1
|
Shouman MA, Fuchs F, Walter F, Corradini S, Westphalen CB, Vornhülz M, Beyer G, Andrade D, Belka C, Niyazi M, Rogowski P. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer - A systematic review of prospective data. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100738. [PMID: 38370495 PMCID: PMC10873666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the current prospective evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in various clinical contexts for pancreatic cancer including its use as neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), salvage therapy for isolated local recurrence (ILR), adjuvant therapy after radical resection, and as a palliative treatment. Special attention is given to the application of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the Medline database via PubMed was conducted focusing on prospective studies published within the past decade. Data were extracted concerning study characteristics, outcome measures, toxicity profiles, SBRT dosage and fractionation regimens, as well as additional systemic therapies. Results and conclusion 31 studies with in total 1,571 patients were included in this review encompassing 14 studies for LAPC, 9 for neoadjuvant treatment, 2 for adjuvant treatment, 2 for ILR, with an additional 4 studies evaluating MRgRT. In LAPC, SBRT demonstrates encouraging results, characterized by favorable local control rates. Several studies even report conversion to resectable disease with substantial resection rates reaching 39%. The adoption of MRgRT may provide a solution to the challenge to deliver ablative doses while minimizing severe toxicities. In BRPC, select prospective studies combining preoperative ablative-dose SBRT with modern induction systemic therapies have achieved remarkable resection rates of up to 80%. MRgRT also holds potential in this context. Adjuvant SBRT does not appear to confer relevant advantages over chemotherapy. While prospective data for SBRT in ILR and for palliative pain relief are limited, they corroborate positive findings from retrospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Shouman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Frederik Fuchs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Marlies Vornhülz
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Georg Beyer
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorian Andrade
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamel R, Zhang T, Comino S, Dennis K. A 15-Year Single-Institution Retrospective Study of Primary Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Non-Ablative Palliative Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:881. [PMID: 38473242 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
We studied the use of palliative radiotherapy (RT) among patients with primary, non-curable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In this subset of patients, with very poor survival, various palliative RT dose fractionation schemes are used; but, in the absence of a guideline, practice patterns vary, and dose choice is mainly based on the physician's intuition. We divided the patients into three groups, according to the dose fractionation schedules received: low (A), intermediate (B), and high (C) dose groups, to study the potential differences in outcome between the different dose prescriptions. Cohort: n = 184. Median age: 69 years. Male: n = 105 (57%), female: n = 79 (43%). Stage IV: n = 117 (64%). T4: n = 127 (69%). Tumor location: head: n = 109 (59%), body: n = 37 (20%), tail: n = 25 (14%), neck: n = 11 (6%), and uncinate: n = 2 (1%). Prior systemic therapy: n = 66 (36%). Most common dose fractionations received: 20 Gy in five fractions n = 67 (36%), 30 Gy in 10 fractions n = 49 (27%), and 8 Gy in one fraction n = 23 (13%). Group A: n = 33 (18%), median overall survival (OS) 19 days (95% CI 4-33). Group B: n = 84 (46%), median OS 52 days (95% CI 43-60). Group C: n = 67 (36%), median OS 126 days (95% CI 77-174). Median days to in-field progression: Group A 59 days (range 7-109), Group B 96 days (range 19-173), and Group C 97 days (range 13-475). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported retrospective cohort of patients receiving non-ablative palliative RT to treat their primary pancreatic tumors. Most patients had metastatic disease, T4 tumors of the pancreatic head and had not received prior systemic therapy. A significant survival benefit was seen favoring the high dose/longer RT fractionation group, presumably due to appropriate patient selection rather than an RT effect. Despite the relatively short median overall survival, one fifth of the patients were found to experience an in-field progression following RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Kamel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tinghua Zhang
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Suzanne Comino
- Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tello Valverde CP, Ebrahimi G, Sprangers MA, Pateras K, Bruynzeel AME, Jacobs M, Wilmink JW, Besselink MG, Crezee H, van Tienhoven G, Versteijne E. Impact of Short-Course Palliative Radiation Therapy on Pancreatic Cancer-Related Pain: Prospective Phase 2 Nonrandomized PAINPANC Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:352-361. [PMID: 37647972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical evidence is limited regarding palliative radiation therapy for relieving pancreatic cancer-related pain. We prospectively investigated pain response after short-course palliative radiation therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe pancreatic cancer-related pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this prospective phase 2 single center nonrandomized trial, 30 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (5-10, on a 0-10 scale) of pancreatic cancer refractory to pain medication, were treated with a short-course palliative radiation therapy; 24 Gy in 3 weekly fractions (2015-2018). Primary endpoint was defined as a clinically relevant average decrease of ≥2 points in pain severity, compared with baseline, within 7 weeks after the start of treatment. Secondary endpoint was global quality of life (QoL), with a clinically relevant increase of 5 to 10 points (0-100 scale). Pain severity reduction and QoL were assessed 9 times using the Brief Pain Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15-PAL, respectively. Both outcomes were analyzed using joint modeling. In addition, acute toxicity based on clinician reporting and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) received palliative radiation therapy. At baseline, the median oral morphine equivalent daily dose was 129.5 mg (range, 20.0-540.0 mg), which decreased to 75.0 mg (range, 15.0-360.0 mg) after radiation (P = .021). Pain decreased on average 3.15 points from baseline to 7 weeks (one-sided P = .045). Patients reported a clinically relevant mean pain severity reduction from 5.9 to 3.8 points (P = .011) during the first 3 weeks, which further decreased to 3.2 until week 11, ending at 3.4 (P = .006) in week 21 after the first radiation therapy fraction. Global QoL significantly improved from 50.5 to 60.8 during the follow-up period (P = .001). Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 3 patients and no grade 4 to 5 toxicity was observed. Median OS was 11.8 weeks, with a 13.3% 1-year actuarial OS rate. CONCLUSIONS Short-course palliative radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer-related pain was associated with rapid, clinically relevant reduction in pain severity, and clinically relevant improvement in global QoL, with mostly mild toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Paola Tello Valverde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gati Ebrahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituut Verbeeten, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam A Sprangers
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstantinos Pateras
- University of Thessaly, Faculty of Public and One Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology & Artificial Intelligence, Karditsa, Greece; Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center of Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Jacobs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Versteijne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Mansor E, Mahoney M, Chenard-Poirier M, Ramjeesingh R, Nair V, Kennedy E, Locke G, Welch S, Berry S, Couture F, Elimova E, Pollett A, Mahmud A, Wilson B, Armstrong D, Falkson C, Asmis T, Vickers M, Goodwin R. Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8172-8185. [PMID: 37754508 PMCID: PMC10527697 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023 was held in Quebec City, Quebec 2-4 February 2023. The purpose of the conference was to develop consensus statements on emerging and evolving treatment paradigms. Participants included Canadian medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists and surgical oncologists from across Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic provinces. Consensus statements were developed following rapid review presentations and discussion of available literature. The recommendations proposed here represent the consensus opinions of physicians involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who participated in this meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essa Al-Mansor
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Meghan Mahoney
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canadac
| | | | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
| | - Vimoj Nair
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (E.K.)
| | - Gordon Locke
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Stephen Welch
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada;
| | - Scott Berry
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Felix Couture
- CHU de Québec—Université Laval, Québec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada (F.C.)
| | - Elena Elimova
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Aaron Pollett
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (E.K.)
