Cone beam CT-based set-up strategies with and without rotational correction for stereotactic body radiation therapy in the liver

Assessment of real-time US-CT/MR-guided percutaneous gold fiducial marker implementation in malignant hepatic tumors for stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

This study explored the initial institutional experience of using gold fiducial markers for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treating malignant hepatic tumors using real-time ultrasound-computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging fusion-guided percutaneous placement.

METHODS

From May 2021 to August 2023, 19 patients with 25 liver tumors that were invisible on pre-contrast CT received fiducial markers following these guidelines. Postprocedural scans were used to confirm their placement. We assessed technical and clinical success rates and monitored complications. The implantation of fiducial markers facilitating adequate treatment prior to SBRT, which was achieved in 96% of the cases (24 of 25 tumors), was considered technical success. Clinical success was the successful completion of SBRT without evidence of marker displacement and was achieved in 88% of cases (22 of 25 tumors). Complications included one major subcapsular hematoma and marker migration into the right atrium in two cases, which prevented SBRT.

RESULTS

Among the treated tumors, 20 of 24 (83.3%) showed a complete response, three of 24 (12.5%) remained stable, and one of 24 (4.2%) progressed during an average 11.7-month follow-up (range, 2-32 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that percutaneous gold fiducial marker placement using real-time CT/MR guidance is effective and safe for SBRT in hepatic tumors, but warns of marker migration risks, especially near the hepatic veins and in subcapsular locations. Using fewer markers than traditionally recommended-typically two per patient, the outcomes were still satisfactory, particularly given the increased risk of migration when markers were placed near major hepatic veins.

A Pilot Study of Simulation-Free Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Using Diagnostic MRI-Based and Online Adaptive Planning

PURPOSE

We aimed to demonstrate the clinical feasibility and safety of simulation-free hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) in a pilot study (National Clinical Trial 05096286).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten HA-WBRT candidates were enrolled for treatment on a commercially available computed tomography (CT)-guided linear accelerator with online adaptive capabilities. Planning structures were contoured on patient-specific diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which were registered to a CT of similar head shape, obtained from an atlas-based database (AB-CT). These patient-specific diagnostic MRI and AB-CT data sets were used for preplan calculation, using NRG-CC001 constraints. At first fraction, AB-CTs were used as primary data sets and deformed to patient-specific cone beam CTs (CBCT) to give patient-matched density information. Brain, ventricle, and brain stem contours were matched through rigid translation and rotation to the corresponding anatomy on CBCT. Lens, optic nerve, and brain contours were manually edited based on CBCT visualization. Preplans were then reoptimized through online adaptation to create final, simulation-free plans, which were used if they met all objectives. Workflow tasks were timed. In addition, patients underwent CT-simulation to create immobilization devices and for prospective dosimetric comparison of simulation-free and simulation-based plans.

RESULTS

Median time from MRI importation to completion of "preplan" was 1 weekday (range, 1-4). Median on-table workflow duration was 41 minutes (range, 34-70). NRG-CC001 constraints were achieved by 90% of the simulation-free plans. One patient's simulation-free plan failed a planning target volume coverage objective (89% instead of 90% coverage); this was deemed acceptable for first-fraction delivery, with an offline replan used for subsequent fractions. Both simulation-free and simulation CT-based plans otherwise met constraints, without clinically meaningful differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation-free HA-WBRT using online adaptive radiation therapy is feasible, safe, and results in dosimetrically comparable treatment plans to simulation CT-based workflows while providing convenience and time savings for patients.

