1
|
Miladinovic V, Klaver YLB, Krol ADG, Kroesen M, Verbist BM, Habraken SJM, van Furth WR, Coremans IEM. Robust IMPT and follow-up toxicity in skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma-a single-institution clinical experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02280-0. [PMID: 39207463 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base are rare, slowly growing malignant bone neoplasms. Despite their radioresistant properties, proton therapy has been successfully used as an adjunct to resection or as a definitive treatment. Herewith, we present our experience with robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and related toxicities in skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients treated at HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands. METHODS Clinical data, treatment plans, and acute toxicities of patients treated between July 2019 and August 2021 were reviewed. CT and 3.0T MRI scans for treatment planning were performed in supine position in a thermoplastic mold. In total, 21 dose optimization and 28 dose evaluation scenarios were simulated. Acute toxicity was scored weekly before and during the treatment according to the CTCAE v4.0. Median follow-up was 35 months (range 12-36 months). RESULTS Overall, 9 chordoma and 3 chondrosarcoma patients with 1-3 resections prior to IMPT were included; 4 patients had titanium implants. Brainstem core and surface and spinal cord core and surface were used for nominal plan robust optimization in 11, 10, 8, and 7 patients, respectively. Middle ear inflammation, dry mouth, radiation dermatitis, taste disorder, and/or alopecia of grades 1-3 were noted at the end of treatment among 6 patients without similar complaints at inclusion; symptoms disappeared 3 months following the treatment. CONCLUSION Robustly optimized IMPT is clinically feasible as a postoperative treatment for skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients. We observed acceptable early toxicities (grade 1-3) that disappeared within the first 3 months after irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vesna Miladinovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Yvonne L B Klaver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Augustinus D G Krol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Berit M Verbist
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Steven J M Habraken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter R van Furth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ida E M Coremans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eekers DBP, Zegers CML, Ahmed KA, Amelio D, Gupta T, Harrabi SB, Kazda T, Scartoni D, Seidel C, Shih HA, Minniti G. Controversies in neuro-oncology: Focal proton versus photon radiation therapy for adult brain tumors. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:369-382. [PMID: 39006517 PMCID: PMC11241386 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of malignant and benign brain tumors. Current state-of-the-art photon- and proton-based RT combines more conformal dose distribution of target volumes and accurate dose delivery while limiting the adverse radiation effects. PubMed was systematically searched from from 2000 to October 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes related to treatment of central nervous system (CNS)/skull base tumors with PT in adults. Several studies have demonstrated that proton therapy (PT) provides a reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma compared with photon-based (xRT) radiation techniques. However, whether dosimetric advantages translate into superior clinical outcomes for different adult brain tumors remains an open question. This review aims at critically reviewing the recent studies on PT in adult patients with brain tumors, including glioma, meningiomas, and chordomas, to explore its potential benefits compared with xRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina M L Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Departments of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dante Amelio
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saito T, Mizumoto M, Oshiro Y, Shimizu S, Li Y, Nakamura M, Hosaka S, Nakai K, Iizumi T, Inaba M, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Maruo K, Sakurai H. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Particle Beam Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy for Skull Base Chordoma: TRP-Chordoma 2024. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2569. [PMID: 39061207 PMCID: PMC11274426 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
[Objective] The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of particle beam therapy (PT) with photon radiotherapy (RT) for treatment of skull base chordoma. [Methods] A systematic review was conducted for skull base chordoma treated with PT or photon RT reported from 1990 to 2022. Data were extracted for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), late adverse events, age, gender, gross total resection (GTR) rates, tumor volume, total irradiation dose, and treatment modality. Random-effects meta-regression analysis with the treatment modality as an explanatory variable was performed for each outcome to compare the modalities. [Results] A meta-analysis of 30 selected articles found 3- and 5-year OS rates for PT vs. photon RT or combined photon RT/proton beam therapy (PBT) of 90.8% (95% CI: 87.4-93.3%) vs. 89.5% (95% CI: 83.0-93.6%), p = 0.6543; 80.0% (95% CI: 75.7-83.6%) vs. 89.5% (95% CI: 83.0-93.6%), p = 0.6787. The 5-year PFS rates for PT vs. photon RT or photon RT/PBT were 67.8% (95% CI: 56.5-76.7%) vs. 40.2% (95% CI: 31.6-48.7%), p = 0.0004. A random-effects model revealed that the treatment modality (PT vs. photon RT or photon RT/PBT) was not a significant factor for 3-year OS (p = 0.42) and 5-year OS (p = 0.11), but was a significant factor for 5-year PFS (p < 0.0001). The rates of brain necrosis were 8-50% after PT and 0-4% after photon RT or photon RT/PBT. [Conclusion] This study shows that PT results in higher PFS compared to photon RT for skull base chordoma, but that there is a tendency for a higher incidence of brain necrosis with PT. Publication and analysis of further studies is needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8558, Ibaraki, Japan;
| | - Shosei Shimizu
- Department of Pediatric Radiation Therapy Center/Pediatric Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hebei Yizhou Cancer Hospital, Zhuozhou 072750, China;
| | - Yinuo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| | - Sho Hosaka
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan; (S.H.); (M.I.); (H.F.); (R.S.)
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| | - Masako Inaba
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan; (S.H.); (M.I.); (H.F.); (R.S.)
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan; (S.H.); (M.I.); (H.F.); (R.S.)
- Department of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan; (S.H.); (M.I.); (H.F.); (R.S.)
- Department of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan;
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan; (T.S.); (Y.L.); (M.N.); (K.N.); (T.I.); (H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dastgheyb SS, Dreyfuss AD, LaRiviere MJ, Mohiuddin JJ, Baumann BC, Shabason J, Lustig RA, Dorsey JF, Lin A, Grady SM, O'Malley BW, Lee JY, Newman JG, Schuster JM, Alonso-Basanta M. A Prospective Phase I/II Clinical Trial of High-Dose Proton Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101456. [PMID: 38550376 PMCID: PMC10972808 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of dose-escalated proton beam therapy for treating chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base and spine. Methods: A prospective cohort of 54 patients (42 with chordomas and 12 with chondrosarcomas) was enrolled between 2010 and 2018. The primary endpoints were feasibility and <20% rate of acute grade ≥3 toxicity, and secondary endpoints included cancer-specific outcomes and toxicities. Patients were followed with magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography at 3-month intervals. Proton beam therapy was delivered with doses up to 79.2 Gy using protons only, combination protons/intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), or IMRT only. Results Feasibility endpoints were met, with only 2 out of 54 patient radiation therapy plans failing to meet dosimetric constraints with protons, and 4 out of 54 experiencing a delay or treatment break >5 days, none for toxicities related to treatment. There were no grade 4 acute toxicities and 1 grade 3 acute toxicity (sensory neuropathy). The only 2 grade 3 late toxicities recorded, osteoradionecrosis and intranasal carotid blowout (mild and not emergently treated), occurred in a single patient. We report overall survival as 83% at 5 years, with local failure-free survival and progression-free survival rates of 72% and 68%, respectively. Five patients developed distant disease, and among the 9/54 patients who died, 4 deaths were not attributed to treatment or recurrence. Conclusions Our findings suggest that high-dose proton therapy alone or in combination with IMRT is a safe and effective treatment option for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base and spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana S. Dastgheyb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexandra D. Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael J. LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jahan J. Mohiuddin
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Brian C. Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacob Shabason
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert A. Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jay F. Dorsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sean M. Grady
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Bert W. O'Malley
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John Y.K. Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason G. Newman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - James M. Schuster
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Mehta MP. How proton therapy fits into the management of adult intracranial tumors. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S26-S45. [PMID: 38437667 PMCID: PMC10911801 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial tumors include a challenging array of primary and secondary parenchymal and extra-axial tumors which cause neurologic morbidity consequential to location, disease extent, and proximity to critical neurologic structures. Radiotherapy can be used in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting either with curative or palliative intent. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising advance due to dosimetric advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy with regards to normal tissue sparing, as well as distinct physical properties, which yield radiobiologic benefits. In this review, the principles of efficacy and safety of PT for a variety of intracranial tumors are discussed, drawing upon case series, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. This manuscript explores the potential advantages of PT, including reduced acute and late treatment-related side effects and improved quality of life. The objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence and clinical outcomes of PT. Given the lack of consensus and directives for its utilization in patients with intracranial tumors, we aim to provide a guide for its judicious use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bin-Alamer O, Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Abdulbaki A, Mallela AN, Lu VM, Peker S, Samanci Y, Nabeel AM, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, El-Shehaby AMN, Abdelkarim K, Emad Eldin RM, Sheehan D, Sheehan K, Liscak R, Chytka T, Tripathi M, Madan R, Speckter H, Hernández W, Barnett GH, Hori YS, Dabhi N, Aldakhil S, Mathieu D, Kondziolka D, Bernstein K, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Kersh CR, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP, Abou-Al-Shaar H. Adjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery With or Without Postresection Fractionated Radiation Therapy for the Management of Clival Chordomas in Adults: An International Multicenter Case Series. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:892-900. [PMID: 37052386 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clival chordomas are challenging because of their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven effective with minimal adverse effects. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of histologically confirmed primary clival chordomas in adults who underwent SRS alone (SRS group) vs SRS after fractionated radiotherapy (FRT+SRS group). METHODS We collected patient data from 10 institutions affiliated with the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. We evaluated overall survival, tumor control, and freedom from additional treatment (FFAT). RESULTS Fifty-seven (77%) patients were included in the SRS group and 17 (23%) in the FRT+SRS group. The median radiological follow-up was 48 months (IQR, 24-85) in the SRS group and 36 months (IQR, 25-41) in the FRT+SRS group. During the follow-up, 8 SRS and 2 FRT+SRS patients died ( P = .80). The groups had comparable 10-year overall survival (SRS: 76% vs FRT+SRS: 80%; logrank test, P = .75) and tumor control rates (SRS: 34% vs FRT+SRS: 45%; logrank test, P = .29). The SRS group had a superior 10-year FFAT rate (40%) compared with FRT+SRS (23%; logrank test, P = .02). This finding persisted in the multivariate analysis of the Cox proportional hazards illustrating a 2.40-fold increase in the relative risk of requiring additional treatment among the FRT+SRS group ( P = .04). CONCLUSION Adjuvant FRT with subsequent boost SRS did not provide superior overall survival or tumor control compared with patients who underwent adjuvant SRS alone. Further studies are required to refine management guidelines among adults with clival chordomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Bin-Alamer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Arif Abdulbaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover , Germany
| | - Arka N Mallela
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami , Florida , USA
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul , Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul , Turkey
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo , Egypt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Benha University, Benha , Egypt
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo , Egypt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo , Egypt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo , Egypt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdelkarim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo , Egypt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo , Egypt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo , Egypt
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Radiation and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Radiation and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague , Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh , India
| | - Renu Madan
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh , India
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo , Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernández
- Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo , Dominican Republic
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Yusuke S Hori
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Nisha Dabhi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Salman Aldakhil
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke , Quebec , Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke , Quebec , Canada
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone, New York , New York , USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone, New York , New York , USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hong S, Mahajan A, Laack NN, Link MJ, Shinya Y, O'Brien E, Stokken JK, Janus JR, Choby GW, Van Gompel JJ. Comparison of Tumor Control After Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Pencil Beam Proton Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Clival Chordomas: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. World Neurosurg 2023; 178:e510-e519. [PMID: 37532022 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of proton radiation therapy (PRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and x-ray-based radiation with an SRS boost (XRT + SRS) for newly diagnosed clival chordoma. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent PRT or SRS in our facility were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were identified (PRT, 36; SRS, 11; XRT + SRS, 12). The mean age (± standard deviation) was 46 ± 20 years, with 54% being male. The mean tumor diameter (± standard deviation) was 3.7 ± 1.5 cm, and 21 (36%) involved the lower clivus. Gross total or near-total resection was attained in 27 patients (46%), all of whom received PRT. PRT was administered with a median prescribed dose of 70.8 Gy (range, 66.0-76.0). SRS involved a median marginal dose of 16 Gy (range, 14-20) and a median maximal dose of 36 Gy (range, 30-45). The XRT + SRS group was treated with an SRS marginal dose of 12.5 Gy (range, 10-20), a maximal dose of 27 Gy (range, 20-40), and an XRT prescription dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 45.0-59.4). Fifteen recurrences were observed (PRT, 6; SRS, 5; XRT + SRS, 4). For the entire cohort (n = 59), recurrence was associated with the degree of resection (P = 0.042), but not with radiation groups (P = 0.98). For patients after subtotal resection or biopsy (n = 32), the SRS ± XRT group was associated with few recurrences (hazard ratio, 0.260; 95% confidence interval, 0.069-0.98; P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS Patients after subtotal resection or biopsy may benefit from the incorporation of SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukwoo Hong
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael J Link
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yuki Shinya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erin O'Brien
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Janalee K Stokken
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Janus
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Garret W Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jamie J Van Gompel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baig Mirza A, Ravindran V, Okasha M, Boardman TM, Maratos E, Sinan B, Thomas N. Systematic Review Comparing Open versus Endoscopic Surgery in Clival Chordomas and a 10-Year Single-Center Experience. Skull Base Surg 2022; 83:e113-e125. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives Chordomas are rare, slow-growing, and osteo-destructive tumors of the primitive notochord. There is still contention in the literature as to the optimal management of chordoma. We conducted a systematic review of the surgical management of chordoma along with our 10-year institutional experience.
Design A systematic search of the literature was performed in October 2020 by using MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles relating to the surgical management of clival chordomas. We also searched for all adult patients surgically treated for primary clival chordomas at our institute between 2009 and 2019.
Participants Only articles describing chordomas arising from the clivus were included in the analysis. For our institution experience, only adult primary clival chordoma cases were included.
Main Outcome Measures Patients were divided into endoscopic or open surgery. Rate of gross total resection (GTR), recurrence, and complications were measured.
Results Our literature search yielded 24 articles to include in the study. Mean GTR rate among endoscopic cases was 51.9% versus 41.7% for open surgery. Among the eight cases in our institutional experience, we found similar GTR rates between endoscopic and open surgery.
Conclusion Although there is clear evidence in the literature that endoscopic approaches provide better rates of GTR with fewer overall complications compared to open surgery. However, there are still situations where endoscopy is not viable, and thus, open surgery should still be considered if required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asfand Baig Mirza
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Visagan Ravindran
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Okasha
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Eleni Maratos
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barazi Sinan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Thomas
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Amstutz F, Fabiano S, Marc L, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Unkelbach J, Zhang Y. Combined proton-photon therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Med Phys 2022; 49:5374-5386. [PMID: 35561077 PMCID: PMC9544482 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still a challenging indication for conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton therapy has the potential to improve outcomes, but proton treatment slots remain a limited resource despite an increasing number of proton therapy facilities. This work investigates the potential benefits of optimally combined proton-photon therapy delivered using a fixed horizontal proton beam line in combination with a photon Linac, which could increase accessibility to proton therapy for such a patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS A treatment planning study has been conducted on a patient cohort of seven advanced NSCLC patients. Each patient had a planning CT and multiple repeated CTs from three different days and for different breath-holds on each day. Treatment plans for combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) were calculated for individual patients by optimizing the combined cumulative dose on the initial planning CT only (non-adapted) as well as on each daily CT respectively (adapted). The impact of inter-fractional changes and/or breath-hold variability was then assessed on the repeat breath-hold CTs. Results were compared to plans for IMRT or IMPT alone, as well as against combined treatments assuming a proton gantry. Plan quality was assessed in terms of dosimetric, robustness and NTCP metrics. RESULTS Combined treatment plans improved plan quality compared to IMRT treatments, especially in regard to reductions of low and medium doses to organs at risk (OARs), which translated into lower NTCP estimates for three side effects. For most patients, combined treatments achieved results close to IMPT-only plans. Inter-fractional changes impact mainly the target coverage of combined and IMPT treatments, while OARs doses were less affected by these changes. With plan adaptation however, target coverage of combined treatments remained high even when taking variability between breath-holds into account. CONCLUSIONS Optimally combined proton-photon plans improve treatment plan quality compared to IMRT only, potentially reducing the risk of toxicity while also allowing to potentially increase accessibility to proton therapy for NSCLC patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Amstutz
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Fabiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Louise Marc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Muhonen EG, Yasaka TM, Lehrich BM, Goshtasbi K, Papagiannopoulos P, Tajudeen BA, St John MA, Harris JP, Hsu FP, Kuan EC. Impact of Treatment Modalities upon Survival Outcomes in Skull Base and Clival Chordoma: An NCDB Analysis. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 84:60-68. [PMID: 36743709 PMCID: PMC9897903 DOI: 10.1055/a-1733-9475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Skull base chordomas are locally aggressive malignant tumors derived from the notochord remnant. There are limited large-scale studies examining the role and extent of surgery and radiation therapy. Design Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed to evaluate the survival outcomes of various treatments, and to assess for predictors of overall survival (OS). Participants This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients diagnosed with a clival/skull base chordoma between 2004 and 2015 in the NCDB. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results In all, 468 cases were identified. Forty-nine percent of patients received surgery and 20.7% had positive margins. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.4 years in the surgical cohort, and 55% were males. Of the surgical cohort, 33.8% had negative margins, 20.7% had positive margins, and 45.5% had unknown margin status. Age ≥ 65 (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-5.76; p < 0.001), diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.90; p = 0.022), tumor size >5 cm (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.26-4.15; p = 0.007), and government insurance (HR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.24-4.2; p = 0.008) were independent predictors of OS. When comparing surgery with or without adjuvant radiation, no survival differences were found, regardless of margin status ( p = 0.66). Conclusion Surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. Advanced age (>65 years), large tumor size, and government insurance were predictors of worse OS. Whereas negative margins and the use of adjuvant radiation did not appear to impact OS, these may very well reduce local recurrences. A multidisciplinary approach is critical in achieving optimal outcomes in this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan G. Muhonen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Tyler M. Yasaka
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Brandon M. Lehrich
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Bobby A. Tajudeen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Maie A. St John
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Jeremy P. Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Frank P.K. Hsu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Edward C. Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States,Address for correspondence Edward C. Kuan, MD, MBA Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of CaliforniaIrvine, 101 The City Drive South Orange, CA 92868-3201United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gordon K, Gulidov I, Koryakin S, Smyk D, Makeenkova T, Gogolin D, Lepilina O, Golovanova O, Semenov A, Dujenko S, Medvedeva K, Mardynsky Y. Proton therapy with a fixed beamline for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: outcomes and toxicity. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:238. [PMID: 34930352 PMCID: PMC8686536 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01961-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas treated with a fixed horizontal pencil proton beam. Background Chordomas (CAs) and chondrosarcomas (CSAs) are rare tumours that are usually located near the base of the skull and very close to the brain's most critical structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the best radiation treatment for these diseases, but it is still a limited resource. Active scanning PT delivered via a fixed pencil beamline might be a promising option. Methods This is a single-centre experience describing the results of proton therapy for 31 patients with CA (n = 23) or CSA (n = 8) located near the base of the skull. Proton therapy was utilized by a fixed pencil beamline with a chair to position the patient between May 2016 and November 2020. Ten patients underwent resection (32.2%), 15 patients (48.4%) underwent R2 resection, and 6 patients had unresectable tumours (19.4%). In 4 cases, the tumours had been previously irradiated. The median PT dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological efficacy, 1.1) [range, 60 to 74] with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean GTV volume was 25.6 cm3 [range, 4.2–115.6]. Patient demographics, pathology, treatment parameters, and toxicity were collected and analysed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 21 months [range, 4 to 52]. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 1- and 2-year OS was 100%, and the 3-year OS was 66.3%. Four patients died due to non-cancer-related reasons, 1 patient died due to tumour progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-related injuries. The 1-year local control (LC) rate was 100%, the 2-year LC rate was 93.7%, and the 3-year LC rate was 85.3%. Two patients with CSA exhibited progression in the neck lymph nodes and lungs. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment interruptions. We observed 2 cases of ≥ grade 3 toxicity, with 1 case of grade 3 myelitis and 1 case of grade 5 brainstem injury. Conclusion Treatment with a fixed proton beam shows promising disease control and an acceptable toxicity rate, even the difficult-to-treat subpopulation of patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas requiring dose escalation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Napieralska A, Blamek S. Intracranial chordoma: radiosurgery, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and treatment outcomes. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:764-772. [PMID: 34760311 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to assess the results of stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for skull base chordomas. Materials and methods Twenty-three patients aged 12-75 were treated with SRS/SRT due to skull base chordoma. In 19 patients SRS/SRT was a part of the primary therapy, while in 4, a part of the treatment of recurrence. In 4 patients SRS/SRT was used as a boost after conventional radiotherapy and in 19 cases it was the only irradiation method applied. Patients were irradiated to total dose of 6-35 Gy and median total equivalent dose of 52 Gy. Results During median follow-up of 39 months, 4 patients died. One-, two- and five-year OS was 95%, 89% and 69%, respectively. In nine patients, progression of the disease was diagnosed during study period. One-, two- and five-year progression free survival (PFS) from the end of radiotherapy was 81%, 59% and 43%, respectively. Radiotherapy was well tolerated and only two patients in our group experienced moderate treatment-related toxicity. Conclusion SRS/SRT alone or in combination with surgery is a safe and effective method of irradiation of patients with skull base chordomas. High EQD2 is necessary to achieve satisfactory treatment results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Napieralska
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Sławomir Blamek
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
El Sayed I, Trifiletti DM, Lehrer EJ, Showalter TN, Dutta SW. Protons versus photons for the treatment of chordoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD013224. [PMID: 34196007 PMCID: PMC8245311 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013224.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chordoma is a rare primary bone tumour with a high propensity for local recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, but complete resection is often morbid due to tumour location. Similarly, the dose of radiotherapy (RT) that surrounding healthy organs can tolerate is frequently below that required to provide effective tumour control. Therefore, clinicians have investigated different radiation delivery techniques, often in combination with surgery, aimed to improve the therapeutic ratio. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects and toxicity of proton and photon adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in people with biopsy-confirmed chordoma. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 4); MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to April 2021); Embase Ovid (1980 to April 2021) and online registers of clinical trials, and abstracts of scientific meetings up until April 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included adults with pathologically confirmed primary chordoma, who were irradiated with curative intent, with protons or photons in the form of fractionated RT, SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery), SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy), or IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy). We limited analysis to studies that included outcomes of participants treated with both protons and photons. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The primary outcomes were local control, mortality, recurrence, and treatment-related toxicity. We followed current standard Cochrane methodological procedures for data extraction, management, and analysis. We used the ROBINS-I tool to assess risk of bias, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included six observational studies with 187 adult participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias. Four studies were included in meta-analysis. We are uncertain if proton compared to photon therapy worsens or has no effect on local control (hazard ratio (HR) 5.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 43.43; 2 observational studies, 39 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Median survival time ranged between 45.5 months and 66 months. We are uncertain if proton compared to photon therapy reduces or has no effect on mortality (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.57; 4 observational studies, 65 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Median recurrence-free survival ranged between 3 and 10 years. We are uncertain whether proton compared to photon therapy reduces or has no effect on recurrence (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.17; 4 observational studies, 94 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study assessed treatment-related toxicity and reported that four participants on proton therapy developed radiation-induced necrosis in the temporal bone, radiation-induced damage to the brainstem, and chronic mastoiditis; one participant on photon therapy developed hearing loss, worsening of the seventh cranial nerve paresis, and ulcerative keratitis (risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 9.86; 1 observational study, 33 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There is no evidence that protons led to reduced toxicity. There is very low-certainty evidence to show an advantage for proton therapy in comparison to photon therapy with respect to local control, mortality, recurrence, and treatment related toxicity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of published evidence to confirm a clinical difference in effect with either proton or photon therapy for the treatment of chordoma. As radiation techniques evolve, multi-institutional data should be collected prospectively and published, to help identify persons that would most benefit from the available radiation treatment techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman El Sayed
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | - Eric J Lehrer
- Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | | | - Sunil W Dutta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hug EB, Pelak M, Frank SJ, Fossati P. A Review of Particle Therapy for Skull Base Tumors: Modern Considerations and Future Directions. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:168-178. [PMID: 34285944 PMCID: PMC8270106 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Skull base tumors constitute one of the established indications for particle therapy, specifically proton therapy. However, a number of prognostic factors, practical clinical management issues, and the emerging role of carbon ion therapy remain subjects of active clinical investigation. This review summarizes these topics, assesses the present status, and reflects on future research directions focusing on the management of chordomas, one of the most aggressive skull base tumors. In addition, the role of particle therapy for benign tumors of the skull base, including pituitary adenoma and acoustic neuroma, is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugen B Hug
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Maciej Pelak
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Steven J Frank
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee SU, Yang K, Moon SH, Suh YG, Yoo GS. Patterns of Proton Beam Therapy Use in Clinical Practice Between 2007 and 2019 in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:935-943. [PMID: 34015892 PMCID: PMC8524026 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a state-of-the-art technology employed in radiotherapy (RT) for cancer patients. This study characterized how PBT has been used in clinical practice in Korea. Materials and Methods Patients who received any type of RT between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the radiation oncology registry of the two PBT facilities operating in Korea (National Cancer Center and Samsung Medical Center). The χ2 test was used to identify patient- and treatment-related characteristics associated with the receipt of PBT. Results A total of 54,035 patients had been treated with some form of RT in the two institutions, of whom 5,398 received PBT (10.0%). The number of patients who receive PBT has gradually increased since PBT first started, from 162 patients in 2007 to 1304 patients in 2019. Among all types of cancer, PBT use in liver cancer has been steadily increasing from 20% in 2008-2009 to 32% in 2018-2019. In contrast, that in prostate cancer has been continuously decreasing from 20% in 2008-2009 to <10% in 2018-2019. Male sex, very young or old age, stage I-II disease, residency in non-capital areas, a definitive setting, a curative treatment aim, enrollment in a clinical trial, re-irradiation and insurance coverage were significantly associated with the receipt of PBT (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Since PBT started in Korea, the number of patients receiving PBT has increased to more than 1,000 per year and treatment indications have expanded. Liver cancer is the most common primary tumor among all PBT cases in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yang-Gun Suh
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Iannalfi A, D'Ippolito E, Riva G, Molinelli S, Gandini S, Viselner G, Fiore MR, Vischioni B, Vitolo V, Bonora M, Ronchi S, Petrucci R, Barcellini A, Mirandola A, Russo S, Vai A, Mastella E, Magro G, Maestri D, Ciocca M, Preda L, Valvo F, Orecchia R. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordomas: a prospective study based on a dual particle and a patient-customized treatment strategy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1348-1358. [PMID: 32193546 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate results in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile and to better identify factors influencing clinical outcome of skull base chordoma treated with proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). METHODS We prospectively collected and analyzed data of 135 patients treated between November 2011 and December 2018. Total prescription dose in the PT group (70 patients) and CIRT group (65 patients) was 74 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) delivered in 37 fractions and 70.4 Gy(RBE) delivered in 16 fractions, respectively (CIRT in unfavorable patients). LC and OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, to identify prognostic factors on clinical outcomes. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 6-87) months, 14 (21%) and 8 (11%) local failures were observed in CIRT and PT group, respectively. Five-year LC rate was 71% in CIRT cohort and 84% in PT cohort. The estimated 5-year OS rate in the CIRT and PT group was 82% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV), optic pathways, and/or brainstem compression and dose coverage are independent prognostic factors of local failure risk. High rate toxicity grade ≥3 was reported in 11% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Particle radiotherapy is an effective treatment for skull base chordoma with acceptable late toxicity. GTV, optic pathways, and/or brainstem compression and target coverage were independent prognostic factors for LC. KEY POINTS • Proton and carbon ion therapy are effective and safe in skull base chordoma.• Prognostic factors are GTV, organs at risk compression, and dose coverage.• Dual particle therapy and customized strategy was adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Iannalfi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Emma D'Ippolito
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Rachele Petrucci
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vai
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Maestri
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL, Mailhot Vega RB, Holtzman AL, Looi WS, Morris CG, Sandler ES, Aldana PR, Bradley JA. Local Control After Proton Therapy for Pediatric Chordoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1406-1413. [PMID: 33253819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to the location and high dose required for disease control, pediatric chordomas are theoretically well-suited for treatment with proton therapy, but their low incidence limits the clinical outcome data available in the literature. We sought to report the efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy among a single-institution cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2008 and 2019, 29 patients with a median age of 14.8 years (range, 3.8-21.8) received passive-scattered proton therapy for nonmetastatic chordoma. No patient received prior irradiation. Twenty-four tumors arose in the clivus/cervical spine region and 5 in the lumbosacral spine. Twenty-six tumors demonstrated classic well-differentiated histology and 3 were dedifferentiated or not otherwise specified. Approximately half of the tumors underwent specialized testing: 14 were brachyury-positive and 10 retained INI-1. Three patients had locally recurrent tumors after surgery alone (n = 2) or surgery + chemotherapy (n = 1), and 17 patients had gross disease at the time of radiation. The median radiation dose was 73.8 Gy relative biological effectivness (range, 69-75.6). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 1.0-10.7), the 5-year estimates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85%, 82%, and 86%, respectively. No disease progression was observed beyond 3 years. Excluding 3 patients with dedifferentiated/not-otherwise-specified chordoma, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92%, 92%, and 91%, respectively. Serious toxicities included 3 patients with hardware failure or related infection requiring revision surgery, 2 patients with hormone deficiency, and 2 patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction causing chronic otitis media. No patient experienced brain stem injury, myelopathy, vision loss, or hearing loss after radiation. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric patients with chordoma, proton therapy is associated with a low risk of serious toxicity and high efficacy, particularly in well-differentiated tumors. Complete resection may be unnecessary for local control, and destabilizing operations requiring instrumentation may result in additional complications after therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Wen S Looi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Eric S Sandler
- Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Childrens Specialty Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Philipp R Aldana
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schaub L, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200183. [PMID: 32795176 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first hospital-based treatment facilities for particle therapy started operation about thirty years ago. Since then, the clinical experience with protons and carbon ions has grown continuously and more than 200,000 patients have been treated to date. The promising clinical results led to a rapidly increasing number of treatment facilities and many new facilities are planned or under construction all over the world. An inverted depth-dose profile combined with potential radiobiological advantages make charged particles a precious tool for the treatment of tumours that are particularly radioresistant or located nearby sensitive structures. A rising number of trials have already confirmed the benefits of particle therapy in selected clinical situations and further improvements in beam delivery, image guidance and treatment planning are expected. This review summarises some physical and biological characteristics of accelerated charged particles and gives some examples of their clinical application. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives of particle therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Saini G, Shukla R, Sood KS, Shukla SK, Chandra R. Role of Proton Beam Therapy in Current Day Radiation Oncology Practice. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractProton beam therapy (PBT), because of its unique physics of no–exit dose deposition in the tissue, is an exciting prospect. The phenomenon of Bragg peak allows protons to deposit their almost entire energy towards the end of the path of the proton and stops any further dose delivery. Braggs peak equips PBT with superior dosimetric advantage over photons or electrons because PBT doesn’t traverse the target/body but is stopped sharply at an energy dependent depth in the target/body. It also has no exit dose. Because of no exit dose and normal tissue sparing, PBT is hailed for its potential to bring superior outcomes. Pediatric malignancies is the most common malignancy where PBT have found utmost application. Nowadays, PBT is also being used in the treatment of other malignancies such as carcinoma prostate, carcinoma breast, head and neck malignancies, and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Despite advantages of PBT, there is not only a high cost of setting up of PBT centers but also a lack of definitive phase-III data. Therefore, we review the role of PBT in current day practice of oncology to bring out the nuances that must guide the practice to choose suitable patients for PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gagan Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashmi Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Kanika S. Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sujit K. Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ritu Chandra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
He S, Ye C, Zhong N, Yang M, Yang X, Xiao J. Customized anterior craniocervical reconstruction via a modified high-cervical retropharyngeal approach following resection of a spinal tumor involving C1-2/C1-3. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 32:432-440. [PMID: 31756709 DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.spine19874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The surgical treatment of an upper cervical spinal tumor (UCST) at C1-2/C1-3 is challenging due to anterior exposure and reconstruction. Limited information has been published concerning the effective approach and reconstruction for an anterior procedure after C1-2/C1-3 UCST resection. The authors attempted to introduce a novel, customized, anterior craniocervical reconstruction between the occipital condyles and inferior vertebrae through a modified high-cervical retropharyngeal approach (mHCRA) in addressing C1-2/C1-3 spinal tumors. METHODS Seven consecutive patients underwent 2-stage UCST resection with circumferential reconstruction. Posterior decompression and occiput-cervical instrumentation was conducted at the stage 1 operation, and anterior craniocervical reconstruction using a 3D-printed implant was performed between the occipital condyles and inferior vertebrae via an mHCRA. The clinical characteristics, perioperative complications, and radiological outcomes were reviewed, and the rationale for anterior craniocervical reconstruction was also clarified. RESULTS The mean age of the 7 patients in the study was 47.6 ± 19.0 years (range 12-72 years) when referred to the authors' center. Six patients (85.7%) had recurrent tumor status, and the interval from primary to recurrence status was 53.0 ± 33.7 months (range 24-105 months). Four patients (57.1%) were diagnosed with a spinal tumor involving C1-3, and 3 patients (42.9%) with a C1-2 tumor. For the anterior procedure, the mean surgical duration and average blood loss were 4.1 ± 0.9 hours (range 3.0-6.0 hours) and 558.3 ± 400.5 ml (range 100-1300 ml), respectively. No severe perioperative complications occurred, except 1 patient with transient dysphagia. The mean pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were 8.0 ± 0.8 (range 7-9) and 2.4 ± 0.5 (range 2.0-3.0; p < 0.001), respectively, and the mean improvement rate of cervical spinal cord function was 54.7% ± 13.8% (range 42.9%-83.3%) based on the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale score (p < 0.001). Circumferential instrumentation was in good position and no evidence of disease was found at the mean follow-up of 14.8 months (range 7.3-24.2 months). CONCLUSIONS The mHCRA provides optimal access to the surgical field at the C0-3 level. Customized anterior craniocervical fixation between the occipital condyles and inferior vertebrae can be feasible and effective in managing anterior reconstruction after UCST resection.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kremenevski N, Schlaffer SM, Coras R, Kinfe TM, Graillon T, Buchfelder M. Skull Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas. Neuroendocrinology 2020; 110:836-847. [PMID: 32541136 DOI: 10.1159/000509386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Skull base chordomas account for less than 0.2% and chondrosarcomas for less than 0.15% of all intracranial tumors. Although their clinical and imaging presentations are similar, they derive from different origins. Chordomas arise from embryonic remnants of the primitive notochord and chondrosarcomas from primitive mesenchymal cells or from the embryonic rest of the cranial cartilaginous matrix. Both entities are characterized by infiltration and destruction of the surrounding bone and soft tissue and a high locoregional recurrence rate. Chondrosarcomas, when treated with similar complex strategies, display a much better prognosis than chordomas. The overall survival is approximately 65% for chordomas and 80% for chondrosarcomas at 5 years and 30 and 50%, respectively, at 10 years. Chordomas are divided into the following 3 histological types: classical (conventional), chondroid, and dedifferentiated. Chondrosarcomas have conventional, mesenchymal, clear cell, and dedifferentiated subgroups. Both tumor entities often present with nonspecific symptoms, and headaches are the most reported initial symptom. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are required to determine the tumor localization and the extent of tumor growth. The treatment philosophy is to maximize tumor resection, minimize morbidity, and preserve function. Neurosurgical approaches commonly used for the resection of intracranial chordomas and chondrosarcomas are transsphenoidal, transbasal, cranio-orbitozygomatic, transzygomatic extended middle fossa, transcondylar, and transmaxillary approaches. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are not sensitive to chemotherapy and there are no approved drugs for their treatment. The present treatment concept is a combination of surgical resection with a maximal excision and preserving patients' quality of life by adjuvant radiotherapy for both chordomas and chondrosarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Kremenevski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany,
| | | | - Roland Coras