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Brooke Wilson
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Dawn Armstrong
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canadac
| | - Conrad Falkson
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Timothy Asmis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Michael Vickers
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Rachel Goodwin
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doppenberg D, Lagerwaard FJ, van Dieren S, Meijerink MR, van der Vliet JJ, Besselink MG, van Tienhoven G, Versteijne E, Slotman BJ, Wilmink JW, Kazemier G, Bruynzeel AME. Optimizing patient selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer after initial chemotherapy - a single center prospective cohort. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1149961. [PMID: 37324027 PMCID: PMC10264658 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1149961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The role of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as local treatment option after chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is evolving. However adequate patient selection criteria for SABR in patients with LAPC are lacking. Methods A prospective institutional database collected data of patients with LAPC treated with chemotherapy, mainly FOLFIRINOX, followed by SABR, which was delivered using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy, 40 Gy in 5 fractions within two weeks. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for OS. Results Overall, 74 patients were included, median age 66 years, 45.9% had a KPS score of ≥90. Median OS was 19.6 months from diagnosis and 12.1 months from start of SABR. Local control was 90% at one year. Multivariable Cox regression analyses identified KPS ≥90, age <70, and absence of pain prior to SABR as independent favorable predictors for OS. The rate of grade ≥3 fatigue and late gastro-intestinal toxicity was 2.7%. Conclusions SABR is a well-tolerated treatment in patients with unresectable LAPC following chemotherapy, with better outcomes when applied in patients with higher performance score, age <70 years and absence of pain. Future randomized trials will have to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Doppenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S. van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M. R. Meijerink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department Intervention Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J. J. van der Vliet
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- LAVA Therapeutics, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M. G. Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E. Versteijne
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - B. J. Slotman
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J. W. Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G. Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A. M. E. Bruynzeel
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gottumukkala S, Salamekh S, Sanford NN. Current State and Future Directions of Radiation Therapy for Pancreas Adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:399-414. [PMID: 37182984 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Studies suggest select patients from across the pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) disease spectrum may benefit from adding radiation therapy (RT) to multi-modality care. In resectable PDAC, there is an evolving role for neoadjuvant RT with adjuvant RT reserved for patients with increased recurrence risk. In borderline resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemoradiation likely improves R0 resection rates and in unresectable PDAC, definitive RT may prolong survival for some patients. Recent developments in RT delivery are promising but additional studies are needed to determine the benefit of these technologies and to optimize the role of RT in multi-modality care.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chang VT, Sandifer C, Zhong F. GI Symptoms in Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:24-33. [PMID: 36623952 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This review will apply a multidisciplinary approach to GI symptoms with attention to symptom assessment (instruments and qualitative aspects), differential diagnosis, and recent findings relevant to management of symptoms and underlying diseases. We conclude that further development of supportive interventions for GI symptoms for both patient and caregivers has the potential to reduce distress from GI symptoms, and anticipate better symptom control with advances in scientific knowledge and improvement of the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor T Chang
- Section Hematology Oncology (111), VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ; Department of Medicine, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
| | | | - Fengming Zhong
- Section Hematology Oncology (111), VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ; Department of Medicine, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Burkoň P, Trna J, Slávik M, Němeček R, Kazda T, Pospíšil P, Dastych M, Eid M, Novotný I, Procházka T, Vrzal M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of Pancreatic Cancer-A Critical Review and Practical Consideration. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102480. [PMID: 36289742 PMCID: PMC9599229 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the developed world and is predicted to become the second by 2030. A cure may be achieved only with surgical resection of an early diagnosed disease. Surgery for more advanced disease is challenging and can be contraindicated for many reasons. Neoadjuvant therapy may improve the probability of achieving R0 resection. It consists of systemic treatment followed by radiation therapy applied concurrently or sequentially with cytostatics. A novel approach to irradiation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has the potential to improve treatment results. SBRT can deliver higher doses of radiation to the tumor in only a few treatment fractions. It has attracted significant interest for pancreatic cancer patients, as it is completed quickly, requires less time away from full-dose chemotherapy, and is well-tolerated than conventional radiotherapy. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a basic overview of current evidence for SBRT indications in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. In the second part of the review, we focus on practical information with respect to SBRT treatment plan preparation the performance of such therapy. Finally, we discuss future directions related to the use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Burkoň
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Trna
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (M.S.)
| | - Marek Slávik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (M.S.)
| | - Radim Němeček
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospíšil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Dastych
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 340/20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Eid
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 340/20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ivo Novotný
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Procházka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Miroslav Vrzal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 57 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salamekh S, Gottumukkala S, Park C, Lin MH, Sanford NN. Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Developments and Advances on the Horizon. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:995-1009. [PMID: 36154787 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Current indications for radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer vary by surgical resectability status of the tumor. Radiation is generally not used pre-operatively for resectable tumors, but may be given adjuvantly particularly in settings of a close or positive surgical margin. For borderline resectable tumors, pre-operative radiation has been shown to improve surgical parameters including lowering nodal positivity and positive margin rates. For locally advanced unresectable tumors, radiation can improve local control, give patients an interval off of chemotherapy and provide symptomatic relief. Multidisciplinary discussion is critical for choosing the best modality and sequencing of care for patients with pancreatic cancer. Prospective trials with appropriately chosen endpoints and meticulous radiotherapy quality assurance are needed to best define populations with pancreatic cancer most likely to benefit from radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Salamekh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Chunjoo Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pavic M, Niyazi M, Wilke L, Corradini S, Vornhülz M, Mansmann U, Al Tawil A, Fritsch R, Hörner-Rieber J, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Belka C, Mayerle J, Beyer G. MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of primary tumor for pain control in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): an open randomized, multicentric, parallel group clinical trial (MASPAC). Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:18. [PMID: 35078490 PMCID: PMC8788088 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01988-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pain symptoms in the upper abdomen and back are prevalent in 80% of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), where the current standard treatment is a systemic therapy consisting of at least doublet-chemotherapy for fit patients. Palliative low-dose radiotherapy is a well-established local treatment option but there is some evidence for a better and longer pain response after a dose-intensified radiotherapy of the primary pancreatic cancer (pPCa). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can deliver high radiation doses in few fractions, therefore reducing chemotherapy-free intervals. However, prospective data on pain control after SBRT of pPCa is very limited. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of SBRT on pain control in patients with mPDAC in a prospective trial.
