Image-guided radiation therapy for post-operative gynaecologic cancer: patient set up verification with and without implanted fiducial markers

Assessment of Setup Errors in Gynecological Malignancies Treated With Radiotherapy Using Onboard Imaging

Introduction  Radiotherapy plays a vital role in the management of gynecological malignancies. However, maintaining patient position poses a challenge during daily radiotherapy treatment of these patients. This study identifies and calculates setup errors in interfraction radiotherapy and optimum clinical target volume-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins in patients with gynecological malignancies. Material and methods  A total of 38 patients with gynecological malignancies were included in the study. They were treated with a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions for five weeks, followed by brachytherapy. All patients were immobilized using a 4-point thermoplastic cast. Anteroposterior and lateral images were taken thrice weekly for five weeks. Setup verification was done using kilovoltage images obtained using Varian On-board Imager (Varian Medical System, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Manual matching was done utilizing bony landmarks such as the widest portion of the pelvic brim, anterior border of S1 vertebrae, and pubic symphysis in the X, Y, and Z axes, respectively. Results A total of 1140 images were taken. The individual systematic errors ranged from -0.24 to 0.17 cm (LR), -0.15 to 0.19 cm (AP) and -0.36 to 0.29 cm (CC) while the individual random errors ranged from 0.04 to 0.36 cm (LR), 0.06 to 0.33 cm (AP) and 0.10 to 0.29 cm (CC). The calculated CTV-PTV margins in LR, AP and CC directions were 0.17, 0.18, and 0.25 cm (ICRU-62); 0.28, 0.31 and 0.47 cm in LR, AP and CC directions (Stroom's), and 0.32, 0.36 and 0.55 cm (Van Herk) respectively. Conclusion Based on this study, the calculated CTV-PTV margin is 6 mm in gynecological malignancies, and the present protocol of 7 mm of PTV margin is optimum.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Medically Inoperable Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed gynecological cancer among women aged 50 and older in developed countries. In patients who are not amenable to surgery, radiotherapy results in improved survival with acceptable adverse effect profiles. Definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a monotherapy remains an unaddressed concept in the literature. Here, we present the case of an 86-year-old woman who was diagnosed with early-stage endometrial carcinoma and was medically inoperable due to cardiac comorbidities. She was treated with magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy-based SBRT. She tolerated the treatment well, with mild increased vaginal discharge. Complete metabolic and radiological responses were obtained. She continues to be disease free in the first year of treatment with no long-term side effects. Our protocol presents promising results with a safe toxicity profile for inoperable early-stage endometrial cancer. Future studies are warranted in light of the current knowledge.

Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the consistency of therapy radiographers performing image registration using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-CT, magnetic resonance (MR)-CT, and MR-MR image guidance for cervix cancer radiotherapy and to assess that MR-based image guidance is not inferior to CBCT standard practice.

METHODS

10 patients receiving cervix radiation therapy underwent daily CBCT guidance and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging weekly during treatment. Offline registration of each MR image, and corresponding CBCT, to planning CT was performed by five radiographers. MR images were also registered to the earliest MR interobserver variation was assessed using modified Bland-Altman analysis with clinically acceptable 95% limits of agreement (LoA) defined as ±5.0 mm.

RESULTS

30 CBCT-CT, 30 MR-CT and 20 MR-MR registrations were performed by each observer. Registration variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were minor and both strategies resulted in 95% LoA over the clinical threshold in the anteroposterior direction (CBCT-CT ±5.8 mm, MR-CT ±5.4 mm). MR-MR registrations achieved a significantly improved 95% LoA in the anteroposterior direction (±4.3 mm). All strategies demonstrated similar results in lateral and longitudinal directions.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of interobserver variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were similar, confirming that MR-CT radiotherapy workflows are comparable to CBCT-CT image-guided radiotherapy. Our results suggest MR-MR radiotherapy workflows may be a superior registration strategy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first publication quantifying interobserver registration of multimodality image registration strategies for cervix radical radiotherapy patients.

Impact of changes in body contours on radiation therapy dose distribution after uterine cervical cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Patients receiving postoperative irradiation for uterine cervical cancer might not be able to eat during radiation therapy because of the effects of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; this may lead to changes in the patient's body shape during treatment. When performing image-guided radiotherapy, it is necessary to determine immediately whether treatment can be performed on the day or whether re-planning is required. The purpose of this study was to determine indicators for re-planning by examining the effects of changing body contours on radiation therapy dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The original body contour was reduced by 1 cm in the front portion (structure-set 1). Based on the original dose distribution, the dose recalculation was performed with a structure set created using the body contour of structure-set 1. The difference between the original and recalculated dose distributions of structure-set 1 was evaluated through gamma analysis (GA).

RESULT

In the GA results for dose distribution obtained via recalculation with structure-set 1, a pass rate of 90% or more was obtained for a criterion of 2 mm/2% in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that dose re-planning is rarely required when the body shape is reduced by only 1 cm in the front.