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Mehari Kinfe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Graillon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, CHU Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Michael Buchfelder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mohamed Ali A, Mathis T, Bensadoun RJ, Thariat J. Radiation induced optic neuropathy: Does treatment modality influence the risk? Bull Cancer 2019; 106:1160-1176. [PMID: 31757405 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiation induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a rare but disastrous complication of radiation therapy in treatment of periorbital tumors. The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence of RION in series of patients treated from peri orbital tumors by recent photon and proton irradiation modalities. We searched the Pub Med database for studies in periorbital tumors including base of skull, sinonasal, pituitary, nasopharyngeal tumors and craniopharyngioma treated with Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and with proton beam therapy (PBT) between 1992 and 2017 excluding metastatic tumors, lymphomas, pediatric series, those treated mainly with chemotherapy, target therapy and those written in languages other than English and French. The result retrieved 421 articles that were revised by the panel. Fourteen articles with IMRT and 27 with PBT reported usable data for the review from which 31studies that had pointed to the doses to the optic nerve (ON) and/or optic chiasm (OC) and incidence of RION have been analyzed. We have found that the incidence of RION had been reported fairly in both modalities and many other factors related to the patient, tumor, and irradiation process interplay in its development. We have concluded that proper treatment planning, good selection of treatment modality, adherence to dose constraints applied to critical structures all along with regular oncological and ophthalmological follow up, control of co-morbidities and early intervention, could help reducing its magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Mohamed Ali
- Sohag University, Sohag University Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag East, 82524 Sohag, Egypt
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France; UMR-CNRS 5510, Mateis, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre François-Baclesse/ARCHADE, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3, avenue General Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN - UMR6534, boulevard du Marechal Juin, 14050 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Metwali H, Samii A, Gerganov V, Giordano M, Fahlbusch R, Samii M. The Significance of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Resection of Skull Base Chordomas. World Neurosurg 2019; 128:e185-e194. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
25
|
Alahmari M, Temel Y. Skull base chordoma treated with proton therapy: A systematic review. Surg Neurol Int 2019; 10:96. [PMID: 31528434 PMCID: PMC6744726 DOI: 10.25259/sni-213-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Chordoma located in the skull base is usually a challenging surgical condition. It is often not possible to achieve gross total resection. Residual tumors have been treated with adjuvant focal radiation therapy employing high-energy particles most commonly through proton beam. In this review, we systematically analyzed indications and outcomes of this treatment with respect to local control rates of the lesion and factors determining recurrence of skull base chordomas. In addition, we collected data on treatment-associated radiation-induced side effects. Methods: In line with the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a literature search algorithm for relevant articles using three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to evaluate all identified studies published between 1980 and 2018. Results: Our review included 11 studies for analysis (n = 511 patients). The mean age of the study population was 47.3 ± 5.8 years. The mean dose of postsurgical irradiation at the time of initial treatment was 71.1 ± 3.1 Gy. The mean follow-up duration was 45.0 ± 17.5 months. Within this follow-up duration, recurrence occurred in 26.8% of the patients. The mean time to recurrence was 34.5 ± 15.2 months. A significant number of patients experienced side effects varying from Grade 1 (mild dermatitis) to Grade 4 (temporal lobe necrosis and visual disorders). Conclusion: Despite advances in proton therapy, recurrence rates in skull base chordoma remain high. The toxicity of proton therapy may be more prevalent than generally thought. Unfortunately, there is substantial variation in the methods of data reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Alahmari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, King Fahad Hospital of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, AL-Khobar, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gatfield ER, Noble DJ, Barnett GC, Early NY, Hoole ACF, Kirkby NF, Jefferies SJ, Burnet NG. Tumour Volume and Dose Influence Outcome after Surgery and High-dose Photon Radiotherapy for Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma of the Skull Base and Spine. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 30:243-253. [PMID: 29402600 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with chordoma and low-grade chondrosarcoma after surgery and high-dose radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS High-dose photon radiotherapy was delivered to 28 patients at the Neuro-oncology Unit at Addenbrooke's Hospital (Cambridge, UK) between 1996 and 2016. Twenty-four patients were treated with curative intent, 17 with chordoma, seven with low-grade chondrosarcoma, with a median dose of 65 Gy (range 65-70 Gy). Local control and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median follow-up was 83 months (range 7-205 months). The 5 year disease-specific survival for chordoma patients treated with radical intent was 85%; the local control rate was 74%. The 5 year disease-specific survival for chondrosarcoma patients treated with radical intent was 100%; the local control rate was 83%. The mean planning target volume (PTV) was 274.6 ml (median 124.7 ml). A PTV of 110 ml or less was a good predictor of local control, with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity. For patients treated with radical intent, this threshold of 110 ml or less for the PTV revealed a statistically significant difference when comparing local control with disease recurrence (P = 0.019, Fisher's exact test). Our data also suggest that the probability of disease control may be partly related to both target volume and radiotherapy dose. CONCLUSION Our results show that refined high-dose photon radiotherapy, following tumour resection by a specialist surgical team, is effective in the long-term control of chordoma and low-grade chondrosarcoma, even in the presence of metal reconstruction. The results presented here will provide a useful source for comparison between high-dose photon therapy and proton beam therapy in a UK setting, in order to establish best practice for the management of chordoma and low-grade chondrosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Gatfield
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
| | - D J Noble
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - G C Barnett
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Y Early
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - A C F Hoole
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - N F Kirkby
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S J Jefferies
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - N G Burnet
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Palm RF, Oliver DE, Yang GQ, Abuodeh Y, Naghavi AO, Johnstone PAS. The role of dose escalation and proton therapy in perioperative or definitive treatment of chondrosarcoma and chordoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2019; 125:642-651. [PMID: 30644538 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are a rare but challenging subset of tumors to treat; however, previous studies have shown benefits from proton therapy, which are thought to be primarily driven by prescription conformality permitting homogeneous tumor dosing and the allowance of higher doses. No retrospective studies to date have directly compared the outcomes of conventional and particle therapy or examined the role of high doses (specifically ≥70 Gy) in definitive radiotherapy (DRT) or perioperative radiotherapy (PRT) for both types of malignancies. METHODS A total of 863 patients with chondrosarcoma and 715 patients with chordoma treated with nonpalliative proton or conventional radiation therapy with a dose range of 20 to 80 Gy and at least 15 months of follow-up were identified from the National Cancer Data Base for the years 2003-2014. The primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) was evaluated, and clinical features, including age, sex, grade, clinical stage, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, were compared. RESULTS Patients receiving DRT were older and had more advanced disease. In DRT for chondrosarcoma, a high dose (40.6% vs 16.9%; P = .006) and proton therapy (75.0% vs 19.1%; P = .046) were associated with improved OS at 5 years in a multivariate analysis. In DRT for chordoma, proton therapy was associated with improved OS at 5 years in a multivariate analysis (100% vs 34.1%; P = .031), and a high dose for chordoma was significant for improved OS in a univariate analysis with both DRT (79.0% vs 54.1%; P = .027) and PRT (83.3% vs 77.4%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS In the largest retrospective series to date, dose escalation and proton radiotherapy were associated with improved OS in patients with chondrosarcoma and chordoma despite limited follow-up and access to particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Daniel E Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - George Q Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yazan Abuodeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A S Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Scala M, Vennarini S, Garrè ML, Tortora D, Cianchetti M, Fellin F, Lorentini S, Pavanello M. Radiation-Induced Moyamoya Syndrome After Proton Therapy in Child with Clival Chordoma: Natural History and Surgical Treatment. World Neurosurg 2018; 123:306-309. [PMID: 30583132 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy has proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of radioresistant skull base tumors such as chordomas. Thanks to the peculiar physical properties of the proton beam, radiation energy is delivered in a narrow space called the Bragg peak and the surrounding normal tissues receive a minimal amount of the radiation dose. This is important to lower the risk of radiation-induced damage, especially in children. However, local adverse effects in proximity to the target volume may occur. In particular, the development of moyamoya syndrome (MMS) has been rarely reported in children receiving proton beam therapy for brain tumors. CASE DESCRIPTION We report on a child who developed rapidly progressive MMS after proton beam therapy for a clivus chordoma. A combined indirect revascularization procedure by encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis and encephalo-myo-synangiosis was performed with good neuroradiologic and clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the presence of known risk factors for MMS, strict neuroimaging surveillance is indicated in all patients treated with radiotherapy including those receiving proton beam therapy. We suggest that an early revascularization procedure should be considered in patients with worsening symptoms and/or sign of neuroradiologic progression of cerebral vasculopathy. This management of MMS could lower the risk of permanent neurologic deficits and improve patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Scala
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
| | | | - Maria Luisa Garrè
- Department of Neuroncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Domenico Tortora
- Department of Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marco Pavanello
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dutta SW, El Sayed I, Lehrer EJ, Showalter TN, Jha RK, Khan L, Trifiletti DM. Particles versus photons for the treatment of chordoma. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil W Dutta
- University of Virginia; Radiation Oncology; PO BOX 800383 Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - Iman El Sayed
- Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics; Alexandria Egypt
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Radiation Oncology; 1184 5th Avenue, 1st Floor New York USA 10029
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- University of Virginia; Radiation Oncology; PO BOX 800383 Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - Robin K Jha
- Punjabi University; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Drug Research; Marathahalli Ashwatha Nagar Bengaluru Karnataka India 560037
