1
|
Yu J, Jiang L, Zhao L, Yang X, Wang X, Yang D, Zhuo M, Chen H, Huang W, Zhu Z, Zhang M, Song Y, Li Q, Ma Z, Wang Q, Qu Y, Yu R, Yu H, Zhao J, Shi A. High-dose hyperfractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy versus standard-dose radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024:S2213-2600(24)00189-9. [PMID: 39146944 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00189-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the past 20 years, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy has been the treatment of choice for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), which has a poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose, accelerated, hyperfractionated, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (54 Gy in 30 fractions) versus standard-dose radiotherapy (45 Gy in 30 fractions) as a first-line treatment for LS-SCLC. METHODS This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was performed at 16 public hospitals in China. The key inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed LS-SCLC, who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and who were previously untreated or had received one course of cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) of 45 Gy in 30 fractions to the gross tumour volume or VMAT with a simultaneous integrated boost of 54 Gy in 30 fractions to the gross tumour volume starting 0-42 days after the first chemotherapy course. Both groups received 10 fractions of twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy per week. The planning target volume was 45 Gy in 30 fractions in both groups. Patients with responsive disease received prophylactic cranial radiotherapy (25 Gy in 10 fractions). Randomisation was performed using a centralised interactive web response system, stratified by ECOG performance status, disease stage, previous chemotherapy course, and chemotherapy choice. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in the as-treated population. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214003. FINDINGS From June 30, 2017, to April 6, 2021, 224 patients (102 [46%] females and 122 [54%] males; median age 64 years [IQR 58-68]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the 54 Gy group (n=108) or 45 Gy (n=116) group. The median follow-up was 46 months (IQR 33-56). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the 54 Gy group (60·7 months [95% CI 49·2-62·0]) than in the 45 Gy group (39·5 months [27·5-51·4]; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·37-0·72]; p=0·003). Treatment was tolerable, and the chemotherapy-related and radiotherapy-related toxicities were similar between the groups. The grade 3-4 radiotherapy toxicities were oesophagitis (14 [13%] of 108 patients in the 54 Gy group vs 14 [12%] of 116 patients in the 45 Gy group; p=0·84) and pneumonitis (five [5%] of 108 patients vs seven [6%] of 116 patients; p=0·663). Only one treatment-related death occurred in the 54 Gy group (myocardial infarction). The study was prematurely terminated by an independent data safety monitoring board on April 30, 2021, based on evidence of sufficient clinical benefit. INTERPRETATION Compared with standard-dose thoracic radiotherapy (45 Gy), high-dose radiotherapy (54 Gy) improved overall survival without increasing toxicity in a cohort of patients aged 18-70 years with LS-SCLC. Our results support the use of twice-daily accelerated thoracic radiotherapy (54 Gy) with concurrent chemotherapy as an alternative first-line LS-SCLC treatment option. FUNDING Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology-Linghang Cancer Research, the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation, and Clinical Research Fund For Distinguished Young Scholars of Peking University Cancer Hospital and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayi Yu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Leilei Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lina Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xue Yang
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Dan Yang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Minglei Zhuo
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hanxiao Chen
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan, China, Department 1st of Radiation Oncology
| | - Zhengfei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yipeng Song
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Quanfu Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, China
| | - Zhanshu Ma
- Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, China
| | - Qifeng Wang
- Thoracic Department of Radiation Oncology Ward 1, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliate Cancer Hospital Of University Of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yanli Qu
- Department of Abdominal and Lymphoma Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hosipital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Rong Yu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Huiming Yu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - Anhui Shi
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levin N, Killingberg KT, Halvorsen TO, Danielsen S, Grønberg BH. Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans in a Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing 2 Schedules of Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00475-9. [PMID: 38583494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is limited clinical data for recommendations on how to deliver thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) concurrently with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. We reviewed radiation therapy treatment plans in a randomized phase 2 trial comparing high-dose with standard-dose twice-daily TRT to assess treatment planning techniques, dose-volume data for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs), evaluate compliance with the protocol, associations with radiation-induced toxicity, and whether an imbalance in treatment planning parameters might be a reason for the large survival benefit of the higher dose (median overall survival 43.6 vs 22.6 months). METHODS AND MATERIALS In the study, 170 patients were to receive 4 courses of platinum/etoposide and were randomized to receive twice-daily TRT of 60 Gy/40 fractions (fx) or 45 Gy/30 fx. TRT treatment plans for those who received 1 or more fx of TRT (n = 166) were analyzed. RESULTS The most common treatment planning technique was 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (67%). The 75th percentile of the reported dose-volume parameters for the OARs were within the protocol-recommended limits for both groups. Mean doses to the esophagus of 25.5 Gy (IQR, 20.2-31.3; 60 Gy/40 fx) and 24.3 Gy (IQR, 20.3-27.5; 45 Gy/30 fx) were associated with 21% and 18% ≥ grade 3 acute esophagitis, respectively. In the 60 Gy/40 fx group, a mean dose to the lungs of 16.5 Gy (IQR, 15.8-16.9), V20 Gy of 29.5% (IQR, 28.8-30.4), and V5 Gy of 65.6% (IQR, 61.5-68.7) led to ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in 4% of the patients. There was no ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in the 45 Gy/30 fx group. The treatment planning techniques, the percentage change in volumes between original and redelineated OARs, planning target volumes, relative doses, and laterality were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups. CONCLUSIONS Considering the incidences of severe radiation-induced toxicities were within the range of other recent trials, the reported doses to the OARs appear to be safe. Treatment planning parameters were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups, supporting that the survival benefit of the twice-daily 60 Gy/40 fx TRT schedule was due to the higher dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Levin
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Kristin T Killingberg
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tarje O Halvorsen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Signe Danielsen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grønberg BH, Killingberg KT, Fløtten Ø, Brustugun OT, Hornslien K, Madebo T, Langer SW, Schytte T, Nyman J, Risum S, Tsakonas G, Engleson J, Halvorsen TO. High-dose versus standard-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:321-331. [PMID: 33662285 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30742-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for limited stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 30 fractions is considered to be the most effective schedule. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-dose, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy in 40 fractions improves survival. METHODS This open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial was done at 22 public hospitals in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment-naive confirmed limited stage SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2, and measurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 were eligible. All participants received four courses of intravenous cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (area under the curve 5-6 mg/mL × min, Calvert's formula) on day 1 and intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 3 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) in permuted blocks (sized between 4 and 10) stratifying for ECOG performance status, disease stage, and presence of pleural effusion to receive thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 30 fractions or 60 Gy in 40 fractions to the primary lung tumour and PET-CT positive lymph node metastases starting 20-28 days after the first chemotherapy course. Patients in both groups received two fractions per day, ten fractions per week. Responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation of 25-30 Gy. The primary endpoint, 2-year overall survival, was assessed after all patients had been followed up for a minimum of 2 years. All randomly assigned patients were included in the efficacy analyses, patients commencing thoracic radiotherapy were included in the safety analyses. Follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02041845. FINDINGS Between July 8, 2014, and June 6, 2018, 176 patients were enrolled, 170 of whom were randomly assigned to 60 Gy (n=89) or 45 Gy (n=81). Median follow-up for the primary analysis was 49 months (IQR 38-56). At 2 years, 66 (74·2% [95% CI 63·8-82·9]) patients in the 60 Gy group were alive, compared with 39 (48·1% [36·9-59·5]) patients in the 45 Gy group (odds ratio 3·09 [95% CI 1·62-5·89]; p=0·0005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (72 [81%] of 89 patients in the 60 Gy group vs 62 [81%] of 77 patients in the 45 Gy group), neutropenic infections (24 [27%] vs 30 [39%]), thrombocytopenia (21 [24%] vs 19 [25%]), anaemia (14 [16%] vs 15 [20%]), and oesophagitis (19 [21%] vs 14 [18%]). There were 55 serious adverse events in 38 patients in the 60 Gy group and 56 serious adverse events in 44 patients in the 45 Gy group. There were three treatment-related deaths in each group (one neutropenic fever, one aortic dissection, and one pneumonitis in the 60 Gy group; one thrombocytic bleeding, one cerebral infarction, and one myocardial infarction in the 45 Gy group). INTERPRETATION The higher radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy resulted in a substantial survival improvement compared with 45 Gy, without increased toxicity, suggesting that twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy is an alternative to existing schedules. FUNDING The Norwegian Cancer Society, The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Kristin Toftaker Killingberg
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Øystein Fløtten
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Odd Terje Brustugun
- Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Health Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | | | - Tesfaye Madebo
