Effect of calculation method on kidney dosimetry in 177Lu-octreotate treatment

Kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy based on multiple small VOIs

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the use of multiple small VOIs for kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy.

METHOD

The study was based on patient and simulated SPECT images in anthropomorphic geometries. Images were reconstructed using two reconstruction programs (local LundaDose and commercial Hermia) using OS-EM with and without resolution recovery (RR). Five small VOIs were placed to determine the average activity concentration (AC) in each kidney. The study consisted of three steps: (i) determination of the number of iterations for AC convergence based on simulated images; (ii) determination of recovery-coefficients (RCs) for 2 mL VOIs using a separate set of simulated images; (iii) assessment of operator variability in AC estimates for simulated and patient images. Five operators placed the VOIs, using for guidance: a) SPECT/CT with RR, b) SPECT/CT without RR, and c) CT only. For simulated images, time-integrated ACs (TIACs) were evaluated. For patient images, estimated ACs were compared with results of a previous method based on whole-kidney VOIs.

RESULTS

Eight iterations and ten subsets were sufficient for both programs and reconstruction settings. Mean RCs (mean ± SD) with RR were 1.03 ± 0.02 (LundaDose) and 1.10 ± 0.03 (Hermia), and without RR 0.91 ± 0.03 (LundaDose) and 0.94 ± 0.03 (Hermia). Most stable and accurate estimates of the AC were obtained using five 2-mL VOIs guided by SPECT/CT with RR, applying them to images without RR, and including an explicit RC for recovery correction.

CONCLUSION

The small VOI method based on five 2-mL VOIs was found efficient and sufficiently accurate for kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy.

Lu-177-PSMA dosimetry for kidneys and tumors based on SPECT images at two imaging time points

Background

Personalized dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA treatment requires multiple-time-point SPECT/CT scans to calculate time-integrated activity (TIA). This study evaluates two-time-point (TTP) methods for TIA calculation for kidneys and tumors.

Methods

A total of 18 patients treated with 3.7-7.4 GBq Lu-177 PSMA-617 were analyzed retrospectively, including 18 sets of left and right kidneys, as well as 45 tumors. Four quantitative SPECT/CT (4TP) were acquired at 2 h, 20 h, 40 h, 60 h (n = 11), or 200 h (n = 7) after treatment, and they were fit bi-exponentially as reference. The TTP method was fitted by a mono-exponential washout function using two selected imaging time points for kidneys. For tumors, one uptake and one washout phase were modeled, assuming linear (type I) and same (type II) uptake phase between 0 h to the first time point and mono-exponential washout thereafter. Two single-time-point (STP) methods were also implemented for comparison. TIA calculated by TTP and STP methods were compared with reference to the 4TP TIA.

Results

For the kidneys, the TTP methods using 20 h-60 h and 40 h-200 h had smaller mean absolute errors of 8.05 ± 6.05% and 4.95 ± 3.98%, respectively, as compared to other combinations of time points and STP methods. For tumors, the type I and type II TTP methods using 20h-60 h and 40-200 h had smaller mean absolute errors of 6.14 ± 5.19% and 12.22 ± 4.44%, and 8.31 ± 7.16% and 4.48 ± 7.10%, respectively, as compared to other TTP and STP methods.

Conclusion

The TTP methods based on later imaging time demonstrated fewer errors than the STP methods in kidney and tumor TIA. Imaging at 20 h-60 h and 40 h-200 h could simplify the dosimetry procedures with fewer TIA estimation errors.

Future trends for patient-specific dosimetry methodology in molecular radiotherapy

Molecular radiotherapy is rapidly expanding, and new radiotherapeutics are emerging. The majority of treatments is still performed using empirical fixed activities and not tailored for individual patients. Molecular radiotherapy dosimetry is often seen as a promising candidate that would allow personalisation of treatments as outcome should ultimately depend on the absorbed doses delivered and not the activities administered. The field of molecular radiotherapy dosimetry has made considerable progress towards the feasibility of routine clinical dosimetry with reasonably accurate absorbed-dose estimates for a range of molecular radiotherapy dosimetry applications. A range of challenges remain with respect to the accurate quantification, assessment of time-integrated activity and absorbed dose estimation. In this review, we summarise a range of technological and methodological advancements, mainly focussed on beta-emitting molecular radiotherapeutics, that aim to improve molecular radiotherapy dosimetry to achieve accurate, reproducible, and streamlined dosimetry. We describe how these new technologies can potentially improve the often time-consuming considered process of dosimetry and provide suggestions as to what further developments might be required.

Safety and Therapeutic Optimization of Lutetium-177 Based Radiopharmaceuticals

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) based radiopharmaceuticals has emerged as a therapeutic area in the field of nuclear medicine and oncology, allowing for personalized medicine. Since the first market authorization in 2018 of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®) targeting somatostatin receptor type 2 in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, intensive research has led to transfer innovative ¹⁷⁷Lu containing pharmaceuticals to the clinic. Recently, a second market authorization in the field was obtained for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu radiopharmaceuticals are now quite well-reported and data on the safety and management of patients are needed. This review will focus on several clinically tested and reported tailored approaches to enhance the risk-benefit trade-off of radioligand therapy. The aim is to help clinicians and nuclear medicine staff set up safe and optimized procedures using the approved ¹⁷⁷Lu based radiopharmaceuticals.