Methods
This is a prospective, double-arm, randomized controlled, international multicenter study testing the added benefit of MR-guided adaptive SBRT of the pPca embedded between standard of care-chemotherapy (SoC-CT) cycles for pain control and prevention of pain in patients with mPDAC. 92 patients with histologically proven mPDAC and at least stable disease after initial 8 weeks of SoC-CT will be eligible for the trial and 1:1 randomized in 3 centers in Germany and Switzerland to either experimental arm A, receiving MR-guided SBRT of the pPCa with 5 × 6.6 Gy at 80% isodose with continuation of SoC-CT thereafter, or control arm B, continuing SoC-CT without SBRT. Daily MR-guided plan adaptation intents to achieve good target coverage, while simultaneously minimizing dose to organs at risk. Patients will be followed up for minimum 6 and maximum of 18 months. The primary endpoint of the study is the “mean cumulative pain index” rated every 4 weeks until death or end of study using numeric rating scale.
Discussion
An adequate long-term control of pain symptoms in patients with mPDAC is an unmet clinical need. Despite improvements in systemic treatment, local complications due to pPCa remain a clinical challenge. We hypothesize that patients with mPDAC will benefit from a local treatment of the pPCa by MR-guided SBRT in terms of a durable pain control with a simultaneously favorable safe toxicity profile translating into an improvement of quality-of-life.
Trial registration
German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS): DRKS00025801. Meanwhile the study is also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT05114213.
Collapse
|
11
|
Noninvasive celiac plexus radiosurgery in palliative treatment for patients with symptomatic pancreatic cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2021; 25:140-145. [PMID: 34667441 PMCID: PMC8506435 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2021.107689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced pancreatic cancer is commonly associated with significant visceral pain, radiating in a belt-like distribution to the upper abdomen, referring to the lower back, and significantly affecting patients' quality of life (QoL). The pain is often poorly controlled by pharmacotherapy, or the doses necessary to control the pain produce substantial adverse effects. Other available pain management options include invasive celiac plexus block or neurolysis, palliative radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy, all with limited efficacy. In this case report, we present the first non-invasive celiac plexus radiosurgery performed in Europe in a patient with pancreatic cancer, demonstrating that significant pain relief can be achieved through a non-invasive procedure performed within 2 outpatient visits.
Collapse
|
12
|
Coveler AL, Mizrahi J, Eastman B, Apisarnthanarax SJ, Dalal S, McNearney T, Pant S. Pancreas Cancer-Associated Pain Management. Oncologist 2021; 26:e971-e982. [PMID: 33885205 PMCID: PMC8176967 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain is highly prevalent in patients with pancreas cancer and contributes to the morbidity of the disease. Pain may be due to pancreatic enzyme insufficiency, obstruction, and/or a direct mass effect on nerves in the celiac plexus. Proper supportive care to decrease pain is an important aspect of the overall management of these patients. There are limited data specific to the management of pain caused by pancreatic cancer. Here we review the literature and offer recommendations regarding multiple modalities available to treat pain in these patients. The dissemination and adoption of these best supportive care practices can improve quantity and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pain management is important to improve the quality of life and survival of a patient with cancer. The pathophysiology of pain in pancreas cancer is complex and multifactorial. Despite tumor response to chemotherapy, a sizeable percentage of patients are at risk for ongoing cancer-related pain and its comorbid consequences. Accordingly, the management of pain in patients with pancreas cancer can be challenging and often requires a multifaceted approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L Coveler
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jonathan Mizrahi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bory Eastman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Shalini Dalal
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lebenthal JM, Zheng J, Glare PA, O'Reilly EM, Yang AC, Epstein AS. Prognostic value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2021; 127:1568-1575. [PMID: 33471374 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score (MPS), a composite of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and albumin, is an objective prognostic tool created as a more readily available alternative to the Glasgow Prognostic Score. A prior analysis of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) suggested that the MPS may predict survival, although it did not control for clinically relevant factors. METHODS MPS scores were calculated for patients with mPDAC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014. An MPS scale of 0 to 2 was used: 0 for an albumin level ≥ 4 g/dL and an NLR ≤ 4 g/dL, 1 for either an albumin level < 4 g/dL or an NLR > 4 g/dL, and 2 for an albumin level < 4 g/dL and an NLR > 4 g/dL. Performance status, antineoplastic therapy, presence of thromboembolism (TE), radiation therapy, and metastatic sites were also analyzed. The associations with overall survival were examined with time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS A multivariate model revealed that higher MPS scores at diagnosis (hazard ratio for MPS of 2 vs MPS of 0, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.76), liver metastases, radiation therapy, hospital admissions, TE, and performance status were associated with worse overall survival. The median overall survival for patients with MPS scores of 0, 1, and 2 were 12.9, 9.0, and 5.