Safety and efficacy of gefitinib treatment in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience

Biomarker Testing in Older Patients Treated for an Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The French ESME Real-Life Multicenter Cohort Experience

Simple Summary

Genomic and immunologic tumor biomarker testing has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients treated for advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). In older patients, targeted therapy and immunotherapy appear attractive considering better tolerance and increased survival. However, it remains unclear whether they have access to biomarker testing techniques in the same proportion as younger patients. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the proportion of biomarker testing performed in non-squamous aNSCLC at diagnosis between patients aged ≥70 years old and their younger counterparts. There was no significant difference between the two age groups in terms of frequency of biomarker testing. Among old patients tested, 22% of them presented an EGFR mutation. Biomarker testing is a crucial diagnostic tool for older patients with aNSCLC in whom the newer anti-EGFR agents have shown clear benefits.

Abstract

Background: Genomic and immunologic tumor biomarker testing has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients, particularly those treated for advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) when access to targeted agents is available. It remains unclear whether older patients have access to therapy-predictive biomarker testing techniques in the same proportion as younger patients. This study aims to compare the proportion of biomarker testing performed in non-squamous aNSCLC at diagnosis between patients aged ≥70 years old and their younger counterparts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Advanced or Metastatic Lung Cancer Data Platform, a French multicenter real-life database. All patients with non-squamous aNSCLC diagnosed between 2015 and 2018 were selected. Biomarker testing corresponded to at least one molecular alteration and/or PD-L1 testing performed within 1 month before or 3 months after the aNSCLC diagnosis. Results: In total, 2848 patients aged ≥70 years and 6900 patients aged <70 years were included. Most patients were male. The proportion of current smokers at diagnosis was higher in the <70 years group (42% vs. 17%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of biomarker testing performed between the two groups (63% vs. 65%, p = 0.15). EGFR mutations were significantly more common in the older group (22% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001) and KRAS mutations significantly more frequent in the younger group (39% vs. 31% p < 0.0001). The distribution of other driver mutations (ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600E, HER2, and MET) was similar across age. In the multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with biomarker testing were gender, smoking status, history of COPD, stage at primary diagnosis, and histological type. Conclusions: Age is not a barrier to biomarker testing in patients with aNSCLC.

Inhibitory effect of gefitinib derivative LPY‑9 on human glioma

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of a gefitinib derivative, LPY-9, on the proliferation, apoptosis and migration of human glioma cell line U251-MG by CCK8, Transwell or flow cytometry, and the effect of LPY-9 on the activity of caspase-3 enzyme and related proteins in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways by western blot and ELISA. It was found that LPY-9 exhibited higher a inhibitory effect on the proliferation of U251-MG cell lines compared with gefitinib and it also exhibited a certain dose-dependence. Following LPY-9 treatment, typical apoptotic morphology was observed under the microscope after Giemsa staining. LPY-9 induced apoptosis at low concentration, and the activity of caspase-3 enzyme increased with the increase in drug concentration, significantly inhibiting the secretion of VEGF in a dose-dependent manner. The effect was notably more evident compared with gefitinib at the same concentration. The expression level of caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 increased with the increase in LPY-9 concentration; however, expression levels of VEGF, EGFR, phosphorylated AKT and PI3K decreased with the increase of LPY-9 concentration and no change was observed in the expression level of AKT. LPY-9 inhibited the proliferation of the human glioma cell line U251-MG, promoted apoptosis and effectively inhibited the migration of U251-MG cells. The effect of LPY-9 was more noticeable compared with gefitinib. The results of the present study may provide a foundation for further study and clinical research of this as an anti-tumor drug in animal models.

Influence of age on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a paradigm shift in the development of cancer treatment. However, it remains to be clarified whether the benefits that they confer differ according to patient age. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess age differences in the benefits of ICI treatment.Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed database for randomised controlled trials of ICIs, including PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors across multiple cancer types, such as melanoma, lung cancer and gastric cancer. We extracted trials including hazard ratios (HRs) for death stratified by patient age (cut-off age, 65 years). The primary objective of this study was to assess the difference in ICI efficacy between younger and older patients. We calculated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for younger and older cancer patients, and assessed data heterogeneity.Results: We identified 3999 studies in our search. Of these, 24 eligible randomised trials, including a total of 8157 (57%) younger and 6104 (43%) older cancer patients, fulfilled the criteria for our study and were thus further analysed. The pooled HRs of the younger and older patients were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), respectively; the difference in ICI efficacy between younger and older cancer patients was not significant (p = .82). Regarding the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, the survival benefit was similar in both age groups (HR: 0.74; p = .96), whereas for the CTLA-4 inhibitors, there tended to be less survival benefit for older versus younger patients (HR: 0.90 and 0.77, respectively; p = .26).Conclusions: The survival benefit conferred by ICI was not age-dependent, amongst patients aged 65 years or younger. However, age-dependent benefits may vary amongst different types of ICIs.