Individualization of Radionuclide Therapies: Challenges and Prospects

Simple Summary

Currently, patient-specific treatment plans and dosimetry calculations are not routinely performed for radionuclide therapies. In external beam radiotherapy, it is quite the opposite. As a result, a small fraction of patients receives optimal radioactivity. This conservative approach provides “radiation safety” to healthy tissues but delivers a lower than indicated absorbed dose to the tumors, resulting in a lower response rate and a higher disease relapse rate. Evidence shows that better and more predictable outcomes can be achieved with patient-individualized dose assessment. Therefore, the incorporation of individual planning into radionuclide therapies is a high priority for nuclear medicine physicians and medical physicists alike. Internal dosimetry is used in tumor therapy to optimize the absorbed dose to the target tissue. The main reasons for the difficulties in incorporating patients’ internal dosimetry into routine clinical practice are discussed. The article presents the prospects for the routine implementation of personalized radionuclide therapies.

Abstract

The article presents the problems of clinical implementation of personalized radioisotope therapy. The use of radioactive drugs in the treatment of malignant and benign diseases is rapidly expanding. Currently, in the majority of nuclear medicine departments worldwide, patients receive standard activities of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Intensively conducted clinical trials constantly provide more evidence of a close relationship between the dose of radiopharmaceutical absorbed in pathological tissues and the therapeutic effect of radioisotope therapy. Due to the lack of individual internal dosimetry (based on the quantitative analysis of a series of diagnostic images) before or during the treatment, only a small fraction of patients receives optimal radioactivity. The vast majority of patients receive too-low doses of ionizing radiation to the target tissues. This conservative approach provides “radiation safety” to healthy tissues, but also delivers lower radiopharmaceutical activity to the neoplastic tissue, resulting in a low level of response and a higher relapse rate. The article presents information on the currently used radionuclides in individual radioisotope therapies and on radionuclides newly introduced to the therapeutic market. It discusses the causes of difficulties with the implementation of individualized radioisotope therapies as well as possible changes in the current clinical situation.

Simplified dosimetry for kidneys and tumors in 177Lu-labeled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Purpose

To evaluate if satisfactory post-therapeutic image-based dosimetry can be achieved for Lu-177-DOTATATE treatments using a reduced number of image acquisitions to improve patient comfort and reduce economical costs.

Methods

39 patients who underwent 147 treatment cycles of Lu-177-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors were included in the study. A total of 291 and 284 absorbed doses were calculated to kidneys and tumors, respectively. Single-point dosimetry was performed using one SPECT/CT image acquired at 1 d or 7 d post-treatment using a fixed effective half-life (T_eff) or using a patient-specific T_eff determined for the initial cycle. Also, dose-per-activity values, (D/A)₁, were determined from the first cycle and used to calculate doses for subsequent cycles. All absorbed doses were evaluated against “true” doses calculated using both the 1 d and 7 d images. The relation between tumor grade and absorbed doses was also investigated. All dosimetry was performed on SPECT images.

Results

Absorbed doses to kidneys were most accurate when single-point dosimetry was performed using 1 d images with median ratios in relation to “true” doses in total dose of 1.00 (IQR: 0.97–1.03) when using fixed T_eff and 1.01 (IQR: 0.98–1.04) when using T_eff from the initial cycle. Calculations based on the 7 d image were most accurate for tumors with corresponding ratios in total absorbed dose of 0.98 (IQR: 0.96–1.00) and 1.00 (IQR: 0.99–1.01) when using a fixed T_eff or T_eff from the first cycle, respectively. The (D/A)₁ approach performed worse, as 2 of 77 total absorbed doses to the kidneys deviated with > 30%, and tumor-absorbed doses were increasingly overestimated with every cycle. Absorbed doses, T_eff and 1 d uptake were higher for G1 tumors than G2 tumors.

Conclusion

Dosimetry can be performed with satisfactory accuracy when using single SPECT/CT images acquired at 1 d for kidneys or at 7 d for tumors.

Impact of cyclic changes in pharmacokinetics and absorbed dose in pediatric neuroblastoma patients receiving [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE

PURPOSE

Recent reports personalizing the administered activity (AA) of each cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy based on the predicted absorbed dose (AD) to the kidneys (dose-limiting organ) have been promising. Assuming identical renal pharmacokinetics for each cycle is pragmatic, however it may lead to over- or under-estimation of the optimal AA. Here, we investigate the influence that earlier cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE had on the biokinetics and AD of subsequent cycles in a recent clinical trial that evaluated the safety and activity of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in pediatric neuroblastoma (NBL). We investigated whether predictions based on an assumption of unchanging AD per unit AA (Gy/GBq) prove robust to cyclical changes in biokinetics.

