1
|
Zhu Z, Gong G, Wang L, Su Y, Lu J, Dong G, Yin Y. Dose-Painting Proton Radiotherapy Guided by Functional MRI in Non-enhancing High-Grade Gliomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:552-561. [PMID: 38876805 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and evaluate the dosimetric effect and clinical impact of dose-painting proton radiotherapy (PRT) guided by functional MRI in non-enhancing high-grade gliomas (NE-HGGs). MATERIALS AND METHODS The 3D-ASL and T2 FLAIR MR images of ten patients with NE-HGGs before radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. The hyperintensity on T2 FLAIR was used to generate the planning target volume (PTV), and the high-perfusion volume on 3D-ASL (PTV-ASL) was used to generate the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) volume. Each patient received pencil beam scanning PRT and photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). There were five plans in each modality: (1) Uniform plans (IMRT60 vs. PRT60): 60Gy in 30 fractions to the PTV. (2)-(5) SIB plans (IMRT72, 84, 96, 108 vs. PRT72, 84, 96, 108): Uniform plan plus additional dose boost to PTV-ASL in 30 fractions to 72, 84, 96, 108 Gy. The dosimetric differences between various plans were compared. The clinical effects of target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were assessed using biological models for both tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS Compared with the IMRT plan, the D2 and D50 of the PRT plans with the same prescription dose increased by 1.27-4.12% and 0.64-2.01%, respectively; the R30 decreased by > 32%; the dose of brainstem and chiasma decreased by > 27% and >32%; and the dose of normal brain tissue (Br-PTV), optic nerves, eyeballs, lens, cochlea, spinal cord, and hippocampus decreased by > 50% (P < 0.05). The maximum necessary dose was 96GyE to achieve >98% TCP for PRT, and it was 84Gy to achieve >91% TCP for IMRT. The average NTCP of Br-PTV was 1.30% and 1.90% for PRT and IMRT at the maximum dose escalation, respectively. The NTCP values of the remaining OARs approached zero in all PRT plans. CONCLUSION The functional MRI-guided dose escalation using PRT is feasible while sparing the OARs constraints and demonstrates a potential clinical benefit by improving TCP with no or minimal increase in NCTP for tissues outside the PTV. This retrospective study suggested that the use of PRT-based SIB guided by functional MRI may represent a strategy to provide benefits for patients with NE-HGGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Zhu
- Harbin Medical University, No.157, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China; Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - G Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - L Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - Y Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - J Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China
| | - G Dong
- Harbin Medical University, No.157, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China.
| | - Y Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.440 Jiyan Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, 250117, Shandong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Liu R, Zhang Q, Dong M, Wang D, Chen J, Ou Y, Luo H, Yang K, Wang X. Charged particle therapy for high-grade gliomas in adults: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 36755321 PMCID: PMC9906872 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02187-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas are the most common intracranial malignancies, and their current prognosis remains poor despite standard aggressive therapy. Charged particle beams have unique physical and biological properties, especially high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ion beam might improve the clinical treatment outcomes of malignant gliomas. We systematically reviewed the safety, efficacy, and dosimetry of carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy to treat high-grade gliomas. The protocol is detailed in the online PROSPERO database, registration No. CRD42021258495. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were collected for data analysis on charged particle radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Until July 2022, two independent reviewers extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eleven articles were eligible for further analysis. Overall survival rates were marginally higher in patients with the current standard of care than those receiving concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide. The most common side effects of carbon-ion-related therapy were grade 1-2 (such as dermatitis, headache, and alopecia). Long-term toxicities (more than three to six months) usually present as radiation necrosis; however, toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed. Similarly, dermatitis, headache, and alopecia are among the most common acute side effects of proton therapy treatment. Despite improvement in survival rates, the method of dose-escalation using proton boost is associated with severe brain necrosis which should not be clinically underestimated. Regarding dosimetry, two studies compared proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. Proton therapy plans aimed to minimize dose exposure to non-target tissues while maintaining target coverage. The use of charged-particle radiotherapy seems to be effective with acceptable adverse effects when used either alone or as a boost. The tendency of survival outcome shows that carbon ion boost is seemingly superior to proton boost. The proton beam could provide good target coverage, and it seems to reduce dose exposure to contralateral organs at risk significantly. This can potentially reduce the treatment-related dose- and volume-related side effects in long-term survivors, such as neurocognitive impairment. High-quality randomized control trials should be conducted in the future. Moreover, Systemic therapeutic options that can be paired with charged particles are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhang Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Meng Dong
