How to optimize therapeutic ratio in brachytherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy in Early Stage Buccal Mucosa and Lip Cancer: Report on the Consecutive 12 Patients and Review of the Literature

Aims and background

To evaluate clinical outcome and toxicity using high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in head and neck carcinomas.

Methods

Between September 2004 and April 2010, a series of 12 patients with lip (7 patients) or buccal mucosa (5 patients) cancers were treated by exclusive interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The median age of the patients was 71.5 years (range, 47–87). Stages were T1N0M0 and T2N0M0 in 6 and 6 patients, respectively. A dose of 27 to 54 Gy in 9 to 16 fractions, 3 to 4.5 Gy per fraction, 2 fractions per day with a minimal gap of 6 h in between was delivered.

Results

After a median follow-up of 46 months (range, 10–85), the disease-free and overall survival was 83% (10 of 12 patients) and 50% (6 of 12 patients), respectively. The crude local control in the lip cancer patients was 100% and in the buccal mucosa cancer patients was 60%. No severe toxicity was registered.

Conclusions

High-dose-rate brachytherapy is feasible and safe and offers the possibility to treat patients in an outpatient regimen.

Early results of pulsed-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for head and neck malignancies after limited surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative incidence of toxicity and local control in patients with head and neck malignancies who underwent interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (iBT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1997 to December 1998, 61 patients underwent interstitial PDR brachytherapy procedures in our department; 47 were patients with head and neck cancer. Forty patients received brachytherapy as part of their curative treatment regimen, and 7 patients were implanted for palliative purposes and excluded from the analysis of therapy efficacy. Twenty-four patients had interstitial brachytherapy procedures alone with D(REF) = 50 Gy; in 23 patients, iBT procedures were performed with D(REF) = 24 Gy in combination with external radiation. A dose per pulse (dp) of 0.5 Gy was prescribed for 38/47 patients, and a dp = 0.7 Gy for 9/47 patients. The pulses were delivered 24 h a day, with a time interval of 1 h between two pulses, resulting in an effective dose rate of 0.5 Gy/h or 0.7 Gy/h. A follow-up of the patients was done to analyze acute and delayed toxicity, local control, and survival. The analysis was performed after median follow-up of 12 months (5-18 months).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12 months, soft tissue necrosis was seen in one patient and bone necrosis in another. No other serious side effects were observed. Permanent locoregional tumor control was achieved in 37 of 40 patients. No distant metastases were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR interstitial brachytherapy with 0.5-0.7 Gy/h is a safe therapy. These preliminary results suggest that PDR interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer is comparable with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy.