Stage I high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Radiotherapy versus combined therapy in early stages with bulky disease aggressive malignant lymphoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of radiotherapy compared with combined therapy (radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy) in early stages (I and II) in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma and bulky disease. One hundred and thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive either radiotherapy involved field doses range from 40 to 48 Gy (median 44.5 Gy) or the same radiation therapy following chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone, by six cycles. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 58 out of 61 patients (95%) of the patients whose received radiotherapy, that was no different to 91% (63 out of 69 patients) in the combined therapy arm. However, at 10-years event-free survival (EFS) was 68% (95% confidence interval (CI): 61-73%) in the radiotherapy arm that was statistical different to 90% (95% CI: 86-94%) in the combined therapy group (p < 0.01). Overall survival (OS) showed statistical differences: 72% (95% CI 67-76%) in the radiotherapy group compared to 89% (95% CI: 84-93%) in the combined therapy arm (p < 0.01). Toxicity was mild in both groups, at this time, no second neoplasm or acute leukemia has been observed. We conclude that combined therapy appear to be superior in patients with early stages and bulky disease in patients with aggressive malignant lymphoma.

Central nervous system involvement following diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a risk model

BACKGROUND

To determine the incidence and risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) relapse in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient records were registered prospectively in successive patients with NHL admitted to the Norwegian Radium Hospital from 1980 to 1996. A total of 2514 patients had no CNS involvement at diagnosis and were treated according to standard protocols. The incidence and risk factors for CNS progression or relapse were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

In low-grade (L)-NHL, the risk of CNS involvement was low (2.8%). In high-grade (H)-NHL, lymphoblastic and Burkitt's NHL patients had a high risk of CNS recurrence (24.4%) at 5 years, and prophylaxis seemed to reduce this risk. For the other patients with H-NHL, the proportion with CNS involvement at 5 years was 5.2%. Multivariate analysis identified five independent risk factors, each present in >5% of patients: elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, serum albumin <35 g/l, <60 years of age, retroperitoneal lymph node involvement and involvement of more than one extranodal site. If four or five of these risk factors were present, the risk of CNS recurrence was in excess of 25% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of CNS involvement in this study is comparable with the results from other large series. CNS prophylaxis is not recommended in any subgroup of L-NHL. The risk of CNS involvement among patients with either Burkitt's or lymphoblastic lymphomas is considerable and these patients should therefore receive intensive chemotherapy including systemic and intrathecal methotrexate. Patients with other types of H-NHL should receive adequate CNS prophylaxis if at least four of the five risk factors identified are present.