1
|
Muszynska C, Lundgren L, Jacobsson H, Sandström P, Andersson B. Preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer improves survival compared with incidental gallbladder cancer in pT3 patients. Scand J Surg 2024; 113:314-323. [PMID: 39066517 DOI: 10.1177/14574969241263539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to compare survival for incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC), respectively, preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer (GBC), subjected to surgery for different pathological tumour (pT) stages and in different treatment groups in a national cohort. METHODS Data were collected and crosslinked from two national quality registers, SweLiv (2009-2019) and GallRiks (2009-2016). Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were used to compare groups. RESULTS In total, 466 IGBC patients, including 225 who only underwent simple cholecystectomy (SC), and 477 GBC patients were included. Most patients were female, with small differences in mean age between groups. In all IGBC patients compared with GBC patients, an improved 5-year overall survival in pT3 GBC undergoing surgery (GBC 13% vs all IGBC 8%, p < 0.001), was seen. GBC was shown to be an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients (hazard ratio (HR): 0.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.8, p < 0.001). In addition, in GBC with curative reresection compared with IGBC SC and IGBC with curative resection, an improved 5-year overall survival in pT3 GBC was shown (GBC 20% vs all IGBC 10%, p < 0.001). GBC was an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients with curative resection (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS GBC was shown to be an independent predictor for improved survival in pT3 patients, and patients with GBC may benefit from one-stage resection. It is, therefore, reasonable to recommend that radiological suspicion of malignancy should be evaluated at a liver tumour centre to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Muszynska
- Carolina Muszynska Department of Surgery Skåne University Hospital Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund SE-221 85 Sweden
| | - Linda Lundgren
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Helene Jacobsson
- Unit for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Clinical Studies Sweden-Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang G, Xu Q, Wan Y, Zhang L, Wang Z, Meng F. miR-193a-3p Enhanced the Chemosensitivity to Trametinib in Gallbladder Carcinoma by Targeting KRAS and Downregulating ERK Signaling. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2023; 38:371-379. [PMID: 34287012 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2021.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: In this study, the authors identified miR-193a-3p as a tumor-suppressing microRNA, and its effects on the chemosensitivity to trametinib in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) were evaluated. Materials and Methods: The levels of miR-193a-3p in clinical GBC tissues and GBC cells were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The protein levels of KRAS, ERK, and phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) were examined by Western blot. Dual-luciferase reporter assays were performed to confirm the interaction between miR-193a-3p and KRAS. The effect of miR-193a-3p knockdown or overexpression on the malignant behaviors and chemosensitivity of GBC was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethlthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazoliumbromide and flow cytometry assays in vitro and further examined in a xenograft model. Results: The levels of miR-193a-3p were significantly decreased in GBC cell lines, especially with KRAS mutations. In addition, miR-193a-3p overexpression retarded cell proliferation of GBC, but induced cell apoptosis. Moreover, miR-193a-3p overexpression significantly improved the chemosensitivity of GBC to trametinib both in in vitro assays and in vivo xenograft mouse model. Further mechanisms disclosed that KRAS was a target of miR-193a-3p and levels of p-ERK were increased by treatment with miR-193a-3p inhibitor in GBC. Conclusions: These data suggested that miR-193a-3p enhanced the chemosensitivity to trametinib in GBC with wild-type KRAS or KRAS mutations by directly targeting KRAS and finally downregulated ERK signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganghua Yang
- Department of Geriatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Qinhong Xu
- Department of Geriatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Yong Wan
- Department of Geriatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Geriatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Fandi Meng
- Department of Geriatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang X, Zheng K, Huang J, Hu W, Xu L, Xu Q, Fan Y, Liu J, Li B, Ran L, Liu T, Liang B, Xiong H, Li W, Fu X, Fang L. Effect of different lymph node dissection methods on the number of lymph nodes detected and prognosis in gallbladder cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34163. [PMID: 37390255 PMCID: PMC10313244 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
At present, the extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for radical gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still controversial, and there is no evidence that LND improves prognosis, however, the latest guidelines for GBC recommend that removal of more than 6 lymph nodes facilitates staging of regional lymph nodes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different LND methods on the number of lymph nodes detected and assess the prognostic factors during radical resection of GBC. This study retrospectively analyzed 133 patients (46 men and 87 women; average age: 64.01, range: 40-83 years) who underwent radical resection of GBC in a single center between July 2017 and July 2022, of which 41 underwent fusion lymph node dissection (FLND) and 92 underwent standard lymph node dissection (SLND). Baseline data, surgical results, number of LNDs, and follow-up data were analyzed. Each patient was followed up every 3 