Influence of FDG-PET on primary nodal target volume definition for head and neck carcinomas

Positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: What impact?

PET-computed tomography (CT) plays a growing role to guide target volume delineation for head and neck cancer in radiation oncology. Pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET-CT adds information to morphological imaging. First, as a whole-body imaging modality, it reveals regional or distant metastases that induce major therapeutic changes in more than 10% of the cases. Moreover, it allows better pathological lymph node selection which improves overall regional control and overall survival. Second, locally, it allows us to define the metabolic tumoral volume, which is a reliable prognostic feature for survival outcome. [18F]FDG PET-CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV) is on average significantly smaller than GTV based on CT. Nevertheless, the overlap is incomplete and more evaluation of composite GTV based on PET and GTV based on CT are needed. However, in clinical practice, the study showed that using GTV PET alone for treatment planning was similar to using GTVCT for local control and dose distribution was better as a dose to organs at risk significantly decreased. In addition to FDG, pretherapeutic PET could give access to different biological tumoral volumes - thanks to different tracers - guiding heterogeneous dose delivery (dose painting concept) to resistant subvolumes. During radiotherapy treatment, follow-up [18F]FDG PET-CT revealed an earlier and more important diminution of GTV than other imaging modality. It may be a valuable support for adaptative radiotherapy as a new treatment plan with a significant impact on dose distribution became possible. Finally, additional studies are required to prospectively validate long-term outcomes and lower toxicity resulting from the use of PET-CT in treatment planning.

Novel Diagnostic Approaches for Assessment of the Clinically Negative Neck in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

In head and neck cancer, the presence of nodal disease is a strong determinant of prognosis and treatment. Despite the use of modern multimodality diagnostic imaging, the prevalence of occult nodal metastases is relatively high. This is why in clinically node negative head and neck cancer the lymphatics are treated “electively” to eradicate subclinical tumor deposits. As a consequence, many true node negative patients undergo surgery or irradiation of the neck and suffer from the associated and unnecessary early and long-term morbidity. Safely tailoring head and neck cancer treatment to individual patients requires a more accurate pre-treatment assessment of nodal status. In this review, we discuss the potential of several innovative diagnostic approaches to guide customized management of the clinically negative neck in head and neck cancer patients.

18F-FDG-PET/CT-based treatment planning for definitive (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improves regional control and survival

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Multimodality imaging including ¹⁸F-FDG-PET has improved the detection threshold of nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this retrospective analysis is to investigate the impact of FDG-PET/CT-based nodal target volume definition (FDG-PET/CT-based NTV) on radiotherapy outcomes, compared to conventional CT-based nodal target volume definition (CT-based NTV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six-hundred-thirty-three patients treated for HNSCC with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy using IMRT/VMAT techniques between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. FDG-PET/CT-based NTV was performed in 46% of the patients. The median follow-up was 31 months. Diagnostic imaging depicting the regional recurrence was co-registered with the initial CT-scan to reconstruct the exact site of the recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with radiotherapy outcome.

RESULTS

FDG-PET/CT-based NTV improved control of disease in the CTV_{elective-nodal} (HR: 0.33, p = 0.026), overall regional control (HR: 0.62, p = 0.027) and overall survival (HR: 0.71, p = 0.033) compared to CT-based NTV. The risk for recurrence in the CTV_{elective-nodal} was increased in case of synchronous local recurrence of the primary tumor (HR: 12.4, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CT-based NTV significantly improved control of disease in the CTV_{elective-nodal}, overall regional control and overall survival compared to CT-based NTV. A significant proportion of CTV_{elective-nodal} recurrences are potentially new nodal manifestations from a synchronous local recurrent primary tumor. These results support the concept of target volume transformation and give an indication of the potential of FDG-PET to guide gradual radiotherapy dose de-escalation in elective neck treatment in HNSCC.

Comparative accuracy of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in detection of lymph node metastasis from anal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of regional and distant lymph node metastasis in patients with anal cancer.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2017, 28 patients with anal cancer who had staging PET/CT and pathological assessment of suspicious lymph nodes were included. For qualitative analysis, positive lymph nodes were defined as uptake visually higher than the liver reference uptake. For quantitative study, lymph nodes were contoured to determine maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to extract the optimal cut-offs and area under the curve (AUC) of SUV_max, lesion to background (L/B) ratio, short axis diameter (SAD), and MTV of lymph nodes. Histopathologic analysis was a reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 28 lymph nodes (24 inguinal, 2 external iliac, 1 internal iliac, and 1 paraaortic nodes) in 28 patients on PET/CT were included. With the qualitative visual analysis, 19 patients were categorized as positive for nodal metastasis with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85%, 75%, and 82%. The optimal SUV_max and L/B ratio cut-offs were 2.6 and 1.0 with both sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 75% (AUC of SUV_max = 0.893, AUC of L/B ratio = 0.912). Using the best cut-off of 1.6 cm for SAD and 3.65 cm³ for MTV, both sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 100% (AUC of SAD = 0.950, AUC of MTV = 0.931).

CONCLUSIONS

SUV_max optimization may be helpful in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in nodal staging patients with anal cancer.