1
|
Vassilev ZP, Fan X, Xu J, Ostojic H, Barzi A. Use of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab and Subsequent Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Age-Stratified Analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024:S1533-0028(24)00031-8. [PMID: 38853099 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset. RESULTS Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent "new" therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julie Xu
- Bayer Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Afsaneh Barzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cura Y, Sánchez-Martín A, Márquez-Pete N, González-Flores E, Martínez-Martínez F, Pérez-Ramírez C, Jiménez-Morales A. Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Capecitabine Bioactivation Pathway with Adjuvant Therapy Safety in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:2548. [PMID: 38004528 PMCID: PMC10675271 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is part of the standard treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Severe adverse dose limiting reactions that impair treatment safety and lead to treatment suspension remain a relevant concern. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the activation of capecitabine may alter the bioavailability of 5-FU and thereby affect therapy outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of these SNPs with severe toxicity and treatment suspension in patients with CRC treated with capecitabine-based therapy. An ambispective cohort study was conducted, including 161 patients with CRC. SNPs were analyzed using real-time PCR with TaqMan® probes. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5.0. CES1 rs71647871-A was associated with a severe hand-foot syndrome (p = 0.030; OR = 11.92; 95% CI = 1.46-73.47; GG vs. A). CDA rs1048977-CC (p = 0.030; OR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.09-5.00; T vs. CC) and capecitabine monotherapy (p = 0.003; OR = 3.13; 95% CI 1.49-6.81) were associated with treatment suspension due to toxicity. SNPs CES1 rs71647871 and CDA rs1048977 may act as potential predictive biomarkers of safety in patients with CRC under capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin Cura
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
| | - Almudena Sánchez-Martín
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
| | - Noelia Márquez-Pete
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
| | - Encarnación González-Flores
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
- Biosanitary Research Institute, Ibs.Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Pérez-Ramírez
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology “José Mataix”, Center of Biomedical Research, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Alberto Jiménez-Morales
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vassilev ZP, Guo H, Lin W, Xu J, Khan N, Fan X. Age-related trends in the incidence of metastatic colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2019 in the USA. Future Oncol 2023; 20:1111-1121. [PMID: 37701992 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate temporal changes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), incidence, and use of chemotherapy treatment by age group using real-world data (RWD) from the USA. Methods: A retrospective, observational study describing temporal trends in mCRC incidence and FOLFOXIRI treatment by age group using a nationwide database of commercially and Medicare Advantage-insured patients from 2010 to 2019. Results: Incidence of mCRC increased by 22.1 and 14.9% in the 18-49 and 50-64 years cohorts, respectively, and decreased by 21.6% in the ≥65 years cohort. Overall, younger patients were more likely to receive FOLFOXIRI treatment versus older patients. Conclusion: The shifting age distribution of mCRC should be considered when recommending screening and treatment. Further research is needed to inform age-specific treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zdravko P Vassilev
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA
| | - Helen Guo
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA
| | - Wenlong Lin
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA
| | - Julie Xu
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA
| | - Nasreen Khan
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA
| | - Xiaozhou Fan
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lehtomäki K, Soveri LM, Osterlund E, Lamminmäki A, Uutela A, Heervä E, Halonen P, Stedt H, Aho S, Muhonen T, Ålgars A, Salminen T, Kallio R, Nordin A, Aroviita L, Nyandoto P, Kononen J, Glimelius B, Ristamäki R, Isoniemi H, Osterlund P. Resectability, Resections, Survival Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Older Adult Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (the RAXO-Study). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103541. [PMID: 37240646 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Older adults are underrepresented in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) studies and thus may not receive optimal treatment, especially not metastasectomies. The prospective Finnish real-life RAXO-study included 1086 any organ mCRC patients. We assessed repeated centralized resectability, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL) using 15D and EORTC QLQ-C30/CR29. Older adults (>75 years; n = 181, 17%) had worse ECOG performance status than adults (<75 years, n = 905, 83%), and their metastases were less likely upfront resectable. The local hospitals underestimated resectability in 48% of older adults and in 34% of adults compared with the centralized multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation (p < 0.001). The older adults compared with adults were less likely to undergo curative-intent R0/1-resection (19% vs. 32%), but when resection was achieved, OS was not significantly different (HR 1.54 [CI 95% 0.9-2.6]; 5-year OS-rate 58% vs. 67%). 'Systemic therapy only' patients had no age-related survival differences. QoL was similar in older adults and adults during curative treatment phase (15D 0.882-0.959/0.872-0.907 [scale 0-1]; GHS 62-94/68-79 [scale 0-100], respectively). Complete curative-intent resection of mCRC leads to excellent survival and QoL even in older adults. Older adults with mCRC should be actively evaluated by a specialized MDT and offered surgical or local ablative treatment whenever possible.
Collapse
Grants
- 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Finska Läkaresällskapet
- 2019-2020, 2021, 2022-23 Finnish Cancer Foundation
- 2023 Swedish Cancer Society
- 2022-2023 Radium Hemmets Research Funds
- 2020-2022 Relander's Foundation
- 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021,2022, 2023 Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere, Helsinki and Turku
- Tukisäätiö 2019, 2020; OOO 2020 Tampere University Hospital
- 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Helsinki University Hospital
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaisa Lehtomäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Home Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Emerik Osterlund
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Aki Uutela
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Stedt
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sonja Aho
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital, Valto Käkelän Katu 1, 53130 Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220 Oulu, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura Aroviita
- Department of Oncology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Ahvenistontie 20, 13530 Hämeenlinna, Finland
| | - Paul Nyandoto
- Department of Oncology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, 15850 Lahti, Finland
| | - Juha Kononen
- Docrates Cancer Centre, Docrates Hospital, Saukonpaadenranta 2, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Tema Cancer, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Eugeniavägen 3, 17176 Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gheybi K, Buckley E, Vitry A, Roder D. Variations in colorectal cancer pattern of care by age and comorbidity in South Australia. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37084009 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced age is associated with decreased likelihood of colorectal cancer treatment. Here, we investigated the extent to which comorbidities are accountable for this lesser treatment. METHODS Using population-based datasets, the pattern of care among CRC cases in South Australia during 2004-2013 was investigated. Models were used to investigate associations of age with each treatment type, and differences in these associations were explored by comorbidity and cancer site. RESULTS The presence of comorbidity was associated with a significantly weaker relationship of age with surgery and chemotherapy. The association of age with surgery also varied for colon and rectal primary cancer sites. Individual comorbidity types varied in their associations with each treatment category. For example, dementia was associated with less chemotherapy provision, however, it was not significantly related to the likelihood of surgery. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the association of age with surgical treatment differed significantly by the CRC subsite. Comorbidity moderated the negative association of age with chemotherapy, and less so, with extent of surgery. Results were novel in indicating associations of multiple individual comorbidity types with CRC treatment modalities. The data suggest that different individual comorbidity types may have different effects on treatment and should be studied separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazzem Gheybi
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Buckley
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Agnes Vitry
- University of South Australia Clinical and Health Sciences, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The oncological multidimensional prognostic index is a promising decision-making tool: A real-world analysis in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2022; 177:112-119. [PMID: 36335781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 50% of colorectal cancers occur in older patients. International societies recommend geriatric tools to optimise treatment of older patients. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional assessment used to classify patients as fit, vulnerable, or frail. The CGA-based oncological multidimensional prognostic index (onco-MPI) also classifies patients as high-, intermediate-, or low-risk based on tumour characteristics. We investigated the role of CGA and onco-MPI in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting. METHODS Data for consecutive mCRC patients aged ≥70 years were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database from 2010 to 2020. We analyzed patients' and tumours' characteristics, and the CGA domains. Onco-MPI was calculated by a validated algorithm derived from CGA domains. Pearson's test was used to verify whether onco-MPI scores and chemotherapy administration were correlated. RESULTS The study included 488 mCRC patients with a mean age of 76.1 years. According to CGA, 52% of patients were fit, 28% vulnerable, and 20% frail. According to onco-MPI, 9% were low, 54% intermediate, and 37% high-risk. The median OS was 22.7 months. The following factors improved OS: 0-1 ECOG PS, low onco-MPI, fit based on CGA, chemotherapy administration, and doublet regimen. Chemotherapy administration significantly correlated with onco-MPI scores, leading to a survival gain regardless of the risk subgroups. First-line regimen had no impact on survival across the CGA and onco-MPI categories. CONCLUSION CGA and onco-MPI scores confirmed their prognostic impact in older mCRC patients and may aid in decision-making and subgroup stratification in dedicated trials.
Collapse
|
7
|
Correa E, Lindsay T, Dotan E. Management of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Older Adults: Balancing Risks and Benefits of Novel Therapies. Drugs Aging 2021; 38:639-654. [PMID: 34143421 PMCID: PMC9951235 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00869-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) will continue to increase with our aging population. Treatment of mCRC has changed significantly in the last few decades as we have learned how to personalize the treatment of mCRC to the biology of the tumor, utilizing new treatment approaches. With an ever-changing treatment paradigm, managing the population of older adults becomes paramount. This review highlights the pivotal clinical trials that defined the use of systemic therapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies for mCRC, and how those are applied to the older patient population. In addition, we outline the tools for an in-depth assessment of an older adult in regards to treatment planning and management of therapy-related toxicities. A comprehensive geriatric assessment can assist in the selection of treatment for an older adult with mCRC. While frail older patients can frequently only tolerate single agents or modified regimens, fit older adults remain candidates for a wider range of treatment options. However, since all of these treatments are associated with possible toxicities, each patient's treatment must be personalized to the patient's goals and wishes through a shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Correa
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Timothy Lindsay
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alabraba E, Gomez D. Systematic Review of Treatments for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients to Guide Surveillance Cessation Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:210-223. [PMID: 33710135 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although included in surveillance programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases, elderly patients are susceptible to declines in health and quality of life that may render them unsuitable for further surveillance. Deciding when to cease surveillance is challenging. METHODS There are no publications focused on surveillance of elderly patients for CRC metastases. A systematic review of studies reporting treatment outcomes for CRC metastases in elderly patients was performed to assess the risk-benefit balance of the key objectives of surveillance; detecting and treating CRC metastases. RESULTS Sixty-eight eligible studies reported outcomes for surgery and chemotherapy in the elderly. Liver resections and use of chemotherapy, including biologics, are more conservative and have poorer outcomes in the elderly compared with younger patients. Selected studies demonstrated poorer quality-of-life (QoL) following surgery and chemotherapy. Studies of ablation in elderly patients are limited. DISCUSSION The survival benefit of treating CRC metastases with surgery or chemotherapy decreases with advancing age and QoL may decline in the elderly. The relatively lower efficacy and detrimental QoL impact of multimodal therapy options for detected CRC metastases in the elderly questions the benefit of surveillance in some elderly patients. Care of elderly patients should thus be customized based on their preference, formal geriatric assessment, natural life-expectancy, and the perceived risk-benefit balance of treating recurrent CRC metastases. Clinicians may consider surveillance cessation in patients aged 75 years and above if geriatric assessment is unsatisfactory, patients decline surveillance, or patient fitness deteriorates catastrophically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Alabraba
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
- NIHR Nottingham Digestive Disease Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Niedersüß-Beke D, Orlinger M, Falch D, Heiler C, Piringer G, Thaler J, Hilbe W, Petzer A, Rumpold H. Clinical Effectiveness of Oncological Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Independent of Comorbidities and Age. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092091. [PMID: 33925931 PMCID: PMC8123394 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. As with many other cancers, the risk for CRC increases with age. This is also true for comorbidities, which may hamper sufficient treatment of the cancer. Due to restrictive inclusion criteria, older patients and patients with comorbidities are underrepresented in clinical trials. Comprehensive knowledge about modern effectiveness of oncological treatments in older and/or comorbid patients is sparse. Due to the lack of clinical trials, this issue is investigated in real-life settings predominantly. In our retrospective study we show that patients benefit from oncological treatments irrespective of comorbidities, measured by the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbity (aaCCI) index, and age. Differences found in treatment outcomes are marginal and are likely due to less intense treatment of comorbid or elderly patients. Balancing risk and benefit for treatment decisions should