Prediction of SBRT response in liver cancer by combining original and delta cone-beam CT radiomics: a pilot study

This study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing a combination of original and delta cone-beam CT (CBCT) radiomics for predicting treatment response in liver tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A total of 49 patients are included in this study, with 36 receiving 5-fraction SBRT, 3 receiving 4-fraction SBRT, and 10 receiving 3-fraction SBRT. The CBCT and planning CT images from liver cancer patients who underwent SBRT are collected to extract overall 547 radiomics features. The CBCT features which are reproducible and interchangeable with pCT are selected for modeling analysis. The delta features between fractions are calculated to depict tumor change. The patients with 4-fraction SBRT are only used for screening robust features. In patients receiving 5-fraction SBRT, the predictive ability of both original and delta CBCT features for two-level treatment response (local efficacy vs. local non-efficacy; complete response (CR) vs. partial response (PR)) is assessed by utilizing multivariable logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation. Additionally, univariate analysis is conducted to validate the capability of CBCT features in identifying local efficacy in patients receiving 3-fraction SBRT. In patients receiving 5-fraction SBRT, the combined models incorporating original and delta CBCT radiomics features demonstrate higher area under the curve (AUC) values compared to models using either original or delta features alone for both classification tasks. The AUC values for predicting local efficacy vs. local non-efficacy are 0.58 for original features, 0.82 for delta features, and 0.90 for combined features. For distinguishing PR from CR, the respective AUC values for original, delta and combined features are 0.79, 0.80, and 0.89. In patients receiving 3-fraction SBRT, eight valuable CBCT radiomics features are identified for predicting local efficacy. The combination of original and delta radiomics derived from fractionated CBCT images in liver cancer patients undergoing SBRT shows promise in providing comprehensive information for predicting treatment response.

Fiducial Markers Allow Accurate and Reproducible Delivery of Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Fiducial markers are utilized for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) alignment during the delivery of liver stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT). There are limited data demonstrating the impact of matching fiducials on the accuracy of liver SBRT. This study quantifies the benefit of fiducial-based alignment and improvements in inter-observer reliability. Nineteen patients with 24 liver lesions were treated with SBRT. Target localization was performed using fiducial markers on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Each CBCT procedure was retrospectively realigned to match both the liver edge and fiducial markers. The shifts were recorded by seven independent observers. Inter-observer variability was analyzed by calculating the mean error and uncertainty for the set-up. The mean absolute Cartesian error observed from fiducial and liver edge-based alignment was 1.5 mm and 5.3 mm, respectively. The mean uncertainty from fiducial and liver edge-based alignment was 1.8 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively. An error of 5 mm or greater was observed 50% of the time when aligning to the liver surface versus 5% of the time when aligning to fiducial markers. Aligning to the liver edge significantly increased the error, resulting in increased shifts when compared to alignment to fiducials. Tumors of 3 cm or farther from the liver dome had higher mean errors when aligned without fiducials (4.8 cm vs. 4.4 cm, p = 0.003). Our data support the use of fiducial markers for safer and more accurate liver SBRT.

The spatial accuracy of ring-mounted halcyon linac versus C-arm TrueBeam linac for single-isocenter/multi-target SBRT treatment