| | - Luluel Khan
- University of Toronto; Radiation Oncology; 2075 Bayview Avenue Toronto ON Canada M4N 3M5
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Takagi M, Demizu Y, Nagano F, Terashima K, Fujii O, Jin D, Mima M, Niwa Y, Katsui K, Suga M, Yamashita T, Akagi T, Sakata KI, Fuwa N, Okimoto T. Treatment outcomes of proton or carbon ion therapy for skull base chordoma: a retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:232. [PMID: 30477528 PMCID: PMC6260885 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1173-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The usefulness of particle therapy for skull base chordoma has not been established. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the treatment outcomes of proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion therapy (CIT) in patients with skull base chordoma at a single institution. METHODS All patients who underwent PT or CIT with curative intent between 2003 and 2014 at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center were included in this study. Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Eleven (46%) received PT and 13 (54%) received CIT. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Late toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS The median follow-up was 71.5 months (range, 14-175 months). The five-year LC, PFS and OS rates were 85, 81, and 86%, respectively. The LC (P = 0.048), PFS (P = 0.028) and OS (P = 0.012) were significantly improved in patients who had undergone surgery before particle therapy. No significant differences were observed in the LC rate and the incidence of grade 2 or higher late toxicities between patients who received PT and CIT. CONCLUSIONS Both PT and CIT appear to be effective and safe treatments and show potential to become the standard treatments for skull base chordoma. To increase the local control, surgery before particle therapy is preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaru Takagi
- Proton Therapy Center, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, 3-1, East-1, North-33, Higashi-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 065-0033, Japan. .,Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Fumiko Nagano
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Osamu Fujii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Dongcun Jin
- Proton Therapy Center, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Mima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yasue Niwa
- Proton Therapy Center, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Katsui
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University, Okayama, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masaki Suga
- Department of Radiation Physics, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Yamashita
- Department of Radiation Physics, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Physics, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takashi Akagi
- Department of Radiation Physics, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koh-Ichi Sakata
- Department of Radiology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Fuwa
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhou J, Yang B, Wang X, Jing Z. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Radiotherapy with Photons and Particles for Chordoma After Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 117:46-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
32
|
Blanchard P, Gunn GB, Lin A, Foote RL, Lee NY, Frank SJ. Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:53-63. [PMID: 29173756 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Because of its sharp lateral penumbra and steep distal fall-off, proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages over photon therapy. In head and neck cancer, proton therapy has been used for decades in the treatment of skull-base tumors. In recent years the use of proton therapy has been extended to numerous other disease sites, including nasopharynx, oropharynx, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, periorbital tumors, skin, and salivary gland, or to reirradiation. The aim of this review is to present the physical properties and dosimetric benefit of proton therapy over advanced photon therapy; to summarize the clinical benefit described for each disease site; and to discuss issues of patient selection and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Gary Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Radiation dose constraints for organs at risk in neuro-oncology; the European Particle Therapy Network consensus. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:26-36. [PMID: 29779919 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For unbiased comparison of different radiation modalities and techniques, consensus on delineation of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs) and on their dose constraints is warranted. Following the publication of a digital, online atlas for OAR delineation in neuro-oncology by the same group, we assessed the brain OAR-dose constraints in a follow-up study. METHODS We performed a comprehensive search to identify the current papers on OAR dose constraints for normofractionated photon and particle therapy in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. Moreover, the included articles' reference lists were cross-checked for potential studies that met the inclusion criteria. Consensus was reached among 20 radiation oncology experts in the field of neuro-oncology. RESULTS For the OARs published in the neuro-oncology literature, we summarized the available literature and recommended dose constraints associated with certain levels of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) according to the recent ICRU recommendations. For those OARs with lacking or insufficient NTCP data, a proposal for effective and efficient data collection is given. CONCLUSION The use of the European Particle Therapy Network-consensus OAR dose constraints summarized in this article is recommended for the model-based approach comparing photon and proton beam irradiation as well as for prospective clinical trials including novel radiation techniques and/or modalities.
Collapse
|
34
|
Snider JW, Schneider RA, Poelma-Tap D, Stieb S, Murray FR, Placidi L, Albertini F, Lomax A, Bolsi A, Kliebsch U, Malyapa R, Weber DC. Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Radiation Therapy for Spinal Chordomas: A Large, Single-Institution Cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:226-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
35
|
Stacchiotti S, Gronchi A, Fossati P, Akiyama T, Alapetite C, Baumann M, Blay JY, Bolle S, Boriani S, Bruzzi P, Capanna R, Caraceni A, Casadei R, Colia V, Debus J, Delaney T, Desai A, Dileo P, Dijkstra S, Doglietto F, Flanagan A, Froelich S, Gardner PA, Gelderblom H, Gokaslan ZL, Haas R, Heery C, Hindi N, Hohenberger P, Hornicek F, Imai R, Jeys L, Jones RL, Kasper B, Kawai A, Krengli M, Leithner A, Logowska I, Martin Broto J, Mazzatenta D, Morosi C, Nicolai P, Norum OJ, Patel S, Penel N, Picci P, Pilotti S, Radaelli S, Ricchini F, Rutkowski P, Scheipl S, Sen C, Tamborini E, Thornton KA, Timmermann B, Torri V, Tunn PU, Uhl M, Yamada Y, Weber DC, Vanel D, Varga PP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA, Casali PG, Sommer J. Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: a position paper by the Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1230-1242. [PMID: 28184416 PMCID: PMC5452071 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Chordomas are rare, malignant bone tumors of the skull-base and axial skeleton. Until recently, there was no consensus among experts regarding appropriate clinical management of chordoma, resulting in inconsistent care and suboptimal outcomes for many patients. To address this shortcoming, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the Chordoma Foundation, the global chordoma patient advocacy group, convened a multi-disciplinary group of chordoma specialists to define by consensus evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to chordoma. In January 2015, the first recommendations of this group were published, covering the management of primary and metastatic chordomas. Additional evidence and further discussion were needed to develop recommendations about the management of local-regional failures. Thus, ESMO and CF convened a second consensus group meeting in November 2015 to address the treatment of locally relapsed chordoma. This meeting involved over 60 specialists from Europe, the United States and Japan with expertise in treatment of patients with chordoma. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication and complements the recommendations of the first position paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Gronchi
- Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
| | - P Fossati
- CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia.,Department of Radiotherapy, IEO-European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - T Akiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - C Alapetite
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris.,Institut Curie-Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay (ICPO), Orsay, France
| | - M Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - J Y Blay
- Cancer Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon
| | - S Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - S Boriani
- Department of Degenerative and Oncological Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute Bologna, Bologna
| | - P Bruzzi
- Department of Epidemiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova
| | - R Capanna
- University Clinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology AO Pisa, Pisa
| | - A Caraceni
- Palliative Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
| | - R Casadei
- Orthopedic Department, Rizzoli Institute Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Colia
- Departments of Cancer Medicine
| | - J Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Delaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Desai
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham
| | - P Dileo
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London, UK
| | - S Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F Doglietto
- Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Flanagan
- University College London Cancer Institute, London.,Histopathology Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, UK
| | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Paris Diderot University, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - P A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Z L Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, USA
| | - R Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Heery
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - N Hindi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - P Hohenberger
- Sarcoma Unit, Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Hornicek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - R Imai
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Research Center Hospital for Charged Particle Therapy, Chiba, Japan
| | - L Jeys
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - R L Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - B Kasper
- Sarcoma Unit, Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - A Kawai
- Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center, Tokio, Japan
| | - M Krengli
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - A Leithner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - I Logowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Martin Broto
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - D Mazzatenta
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna
| | - C Morosi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
| | - P Nicolai
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - O J Norum
- Department of Tumor Orthopedic Surgery, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - N Penel
- Cencer Medicine Department, Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre, Lille, France
| | - P Picci
- Laboratory of Oncologic Research, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna
| | - S Pilotti
- Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - S Radaelli
- Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
| | - F Ricchini
- Palliative Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - S Scheipl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - C Sen
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - E Tamborini
- Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - K A Thornton
- Center for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - B Timmermann
- Particle Therapy Department, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - V Torri
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - P U Tunn