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Seppo Wang Langer
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Nyman
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Signe Risum
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Georgios Tsakonas
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jens Engleson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Tarje Onsøien Halvorsen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tumour size reduction after the first chemotherapy-course and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy in limited disease small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2016; 102:9-14. [PMID: 27987595 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Revised: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is recommended for limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC). TRT should start as early as possible, often meaning with the second course due to patient referral time and the fact that TRT planning takes time. Early assessment of response to the first course of chemotherapy may be a useful way to individualise treatment. The aims of this study were to assess tumour size reduction after the first chemotherapy-course, and whether this reduction was associated with outcomes in LD SCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomised trial comparing twice-daily (45Gy/30 fractions) with once-daily (42Gy/15 fractions) TRT, given concurrently with four courses of cisplatin/etoposide (n=157) was the basis for this study. Tumour size was assessed on CT scans at baseline and planning scans for TRT according to RECIST 1.0. RESULTS CT scans were available for 135 patients (86%). Ninety-four percent had a reduction in tumour size after the first chemotherapy-course. The median reduction in sum of diameters (SOD) of measurable lesions was ÷16mm (÷84 to +10mm), corresponding to ÷18% (÷51 to +12%). Eighty-two percent had stable disease, 18% partial response. Reduction in SOD was significantly associated with complete response at first follow-up (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p=0.013), PFS (HR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p=0.001), and overall survival (HR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; p=0.010). CONCLUSION Response from the first course of chemotherapy had a significant positive association with outcomes from chemoradiotherapy, and might be used to stratify and randomise patients in future studies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Winther-Larsen A, Hoffmann L, Moeller DS, Khalil AA, Knap MM. Evaluation of factors associated with loco-regional failure and survival in limited disease small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2015. [PMID: 26203924 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1062135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loco-regional failure (LRF) remains a significant problem in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Dose-escalation may be a way forward to reduce the failure rate. However, the risk of toxicity rises with increasing doses. Knowledge on factors associated with LRF could aid the selection of patients for more aggressive treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate factors correlated with LRF in a cohort of LD-SCLC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, factors associated with improved survival were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 147 consecutive LD-SCLC patients treated from 2007 to 2013. Radiotherapy was delivered as either 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily or 46-50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions once daily. Chemotherapy was etoposide combined with either carboplatin or cisplatin given mainly concomitantly with radiotherapy. Pattern of first failure and survival were evaluated retrospectively. Cumulative LRF (CLRF) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of covariates on LRF and OS was evaluated by using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 42.2 months, 37 patients experienced LRF as first failure. Isolated LRF was seen in 16 patients, but no isolated regional failure was seen. The CLRF rate was 22% at 1-year and 43% at 3-years. N3-stage was an independent prognostic factor correlated with LRF development (p = 0.043). Median OS was 24.1 months (95% CI 19-29 months) and a three-year survival of 34%. Prognostic factors associated with improved OS were staging including a positron emission tomography (PET) scan (p = 0.004) and receiving prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION N3-stage was an independent prognostic factor for LRF. Receiving a pretreatment PET scan and receiving PCI were prognostic factors for improved OS. Reduction in LRF may be achieved with dose-escalation in patients with N3-stage. This can be evaluated in prospective dose-escalation trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lone Hoffmann
- b Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Ditte S Moeller
- b Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Azza A Khalil
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Marianne M Knap
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larsen AW, Khalil AA, Meldgaard P, Knap MM. <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET/CT Is a Useful Tool in Staging Procedure before Chemo-Radiotherapy in Patients with Limited Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Pattern of Failure and Survival Is Analyzed. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.4236/jct.2012.324049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
Watkins JM, Wahlquist AE, Shirai K, Garrett-Mayer E, Aguero EG, Fortney JA, Sherman CA, Sharma AK. Factors Associated With Severe Acute Esophagitis From Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74:1108-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2008] [Revised: 08/26/2008] [Accepted: 09/17/2008] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|