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment of oligometastatic lesions via single-isocenter/multi-target (SIMT) plan is more efficient than using multi-isocenter/multitarget SBRT. This study quantifies the spatial positioning accuracy of 2 commercially available LINAC systems for SIMT treatment pertaining to the potential amplification of error as a function of the target's distance-to-isocenter. We compare the Ring-Gantry Halcyon LINAC equipped with the fast iterative conebeam-CT (iCBCT) for image-guided SIMT treatment, and the SBRT-dedicated C-Arm TrueBeam with standard pretreatment CBCT imaging. For both systems, Sun Nuclear's MultiMet Winston-Lutz Cube phantom with 6 metallic BBs distributed at different planes up to 7 cm away from the isocenter was used. The phantom was aligned and imaged via CBCT, and then couch corrections were applied. To treat all 6 BBs, an Eclipse 10-field 3D-conformal Field-in-Field (2×2 cm² MLC field to each BB) plan for varying gantry, collimator, and couch (TrueBeam only) positions was developed for both machines with 6MV-FFF beam. The plan was delivered through ARIA once a week. The EPID images were analyzed via Sun Nuclear's software for spatial positioning accuracy. On TrueBeam, the treatment plan was delivered twice: once with 3DoF translational corrections and once with PerfectPitch 6DoF couch corrections. The average 3D spatial positioning accuracy was 0.55 ± 0.30 mm, 0.54 ± 0.24 mm, and 0.56 ± 0.28 mm at isocenter, and 0.59 ± 0.30 mm, 0.69 ± 0.30 mm, and 0.70 ± 0.35 mm at 7 cm distance-to-isocenter for Halcyon, TrueBeam 3DoF, and TrueBeam 6DoF, respectively. This suggests there are no clinically significant deviations of spatial uncertainty between the platforms with the distance-to-isocenter. On both platforms, our weekly independent measurements demonstrated the reproducibility for less than 1.0 mm positional accuracy of off-axis targets up to 7 cm from the isocenter. Due to this, no additional PTV-margin is suggested for lesions within 7 cm of isocenter. This study confirms that Halcyon can deliver similar positional accuracy to SBRT-dedicated TrueBeam to off-axis targets up to 7 cm from isocenter. These results further benchmark the spatial uncertainty of our extensively used SBRT-dedicated TrueBeam LINAC for SIMT SBRT treatments.

Bone versus soft-tissue setup in proton therapy for patients with oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patient positioning based on either bone or soft-tissue matching for PT in oesophageal cancer and its impact on plan adaptation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two retrospective patient cohorts treated with radiotherapy were included in the study. Cohort A consisted of 26 consecutive patients with a planning 4DCT scan (CT1) and a surveillance 4DCT scan (CT2) at fraction ten. Cohort B consisted of 17 patients selected based on large anatomical changes identified during treatment resulting in a rescan (CT2). Mean dose to the iCTV (sum of the CTVs in all respiratory phases) was 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions or 41.4 Gy (RBE) in 23 fractions. A nominal pencil beam scanning plan was created using two posterior beams and robust optimization (5 mm setup, 3.5% range). For each patient, two rigid registrations were made between average (avg) CT1 and CT2: a match on the vertebral column (bone match) and a match on the iCTV (soft-tissue match). Robustness towards setup (5 mm) and range (3.5%) errors was evaluated at CT2. Robustness towards respiration was evaluated by recalculation of the plan on all phases of the CT2 scan. Dose coverage <96% would trigger adaptation. The statistical significance (p-value <0.05) between dose coverage for the two registration methods was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

All plans fulfilled V95%_iCTV>99% for the nominal plan and V95%_iCTV>97% for all respiratory phases and robustness scenarios at CT1. In two (8%) and three (18%) patients, V95%_iCTV<96% on CT2 for Cohort A and B, respectively when bone match was used. For soft-tissue match, V95%iCTV >96% for all patients. V95%_iCTV was significantly higher (p-value = 0.0001) for soft-tissue match than bone match.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical changes during the treatment course led to target dose deterioration and a need for plan adaptation when using a bone match.

Fiducial marker position affects target volume in stereotactic lung irradiation

Purpose

Real‐time tracking systems of moving respiratory targets such as CyberKnife, Radixact, or Vero4DRT are an advanced robotic radiotherapy device used to deliver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The internal target volume (ITV) of lung tumors is assessed through a fiducial marker fusion using four‐dimensional computed tomography (CT). It is important to minimize the ITV to protect normal lung tissue from exposure to radiation and the associated side effects post SBRT. However, the ITV may alter if there is a change in the position of the fiducial marker with respect to the tumor. This study investigated the relationship between fiducial marker position and the ITV in order to prevent radiation exposure of normal lung tissue, and correct target coverage.

Materials and methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 230 lung cancer patients who received a fiducial marker for SBRT between April 2015 and September 2021. The distance of the fiducial marker to the gross tumor volume (GTV) in the expiratory (d_ex) and inspiratory (d_in) CT, and the ratio of the ITV/V(GTV_ex), were investigated.