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dandan Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junru Chen
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuhong Ou
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sarkar B, Ganesh T, Munshi A, Manikandan A, Mohanti BK. 4π Radiotherapy Using a Linear Accelerator: A Misnomer in Violation of the Solid Geometric Boundary Conditions in Three-Dimensional Euclidean Space. J Med Phys 2019; 44:283-286. [PMID: 31908388 PMCID: PMC6936196 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_2_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The concept of 4πc radiotherapy is a radiotherapy planning technique receiving much attention in recent times. The aim of this article is to disprove the feasibility of the 4π radiotherapy using a cantilever-type linear accelerator or any other external-beam delivery machines. Materials and Methods: A surface integral-based mathematical derivation for the maximum achievable solid angle for a linear accelerator was carried out respecting the rotational boundary conditions for gantry and couch in three-dimensional Euclidean space. The allowed movements include a gantry rotation of 0–2πc and a table rotation of . Results: Total achievable solid angle by cantilever-type linear accelerator (or any teletherapy machine employing a cantilever design) is , which is applicable only for the foot and brain radiotherapy where the allowed table rotation is 90°–0°–270°. For other sites such as pelvis, thorax, or abdomen, achievable solid angle as the couch rotation comes down significantly. Practically, only suitable couch angle is 0° by avoiding gantry–couch–patient collision. Conclusions: Present cantilever design of linear accelerator prevents achieving a 4π radian solid angle at any point in the patient. Even the most modern therapy machines like CyberKnife which has a robotic arm also cannot achieve 4π geometry. Maximum achievable solid angle under the highest allowable boundary condition(s) cannot exceed 2πc, which is restricted for only extremities such as foot and brain radiotherapy. For other parts of the body such as pelvis, thorax, and abdomen, the solid angle is reduced to 1/5th (maximum value) of the 4πc. To obtain a 4πc solid angle in a three-dimensional Euclidean space, the patient has to be a zero-dimensional point and X-ray head of the linear accelerator has a freedom to rotate in every point of a hypothetical sphere of radius 1 m. This article establishes geometrically why it is not possible to achieve a 4πc solid angle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biplab Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Tharmarnadar Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Anusheel Munshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manipal Hospitals, Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Arjunan Manikandan
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Center, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kazda T, Pafundi DH, Kraling A, Bradley T, Lowe VJ, Brinkmann DH, Laack NN. Dosimetric impact of amino acid positron emission tomography imaging for target delineation in radiation treatment planning for high-grade gliomas. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 6:94-100. [PMID: 33458396 PMCID: PMC7807641 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose The amino-acid positron emission tomography (PET) tracer 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluoro-l-phenylalanine (18F-DOPA) has increased sensitivity for detecting regions of biologically aggressive tumors compared to T1 contrast-enhanced (T1-CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed dosimetric evaluation of treatment plans prepared with and without inclusion of 18F-DOPA-based biological target volume (BTV) evaluating its role in guiding radiotherapy of grade III/IV gliomas. Materials and methods Eight patients (five T1-CE, three non-contrast-enhancing [NCE]) were included in our study. MRI only-guided anatomic plans and MRI+18FDOPA-PET-guided biologic plans were prepared for each patient, and dosimetric data for target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were compared. High-dose BTV60Gy was defined as regions with tumor to normal brain (T/N) >2.0, while low-dose BTV51Gy was initially based on T/N >1.3, but refined per Nuclear Medicine expert. Results For T1-CE tumors, planning target volumes (PTV) were larger than MRI-only anatomic target volumes. Despite increases in size of both gross target volumes and PTV, with volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning, no increase of dose to OAR was observed while maintaining similar target dose coverage. For NCE tumors, MRI+18F-DOPA PET biologic imaging identified a sub-region of the large, T2-FLAIR abnormal signal which may allow a smaller volume to receive the high dose (60 Gy) radiation. Conclusions For T1-CE tumors, PTVs were larger than MRI-only anatomic target volumes with no increase of dose to OARs. Therefore, MRI+18F-DOPA PET-based biologic treatment planning appears feasible in patients with high-grade gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Deanna H. Pafundi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Alan Kraling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Thomas Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Val J. Lowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Debra H. Brinkmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Nadia N. Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905,United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Malinen E, Hysing LB, Waldeland E, Muren LP. Bridging imaging and therapy: the role of medical physics in development of precision cancer care. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:757-760. [PMID: 28464737 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1316869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Liv Bolstad Hysing
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Einar Waldeland
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|