METHODS

A simulation study, based on dosimetry data from six children with NBL who received four-cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in the LuDO trial (ISRCTN98918118), was performed to explore the effect of variable biokinetics on AD. In the LuDO trial, AA was adapted to the patient's weight and SPECT/CT-based dosimetry was performed for the kidneys and tumour after each cycle. The largest tumour mass was selected for dosimetric analysis in each case.

RESULTS

The median tumour AD per cycle was found to decrease from 15.6 Gy (range 8.12-26.4) in cycle 1 to 11.4 Gy (range 9.67-28.8), 11.3 Gy (range 2.73-32.9) and 4.3 Gy (range 0.72-20.1) in cycles 2, 3 and 4, respectively. By the fourth cycle, the median of the ratios of the delivered AD (ADD) and the predicted (or "expected") AD (ADE) (which was based on an assumption of stable biokinetics from the first cycle onwards) were 0.16 (range 0.02-0.92, p = 0.013) for the tumour and 1.08 (range 0.84-1.76, p > 0.05) for kidney. None of the patients had an objective response at 1 month follow up.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates variability in Gy/GBq and tumour AD per cycle in children receiving four administrations of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment for NBL. NBL is deemed a radiation sensitive tumour; therefore, dose-adaptive treatment planning schemes may be appropriate for some patients to compensate for decreasing tumour uptake as treatment progresses. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN98918118. Registered 20 December 2013 (retrospectively registered).

Theoretical aspects on the use of single-time-point dosimetry for radionuclide therapy

Objective: This study considers the error distributions for time-integrated activity (TIA) of single-time-point (STP) methods for patient-specific dosimetry in radionuclide therapy.Approach: The general case with the same pharmaceutical labelled with different radionuclides for imaging and therapy are considered for a mono-exponential time-activity curve. Two methods for STP dosimetry, both based on the combination of one activity estimate with the population-mean effective decay constant, are investigated. The cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) and the probability density functions for the two methods are analytically derived for arbitrary distributions of the biological decay constant. The CDFs are used for determining 95 % coverage intervals of the relative errors for different combinations of imaging time points, physical decay constants, and relative standard deviations of the biological decay constant. Two examples, in the form of kidney dosimetry in [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy and tumour dosimetry for Na[¹³¹I]I therapy for thyroid cancer with dosimetry based on imaging of Na[¹²⁴I]I, are also studied in more detail with analysis of the sensitivity with respect to errors in the mean biological decay constant and to higher moments of the distribution.Main results: The distributions of the relative errors are negatively skewed, potentially leading to the situation that some TIA estimates are highly underestimated even if the majority of estimates are close to the true value.Significance: The main limitation of the studied STP dosimetry methods is thereby the risk of large underestimations of the TIA.

Quantitative SPECT/CT for dosimetry of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon malignancies of increasing incidence and prevalence. As these slow growing tumors usually overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), the use of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-peptides (gallium-68 chelated with dodecane tetra-acetic acid to somatostatin), which bind to the SSTRs, allows for PET based imaging and selection of patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). PRRT with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues such as ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (lutetium-177-[DOTA,Tyr³]-octreotate), is mainly used for the treatment of metastatic or inoperable NETs. However, PRRT is generally administered at a fixed injected activity in order not to exceed dose limits in critical organs, which is suboptimal given the variability in radiopharmaceutical uptake among patients. Advances in SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) imaging enable the absolute quantitative measure of the true radiopharmaceutical distribution providing for PRRT dosimetry in each patient. Personalized PRRT based on patient-specific dosimetry could improve therapeutic efficacy by optimizing effective tumor absorbed dose while limiting treatment related radiotoxicity.

Practical kidney dosimetry in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE with focus on uncertainty estimates

Background

Kidney dosimetry after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled somatostatin analogues is a procedure with multiple steps. We present the SPECT/CT-based implementation at Aarhus University Hospital and evaluate the uncertainty of the various steps in order to estimate the total uncertainty and to identify the major sources of uncertainty. Absorbed dose data from 115 treatment fractions are reported.

Results

The total absorbed dose with uncertainty is presented for 59 treatments with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 56 treatments with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. For [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC the mean and median specific absorbed dose (dose per injected activity) is 0.37 Gy/GBq and 0.38 Gy/GBq, respectively, while for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE the median and mean are 0.47 Gy/GBq and 0.46 Gy/GBq, respectively. The uncertainty of the procedure is estimated to be about 13% for a single treatment fraction, where the absorbed dose calculation is based on three SPECT/CT scans 1, 4 and 7 days post-injection, while it increases to about 19% if only a single SPECT/CT scan is performed 1 day post-injection.

Conclusions

The specific absorbed dose values obtained with the described procedure are comparable to those from other treatment sites for both [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, but towards the lower end of the range of reported values. The estimated uncertainty is also comparable to that from other reports and judged acceptable for clinical and research use, thus proving the kidney dosimetry procedure a useful tool. The greatest reduction in uncertainty can be obtained by improved activity determination, partial volume correction and additional SPECT/CT scans.