Results

Upon comparing each lobe, although there was no significant difference in the d_diff and the ITV/V(GTV_ex) between all lobes for d_ex < 10 mm, there was significant difference in the d_diff and the ITV/V(GTV_ex) between the lower and upper lobes for d_ex ≥ 10 mm (p < 0.05). Moreover, there was significant difference in the d_diff and the ITV/V(GTV_ex) between d_ex ≥10 mm and d_ex < 10 mm in all lung regions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The ITV that had no margin from GTVs increased when d_ex was ≥10 mm for all lung regions (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the increase in ITV tended to be greater in the lower lung lobe. These findings can help decrease the possibility of adverse events post SBRT, and correct target coverage.

Demonstration of quasi-real-time intrafractional motion in esophageal cancer radiotherapy provided by ExacTrac X-ray snap verification

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the following hypotheses: (1) ExacTrac X-ray Snap Verification (ET-SV) is an alternative to CBCT for positioning patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC), (2) ET-SV can detect displacement in EC patients during radiotherapy (RT) and (3) EC patients can be feasibly monitored in quasi-real-time with ET-SV during RT.

METHODS

Anthropomorphic phantoms and 13 patients were included in this study. CBCT and ET-SV were both implemented before treatment delivery to detect displacement, and their correction results were compared. For the patient tests, positional correction in 3 translational directions and the yaw direction were applied using the ET-SV correction results. The residual error was detected immediately using ET-SV. Finally, to acquire the intrafractional motion, ET-SV was implemented when the gantry was at 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°, respectively.

RESULTS

In phantom tests, the maximum value of the difference in displacement between the CBCT and ET systems was 1.16 mm for translation and 0.31° for yaw. According to Bland-Altman analysis of the patient test results, 5% (5/98), 5% (5/98), 5% (5/98), and 4% (4/98) of points were beyond the upper and lower limits of agreement in the AP, SI, LR and yaw directions, respectively. The mean residual error was -0.482 mm, 1.215 mm, 1.0 mm, -0.487°, 0.105°, and 0.003° in the AP, SI, LR, pitch, roll and yaw directions, respectively. The intrafractional displacement ranged from -0.21 mm to 0 mm for translation and from -0.63° to 0.21° for rotation. The mean total translational error for intrafractional motion increased from 0.47 mm to 1.14 mm during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of ET-SV for EC RT positional correction is comparable to that of CBCT. Thus, Quasi-real-time intrafractional monitoring can be used to detect EC patient displacement during radiotherapy.

Image-guided Radiotherapy to Manage Respiratory Motion: Lung and Liver

Organ motion as a result of respiratory and cardiac motion poses significant challenges for the accurate delivery of radiotherapy to both the thorax and the upper abdomen. Modern imaging techniques during radiotherapy simulation and delivery now permit better quantification of organ motion, which in turn reduces tumour and organ at risk position uncertainty. These imaging advances, coupled with respiratory correlated radiotherapy delivery techniques, have led to the development of a range of approaches to manage respiratory motion. This review summarises the key strategies of image-guided respiratory motion management with a focus on lung and liver radiotherapy.

Intrafractional fiducial marker position variations in stereotactic liver radiotherapy during voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate intrafractional fiducial marker position variations during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients treated for liver metastases in visually guided, voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH).

METHODS

10 patients with implanted fiducial markers were studied. Respiratory coaching with visual guidance was used to ensure comfortable voluntary breath-holds for SBRT imaging and delivery. Three DIBH CTs were acquired for treatment planning. Pre- and post-treatment CBCTs were acquired for each of the three treatment fractions. Per-fraction marker position was evaluated on planar 2D kV images acquired during treatment fractions for 4 of the 10 patients.