Tolerance to Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Cancer

Background

Due to demographic changes, the number of elderly people with cancer will increase in the next decades. In the past, elderly patients with cancer were often excluded from clinical trials. Chronological age has been considered a risk factor for increased toxicity and reduced tolerance to chemotherapy.

Methods

We present a review on toxicity of chemotherapy and factors associated with toxicity in elderly patients with cancer, and we discuss chemotherapeutic agents and treatment options in treating this patient population.

Results

Age is a risk factor for increased toxicity to chemotherapy and decreased tolerance. However, few trials have been reported with adjustment for age-associated changes such as impairment of functional status and increased comorbidity, which also show an independent association with increased toxicity. Published data may include several biases, such as referral and publication bias.

Conclusions

Decision making in elderly cancer patients should be based on the results of a geriatric assessment. Patients with few or no limitations should be treated as younger patients are treated. Data with a high level of evidence are unavailable for patients showing moderate or severe limitations in a geriatric assessment.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small-cell lung cancer patients aged 80 years or older: A retrospective analysis

The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients aged ≥ 80 years. We analyzed data from 21 NSCLC patients aged ≥ 80 years who were administered gefitinib and/or erlotinib between January, 2009 and December, 2014. The clinical characteristics, smoking status, type of EFGR mutation and the efficacy and toxicity of EGFR-TKIs were evaluated in these patients. In total, 14 (66.7%), 5 (23.8%) and 2 patients (9.5%) displayed partial response, stable disease and progressive disease, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 182 days, whereas the median overall survival was 371 days. Adverse events ≥ grade 2 were as follows: skin toxicities, 12 patients; liver function test abnormalities, 7 patients; anorexia, 3 patients; and diarrhea, 2 patients. Dose reduction of EGFR-TKIs due to adverse events was required in 15 patients (71.4%). Although gefitinib and erlotinib therapy may be beneficial in patients aged ≥ 80 years, EGFR-TKI dose modification may be necessary according to the overall medical condition of elderly patients. Further studies are required to evaluate our findings.

[Clinical effects for patients with recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with icotinib hydrochloride]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Icotinib hydrochloride is the third single target EGFR-TKI used in clinical treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical research reports on its efficacy and survival in patients with Recurrent Advanced NSCLC are still little.The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and survival of Icotinib hydrochloride for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed to previous chemotherapy and explore the association of clinical features with the efficacy and survival.

METHODS

The clinical data of 60 NSCLC patients referred to the Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 2009 to July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 45.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 6.7 months. RR and PFS in female were superior to male (P=0.014, 0.013, respectively). RR, DCR in 2nd-line subgroup were superior to ≥3rd-line subgroup (P=0.020, 0.024, respectively). RR, DCR and PFS in EGFR mutation carriers were significantly superior to wild-type patients (P=0.006, <0.001, 0.002, respectively). There was no statistical difference in RR and PFS between those age<65 and ≥65 or PS<2 and PS≥2. There was no statistical difference in RR and DCR between exon 19 deletion and exon 21 mutations, while the former had much longer PFS (P=0.020). EGFR mutation and exon 19 deletion are the independent prognostic factors to significantly improve the PFS (P=0.009, 0.012, respectively). The side effects were generally mild and consisted of rash and diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Icotinib hydrochloride is effective especially in EGFR mutation carriers and well tolerated in patients with recurrent advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Clinical outcomes and biomarker profiles of elderly pretreated NSCLC patients from the BATTLE trial

BACKGROUND

Treating elderly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the salvage setting is challenging because of concerns of intolerance to therapy. Here we report outcomes (survival and toxicity) of elderly patients on the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-five chemorefractory NSCLC patients received tumor molecular analysis, and were randomized to erlotinib, erlotinib-bexarotene, vandetanib, or sorafenib. Retrospective subgroup analyses were conducted comparing outcomes among age groups (< 65 versus ≥ 65 years; < 70 versus ≥ 70 years; < 75 versus ≥ 75 years), treatments, and sex.