Dosimetric optimization of nuclear medicine therapy based on the Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM and the Italian law N. 101/2020. Position paper and recommendations by the Italian National Associations of Medical Physics (AIFM) and Nuclear Medicine (AIMN)

This recommendation by the Italian Associations of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) and Medical Physics (AIFM) focuses on the dosimetric optimization of Nuclear Medicine Therapy (NMT) as clearly requested by the article 56 of the EURATOM Directive 2013/59 and its consequent implementation in article 158 in the Italian Law n. 101/2020. However, this statement must deal with scientific and methodological limits that still exist and, above all, with the currently available limited resources. This paper addresses these specific issues. It distinguishes among many possible kinds of NMT. For each type, dosimetric optimization is recommended or considered optional, according to the general criteria adopted in any human choice, i.e. a check of technical feasibility first, followed by a cost/benefit argument. The classification of therapies as standardized or non-standardized is presented. This is based on the complexity of the type of pathology, on the variability of the treatment outcome, and on the risks involved. According to the present document, which was officially delivered to Italian Health Ministry as necessary interpretation of the law, a therapeutic team can, in science and consciousness, overcome the indications of posology, to optimize and tailoring a treatment with dosimetry, on the basis of published national or international data or guidelines, without need of an Ethics Committee approval. Data collected in this way will provide additional evidence about optimal dosimetric reference values. As conclusion, a formal appeal is made to the European and National regulatory agencies for pharmaceuticals to obtain the official acknowledgment of this principle.

A Novel Time-Activity Information-Sharing Approach Using Nonlinear Mixed Models for Patient-Specific Dosimetry with Reduced Imaging Time Points: Application in SPECT/CT After 177Lu-DOTATATE

Multiple-time-point SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry is burdensome for patients and lacks statistical efficiency. A novel method for joint kidney time-activity estimation based on a statistical mixed model, a prior cohort of patients with complete time-activity data, and only 1 or 2 imaging points for new patients was compared with previously proposed single-time-point methods in virtual and clinical patient data. Methods: Data were available for 10 patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and imaged up to 4 times between days 0 and 7 using SPECT/CT. Mixed models using 1 or 2 time points were evaluated retrospectively in the clinical cohort, using the multiple-time-point fit as the reference. Time-activity data for 250 virtual patients were generated using parameter values from the clinical cohort. Mixed models were fit using 1 (∼96 h) and 2 (4 h, ∼96 h) time points for each virtual patient combined with complete data for the other patients in each dataset. Time-integrated activities (TIAs) calculated from mixed model fits and other reduced-time-point methods were compared with known values. Results: All mixed models and single-time-point methods performed well overall, achieving mean bias < 7% in the virtual cohort. Mixed models exhibited lower bias, greater precision, and substantially fewer outliers than did single-time-point methods. For clinical patients, 1- and 2-time-point mixed models resulted in more accurate TIA estimates for 94% (17/18) and 72% (13/18) of kidneys, respectively. In virtual patients, mixed models resulted in more than a 2-fold reduction in the proportion of kidneys with |bias| > 10% (6% vs. 15%). Conclusion: Mixed models based on a historical cohort of patients with complete time-activity data and new patients with only 1 or 2 SPECT/CT scans demonstrate less bias on average and significantly fewer outliers when estimating kidney TIA, compared with popular reduced-time-point methods. Use of mixed models allows for reduction of the imaging burden while maintaining accuracy, which is crucial for clinical implementation of dosimetry-based treatment.

Description of the methodology for dosimetric quantification in treatments with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Implementation of dosimetry calculations in the daily practice of Nuclear Medicine Departments is, at this time, a controversial issue, partly due to the lack of a standardized methodology that is accepted by all interested parties (patients, nuclear medicine physicians and medical physicists). However, since the publication of RD 601/2019 there is a legal obligation to implement it, despite the fact that it is a complex and high resource consumption procedure. The aim of this article is to review the theoretical bases of in vivo dosimetry in treatments with 177Lu-DOTATATE. The exposed methodology is the one proposed by the MIRD Committee (Medical Internal Radiation Dose) of the SNMMI (Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging). According to this method, the absorbed dose is obtained as the product of 2factors: the time-integrated activity of the radiopharmaceutical present in a source region and a geometrical factor S. This approach, which a priori seems simple, in practice requires several SPECT/CT acquisitions, several measurements of the whole body activity and taking several blood samples, as well as hours of image processing and computation. The systematic implementation of these calculations, in all the patients we treat, will allow us to obtain homogeneous data to correlate the absorbed doses in the lesions with the biological effect of the treatment. The final purpose of the dosimetry calculations is to be able to maximize the therapeutic effect in the lesions, controlling the radiotoxicity in the organs at risk.

Comparison of commercial dosimetric software platforms in patients treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Purpose

The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare five commercial dosimetric software platforms based on the analysis of clinical datasets of patients who benefited from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ¹⁷⁷Lu‐DOTATATE (LUTATHERA^®).