RESULTS

The median difference in marker position was 0.3 cm (range, 0.0-0.9 cm) between the three DIBH CTs and 0.3 cm (range, 0.1 to 1.4 cm) between pre- and post-treatment CBCTs. The maximum intrafractional variation in marker position in craniocaudal (CC) direction on planar kV images was 0.7 to 1.3 cm and up to 1.0 cm during a single DIBH.

CONCLUSION

Difference in marker position of up to 1.0 cm was observed during a single DIBH despite use of narrow external gating window and visual feedback. Stability examination on pre-treatment DIBH CTs was not sufficient to guarantee per-fraction stability. Evaluation of differences in marker position on pre- and post-treatment CBCT did not always reveal the full magnitude of the intrafractional variation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

To increase treatment accuracy, it is necessary to apply real-time monitoring of the tumour or a reliable internal surrogate when delivering liver SBRT in voluntary DIBH.

Isotoxic dose prescription level strategies for stereotactic liver radiotherapy: the price of dose uniformity

Introduction: To find the optimal dose prescription strategy for liver SBRT, this study investigated the tradeoffs between achievable target dose and healthy liver dose for a range of isotoxic uniform and non-uniform prescription level strategies.Material and methods: Nine patients received ten liver SBRT courses with intrafraction motion monitoring during treatment. After treatment, five VMAT treatment plans were made for each treatment course. The PTV margin was 5 mm (left-right, anterior-posterior) and 10 mm (cranio-caudal). All plans had a mean CTV dose of 56.25 Gy in three fractions, while the PTV was covered by 50%, 67%, 67 s% (steep dose gradient outside CTV), 80%, and 95% of this dose, respectively. The 50%, 67 s%, 80%, and 95% plans were then renormalized to be isotoxic with the standard 67% plan according to a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability model for radiation induced liver disease. The CTV D98 and mean dose of the iso-toxic plans were calculated both without and with the observed intrafraction motion, using a validated method for motion-including dose reconstruction.Results: Under isotoxic conditions, the average [range] mean CTV dose per fraction decreased gradually from 21.2 [20.5-22.7] Gy to 15.5 [15.0-16.6] Gy and the D98 dose per fraction decreased from 20.4 [19.7-21.7] Gy to 15.0 [14.5-15.5] Gy, as the prescription level to the PTV rim was increased from 50% to 95%. With inclusion of target motion the mean CTV dose was 20.5 [16.5-22.5] Gy (50% PTV rim dose) and 15.4 [13.9-16.7] Gy (95% rim dose) while D98 was 17.8 [7.4-20.6] Gy (50% rim dose) and 14.6 [8.8-15.7] Gy (95% rim dose).Conclusion: Requirements of a uniform PTV dose come at the price of excess normal tissue dose. A non-uniform PTV dose allows increased CTV mean dose at the cost of robustness toward intrafraction motion. The increase in planned CTV dose by non-uniform prescription outbalanced the dose deterioration caused by motion.

Retrospective assessment of a single fiducial marker tracking regimen with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumours

Aim

To investigate tumour motion tracking uncertainties in the CyberKnife Synchrony system with single fiducial marker in liver tumours.

Background

In the fiducial-based CyberKnife real-time tumour motion tracking system, multiple fiducial markers are generally used to enable translation and rotation corrections during tracking. However, sometimes a single fiducial marker is employed when rotation corrections are not estimated during treatment.

Materials and methods

Data were analysed for 32 patients with liver tumours where one fiducial marker was implanted. Four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to determine the internal target volume (ITV). Before the first treatment fraction, the CT scans were repeated and the marker migration was determined. Log files generated by the Synchrony system were obtained after each treatment and the correlation model errors were calculated. Intra-fractional spine rotations were examined on the spine alignment images before and after each treatment.

Results

The mean (standard deviation) ITV margin was 4.1 (2.3) mm, which correlated weakly with the distance between the fiducial marker and the tumour. The mean migration distance of the marker was 1.5 (0.7) mm. The overall mean correlation model error was 1.03 (0.37) mm in the radial direction. The overall mean spine rotations were 0.27° (0.31), 0.25° (0.22), and 0.23° (0.26) for roll, pitch, and yaw, respectively. The treatment time was moderately associated with the correlation model errors and weakly related to spine rotation in the roll and yaw planes.

