Treatment approaches for nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma

Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Nasopharynx: A Retrospective Study of 12 Cases

Objective: This study aimed to describe the experience of a single institution in China in treating adenoid cystic carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Methods: We reviewed the previous literature and conducted a retrospective analysis of 12 patients who diagnosed with nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC) in clinical data, treatment, and follow-up data during 2019 to 2021. Results: Patients ranged in age from 32 to 68 years (mean 40.7 years, median 48.5 years), with a male to female ratio of 5:7. Most of our patients have T4a and T4b diseases (50% and 25%, respectively). A quarter of patients develop distant metastases. Among the 12 patients, 7 of them have positive margins under the microscope (7/12, 58.3%). The chief clinical manifestations were epistaxis, facial swelling, facial pain, headache ear stuffy, and hearing loss. If the tumors involved with cavernous sinus, brain stem infiltrated, and internal carotid artery circumvented, patients will undertake routine enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with Magnetic Resonance Angiography/Magnetic Resonance Venogram (MRA/MRV) to clearly show the lesion region. All patients underwent endoscopic endonasal approach. Fifty percent of patients received radiotherapy and 25% of patients received chemotherapy. None of the patients was lost and the follow-up time ranged from 16 to 45 months. The mean and median follow-up were 2.08 and 1.58 years. Two patients were dead of distant metastasis within 18 and 20 months after the surgery, and another patient with recurrent NACC died of hemorrhage. Conclusion: NACC is a rare malignant tumor that occurs in the nasopharynx, which can grow along the nerve, destroy the bone of the skull base, and metastasize to other organs. Up to now, there is no standard treatment. Our results show that endoscopic sinus surgery is a better choice for advanced or recurrent NACC.

Outcomes of patients in nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma in the IMRT era: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC) is a rare malignancy with special biological features. Controversies exist regarding the treatment approach and prognostic factors in the IMRT era. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and management approaches in NACC.

METHODS

Fifty patients with NACC at our institution between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Sixteen patients received primary radiotherapy (RT), and 34 patients underwent primary surgery.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and October 2020, a total of 50 patients with pathologically proven NACC were included in our analysis. The median follow-up time was 58.5 months (range: 6.0-151.0 months). The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) and progression-free survival rate (PFS) were 83.9% and 67.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients whose primary treatment was surgery and RT were 90.0% and 67.3%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.028). The 5-year PFS rates of patients whose primary treatment was surgery or RT were 80.8% and 40.7%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.024). Multivariate analyses showed that nerve invasion and the pattern of primary treatment were independent factors associated with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the relative insensitivity to radiation, primary surgery seemed to provide a better chance of disease control and improved survival in NACC. Meanwhile, postoperative radiotherapy should be performed for advanced stage or residual tumours. Cranial nerve invasion and treatment pattern might be important factors affecting the prognosis of patients with NACC.

Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Nasopharynx with Skull Base Involvement: Retrospective National Cohort Analysis of Treatment Paradigms, Outcomes, and Provider Density

Objectives This article examines a national cohort of patients with nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) for incidence, skull base invasion, overall survival, and treatment paradigms.

Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective national population-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data of patients with ACC of the nasopharynx (NACC) and skull base between 2004 and 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival and odds of radiation treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 15.0 (STATACorp). p-Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results Of the 2,385 cases of ACC, 70 cases were classified as NACC. Twenty-one percent (15) involved invasion of the skull base or posterior pharyngeal wall, and 42% (30) were either stage 3 or stage 4. The 5-year overall survival for patients with NACC without skull base invasion was 67% which dropped to 40% with invasion into the skull base. Radiation was used as the primary form of therapy for 62% of NACC and 73% of NACC invading into skull base. Odds of receiving radiation therapy and 5-year survival were not affected by socioeconomic status or density of providers.

Conclusion NACC is rare in incidence and was most commonly treated with radiation therapy when advanced in stage. Prognosis was dependent on invasion through posterior pharyngeal wall and skull base. Provider density and socioeconomic status did not affect odds of radiation or overall survival for NACC.

Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Skull Base: Response to Radiation Therapy and Outcomes in a Retrospective Case Series

Objectives  The main purpose of this article is to examine a single-center cohort of patients with nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) for pathologic features, skull base invasion, overall survival, and disease-free survival, with a focus on response to proton beam radiation therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants  Single-center institutional cancer registry was used to retrospectively identify and analyze outcomes for 12 patients treated for ACC of the nasopharynx from 2000 to 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures  Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival and locoregional control. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 12.0 (STATACorp, College Station, Texas, United States). Spearman's rank order correlation was used for ordinal, monotonic variables with p -values <0.05 considered statistically significant. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method; comparison between groups was performed using log-rank test. Results  Twelve patients with ACC of the nasopharynx were included. All patients presented with advanced disease and were treated with primary radiation therapy, typically proton beam therapy. Only two underwent a surgical attempt at resection. A majority of cases had a cribriform growth pattern. The 5-year survival was 75% and rate of locoregional control rate at 5 years was 50%, comparable to other ACC cohort studies that included earlier stage tumors in various subsites that were surgically resected. Conclusions  Although ACC is traditionally noted to be radioresistant, ACC of the nasopharynx was responsive to radiotherapy in our cohort, despite advanced stage and skull base invasion. Reasons for this improved survival are unclear and suggest the need for further pathologic and genetic characterization of nasopharyngeal ACC.