Methods

The dosimetric analysis was performed on two patients during two cycles of PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu. Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images were acquired at 4, 24, 72, and 192 h post injection. Reconstructed images were generated using Dosimetry Toolkit^® (DTK) from Xeleris™ and HybridRecon‐Oncology version_1.3_Dicom (HROD) from HERMES. Reconstructed images using DTK were analyzed using the same software to calculate time‐integrated activity coefficients (TIAC), and mean absorbed doses were estimated using OLINDA/EXM V1.0 with mass correction. Reconstructed images from HROD were uploaded into PLANET® OncoDose from DOSIsoft, STRATOS from Phillips, Hybrid Dosimetry Module™ from HERMES, and SurePlan™ MRT from MIM. Organ masses, TIACs, and mean absorbed doses were calculated from each application using their recommendations.

Results

The majority of organ mass estimates varied by <9.5% between all platforms. The highest variability for TIAC results between platforms was seen for the kidneys (28.2%) for the two patients and the two treatment cycles. Relative standard deviations in mean absorbed doses were slightly higher compared with those observed for TIAC, but remained of the same order of magnitude between all platforms.

Conclusions

When applying a similar processing approach, results obtained were of the same order of magnitude regardless of the platforms used. However, the comparison of the performances of currently available platforms is still difficult as they do not all address the same parts of the dosimetric analysis workflow. In addition, the way in which data are handled in each part of the chain from data acquisition to absorbed doses may be different, which complicates the comparison exercise. Therefore, the dissemination of commercial solutions for absorbed dose calculation calls for the development of tools and standards allowing for the comparison of the performances between dosimetric software platforms.

Dosimetry after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: impact of reduced number of post-treatment studies on absorbed dose calculation and on patient management

Background

After each cycle of [¹⁷⁷Lu]-DOTA-TATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) dosimetry is performed to enable precise calculation of the radiation-absorbed dose to tumors and normal organs. Absorbed doses are routinely calculated from three quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies corrected by computed tomography (CT) acquired at t₁ = 24 h, t₂ = 96 h, and t₃ = 168 h after the first cycle of treatment. After following cycles, a single SPECT/CT study is performed. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility of a “two time point” quantitative SPECT/CT protocol after the first PRRT cycle and its impact on patient management.

Quantitative SPECT/CT data of 25 consecutive patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors after PRRT were retrospectively analyzed. Radiation-absorbed doses calculated using the standard protocol with three SPECT/CT studies acquired at (t₁, t₂, t₃) were compared to those obtained from three different “two time point” protocols with SPECT/CT studies performed at (t₁, t₂), (t₁, t₃), or (t₂, t₃).

Results

The best agreement for the cumulative doses absorbed by the kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and tumors with the conventional protocol was obtained with the (t₁, t₃) protocol with mean relative differences of − 1.0% ± 2.4%, 0.4% ± 3.1%, − 0.9% ± 4.0%, − 0.8% ± 1.1%, and − 0.5% ± 2.0%, respectively, and correlation coefficients of r = 0.99 for all.

In all patients, there was no difference in the management decision of whether or not to stop PRRT because of unsafe absorbed dose to risk organs using either the standard protocol or the (t₁, t₃) protocol.

Conclusion

These preliminary results demonstrate that dosimetry calculations using two quantitative SPECT/CT studies acquired at 24 and 168 h after the first PRRT cycle are feasible and are in good agreement with the standard imaging protocol with no change in patient management decisions, while enabling improved patient comfort and reduced scanner and staff time.

Accuracy of kidney dosimetry performed using simplified time activity curve modelling methods: a 177Lu-DOTATATE patient study

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy has been shown to produce encouraging results in treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Unfortunately, since dosimetry for radionuclide therapy is considered to be challenging, typically similar amount of radiopharmaceutical is administered to every patient. There is growing evidence that the efficacy of this therapy can be significantly improved by employing personalized protocols, based on the organ-at-risk dosimetry. The aim of this study is to propose a practical and accurate dosimetry protocol based on the simplified acquisition schedules. Data from fifty-three therapy cycles in thirty-nine NET patients were analyzed. Three SPECT/CT scans, acquired at 4 h (D0), 23 h (D1) and 70 h (D3) after injection, were performed. The kidney volume was determined using CT and the activity was determined from quantitative SPECT using an iterative thresholding method. For each dataset, four methods were used to model the time-activity-curves (TAC): M1-two trapezoid segments (0 to D0 and D0 to D1), followed by monoexponential fit to D1  +  D3 data; M2-monoexponential fit to D0  +  D1  +  D3 data; M3 and M4-monoexponential fit to D0  +  D3 and D1  +  D3 data, respectively. Additionally, kidney doses obtained from single time point method using a monoexponential curve with the population mean effective half-life, normalized to activities at D0 or D1 or D3 points, were calculated. The accuracy of simplified dosimetry methods was assessed as the percentage difference relative to doses calculated from M1. The major contribution to the absorbed dose estimate comes from the area under the late time portion of the TAC (D1 to infinity). Therefore, information from the late scan (D3) is crucial for the determination of kidney absorbed doses. Single time point method using monoexponential TAC, with the population mean effective half-life normalized to the late data point (48-72 h for kidneys) produces  <10% deviation in the absorbed dose estimation, thus is recommended for clinical use.

Personalized kidney dosimetry in 177Lu-octreotate treatment of neuroendocrine tumours: a comparison of kidney dosimetry estimates based on a whole organ and small volume segmentations

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ¹⁷⁷Lu- radiolabeled octreotate is an effective treatment method for inoperable neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). There is growing evidence that estimates of the organ-at-risks (OARs) doses are necessary for the optimization of personalized PRRT (P-PRRT). Dosimetry, however, requires a complicated and time-consuming procedure, which hinders its implementation in the clinic. The aim of this study is to develop a practical and automatic technique to simplify personalized dosimetry of kidney, the major OAR in ¹⁷⁷Lu P-PRRT. The data from 30 NETs patients undergoing 44 personalized ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy cycles were analyzed. To determine the biokinetics of the radiopharmaceutical in the kidneys, for each patient three SPECT/CT scans were acquired, at about 4 h, 24 h and 70 h after injection. The kidneys doses were evaluated using three different approaches: (1) a traditional approach based on whole kidney (WK) segmentation; (2) a small volume (SV) manual approach (M-SV) with observer-defined SV location; and (3) a software based SV-approach that automatically defines SV location (A-SV). Four different methods of automatic SV location selections were investigated. The SV kidney doses estimated using M-SV and A-SV approaches was evaluated and the accuracy of these two approaches were compared to the WK dosimetry. The kidney bio-kinetics, in terms of effective half-lives, obtained from both of the A-SV and M-SV approaches agreed to within 10% with those obtained from the WK segmentation. The average ratios of SV doses to WK doses were mostly about 1.8  ±  0.2 for both A-SV and M-SV approaches. The linear correlation coefficients between SV doses (both A-SV and M-SV) and WK doses were up to 0.9 with p   <  0.001. The differences between A-SV and M-SV were minor. By comparing different methods of SV location selections, independently selecting SV in images from each of the acquisitions was proved the most appropriate and accurate approach. An automatic, observer-independent method for selecting the location of the small volume in kidneys was developed. The accuracy of this dose estimation approach has been demonstrated by comparing it with the manual SV dosimetry, as well as the WK dosimetry. The proposed automatic approach can potentially be considered as a practical and simple method for dose estimation in the future clinical studies.

Side Effects of CXC-Chemokine Receptor 4-Directed Endoradiotherapy with Pentixather Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The chemokine receptor CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is a transmembrane receptor involved in survival, proliferation, and dissemination of different cancers, including hematopoietic malignancies. Relapsed or refractory hematopoietic cancers are frequently resistant to conventional therapy, and novel highly active strategies are urgently needed. CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy constitutes a highly promising targeted therapeutic concept. Here, we investigated the adverse effects of this novel treatment approach. Methods: Twenty-two patients with heavily pretreated lymphoproliferative or myeloid malignancies were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu- or ⁹⁰Y-pentixather-a CXCR4-directed therapeutic radioligand-before conventional conditioning therapy followed by autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Twenty-five CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapies were administered to those patients. Adverse events occurring between endoradiotherapy and the start of conventional conditioning therapy were retrospectively analyzed and graded for the estimation of the safety profile. Results: CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy with pentixather showed a favorable toxicity profile. As expected, the hematopoietic system was most affected, with all subjects developing cytopenias. Except for 1 acute kidney failure, grade 3, due to tumor lysis syndrome, overall nephro- and hepatotoxicity was low. Other higher-grade adverse events were either transient and resolved or easily manageable. Conclusion: Therapy with radiolabeled pentixather appears to be well tolerated and easily applicable when preceding conventional conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Radionuclide therapy: current status and prospects for internal dosimetry in individualized therapeutic planning

The efficacy and toxicity of radionuclide therapy are believed to be directly related to the radiation doses received by target tissues; however, nuclear medicine therapy continues to be based primarily on the administration of empirical activities to patients and less frequently on the use of internal dosimetry for individual therapeutic planning. This review aimed to critically describe the techniques and clinical evidence of dosimetry as a tool for therapeutic planning and the main limitations to its implementation in clinical practice. The present article is a nonsystematic review of voxel-based dosimetry. Clinical evidence pointing to a correlation between the radiation dose and therapeutic response in various diseases, such as thyroid carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer, is reviewed. Its limitations include technical aspects related to image acquisition and processing and the lack of randomized clinical trials demonstrating the impact of dosimetry on patient therapy. A more widespread use of dosimetry in therapeutic planning involves the development of user-friendly dosimetric protocols and confirmation that dose estimation implies good efficacy and low treatment-related toxicity.

Feasibility and accuracy of single time point imaging for renal dosimetry following 177Lu-DOTATATE ('Lutate') therapy

Background

This study aims to assess both feasibility and accuracy of renal dosimetry imaging protocols in patients receiving Lutate therapy for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), when data acquisition over multiple days is not possible on all cycles.

Method

Patients who had received a full 4 cycles of Lutate therapy with complete imaging at each cycle were included. Imaging consisted of quantitative SPECT/CT of the kidneys at 4, 24 and 96–120 h post injection. Renal absorbed dose was calculated for each data set, and in addition, five alternative methods were explored for comparison. Method 1: a patient average clearance time (t_1/2 average) derived from the first half of contributing patient data was used to estimate absorbed dose for subsequent patients based on 4 h imaging alone; method 2: t_1/2 average was applied to subsequent patients on 24 h imaging alone; method 3: a patient-specific clearance rate (t_1/2 patient) was determined from complete image data of cycle 1 and applied subsequently to remaining cycles using 4 h image data alone; method 4: t_1/2 patient was applied to 24 h imaging alone in subsequent cycles; method 5: the 120 h data was estimated on subsequent cycles based on the cycle 1 fraction of injected activity (%IA) at 24 and 120 h.

Results

Twenty treatments from 18 patients, resulting in 80 cycles of therapy, were analysed. The measured average renal absorbed dose per cycle of treatment was 0.38 ± 0.19 Gy/GBq when derived from full imaging data. The use of t_1/2 average applied to a single time point led to large deviations of dose estimates from true values (on average 59% and 30%, when using 4 h data and 24 h data, respectively). The use of complete image data on cycle 1 and the derivation of t_1/2 patient led to improved dose estimates, with an average deviation from true values of 13% and 2% when using 4 h data only and 24 h data only, respectively. The use of a 120 h %IA derived from cycle 1 led to an average deviation from true dose estimates of 14%.

Conclusion

In instances where demands on both patients and facilities make multiple time point data acquisition impractical, renal dosimetry is best derived through complete imaging at cycle 1 only followed by a single 24 h imaging time point on subsequent cycles, assuming no significant changes in renal function during the time course of therapy.

Implementation of patient dosimetry in the clinical practice after targeted radiotherapy using [177Lu-[DOTA0, Tyr3]-octreotate

Background

This study’s aim was to develop our dosimetric methodology using a commercial workstation for the routine evaluation of the organs at risk during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ¹⁷⁷Lu.

Methods

First, planar and SPECT sensitivity factors were determined on phantoms. The reconstruction parameters were optimized by SPECT/CT image acquisition using a NEMA IEC phantom containing a 500 ml bottle of ¹⁷⁷Lu, to simulate a kidney. The recovery coefficients were determined on various phantoms. For the red marrow, this was calculated using a NEMA IEC phantom that contained a centrally placed bottle of 80 ml of ¹⁷⁷Lu (to model the L2-L4 red marrow) flanked by two 200 ml bottles with ¹⁷⁷Lu to simulate the kidneys.

Then, SPECT/CT images were acquired at 4, 24, 72, and 192 h after injection in 12 patients with neuroendocrine tumors who underwent PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. SPECT data were reconstructed using the iterative ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) method, with six iterations and ten subsets, attenuation, scatter, recovery resolution corrections, and a Gaussian post-filter of 0.11 cm. The liver, spleen, kidneys, and red marrow dose per administered activity (AD/A admin) values were calculated with the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) formalism and the residence times (Dosimetry toolkit® application) using standard and CT imaging-based organ masses (OLINDA/EXM® V1.0 software).

Results

Sensitivity factors of 6.11 ± 0.01 and 5.67 ± 0.08 counts/s/MBq were obtained with planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions, respectively. A recovery coefficient of 0.78 was obtained for the modeled L2–L4 red marrow. The mean AD/A admin values were 0.43 ± 0.13 mGy/MBq [0.27–0.91] for kidneys, 0.54 ± 0.58 mGy/MBq [0.12–2.26] for liver, 0.61 ± 0.13 mGy/MBq [0.42–0.89] for spleen, and 0.04 ± 0.02 mGy/MBq [0.01–0.09] for red marrow. The AD/A admin values varied when calculated using the personalized and standard organ mass, particularly for kidneys (p = 1 × 10⁻⁷), spleen (p = 0.0069), and red marrow (p = 0.0027). Intra-patient differences were observed especially in organs close to or including tumor cells or metastases.

Conclusions

The obtained AD/A admin values were in agreement with the literature data. This study shows the technical feasibility of patient dosimetry in clinical practice and the need to obtain patient-specific information.

A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE

Objective(s):

To investigate and compare quantitative accuracy of kidney absorbed dose measures made from both 2D and 3D imaging in patients receiving ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (Lutate) for treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).

Methods:

Patients receiving Lutate therapy underwent both whole body planar imaging and SPECT/CT imaging over the kidneys at time points 0.5, 4, 24, and 96-120 hours after injection. Planar data were corrected for attenuation using transmission data, and were converted to units of absolute activity via two methods, using either a calibration standard in the field of view or relative to pre-voiding image total counts. Hand drawn regions of interest were used to generate time activity curves and kidney absorbed dose estimates in OLINDA-EXM. Fully quantitative SPECT data were generated using CT-derived corrections for both scatter and attenuation, before correction for dead time and application of a camera specific sensitivity factor to convert data to units of absolute activity. Volumes of interest were defined for kidney using the co-registered x-ray CT, before time activity curves and absorbed dose measures were generated in OLINDA-EXM, both with and without corrections made to the model for patient specific kidney volumes. Quantitative SPECT data were also used to derive dose maps through dose kernel convolution (DKC), which was treated as the gold standard.

Results:

A total of 50 studies were analysed, corresponding to various cycles of treatment from 21 patients. Planar absorbed dose estimates were consistently higher than SPECT derived estimates by, on average, a factor of 3.

Conclusion:

Quantitative SPECT is considered the gold standard approach for organ specific dosimetry however often relies on in house software. As such planar methods for estimating absorbed dose are much more widely available, and in particular, are often the only source of reference in previously published data. For the case of Lutate dosimetry, planar measures may lead to a three-fold increase in measures of kidney absorbed dose.

The effect of kidney volume estimation on dosimetry in lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy

BACKGROUND

The kidneys are the dose-limiting organ in lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy. Therefore, it is advisable to perform critical organ dosimetry focussed on renal dose in treated patients. A key uncertainty in such dose estimates is the use of standard phantoms to represent the individual patient. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of methods for estimating kidney size, and hence absorbed kidney dose, by comparison with individual measurements from computed tomography (CT) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney volume was measured using diagnostic CT images for 57 patients who underwent lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy. Kidney mass was also estimated in two ways: using the standard adult phantoms, as well as through the application of a weight scaling factor to these phantoms and their organs. Dose calculations were performed for each of the three methods using OLINDA/EXM software.

RESULTS

Scaling of the phantom by patient weight gave a more accurate result when compared with the CT gold standard than the standard phantom. The dose difference from the CT method had mean values of 1.4% (SD=22.6%) and 8.4% (SD=21.5%) for scaled and unscaled, respectively. Patient weight was not found to be a good predictor of kidney mass in these patients (r of 0.12 from linear regression analysis).

CONCLUSION

The most accurate method of organ volume estimation would be individual measurements from CT imaging; however, where this is not possible, scaling of organ masses by weight ratio is more accurate than the use of the standard phantom.

Absorbed dose estimates from a single measurement one to three days after the administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE/-TOC

AIM

To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of absorbed dose estimates from a single measurement of the activity concentrations in tumors and relevant organs one to three days after the administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TATE/TOC assuming tissue specific effective half-lives.

METHODS

Activity kinetics in 54 kidneys, 30 neuroendocrine tumor lesions, 25 livers, and 27 spleens were deduced from series of planar images in 29 patients. After adaptation of mono- or bi-exponential fit functions to the measured data, it was analyzed for each fit function how precise the time integral can be estimated from fixed tissue-specific half-lives and a single measurement at 24, 48, or 72 h after the administration.

RESULTS

For the kidneys, assuming a fixed tissue-specific half-life of 50 h, the deviations of the estimate from the actual integral were median (5 % percentile, 95 % percentile): -3 °% (-15 %>; +16 °%) for measurements after 24 h, +2 %> (-9 %>; +12 %>) for measurements after 48 h, and 0 % (-2 %; +12 %) for measurements after 72 h. The corresponding values for the other tissues, assuming fixed tissue-specific half-lives of 67 h for liver and spleen and 77 h for tumors, were +2 % (-25 %; +20 %) for measurements after 24 h, +2 °% (-16 %>; +17 %>) for measurements after 48 h, and +2 %> (-11 %>; +10 %>) for measurements after 72 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially for the kidneys, which often represent the dose limiting organ, but also for liver, spleen, and neuroendocrine tumors, a meaningful absorbed dose estimate is possible from a single measurement after 2, more preferably 3 days after the administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TATE/-TOC assuming fixed tissue specific effective half-lives.

Dosimetry software Hermes Internal Radiation Dosimetry: from quantitative image reconstruction to voxel-level absorbed dose distribution

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to validate a software package called Hermes Internal Radiation Dosimetry (HIRD) for internal dose assessment tailored for clinical practice. The software includes all the necessary steps to perform voxel-level absorbed dose calculations including quantitative reconstruction, image coregistration and volume of interest tools.

METHODS

The basics of voxel-level dosimetry methods and implementations to HIRD software are reviewed. Then, HIRD is validated using simulated SPECT/CT data and data from Lu-DOTATATE-treated patients by comparing absorbed kidney doses with OLINDA/EXM-based dosimetry. In addition, electron and photon dose components are studied separately in an example patient case.

RESULTS

The simulation study showed that HIRD can reproduce time-activity curves accurately and produce absorbed doses with less than 10% error for the kidneys, liver and spleen. From the patient data, the absorbed kidney doses calculated using HIRD and using OLINDA/EXM were highly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r=0.98). From Bland-Altman plot analysis, an average absorbed dose difference of -2% was found between the methods. In addition, we found that in Lu-DOTATATE-treated patients, photons can contribute over 10% of the kidney's total dose and is partly because of cross-irradiation from high-uptake lesions close to the kidneys.

CONCLUSION

HIRD is a straightforward voxel-level internal dosimetry software. Its clinical utility was verified with simulated and clinical Lu-DOTATATE-treated patient data. Patient studies also showed that photon contribution towards the total dose can be relatively high and voxel-level dose calculations can be valuable in cases where the target organ is in close proximity to high-uptake organs.