Validation of genetic predictors of late radiation-induced morbidity in prostate cancer patients

Genetic predictors of radiation-induced morbidity in prostate cancer patients

Cancer survivors often face adverse effects of treatment, which have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Normal-tissue side effects following radiotherapy (RT), as one of therapeutic modalities, are common and may seriously affect quality of life which is especially important in long-term prostate cancer (PC) survivors. Upgrading in our knowledge in radiation biology have led to the better understanding that genetics plays a significant role in determining a patient's predisposition to developing late RT toxicity, leading to the new field of research called "radiogenomics". With the evolution of DNA sequencing technologies and genomic analysis, radiogenomics made an appearance as a state-of-the-art science in the field of personalized medicine with the goal of detection the genetic determinants RT adverse reactions. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) - based assay could be used to predict the risk of RT side effects along with clinical features and treatment factors. Several SNPs have been identified that are associated with late radiation-induced morbidity in PC patients. Most importantly, these SNPs make up genes expressed in the tissues that are likely at the root of these symptoms, including the bladder, rectum, and small intestine, which are most exposed in PC RT. Furthermore, genome-wide association studies are likely to lead to an increasing number of genetic polymorphisms that can predict long-term RT complications. Finally, radiogenomics attempts to predict which PC patients will show radiosensitivity, so that radiation oncologists, as well as surgeons, can change treatment accordingly in order to reduce side effects or increase the RT effectiveness.

Harnessing genome-wide association studies to minimize adverse radiation-induced side effects

Radiotherapy is used as definitive treatment in approximately two-thirds of all cancers. However, like any treatment, radiation has significant acute and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies. Even when similar radiation parameters are used, 5%–10% of patients will experience adverse radiation side effects. Genomic susceptibility is thought to be responsible for approximately 40% of the clinical variability observed. In the era of precision medicine, the link between genetic susceptibility and radiation-induced side effects is further strengthening. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have begun to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) attributed to overall and tissue-specific toxicity following radiation for treatment of breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other cancers. Here, we review the use of GWAS in identifying polymorphisms that are predictive of acute and long-term radiation-induced side effects with a focus on chest, pelvic, and head-and-neck irradiation. Integration of GWAS with “omic” data, patient characteristics, and clinical correlates into predictive models could decrease radiation-induced side effects while increasing therapeutic efficacy.

Frailty and aging in cancer survivors

There are over 15 million survivors of cancer in the United States whose rates of frailty, an aging phenotype, range from just under 10% to over 80%. Frailty impacts not only disease survival but also long-term function and quality of life in children, adolescents, and in all adults diagnosed and/or treated for cancer. This review explains frailty as a construct and model of physiologic well-being. It also describes how frailty at diagnosis impacts cancer outcomes in adult populations and enumerates the prevalence of frailty in different populations of cancer survivors. Biological mechanisms responsible for aging and potentially for frailty among individuals with or who have been treated for cancer are discussed. Finally, promising pharmaceutical and lifestyle interventions designed to impact aging rather than a specific disease, tested in other populations, but likely applicable in cancer patients and survivors, are discussed.