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Y Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - D C Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institut PSI, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - D Vanel
- Department of Radiology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - P P Varga
- National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - J Sommer
- Chordoma Foundation, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fung V, Calugaru V, Bolle S, Mammar H, Alapetite C, Maingon P, De Marzi L, Froelich S, Habrand JL, Dendale R, Noël G, Feuvret L. Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas in 106 patients: A dose adaptive radiation protocol. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:198-202. [PMID: 29310903 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate clinical results and safety of a dose adaptive protocol based on tumor volume coverage and critical structure constraints, for the treatment of skull base chordomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between May 2006 and October 2012, 106 patients with skull base chordoma were treated by combined photon and proton irradiation. Prescribed dose levels were 68.4, 70.2, 72 and 73.8 Gy(RBE) in once daily fractionation of 1.8 Gy(RBE). Dose level and dosimetric constraints to organs at risk depended on postoperative residual Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) coverage. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 61 months, the 2-year, 4-year, and 5-year LC rates were 88.6%, 78.3%, and 75.1%, respectively. GTV > 25 mL (p = 0.034, HR = 2.22; 95%CI 1.06-4.62) was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of LC. The 2-year, 4-year, and 5-year OS rates were 99%, 90.2%, and 88.3%, respectively. Grade 3-5 late toxicity was observed in 7 patients, resulting in 93% 5-year freedom from high-grade toxicity. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the probability of LC of skull base chordomas depends on postoperative GTV. The dose adaptive protocol achieves acceptable local control. Future studies should investigate whether further dose escalation to doses in excess of 74 Gy(RBE) would achieve better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivien Fung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France; Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Amiens site SUD, France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Hamid Mammar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, groupe Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris), France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France
| | - Sébastien Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Lariboisière (Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris), France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France
| | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Loïc Feuvret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie - Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), France; Department of Radiation Oncology, groupe Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris), France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Austin AM, Douglass MJ, Nguyen GT, Penfold SN. A radiobiological Markov simulation tool for aiding decision making in proton therapy referral. Phys Med 2017; 44:72-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
38
|
|
39
|
Kim JW, Suh CO, Hong CK, Kim EH, Lee IJ, Cho J, Lee KS. Maximum surgical resection and adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for skull base chordoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159:1825-1834. [PMID: 27502775 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-2909-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local recurrence is common after surgical resection of clivus chordoma. We report the results of maximum surgical resection followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB). METHODS We reviewed 14 consecutive clivus chordoma cases undergoing postoperative IMRT-SIB using the institutional protocol between 2005 and 2013. Total and near-total resections were achieved in 11 patients (78.6 %), partial in 2 patients (14.3 %), and 1 patient (7.1 %) received RT for recurrent tumor after total resection. Gross residual or the high-risk area defined the planning target volume (PTV)1; PTV2 was the postoperative tumor bed plus a 3-5-mm margin, and PTV3 was PTV2 plus a 5-10 mm margin. A moderate hypofractionation schedule was used: doses to PTV1, PTV2 and PTV3 were 3.9 Gy, 3.15 Gy and 2.8 Gy through 15 fractions for the first two patients, and the rest received 2.5 Gy, 2.2 Gy and 1.8 Gy through 25 fractions. The biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was 65-68 Gy for PTV1, 52-56 Gy for PTV2, and 44.3-44.8 Gy for PTV3. RESULTS Median follow-up was 41 months. Eight patients were free of disease for median 42.5 months (range 23-91 months), four patients had stable disease for median 60.5 months (range 39-113 months), and 1 patient showed partial response for 38 months after RT. Local progression was seen in one patient who received EQD2 67.8 Gy after partial resection. Estimated 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 92.9 %. Surgery improved the neurologic deficit in six patients, and IMRT-SIB was well tolerated without lasting toxicity. CONCLUSION Our experience suggests that maximum resection and high-dose IMRT-SIB can achieve local control without significant morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Won Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Chang-Ki Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea
| | - Eui Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Kyu-Sung Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Förander P, Bartek J, Fagerlund M, Benmaklouf H, Dodoo E, Shamikh A, Stjärne P, Mathiesen T. Multidisciplinary management of clival chordomas; long-term clinical outcome in a single-institution consecutive series. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159:1857-1868. [PMID: 28735379 PMCID: PMC5590026 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-017-3266-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chordomas of the skull base have high recurrence rates even after radical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. We evaluate the long-term clinical outcome using multidisciplinary management in the treatment of clival chordomas. METHODS Between 1984 and 2015, 22 patients diagnosed with an intracranial chordoma were treated at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Sixteen of 22 were treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for tumour residual or progression during the disease course. Seven of 22 received adjuvant fractionated radiotherapy and 5 of these also received proton beam radiotherapy. RESULTS Fifteen of 22 (68%) patients were alive at follow-up after a median of 80 months (range 22-370 months) from the time of diagnosis. Six were considered disease free after >10-year follow-up. The median tumour volume at the time of GKRS was 4.7 cm3, range 0.8-24.3 cm3. Median prescription dose was 16 Gy, range 12-20 Gy to the 40-50% isodose curve. Five patients received a second treatment with GKRS while one received three treatments. After GKRS patients were followed with serial imaging for a median of 34 months (range 6-180 months). Four of 16 patients treated with GKRS were in need of a salvage microsurgical procedure compared to 5/7 treated with conventional or proton therapy. CONCLUSION After surgery, 7/22 patients received conventional and/or photon therapy, while 15/22 were treated with GKRS for tumour residual or followed with serial imaging with GKRS as needed upon tumour progression. With this multidisciplinary management, 5- and 10-year survivals of 82% and 50% were achieved, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petter Förander
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Michael Fagerlund
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hamza Benmaklouf
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ernest Dodoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alia Shamikh
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Stjärne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tiit Mathiesen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Blanchard P, Frank SJ. [Proton therapy for head and neck cancers]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:515-520. [PMID: 28869195 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The absence of exit dose and the sharp lateral penumbra are key assets for proton therapy, which are responsible for its dosimetric superiority over advanced photon radiotherapy. Dosimetric comparisons have consistently shown a reduction of the integral dose and the dose to organs at risk favouring intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) over intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The structures that benefit the most of these dosimetric improvements in head and neck cancers are the anterior oral cavity, the posterior fossa, the visual apparatus and swallowing structures. A number of publications have concluded that these dosimetric differences actually translate into reduced toxicities with IMPT, for example with regards to reduced weight loss or need for feeding tube. Patient survival is usually similar to IMRT series, except in base of skull or sinonasal malignancies, where a survival advantage of IMPT could exist. The goals of the present review is to describe the major characteristics of proton therapy, to analyse the clinical data with regards to head and neck cancer patients, and to highlight the issue of patient selection and physical and biological uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Blanchard
- Department of radiation oncology, MD Anderson cancer center, the university of Texas, Houston, Texas, États-Unis; Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy cancer campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
| | - S J Frank
- Department of radiation oncology, MD Anderson cancer center, the university of Texas, Houston, Texas, États-Unis
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Leeman JE, Romesser PB, Zhou Y, McBride S, Riaz N, Sherman E, Cohen MA, Cahlon O, Lee N. Proton therapy for head and neck cancer: expanding the therapeutic window. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e254-e265. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30179-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
43
|
Demizu Y, Mizumoto M, Onoe T, Nakamura N, Kikuchi Y, Shibata T, Okimoto T, Sakurai H, Akimoto T, Ono K, Daimon T, Murayama S. Proton beam therapy for bone sarcomas of the skull base and spine: A retrospective nationwide multicenter study in Japan. Cancer Sci 2017; 108:972-977. [PMID: 28182320 PMCID: PMC5448607 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2016] [Revised: 02/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective, nationwide multicenter study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of proton beam therapy for bone sarcomas of the skull base and spine in Japan. Eligibility criteria included: (i) histologically proven bone sarcomas of the skull base or spine; (ii) no metastases; (iii) ≥20 years of age; and (iv) no prior treatment with radiotherapy. Of the 103 patients treated between January 2004 and January 2012, we retrospectively analyzed data from 96 patients who were followed-up for >6 months or had died within 6 months. Seventy-two patients (75.0%) had chordoma, 20 patients (20.8%) had chondrosarcoma, and four patients (7.2%) had osteosarcoma. The most frequent tumor locations included the skull base in 68 patients (70.8%) and the sacral spine in 13 patients (13.5%). Patients received a median total dose of 70.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). The median follow-up was 52.6 (range, 6.3-131.9) months. The 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 75.3%, 49.6%, and 71.1%, respectively. Performance status was a significant factor for overall survival and progression-free survival, whilst sex was a significant factor for local control. Acute Grade 3 and late toxicities of ≥Grade 3 were observed in nine patients (9.4%) each (late Grade 4 toxicities [n = 3 patients; 3.1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Proton beam therapy is safe and effective for the treatment of bone sarcomas of the skull base and spine in Japan. However, larger prospective studies with a longer follow-up are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Proton Therapy Division, Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kikuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | | | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kota Ono
- Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takashi Daimon
- Department of Biostatistics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Murayama