months. The total number of lymph nodes detected after the operation was 12.00 ± 6.95 versus 6.10 ± 4.71 (P < .05). The number of positive lymph nodes detected was (mean) 1.85 versus 0.78 and (percentage) 15.45% versus 12.83% (P < .05). Postoperative complications (8 vs 23, P > .05). The progression-free survival was 13 versus 8 months, the median survival time was 17 versus 9 months (P < .05). This study concluded that FLND can increase the detection rate of total lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes after surgery, which can prolong the survival time of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinguo Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Kangpeng Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Liangzhi Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Qi Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yuting Fan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jinghang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Bowen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Longjian Ran
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Tiande Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Bo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hu Xiong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiaowei Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Lu Fang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Q, Zhang J, Gao Q, Fu J, Li M, Liu H, Chen C, Zhang D, Geng Z. Preoperative Fibrinogen Albumin Ratio is an Effective Biomarker for Prognostic Evaluation of Gallbladder Carcinoma After Radical Resection: A 10-Year Retrospective Study at a Single Center. J Inflamm Res 2023; 16:677-689. [PMID: 36844254 PMCID: PMC9946813 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s399586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To explore and screen preoperative serum immune response level-related biomarkers with better prognostic ability and developed a prognostic model for decision-making in clinical practice for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients. Methods A total of 427 patients who underwent radical resection for GBC in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) was performed to determine the prognostic predictive power of preoperative biomarkers. A nomogram survival model was established and validated. Results Time-ROC indicated that the preoperative fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) had a better predictive ability for overall survival among preoperative serum immune response level-related biomarkers. Multivariate analysis indicated that FAR was an independent risk factor (P<0.05). The proportion of clinicopathological characteristics of poor prognosis (such as advanced T stage, and N1-2 stage) was significantly higher in high FAR group (P<0.05). Subgroup analyses indicate the prognostic discrimination ability of FAR depended on CA19-9, CA125, liver involvement, major vascular invasion, perineural invasion, T stage, N stage, and TNM stage (all P <0.05). A nomogram model was established based on the prognostic independent risk factors with the C-index of 0.803 (95% CI:0.771~0.835) and 0.774 (95% CI:0.696~0.852) in the training and testing sets, respectively. The decision curve analysis indicated the nomogram model had a better predictive ability than the FAR and TNM staging system in the training and testing sets. Conclusion Preoperative serum FAR has a better predictive ability for overall survival among preoperative serum immune response level-related biomarkers, and it can be used for survival assessment of GBC and guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jialu Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China,Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mengke Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hengchao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhimin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Zhimin Geng, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China, Email
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jiang C, Li Y, Li Y, Liu L, Wang XA, Wu W, Bao R, Weng H, Li M, Geng Y, Shu Y, Liu Y. Fibrinogen promotes gallbladder cancer cell metastasis and extravasation by inducing ICAM1 expression. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (NORTHWOOD, LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 40:10. [PMID: 36352295 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01874-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Fibrinogen plays an important role in tumor progression. Here, we explored the role of fibrinogen in gallbladder cancer (GBC) metastasis. The plasma fibrinogen level in M1 GBC patients was higher than in M0 GBC patients, indicating that fibrinogen may participate in GBC metastasis. Treatment of GBC cell lines with fibrinogen promoted metastasis and induced the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1). ICAM1 overexpression promoted metastasis and knockdown inhibited it. The cell adhesion and transendothelial migration of GBC cells were enhanced by fibrinogen treatment and ICAM1 overexpression. In addition, the medium of fibrinogen-treated and overexpression-ICAM1 NOZ cells exhibited enhanced macrophages recruitment. This may work in concert to promote angiogenesis. Immunohistochemistry results on clinical specimens showed that higher fibrinogen levels, higher ICAM1 expression, higher blood vessel density, and higher macrophage levels were present simultaneously. Collectively, this study indicates fibrinogen promotes metastasis and extravasation by inducing ICAM1 expression to enhance tumor cell migration, cell adhesion, transendothelial migration and promote angiogenesis and increase vascular endothelial permeability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengkai Jiang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yongsheng Li
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Liguo Liu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Xu-An Wang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Wenguang Wu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Runfa Bao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Hao Weng
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Maolan Li
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yajun Geng
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China. .,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China. .,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| | - Yijun Shu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China. .,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China. .,Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| | - Yingbin Liu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China. .,State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai, 200127, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, 200092, China. .,Shanghai Research Center of Biliary Tract Disease, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu D, Jin W, Zhang Y, An Y, Chen X, Chen W. Insights From the Analysis of Clinicopathological and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Gallbladder Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:889334. [PMID: 35494009 PMCID: PMC9046570 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of primary gallbladder cancer (GBC) treated by radical surgery. Methods The clinical and pathological data of 168 patients with primary gallbladder cancer admitted and treated in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan Meier method was used to draw the survival curve and evaluate the survival rate. Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis and binary logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results 94 cases showed symptoms of abdominal pain and abdominal distension. 7 cases showed symptoms of fatigue and weight loss. Jaundice occurred in 10 patients. Fever occurred in 6 patients. 51 patients had no symptoms at all. The median survival time of 168 patients was 35.0 (1.0 ~ 142.0) months. The overall 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative survival rates were 69.6%, 55.4% and 48.8% respectively. The univariate analysis indicated that preoperative bilirubin, tumor size, tumor location, pathological type, degree of differentiation, liver invasion, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, surgical margin, filtration depth and N staging were significant factors influencing prognosis of patients with primary GBC (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis demonstrated that degree of differentiation, nerve invasion, filtration depth and N staging were independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with primary GBC (P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with risk factors of gallbladder cancer should be more active in early cholecystectomy to avoid the malignant transformation of benign diseases. Degree of differentiation, nerve invasion, filtration depth and N staging were important factors for poor prognosis of patients with primary GBC. For T4 staging patients, preoperative evaluation should be more comprehensive, and patients and surgeons should be more prudent in adopting appropriate clinical treatment. The primary purpose should be prolonging the survival time and improving the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Weibo Chen
- *Correspondence: Weibo Chen, ; Xuemin Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hemminki K, Försti A, Hemminki O, Liska V, Hemminki A. Long-term incidence and survival trends in cancer of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden with etiological implications related to Thorotrast. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:200-208. [PMID: 35213036 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Cancers of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts (called here 'GBC' because gallbladder cancer is the main component) are rare in Europe, including the Nordic countries. Their incidence has varied for unknown reasons and we hypothesize that Thorotrast, a previously used carcinogenic radiographic contrast medium, has contributed to the incidence trends. We obtained incidence and survival data from the NORDCAN database, which includes cancer registry data from Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO) and Sweden (SE), which are globally the oldest national cancer databases, starting from 1943 in DK, 1953 in FI and NO and 1960 in SE, and extending to 2016. The incidence trend for GBC showed a broad maximum around 1980 in men (close to 3/100,000) and women (4/100,000), except for NO, where this phenomenon was not seen. In 1955, FI and NO incidence rates were equal but FI rates peaked and later declined similar to DK and SE rates. By 2010, the incidence was similar in all Nordic countries, for both men and women, at close to 2.0/100,000. Birth cohort analysis showed strong effects for countries other than NO. Relative 1-year survival increased for men from 20% to about 50% and similarly for women although at a 5 percentage points lower level. Survival in NO was better than in other countries in the 1980s. Thorotrast, causing a high risk of GBC, was extensively used in the Nordic countries between 1930 and end of 1940s, with the exception of NO, where these was no documented use. These data suggest that Thorotrast influenced GBC epidemiology and probably worsened survival in certain periods. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Hemminki
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.,Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Asta Försti
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Otto Hemminki
- Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Urology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vaclav Liska
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.,Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Center in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Akseli Hemminki
- Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Finland.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koppatz H, Takala S, Peltola K, But A, Mäkisalo H, Nordin A, Sallinen V. Gallbladder cancer epidemiology, treatment and survival in Southern Finland - a population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:929-939. [PMID: 34224306 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1915373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy in Western population with poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the trends in GBC incidence, treatment pattern, and survival in Finland. METHODS Patients diagnosed with primary GBC in a geographically defined area (Southern Finland Regional Cancer Center) during 2006-2017 were identified. RESULTS Final cohort included 270 patients with GBC. The incidence was 1.32/100,000 persons, and it decreased 6.8 cases per million personyears during the study period. One hundred fifty-one (56%) patients were diagnosed at Stage IV. Fifty-one patients (19%) underwent curative-intent resection with 96% R0-resection rate. The median overall survival was 7.1 months and 5-year overall survival 11.6% for all patients, and 67.7 months and 56.8% after curative-intent resection, respectively. No improvement was noted over time in overall survival in patients with GBC, or in subgroups of different stages of GBC. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of GBC is slightly decreasing in Southern Finland, but survival has not improved over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Koppatz
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sini Takala
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Katriina Peltola
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna But
- Biostatistics consulting, Department of Public Health, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heikki Mäkisalo
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Akhtar-Danesh N, Akhtar-Danseh GG, Seow H, Shakeel S, Finley C. Treatment Modality and Trends in Survival for Gallbladder Cancer: a Population-Based Study. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 52:256-262. [PMID: 32185744 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00397-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are only a few reports on the treatment-based survival of gallbladder cancer (GBC). The primary objective of this study was to examine the change in treatment modality and the related trends in the survival of GBC. METHODS This study includes all cases of primary GBC diagnosed in the province of Ontario, Canada, from January 2007 to December 2015 with known disease stage. Treatment modalities were classified as no treatment, radiation or chemotherapy, and surgical resection. We examined the association between surgical resection and demographics and tumor characteristics and estimated the trends in survival based on treatment modality. RESULTS In total, 564 patients with GBC were identified, of which 374 (66.3%) were female. Although there were no significant trends in treatment modalities over the study period (p = 0.276), survival rates improved for all treatment modalities over time. There was a 35% increase in 5-year survival for the surgical resection group from 2007 to 2015. For patients with stage I-II disease, the 5-year survival rate increased 40% over time. The highest 5-year survival was observed for the surgical resection group in patients with stage I-II disease (0.533 (95% CI, 0.514-0.552)) while the average 5-year survival rate for all patients over the study period was 0.247 (95% CI, 0.228-0.266). CONCLUSIONS Most cases of GBC continue to be diagnosed in the late stage. Five-year survival for the surgical resection group has markedly improved over time, specifically for patients with stage I-II disease which increased from 30% in 2007 to 70% in 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noori Akhtar-Danesh
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Room 3N28B, Hamilton, ON, l8S 4K1, Canada. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | | | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Saad Shakeel
- School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christian Finley
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ren T, Li Y, Zhang X, Geng Y, Shao Z, Li M, Wu X, Wang XA, Liu F, Wu W, Shu Y, Bao R, Gong W, Dong P, Dang X, Liu C, Liu C, Sun B, Liu J, Wang L, Hong D, Qin R, Jiang X, Zhang X, Xu J, Jia J, Yang B, Li B, Dai C, Cao J, Cao H, Tao F, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Jin H, Cai H, Fei Z, Gu J, Han W, Feng X, Fang L, Zheng L, Zhu C, Wang K, Zhang X, Li X, Jin C, Qian Y, Cui Y, Xu Y, Wang X, Liu H, Hua Y, Liu C, Hao J, Wang C, Li Q, Li X, Liu J, Li M, Qiu Y, Wu B, Zheng J, Chen X, Zhu H, Hua K, Yan M, Wang P, Zang H, Ma X, Hong J, Liu Y. Protocol for a gallbladder cancer registry study in China: the Chinese Research Group of Gallbladder Cancer (CRGGC) study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e038634. [PMID: 33593763 PMCID: PMC7888310 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder cancer (GBC), the sixth most common gastrointestinal tract cancer, poses a significant disease burden in China. However, no national representative data are available on the clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of GBC in the Chinese population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Chinese Research Group of Gallbladder Cancer (CRGGC) study is a multicentre retrospective registry cohort study. Clinically diagnosed patient with GBC will be identified from 1 January 2008 to December, 2019, by reviewing the electronic medical records from 76 tertiary and secondary hospitals across 28 provinces in China. Patients with pathological and radiological diagnoses of malignancy, including cancer in situ, from the gallbladder and cystic duct are eligible, according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019 guidelines. Patients will be excluded if GBC is the secondary diagnosis in the discharge summary. The demographic characteristics, medical history, physical examination results, surgery information, pathological data, laboratory examination results and radiology reports will be collected in a standardised case report form. By May 2021, approximately 6000 patient with GBC will be included. The clinical follow-up data will be updated until 5 years after the last admission for GBC of each patient. The study aimed (1) to depict the clinical characteristics, including demographics, pathology, treatment and prognosis of patient with GBC in China; (2) to evaluate the adherence to clinical guidelines of GBC and (3) to improve clinical practice for diagnosing and treating GBC and provide references for policy-makers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol of the CRGGC has been approved by the Committee for Ethics of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SHEC-C-2019-085). All results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04140552, Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai Ren