RESULTS

Median age was 62 years (range, 26-84); 38% were aged 65 years or more. No significant differences among age groups were seen in rates of biopsy-related pneumothorax, treatment-related death, compliance, grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities, response rate, nor overall survival. However, older women aged 65 years or more had more grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities (p = 0.05). Elderly men aged 65 years or more (p = 0.008) had a higher disease-control rate at 8 weeks and a better progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0068). Elderly women aged 70 years or more had a trend toward higher 8-week disease-control rate (p = 0.06). Older men aged 65 years or more treated with vandetanib had a better median PFS (p = 0.03) whereas PFS of older women aged 70 years or more was worse (p = 0.03) compared with younger patients. Elderly men aged 70 years or more treated with sorafenib had a higher overall survival compared with younger men (p = 0.04). Tumor tissue biomarkers show distinct differences by sex and age.

CONCLUSION

Fit elderly NSCLC patients should be considered for salvage targeted therapy. In this subset of patients, older men seem to have significant clinical benefit from certain agents. Tumor biomarker analysis demonstrates sex and age variations, and is hypothesis-generating.

Clinical retrospective analysis of erlotinib in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In order to evaluate the clinical efficacy and the safety profile of molecularly targeted therapies as a palliative approach in elderly populations affected by advanced thoracic neoplasms, we retrospectively studied, in terms of effectiveness and toxicities, a group of pretreated elderly metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients admitted to our institution and treated with erlotinib at standard daily/dose. Forty-three patients aged 70 years or older who had previously failed on chemotherapy or radiotherapy were treated with oral Eerlotinib (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical data, pathological types, potential prognostic factors, efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib were included in this analysis. In our series we observed: objective responses in six patients (14%) and stable disease in 15 (35%). Skin rash was the most common side effect (67%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 16 cases (37%). The median overall survival and the median progression-free survival were 8.4 months (CI 95%: 0.7-43.6) and 3 months (CI 95%: 0.4-28.4), respectively. Patients with adenocarcinoma achieved the best disease control rate (p = 0.027), while not/former smokers showed a better response (p = 0.069). In our experience the use of erlotinib after chemotherapy failure in an unselected elderly population affected by NSCLC showed moderate efficacy and a moderate safety profile. However, erlotinib represents a valid option in this setting, but other factors such as biological information, comorbidities and concomitant medications need to be carefully take into consideration in this particular subset of cancer patients.

The role of targeted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

The introduction of targeted biological agents represents the most promising approach to improve the disease control and outcome for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The epidermal growth factor and the vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathways have been successfully targeted using both orally administered small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, with associated improvement in overall survival. Although the trials that established the efficacy of these agents allowed the enrollment of patients older than 70 years, the elderly patients constituted the minority. Given the stringent enrolment criteria in terms of organ function and performance status for most clinical trials, the elderly patients on clinical trials are not entirely representative of the overall elderly patient population. Therefore, the applicability of these data to the overall patient population deserves critical appraisal in the absence of trials dedicated specifically to the elderly. Preplanned and unplanned subset analysis of registration trial data is becoming increasingly common as a substitute measure to provide valuable information to guide the use of targeted agents in the elderly. Using this approach, it has been demonstrated that elderly patients are able to tolerate targeted biological therapies but suffer increased rate of toxicities. However, they derive benefit from such agents when they are carefully selected and have their drug doses adjusted appropriately to minimize potential toxicities. This article reviews the use of targeted agents for the treatment of NSCLC in elderly patients.

Oral Anticancer Drugs in the Elderly

The increasing number of elderly people in the world population has led to a parallel increase in the number of older cancer patients, with over 45% of all cancers in Europe occurring in patients >70 years of age. The increasing tendency to use oral chemotherapy is thus of interest in the elderly, given that both elderly patients and their physicians prefer to use less complex and toxic regimens when such treatments have equivalent efficacy to more complex regimens. However, data from studies designed to evaluate these therapies in the elderly are currently limited. Factors that must be considered before prescribing oral agents to this subset of patients include age-related physiological changes affecting clinical pharmacology, adherence, the patient's capability to self-administer medications, and safety issues concerning the older patient and his or her caregivers. The idea that elderly patients may benefit from the introduction of oral chemotherapy is very fashionable, but to date there is no proof that this approach is as effective as intravenous therapy in this age group, particularly since randomised trials are lacking. This review discusses these issues and reviews current information about the use of specific oral chemotherapeutic drugs for major neoplastic diseases in the elderly.