- Proton Therapy Division, Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Proton therapy is characterized by certain physical properties leading to a reduction in integral dose. As proton therapy becomes more widely available, the ongoing discussion on the real indications for proton therapy becomes more important. In the present article, data on proton therapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is summarized and discussed in view of modern photon treatments. Still today, no randomized controlled trials are available confirming any clinical benefit of protons in CNS tumors. For certain skull base lesions, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas, dose escalation is possible with protons thus patients should be referred to a proton center if readily available. For vestibular schwannoma, at present, proton data are inferior to advanced photons. For glioma patients, early data is present for low-grade gliomas, presenting comparable results to photons; dose escalation studies for high-grade gliomas have led to significant side effects, thus strategies of dose-escalation need to rethought. For skull base meningiomas, data from stereotactic series and IMRT present excellent local control with minimal side effects, thus any improvement with protons might only be marginal. The largest benefit is considered in pediatric CNS tumors, due to the intricate radiation sensitivity of children's normal tissue, as well as the potential of long-term survivorship. Long-term data is still lacking, and even recent analyses do not all lead to a clear reduction in side effects with improvement of outcome; furthermore, clinical data seem to be comparable. However, based on the preclinical evidence, proton therapy should be evaluated in every pediatric patient. Protons most likely have a benefit in terms of reduction of long-term side effects, such as neurocognitive sequelae or secondary malignancies; moreover, dose escalation can be performed in radio-resistant histologies. Clinical data with long-term follow-up is still warranted to prove any superiority to advanced photons in CNS tumors. If available, protons should be evaluated for chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base and pediatric tumors. However, many factors are important for excellent oncology care, and no time delay or inferior oncological care should be accepted for the sake of protons only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ahmed KA, Demetriou SK, McDonald M, Johnstone PA. Clinical Benefits of Proton Beam Therapy for Tumors of the Skull Base. Cancer Control 2017; 23:213-9. [PMID: 27556661 DOI: 10.1177/107327481602300304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The unique radiobiological properties of protons have been understood for many years. In addition, many of the clinical benefits of radiotherapy were first noted in tumors involving the skull base. More public attention has been given to proton beam therapy due to the increasing number of centers now in operation or in the planning stages for offering this treatment option. METHODS We reviewed the physical properties of protons and the clinical studies performed to justify their use in the management of skull-base tumors and determine the benefits of proton beam therapy. RESULTS Published reports suggest a benefit to proton beam therapy for use in tumors of the skull base, including craniopharyngiomas, chordomas, skull-base sarcomas, and unresectable meningiomas. CONCLUSIONS Use of proton beam therapy may be beneficial in select patients. Surgical and medical oncologists should have a general understanding of such cases to facilitate their appropriate referral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Santegoeds R, Yakkioui Y, Jahanshahi A, Raven G, Van Overbeeke J, Herrler A, Temel Y. Notochord isolation using laser capture microdissection. J Chem Neuroanat 2017; 80:37-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
47
|
Mohan R, Grosshans D. Proton therapy - Present and future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; 109:26-44. [PMID: 27919760 PMCID: PMC5303653 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Revised: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In principle, proton therapy offers a substantial clinical advantage over conventional photon therapy. This is because of the unique depth-dose characteristics of protons, which can be exploited to achieve significant reductions in normal tissue doses proximal and distal to the target volume. These may, in turn, allow escalation of tumor doses and greater sparing of normal tissues, thus potentially improving local control and survival while at the same time reducing toxicity and improving quality of life. Protons, accelerated to therapeutic energies ranging from 70 to 250MeV, typically with a cyclotron or a synchrotron, are transported to the treatment room where they enter the treatment head mounted on a rotating gantry. The initial thin beams of protons are spread laterally and longitudinally and shaped appropriately to deliver treatments. Spreading and shaping can be achieved by electro-mechanical means to treat the patients with "passively-scattered proton therapy" (PSPT) or using magnetic scanning of thin "beamlets" of protons of a sequence of initial energies. The latter technique can be used to treat patients with optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the most powerful proton modality. Despite the high potential of proton therapy, the clinical evidence supporting the broad use of protons is mixed. It is generally acknowledged that proton therapy is safe, effective and recommended for many types of pediatric cancers, ocular melanomas, chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Although promising results have been and continue to be reported for many other types of cancers, they are based on small studies. Considering the high cost of establishing and operating proton therapy centers, questions have been raised about their cost effectiveness. General consensus is that there is a need to conduct randomized trials and/or collect outcomes data in multi-institutional registries to unequivocally demonstrate the advantage of protons. Treatment planning and plan evaluation of PSPT and IMPT require special considerations compared to the processes used for photon treatment planning. The differences in techniques arise from the unique physical properties of protons but are also necessary because of the greater vulnerability of protons to uncertainties, especially from inter- and intra-fractional variations in anatomy. These factors must be considered in designing as well as evaluating treatment plans. In addition to anatomy variations, other sources of uncertainty in dose delivered to the patient include the approximations and assumptions of models used for computing dose distributions for planning of treatments. Furthermore, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is simplistically assumed to have a constant value of 1.1. In reality, the RBE is variable and a complex function of the energy of protons, dose per fraction, tissue and cell type, end point, etc. These uncertainties, approximations and current technological limitations of proton therapy may limit the achievement of its true potential. Ongoing research is aimed at better understanding the consequences of the various uncertainties on proton therapy and reducing the uncertainties through image-guidance, adaptive radiotherapy, further study of biological properties of protons and the development of novel dose computation and optimization methods. However, residual uncertainties will remain in spite of the best efforts. To increase the resilience of dose distributions in the face of uncertainties and improve our confidence in dose distributions seen on treatment plans, robust optimization techniques are being developed and implemented. We assert that, with such research, proton therapy will be a commonly applied radiotherapy modality for most types of solid cancers in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
The sellar region is a tiny anatomic compartment in which many lesions and developmental diseases can be found. If pituitary adenomas represent most of the sellar mass, it is important to recognize other pathologic conditions before any surgical procedure, because the optimal treatment may differ considerably from one lesion to another. A careful clinical evaluation followed by neuroimaging studies and an endocrinologic and ophtalmologic workup will lead, in most cases, to a diagnosis with near certainty. This article provides an overview of sellar diseases with emphasis on their most useful characteristics for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Bresson
- Neurosurgery Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France
| | - Philippe Herman
- ENT Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris VII - Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France
| | - Marc Polivka
- Department of Pathology, Lariboisiere Hospital, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France
| | - Sébastien Froelich
- Neurosurgery Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII - Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Thariat J, Vidal M, Gérard A, Hérault J, Carrie C, Hannoun-Lévi JM. [Indications and results for protontherapy in cancer treatments]. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:513-8. [PMID: 27614508 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose was to summarize results for proton therapy in cancer treatment. A systematic review has been done by selecting studies on the website www.pubmed.com (Medline) and using the following keywords: proton therapy, radiation therapy, cancer, chordoma, chondrosarcoma, uveal melanoma, retinoblastoma, meningioma, glioma, neurinoma, pituitary adenoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma and nasal cavity. There are several retrospective studies reporting results for proton therapy in cancer treatments in the following indications: ocular tumors, nasal tumors, skull-based tumors, pediatric tumors. There is no prospective study except one phase II trial in medulloblastoma. The use of proton therapy for these indications is due to dosimetric advantages offering better tumor coverage and organ at risk sparing in comparison with photon therapy. Clinical results are historically at least as efficient as photon therapy with a better toxicity profile in pediatric tumors (cognitive and endocrine functions, radiation-induced cancer) and a better tumoral control in tumors of the nasal cavity. Clinical advantages of proton therapy counterbalance its cost especially in pediatric tumors. Proton therapy could be used in other types of cancer. Proton therapy showed good outcome in ocular, nasal tumors, pediatric, skull-based and paraspinal tumors. Because of some dosimetric advantages, proton therapy could be proposed for other indications in cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Doyen
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - P-Y Bondiau
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - K Benezery
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - J Thariat
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - A Gérard
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - J Hérault
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - C Carrie
- Centre Léon-Bérard, radiation oncology, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - J-M Hannoun-Lévi
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, radiation oncology, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Habrand JL, Datchary J, Bolle S, Beaudré A, de Marzi L, Beccaria K, Stefan D, Grill J, Dendale R. Reprint of "Chordoma in children: Case-report and review of literature". Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016; 21:412-7. [PMID: 27330429 PMCID: PMC4899428 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We report an exceptional case of a very late local failure in a 9-year-old boy presenting with a chordoma of the cranio-cervical junction. The child was initially treated with a combination of surgical resection followed by high dose photon-proton radiation therapy. This aggressive therapy allowed a 9-year remission with minimal side-effects. Unfortunately, he subsequently presented with a local failure managed with a second full-dose course of protons. The child died one year later from local bleeding of unclear etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 rue du Général Harris, 14076 Caen, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Campus universitaire, 91406 Orsay, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Datchary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 rue du Général Harris, 14076 Caen, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Campus universitaire, 91406 Orsay, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Beaudré
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Campus universitaire, 91406 Orsay, France
| | - Kévin Beccaria
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Necker-Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 rue du Général Harris, 14076 Caen, France
| | - Jacques Grill
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Protontherapy Center, Campus universitaire, 91406 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|