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongsheng Li
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Zhang
- Clinical Research Unit, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yajun Geng
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziyu Shao
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Maolan Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiangsong Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu-An Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Fatao Liu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenguang Wu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yijun Shu
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Runfa Bao
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Gong
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Xueyi Dang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Changjun Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Bei Sun
- Department of HPB Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Defei Hong
- Department of HPB Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Renyi Qin
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoqing Jiang
- Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuewen Zhang
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Junmin Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianguang Jia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of HPB Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Jingyu Cao
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hong Cao
- Department of GI Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Feng Tao
- Department of GI Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zaiyang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of GI Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Huihan Jin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hongyu Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhewei Fei
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianfeng Gu
- Department of General Surgery, Changshu No. 1 People's Hospital, Changshu, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Han
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Xuedong Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Tongliao City Hospital, Inner Mongolia, Tongliao, China
| | - Lu Fang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Linhui Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Chunfu Zhu
- Department of HPB Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Kunhua Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Xueli Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyong Li
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Chong Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yeben Qian
- Department of HPB Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Yunfu Cui
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yuzhen Xu
- Department of GI Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of HPB Surgery, Xinghua City People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Houbao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yawei Hua
- Department of General Surgery, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jihui Hao
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chuanlei Wang
- Department of HPB Surgery, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Qiyun Li
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xun Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Jiansheng Liu
- Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Mingzhang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Baotou City Central Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Yudong Qiu
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Buqiang Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China
| | - Jinfang Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Hainan Provincial People's Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Xiaoliang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Haihong Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, China
| | - Kejun Hua
- Department of General Surgery, Yinzhou Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Maolin Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of HPB Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hong Zang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Nantong, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaoming Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jian Hong
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yingbin Liu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jha AK, Jha P, Jha SK, Keshari R. Plastic versus metal stents for inoperable gallbladder cancer with hilar biliary obstruction: the jury is still out. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:12-19. [PMID: 33414616 PMCID: PMC7774665 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2020.0548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In unresectable malignant hilar obstruction, adequate biliary drainage can be achieved with endoscopic placement of plastic or metal stents. Stent patency and patient survival may differ, depending on the primary disease, disease progression and stent type. Metal and plastic stents were compared in patients with malignant hilar strictures in several studies, but these studies mainly included patients who had cholangiocarcinoma, without taking into consideration potential differences in the invasion properties of tumor cells, histological differentiation and the biological behavior of different tumors. Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract, especially in the Indian subcontinent and Latin America. About half the patients with GBC present with jaundice, which usually means the tumor is inoperable. Palliative endoscopic stenting remains the first-line treatment of unresectable GBC with biliary obstruction. Primary disease progression is faster in GBC compared to cholangiocarcinoma. There is a paucity of data on the selection of stents for inoperable GBC with hilar biliary obstruction. This review focuses on the published literature related to the selection of stents for unresectable GBC with hilar obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Kumar Jha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Praveen Jha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Sharad Kumar Jha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Ravi Keshari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patel A, Soneji D, Singh HP, Kumar M, Bandyopadhyay A, Mathur A, Sharma A, Gahlot GPS, MS S, Guleria B, Nair R, Bhuva D, Pandalanghat S. Genomic Landscape and Targeted Treatment of Gallbladder Cancer: Results of a First Ongoing Prospective Study. South Asian J Cancer 2020; 9:74-79. [PMID: 33354548 PMCID: PMC7745744 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prognosis of gallbladder cancer (GBC) has not changed in the past 20 years. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) carries potential to determine the actionability for multiple targets, including ERBB2 , ERBB3 , MET , ROSI , FGFR , and PIK3 . This study evaluates the role of CGP and targeted therapies. Methods This is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study. All consecutive patients of unresectable and/or metastatic GBC of age ≥18 years were enrolled. Hybrid capture-based CGP was performed by Foundation Medicine CDx. All patients received first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen. Patients with ERBB2/3 amplification received trastuzumab with capecitabine or nab-paclitaxel, and patients with MET amplification were treated with crizotinib. For ERBB2/3 mutations, lapatinib plus capecitabine regimen was used. Results Fifty patients were studied with a median age of 56 years (range 26-83) and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.6. ERBB2 and ERBB3 amplification was seen in 9 (18%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. Four patients with ERBB2 amplification received trastuzumab and/or lapatinib, showed partial response, and maintained response beyond 12 weeks. One patient had mixed response, whereas two patients progressed on trastuzumab and lapatinib. Three patients with ERBB3 mutations showed response to lapatinib-capecitabine. One patient with MET amplification responded to crizotinib for 4 weeks. PIK3 mutations were present in 14% of cases and were independent of ERBB aberrations. Conclusion GBC is enriched in 28% of patients with ERBB2 and ERBB3 amplifications and/or mutations. Responses are seen with lapatinib in concurrent ERBB2 mutation and amplification. ERBB3 mutation showed response to lapatinib. MET and PIK3 are new findings in GBC, which may be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Dharmesh Soneji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Harinder Pal Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Manish Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Arnab Bandyopadhyay
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Command Hospital (Eastern Command), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Ankit Mathur
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Anuj Sharma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Shivashankara MS
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Bhupesh Guleria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajesh Nair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Dipen Bhuva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| | - Suresh Pandalanghat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lundgren L, Muszynska C, Ros A, Persson G, Gimm O, Andersson B, Sandström P. Management of incidental gallbladder cancer in a national cohort. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1216-1227. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Incidental gallbladder cancer is a rare event, and its prognosis is largely affected by the tumour stage and treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse the management, treatment and survival of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in a national cohort over a decade.
Methods
Patients were identified through the Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery (GallRiks). Data were cross-linked to the national registry for liver surgery (SweLiv) and the Cancer Registry. Medical records were collected if registry data were missing. Survival was measured as disease-specific survival. The study was divided into two intervals (2007–2011 and 2012–2016) to evaluate changes over time.
Results
In total, 249 patients were identified with incidental gallbladder cancer, of whom 92 (36·9 per cent) underwent re-resection with curative intent. For patients with pT2 and pT3 disease, median disease-specific survival improved after re-resection (12·4 versus 44·1 months for pT2, and 9·7 versus 23·0 months for pT3). Residual disease was present in 53 per cent of patients with pT2 tumours who underwent re-resection; these patients had a median disease-specific survival of 32·2 months, whereas the median was not reached in patients without residual disease. Median survival increased by 11 months for all patients between the early and late periods (P = 0·030).
Conclusion
Re-resection of pT2 and pT3 incidental gallbladder cancer was associated with improved survival, but survival was impaired when residual disease was present. A higher re-resection rate and more R0 resections in the later time period may have been associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Lundgren
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - C Muszynska
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Ros
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - G Persson
- Department of Surgery, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - O Gimm
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|