A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in oesophageal cancer

Radical treatment for oesophageal cancer patients unfit for surgery and chemotherapy. A 10-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital

BACKGROUND

Over a 10-year period from 1990, 445 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus were admitted to the Norwegian Radium Hospital and 184 of these patients received treatment with curative intent. Even though surgery is the treatment of choice for these patients, many of them suffer from medical conditions that increase the risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity. In a retrospective study, the effect of the curative treatment offered to patients was explored with a particular focus on patients unfit for surgery.

METHODS

Medical data of the 184 patients treated with curative intent were reviewed and additional clinical information was retrieved from local hospitals and general practitioners. Preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery was the standard curative treatment for operable patients. Medically inoperable patients were offered radical split-course hyperfractionated radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost.

RESULTS

More than 50% (103/184) received non-surgical treatment only. Patients who received radical surgery (n = 81) were younger, had better performance status, less weight loss and dysphagia compared to patients treated with radical radiotherapy (n = 102). One patient received only photodynamic therapy. The 3-year survival was 29% for patients treated with radical surgery, and 8% for patients who received radical radiotherapy. The overall median crude survival for the two groups of patients were 20 months and seven months respectively.

CONCLUSION

The hyperfractionated radiotherapy provided symptom relief without extensive toxicity and with a possibility for cure for patients with oesophageal cancer who are unfit for surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The literature supports the curative potential of high dose accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy even though the optimal radiotherapy regimen still needs to be explored.

Number of patients potentially eligible for proton therapy

A group of Swedish radiation oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy in a facility where one of the principal aims is to facilitate randomized and other studies in which the advantage of protons can be shown and the magnitude of the differences compared with optimally administered conventional radiation treatment, also including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and brachytherapy, can be shown. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence in Sweden, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours together with information on normal tissue complication rates. In Sweden, it is assessed that between 2200 and 2500 patients annually are eligible for proton beam therapy, and that for these patients the potential therapeutic benefit is so great as to justify the additional expense of proton therapy. This constitutes between 14-15% of all irradiated patients annually.

The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer

A group of Swedish oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours and normal tissues. In gastrointestinal cancers, it is assessed that at least 345 patients, mainly non-resectable rectal cancers, oesophageal and liver cancers, are eligible. Great uncertainties do however exist both in the number of patients with gastrointestinal cancers suitable for radiation therapy, and in the proportion of those where proton beams may give sufficiently better results.

Pilot study of gefitinib, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma: tissue effect predicts clinical response

PURPOSE

Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in esophageal cancer is associated with poor prognosis. Preclinical studies indicate synergism between the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib and oxaliplatin or radiotherapy (RT). We report here early results of a planned phase I/II study of gefitinib, oxaliplatin, and RT for locally advanced, unresectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The protocol consisted of oral gefitinib 250 mg daily for 1 year plus intravenous oxaliplatin 85 or 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29, and RT (50.4 Gy in 28 1.8-Gy fractions). Four-quadrant biopsies were obtained at 1-cm intervals along the length of the tumor before and after treatment and the specimens were immunostained for EGFR, Erk, Akt, and their phosphorylated (activated) forms.

RESULTS

Enrollment was halted at 6 evaluable cases [all male; median age, 72.5 years (range, 51-75); and all with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1]. All 6 tumors were adenocarcinomas; 5 were stage III and 1 stage IVA. Oxaliplatin was given at 85 mg/m(2) in 3 cases and at 100 mg/m(2) in 3 cases. Gefitinib therapy lasted a median 24 weeks; the median number of oxaliplatin doses was 6.5. Best responses were mucosal complete response (n = 1), partial response (n = 1), stable disease (n = 1), and progressive disease (n = 3). EGFR was expressed by tumor in 5 cases and Erk and Akt in 6 cases before treatment; no changes were noted after treatment. EGFR expression did not correlate with survival or response. No grade 4 toxicities were noted; grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (n = 1), vomiting (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), and constipation (n = 2). Median overall and disease-free survival times were 10.8 months and 8.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Gefitinib in combination with oxaliplatin and RT was tolerable, but had limited clinical activity and did not down-regulate total or activated EGFR, Akt, or Erk in esophageal tumor samples.

Long-term survivorship of esophageal cancer patients treated with radical intent

To investigate the recent trends in definitive management of esophageal cancer, the records of 138 consecutive patients treated with radical intent in a single institution between 1995 and 2003 were reviewed and analyzed. The median follow-up period was 5.7 years (range 1.1 to 10.4 years). Seventy-seven patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) only and 61 with combined regimens (CRT), in which RT was combined with either radical surgery or chemotherapy, or both. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 32% over two years and 20% over five years. The survivorship in the RT group was 17% over two years and 5% over five years. In the CRT group, 51% and 35% survived over two and five years, respectively. From all the potential prognostic factors examined by univariate and multivariate analyses, only male sex and use of CRT were strongly associated with better survivorship. There was no significant difference in the outcomes among the different regimens of CRT. Survivorship was not affected by the location or histology of the tumour, clinical stage, dose of RT or use of endoluminal brachytherapy in addition to external beam RT. There was a greater tendency to use RT only more often in older patients, but patient age did not affect survivorship. The proportion of patients treated with CRT did not change significantly over the last versus the first four years of the observed period. Combined regimens are undoubtedly superior to RT as a single modality. The long-term survivorship of patients in a subgroup of our patients treated with combined modality protocols compared favourably with the previously reported results in the literature and specifically in prospective randomized trials. However, the optimal combined modality regimen is yet to be defined.

A phase I/II study to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of accelerated fractionation radiotherapy for the palliation of dysphagia from carcinoma of the oesophagus

AIMS

We hypothesised that accelerated fractionated radiotherapy may provide a good palliative approach for dysphagia relief in patients with incurable oesophageal cancer, significantly reducing the overall duration of treatment, while providing symptom response with an acceptable toxicity profile. A phase I/II accelerated fractionation study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with incurable oesophageal cancer, symptomatic with dysphagia, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status<or=3, without fistula or oesophageal stent in situ, were eligible. Treatment consisted of 40 Gy in 20 fractions, twice a day (2 Gy per fraction, >or=6 h apart), 5 days a week, over 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 39 evaluable patients, the dysphagia response rate was 69% (27/39) with a median response duration of 5.5 months. The median time to response was 4 weeks. Twenty-eight per cent (11/39) of patients had transient worsening in their dysphagia scores. Acute toxicity (weeks 1-8) occurred in 41% (16/39) of patients. An improvement in global quality of life by week 8 was seen in 42% of patients. There were no late neurological sequelae. The median overall survival was 8 (range 1.7-58+) months.

CONCLUSION

The ideal palliative regimen should be relatively short, with minimal toxicity, while offering a favourable response profile. Accelerated fractionation fulfils these criteria and is a suitable treatment alternative for the palliation of dysphagia, especially if the goal is to deliver a higher total biological dose within a shorter (2 week) period of time.