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MPS, an easily calculated composite of the NLR and albumin, is an objective tool that may predict survival in mPDAC independently of performance status, disease characteristics, and cancer therapy. LAY SUMMARY The Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score (MPS) is a new scoring system that incorporates markers of inflammation found in individuals' blood at the diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Data suggest that the MPS may help to determine prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Lebenthal
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Junting Zheng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul A Glare
- Department of Pain Medicine, University of Sydney Medical Center, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew C Yang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew S Epstein
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Despite extensive research that has identified new risk factors, genetic mutations, and therapeutic options, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma continues to be a leading cause of cancer related death. Patients with pancreatic cancer, along with their clinicians, must balance realistic hope alongside a life-threatening diagnosis. As the search for treatments to reduce the morbidity and mortality continues, symptom management and quality of life remain the focus of our efforts. In addition to side effects of cancer-directed therapy, patients are at risk for malnutrition, pain, and fatigue. These factors are often overlooked in practice, so a multidisciplinary team is critical in optimizing the care of patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang W, Lu J, Chen KM, Wu ZY, Wang QB, Liu JJ, Gong J, Chen ZJ, Ding XY, Wang ZM. Preliminary application of 3D-printed coplanar template for iodine-125 seed implantation therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:5280-5287. [PMID: 30581276 PMCID: PMC6295836 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate a 3D-printed coplanar template for iodine-125 seed implantation therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.
METHODS A retrospective analysis of our database was performed, and a total of 25 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent iodine-125 seed implantation between January 2014 and November 2017 were analyzed. Of these, 12 implantations were assisted by a 3D-printed coplanar template (group A), and 13 implantations performed freehand were selected as a control group (group B). A 3D coplanar template was designed and printed according to a preoperative CT scan and treatment planning system. The iodine-125 seeds were then implanted using the template as a guide. Dosimetric verification was performed after implantation. Pre- and postoperative D90, V100, and V150 were calculated. The success rate of iodine-125 seed implantation, dosimetric parameters, and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS Iodine-125 seed implantation was successfully performed in both groups. In group A, the median pre- and postoperative D90 values were 155.32 ± 8.05 Gy and 154.82 ± 16.43 Gy, respectively; the difference between these values was minimal and not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Postoperative V100 and V150 were 91.05% ± 4.06% and 64.54% ± 13.40%, respectively, which met the treatment requirement. A better dosimetric parameter was observed in group A than in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (V100: 91.05% ± 4.06% vs 72.91% ± 13.78%, P < 0.05). No major procedure-related complications were observed in either group. For group A, mild hemorrhage was observed in 1 patient with a peritoneal local hematoma due to mesenteric vein damage from the iodine-125 seed implantation needle. The hematoma resolved spontaneously without treatment. Postoperative blood amylase levels remained within the normal range for all patients.
CONCLUSION A 3D-printed coplanar template appears to be a safe and effective iodine-125 seed implantation guidance tool to improve implantation accuracy and optimize dosimetric distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Jian Lu
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Ke-Min Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Zhi-Yuan Wu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Qing-Bin Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Jing-Jing Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Ju Gong
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Zhi-Jin Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Ding
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Zhong-Min Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|