherapy for the management of hemorrhagic, traumatic vascular injuries in upper and lower limbs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with traumatic or iatrogenic hemorrhagic vascular injuries to the extremities and managed with endovascular embolotherapy in the authors' institution between 1998 and 2010 were included in this retrospective study. Embolization was performed with different embolic materials; technical and long-term clinical outcome was assessed by review of the medical records or by telephone interviews of the referring physicians.

RESULTS

Embolization was performed in 31 patients. In six patients the vascular lesion was traumatic, in the remaining 25 patients the lesion was of iatrogenic origin. Angiographic vascular lesions identified were: contrast extravasation (n = 19, 61%), pseudoaneurysm (n = 8, 26%), and pseudoaneurysm with arteriovenous fistula (n = 3, 10%). Primary and secondary clinical success was obtained in 84% and 97% of cases, respectively. Procedure-related complications occurred in five patients (16%). Most of them were mild. One patient expired 34 days after the procedure due to amputation-stump infection, septicaemia, and multiple organ failure. Long-term outcome showed no recurrent bleeding or other embolization-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Embolotherapy for the management of hemorrhagic, traumatic vascular injuries in upper and lower limbs is relatively safe, very effective without recurrence or other embolization-related symptoms.

Evaluation and management of acute vascular trauma

With the technical advances and the increasing availability of sophisticated imaging equipment, techniques, and protocols, and with continually evolving transcatheter endovascular therapies, minimally invasive imaging and treatment options are being routinely used for the clinical management of trauma patients. Thus, the primary treatment algorithm for managing acute vascular trauma now increasingly involves the interventional radiologist or other endovascular specialist. Endovascular techniques represent an attractive option for both stabilizing and definitively treating patients who have sustained significant trauma, with resultant vascular injury. Endovascular treatment frequently offers the benefit of a focused definitive therapy, even in the presence of massive hemorrhage that allows for preservation of major vessels or injured solid organs and serves as an alternative to an open surgical intervention. This article presents an overview of various endovascular techniques that can be used for trauma patients presenting with vascular injuries.

Blunt injury to the inferior gluteal artery: case report of a rare "near miss" event

Traumatic injuries of the inferior gluteal artery are rare, the majority of which are aneurysms due to sharp or blunt trauma. We report the rare case of a "near miss" event of a patient with an acute hemorrhagic mass in the right buttock caused by blunt trauma to the inferior gluteal artery without "hard" clinical signs of vascular injury. Despite the unusual presentation, diffuse injury of the inferior gluteal artery branches was diagnosed by ultrasonography and angiography. This article highlights the importance of considering an arterial injury following blunt trauma to the buttock with subsequent pain and swelling. Appreciation of this rare injury pattern is necessary in order to facilitate rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Endovascular treatment of lower limb penetrating arterial traumas

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous arterial embolization in patients with penetrating peripheral arterial trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with penetrating peripheral arterial trauma were treated with percutaneous arterial embolization between 2002 and 2007. All injuries were secondary to penetrating stab wounds. Active bleeding (eight patients), recurrent bleeding episodes (one patient), persistent pain and mass (one patient), leg edema, claudication, swelling (one patient), local hyperemia, and pain (one patient) were the presenting symptoms. Microcatheter systems were used for catheterization. We used n-butyl cyanoacrylate mixture as the embolizing agent in all patients.

RESULTS

On angiograms the inferior gluteal artery (one patient), internal pudendal artery (one patient), perforating branch of the profundal femoral artery (six patients), superficial femoral artery (one patient), peroneal artery (two patients), and anterior tibial artery (one patient) were found to be injured. In all patients, the source of arterial bleeding could be reached, and a safe embolization was achieved. Nontarget embolization due to backflow of n-butyl cyanoacrylate mixture was detected in two patients and inguinal hematoma at the puncture site occurred in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that embolization-particularly n-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization-is technically feasible in patients with penetrating peripheral arterial trauma.

Surgical access of the gluteal artery to embolize a previously excluded, expanding internal iliac artery aneurysm

We describe open exposure of the inferior gluteal artery to allow coil embolization on an enlarging internal iliac artery aneurysm after previous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. An 84-year-old man with a stoma had undergone open AAA repair surgery 8 years previously, during which the proximal aortic neck and both proximal external iliac arteries were ligated, followed by an aorta to right external iliac and left common femoral bypass. Eight years later, he complained of abdominal pain, and a computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed persistent flow in the right internal iliac artery with enlargement to 8 cm in diameter. Because prograde access to the internal iliac artery was not possible as a result of the previous exclusion, the inferior gluteal artery was exposed surgically. Coil embolization of the arteries supplying the internal iliac artery aneurysm was successfully performed. The AAA and internal iliac artery aneurysm were treated by the exclusion technique. Eight years after the operation, CT revealed that the iliac artery had expanded to approximately 8 cm in diameter. The patient was placed face down, and a catheter was directly inserted into the internal iliac artery from the inferior gluteal artery. Four embolization coils were placed in the internal iliac artery and its branches. Absence of blood flow and shrinkage of the aneurysm were subsequently confirmed in the aneurysm, as shown by echogram color duplex scanning and CT scanning at 1 year. This technique could also be applicable for persistent blood flow in an internal iliac aneurysm after endovascular AAA repair, and the size of the aneurysm was reduced to approximately 1 cm 1 year after the operation.

Urinary catheter tamponade to control intra-operative bleeding from the superior gluteal artery

Bleeding is a major complication of revision total hip replacement. We report a case where the inflated balloon of a urinary catheter was used to temporarily control intrapelvic bleeding from the superior gluteal artery, while definitive measures for endovascular embolisation were made.