Long-term outcomes of patients in different histological subtypes of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma: A single-center experience with 71 cases

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and management approaches in different histological subtypes of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma (NPAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

71 patients with NPAC at our institution between 1984 and 2016 were reviewed, including adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in 43 patients, mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) in 17 patients, and primary traditional adenocarcinoma (AC) in 11 patients. 37 patients received primary radiotherapy and 34 patients underwent primary surgery.

RESULTS

The median time of follow-up was 77 months. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS), locoregional failure-free survival rate (LRFFS) and distant metastasis failure-free survival rate (DFFS) were 69.9%, 67.1% and 77.9%, respectively. Patients who received combined modality therapy had better 5-year OS (73.7% vs 66.2%, p = 0.065) and LRFFS (73.1% vs 64.5%, p = 0.047) than patients receiving single modality therapy. Regarding the different histological subtypes, the survival rates of patients with ACC undergoing primary radiotherapy and primary surgery were similar (5-year OS 82.3% vs 68.8%, LRFFS 70.0% vs 70.8%, p＞0.05). As to patients with MEC and AC, those who underwent primary surgery achieved better 5-year OS (75.6% vs 45.5%, p = 0.001) and LRFFS (70.6%% vs 57.1%, p = 0.014) than those who received primary radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses indicated that histological subtypes and radiotherapy technique were independent factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal treatment policy for NPAC remained the combination of radiotherapy and surgery. For patients with ACC, radiotherapy could be considered as the primary treatment. Surgery was suggested to be the primary treatment in patients with MEC and AC.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients Not Meeting Age-based Criteria of the CROSS Trial

OBJECTIVES

The CROSS trial established neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT-S) as superior to surgery alone (S) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). However, because patients above 75 years of age were excluded, this comparison cannot be extrapolated to older patients. This study of a large, contemporary national database evaluated practice patterns in elderly patients ineligible for CROSS, and analyzed overall survival (OS) between nCRT+S, S, and definitive CRT (dCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for EC patients with cT1N1M0/T2-3N0-1M0 EC (per the CROSS trial) but 76 years and above of age. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with nCRT+S (vs. S). Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated OS; Cox multivariate analysis determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching aimed to address group imbalances and indication biases.

RESULTS

Of 4099 total patients, 594 (14%) underwent nCRT+S, 494 (12%) underwent S, and 3011 (73%) underwent dCRT. Since 2010, trimodality management has risen, corresponding to declines in S and dCRT. Median OS in the respective groups were 26.7, 20.3, and 17.8 months (P<0.05). Following propensity matching, there was a trend towards higher OS with nCRT-S over S (P=0.077); dCRT showed poorer OS than nCRT-S (P<0.001) but was equivalent to S (P=0.669). Before and following matching, nCRT-S experienced equivalent 30- and 90-day mortality as S (P>0.05), with lower 30-day readmission and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most older patients not meeting CROSS criteria undergo dCRT, utilization of trimodality therapy is rising. Despite the trend towards higher OS with trimodality therapy without poorer postoperative outcomes, careful patient selection continues to be essential in this population.

Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma and Oligoastrocytoma

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant management of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AOs) and anaplastic oligoastrocytomas (AOAs) is guided by 2 seminal phase III trials, one of which utilized radiotherapy (RT) followed by chemotherapy (CT) (RT-CT), and the other in which CT was followed by RT (CT-RT). Both paradigms are endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network because no direct comparison in the first-line (nonprogressive) setting has been performed to date. This study of a contemporary national database sought to evaluate practice patterns and outcomes between both approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for newly diagnosed AO/AOA treated with postoperative sequential CT-RT or RT-CT. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors independently associated with delivery of a particular paradigm. Overall survival (OS) between cohorts was compared using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling evaluated factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

Of 225 patients, 19 (8.4%) received CT-RT and 206 (91.6%) underwent RT-CT. Groups were well-balanced, although CT-RT was more often administered to men (P=0.009) and AOs (P=0.037). Median follow-up was 58 months. Median OS in the CT-RT cohort was 93 months (95% confidence interval, 37-150 mo), and 107 months (95% confidence interval, 72-142 mo) in the RT-CT group (P=0.709). Therapy sequence was not associated with OS on univariate (P=0.709) or multivariate (P=0.257) assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, most AO/AOA patients receiving sequential therapy undergo RT followed by CT. No differences in survival were observed with either approach; this addresses a knowledge gap and confirms that both paradigms are appropriate in the first-line setting.

Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: practice patterns and outcomes from the national cancer data base

Background

Current guidelines recommend chemotherapy (CT) with or without radiotherapy (RT) for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IC). Although there is currently lack of consensus, previous smaller studies have illustrated the efficacy of local therapy for this population. This investigation evaluated outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus CT alone in unresected IC using a large, contemporary national database.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for primary IC cases (2004-2013) receiving CT alone or CRT. Patients undergoing resection or not receiving CT were excluded, as were those with M1 disease or unknown M classification. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with CRT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between both groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed variables associated with OS.

Results

In total, 2,842 patients were analyzed [n=666 (23%) CRT, n=2,176 (77%) CT]. CRT was less likely delivered at community centers, in more recent time periods (2009-2013), to older patients, and in certain geographic locations. Median OS in the CRT and CT groups were 13.6 vs. 10.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, poorer OS was associated with age, male gender, increased comorbidities, treatment at a community center, and treatment at earlier time periods (2004-2008) (P<0.05 for all). Notably, receipt of CRT independently predicted for improved OS (P<0.001).

Conclusions

As compared to CT alone, CRT was independently associated with improved survival in unresected IC. These findings support a randomized trial evaluating this question that is currently accruing.