Conclusions

More caution and an additional safety margins are required when tracking a single fiducial marker.

Geometrical tracking accuracy and appropriate PTV margins for robotic radiosurgery of liver lesions by SBRT

Purpose: To assess the geometrical accuracy and estimate adequate PTV margins for liver treatments using the Synchrony respiratory tracking system. Material and methods: Treatment log files are analyzed for 72 liver patients to assess tracking accuracy. The tracking error is calculated as the quadratic sum of the correlation, the predictor and the beam positioning errors. Treatment target rotations and rigid body errors reported by the system are also evaluated. The impact of uncorrected rotations is assessed by rotating the planned dose distribution and reassessing target coverage. Total PTV margins are estimated by summing in quadrature tracking errors and rigid body errors. Relationships are explored between tracking errors, model linearity and motion amplitudes of internal and external markers. Results: Margins of 3, 2, 2 mm in SUP-INF, LT-RT and ANT-POST directions, respectively, are sufficient to account for tracking and beam positioning errors for 95% of patients. If rigid body error is also considered, margins increase to 4 mm isotropic. Rotations could not be corrected for 92% of patients due to imperfect fiducial implantation and limitations in the magnitude of corrections that the system can apply. Uncorrected rotations would lead to average estimated dose reductions of 2.7% ± 5.8% of the prescribed dose for D99 of GTVs (5 mm PTV expansion) in which the target was well covered in the original plan (28 of 31 GTVs). 80% of tracking models exhibit near linear correlation between internal and external marker motions with small tracking errors (<2.2 mm). Conclusions: Isotropic PTV margins considering tracking errors and target rigid body errors could be used for liver SBRT treatments if rotational corrections can be calculated accurately so that systematic rotational offsets can be avoided. The linearity of the internal and external breathing motions might be useful for other types of treatment modalities for liver cancer.

Geometric and dosimetric comparison of four intrafraction motion adaptation strategies for stereotactic liver radiotherapy

The accuracy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the liver is limited by tumor motion. Selection of the most suitable motion mitigation strategy requires good understanding of the geometric and dosimetric consequences. This study compares the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of actually delivered respiratory gated SBRT treatments for 15 patients with liver tumors with three simulated alternative motion adaptation strategies. The simulated alternatives are MLC tracking, baseline shift adaptation by inter-field couch corrections and no intrafraction motion adaptation. The patients received electromagnetic transponder-guided respiratory gated IMRT or conformal treatments in three fractions with a 3-4 mm gating window around the full exhale position. The CTV-PTV margin was 5 mm axially and 7-10 mm cranio-caudally. The CTV and PTV were covered with 95% and 67% of the prescribed mean CTV dose, respectively. The time-resolved target position error during treatments with the four investigated motion adaptation strategies was used to calculate motion margins and the motion-induced reduction in CTV D ₉₅ relative to the planned dose (ΔD ₉₅). The mean (range) number of couch corrections per treatment session to compensate for tumor drift was 2.8 (0-7) with gating, 1.4 (0-5) with baseline shift adaptation, and zero for the other strategies. The motion margins were 3.5 mm (left-right), 9.4 mm (cranio-caudal) and 3.9 mm (anterior-posterior) without intrafraction motion adaptation, approximately half of that with baseline shift adaptation, and 1-2 mm with MLC tracking and gating. With 7 mm CC margins the mean (range) of ΔD ₉₅ for the CTV was 8.1 (0.6-29.4)%-points (no intrafraction motion adaptation), 4.0 (0.4-13.3)%-points (baseline shift adaptation), 1.0 (0.3-2.2)%-points (MLC tracking) and 0.8 (0.1-1.8)%-points (gating). With 10 mm CC margins ΔD ₉₅ was instead 4.8 (0.3-14.8)%-points (no intrafraction motion adaptation) and 2.9 (0.2-9.8)%-points (baseline shift adaptation). In conclusion, baseline shift adaptation can mitigate gross dose deficits without the requirement of real-time motion adaptation. MLC tracking and gating, however, more effectively ensure high similarity between planned and delivered doses.

Evaluation of the intra- and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial-based real-time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Tumor motion amplitude varies during treatment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intra- and interfraction tumor motion and variability in patients with liver cancer treated with fiducial-based real-time tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

Fourteen liver patients were treated with SBRT using a CyberKnife. Two to four fiducial markers implanted near the tumor were used for real-time monitoring using the Synchrony system. The tumor motion information during treatment was extracted from the log files recorded by the Synchrony system. Logfile-based amplitudes in the superior-posterior (SI), left-right (LR) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were compared to the 4DCT-based amplitudes. The intra- and interfraction amplitude variations and the incidence of baseline shifts were analyzed for 66 fractions administered to 14 patients.

RESULTS

The median (range) logfile-based liver motion amplitudes for all patients were 11.9 (5.1-17.3) mm, 1.3 (0.4-4) mm and 3.8 (0.9-7.7) mm in the SI, LR and AP directions, respectively. Compared with the logfile-based amplitude, the 4DCT-based amplitude was underestimated (P < 0.05). The median (range) intra- and interfraction liver motion amplitude variations were 4.3 (1.6-6.0) mm (SI), 0.5 (0.2-2.2) mm(LR) and 1.5 (0.3-3.3) mm (AP) and 1.7 (0.5-4.6) mm (SI), 0.3 (0.1-3.0) mm (LR) and 0.7 (0.3-2.7) mm (AP), respectively. Baseline shifts exceeding 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm were observed in 27.3%, 7.6% and 3% of the measurements, respectively, within 10 min, and in 66.7%, 38.1% and 19%, respectively, within 30 min for the square root of the sum of the squares of the distances in the SI, LR and AP directions (3D). The tumor motion amplitude was found to be correlated with the baseline shift.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed significant intra- and interfraction liver motion amplitude variations over the entire course of radiation. More caution is needed for patients with large tumor motion amplitudes.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Rotational Corrections for Standard-Fractionation Head and Neck Image-Guided Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Modern linear accelerators are equipped with cone beam computed tomography and robotic couches that can correct for errors in the translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (α, β, γ) axes prior to treatment delivery. Here, we compared the positional accuracy of 2 cone beam registration approaches: (1) employing translational shifts only in 3 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z), versus; (2) using translational-rotational shifts in 6 degrees of freedom (X, Y, Z, α, β, γ).

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 140 interfraction cone beam images from 20 patients with head and neck cancer treated with standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The cone beam images were matched to planning simulation scans in 3, then in 6 degrees of freedom, using the mandible, clivus, and C2 and C7 vertebrae as surrogate volumes. Statistical analyses included a generalized mixed model and was used to assess whether there were significant differences in acceptable registrations between the 2 correction methods.

RESULTS

The rates of improvement with corrections in 6 degrees of freedom for the mandible with a 5-mm expansion margin were 54.55% ( P = .793), for the clivus 85.71% ( P = .222), and for C7 87.50% ( P = .015). There was a 100% increase in acceptability for the C2 vertebra within the 5-mm margin ( P < .001). For the 3-mm expansion margin, the rates of improvement for the mandible, clivus, C2, and C7 were 63.16% ( P = .070), 91.30% ( P = .011), 84.21% ( P = .027), and 76.92% ( P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant registration improvements with the use of rotational corrections with a 5-mm expansion margin are only seen in the C7 vertebra. At the 3-mm margin, significant improvements are found for the C2, C7, and clivus registrations, suggesting that intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments for head and neck cancers with 3-mm planning target volume margins may benefit from corrections in 6 degrees of freedom.