take potential under-treatment of comorbid and older patients into account. Abstract We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of oncological treatments in metastatic CRC related to comorbidities and age. This retrospective study included 1105 patients from three oncological centers. aaCCI and CCI was available from 577 patients. An aaCCI > 3 was of the highest predictive value compared to other aaCCI-levels, CCI or age (p < 0.001 for all). Treatment (best supportive care (BSC), systemic treatment only (STO) and resection of metastases (ROM)) significantly prolonged survival in patients with aaCCI > 3 (STO: HR 0.39, CI 0.29–0.51; ROM: HR 0.16, CI 0.10–0.24) and patients older than 70 years (STO: HR 0.56, CI 0.47–0.66; ROM: HR 0.23, 0.18–0.30). Median overall survival was shorter in patients with aaCCI or age > 70 years and interaction for treatment type not significant for aaCCI, but significant for age older or younger than 70 years (STO: p = 0.01; ROM p = 0.02). BSC is more often considered as optimal care for patients with an aaCCI > 3 (37.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001) or age > 70 years (35.7% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.001). Older patients or patients with comorbidities benefit from cancer-specific therapy independently of their age and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dora Niedersüß-Beke
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminenspital, 1160 Vienna, Austria; (D.N.-B.); (D.F.); (C.H.); (W.H.)
| | - Manuel Orlinger
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, 4010 Linz, Austria; (M.O.); (A.P.)
| | - David Falch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminenspital, 1160 Vienna, Austria; (D.N.-B.); (D.F.); (C.H.); (W.H.)
| | - Cordula Heiler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminenspital, 1160 Vienna, Austria; (D.N.-B.); (D.F.); (C.H.); (W.H.)
| | - Gudrun Piringer
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, 4600 Wels, Austria; (G.P.); (J.T.)
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Josef Thaler
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, 4600 Wels, Austria; (G.P.); (J.T.)
| | - Wolfgang Hilbe
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminenspital, 1160 Vienna, Austria; (D.N.-B.); (D.F.); (C.H.); (W.H.)
| | - Andreas Petzer
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, 4010 Linz, Austria; (M.O.); (A.P.)
| | - Holger Rumpold
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4020 Linz, Austria
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, 4010 Linz, Austria
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Loh KP, Lam V, Webber K, Padam S, Sedrak MS, Musinipally V, Grogan M, Presley CJ, Grandi J, Sanapala C, Castillo DA, DiGiovanni G, Mohile SG, Walter LC, Wong ML. Characteristics Associated With Functional Changes During Systemic Cancer Treatments: A Systematic Review Focused on Older Adults. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1055-1062. [PMID: 33857918 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining functional status is important to older adults with cancer, but data are limited on how systemic treatments affect functional status. We systematically reviewed changes in functional status during systemic cancer treatments and identified characteristics associated with functional decline and improvement. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for articles examining characteristics associated with functional changes in older adults during systemic cancer treatment published in English between database inception and January 11, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019123125). Findings were summarized with descriptive statistics. Study characteristics between older adult-specific and non-older adult-specific studies were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS We screened 15,244 titles/abstracts and 519 full texts. The final analysis included 44 studies, which enrolled >8,400 patients; 39% of studies focused on older adults (1 study enrolled adults aged ≥60 years, 10 enrolled adults aged ≥65 years, and 6 enrolled adults aged ≥70 years). Almost all studies (98%) used patient-reported outcomes to measure functional status; only 20% used physical performance tests. Reporting of functional change was heterogeneous, with 48% reporting change scores. Older adult-specific studies were more likely to analyze functional change dichotomously (29% vs 4%; P=.008). Functional decline ranged widely, from 6% to 90%. The most common patient characteristics associated with functional decline were older age (n=7 studies), worse performance status (n=4), progressive disease status (n=4), pain (n=4), anemia (n=4), and worse nutritional status (n=4). Twelve studies examined functional improvement and identified 11 unique associated characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Functional decline is increasingly recognized as an important outcome in older adults with cancer, but definitions and analyses are heterogeneous, leading to a wide range of prevalence. To identify patients at highest risk of functional decline during systemic cancer treatments, trials need to routinely analyze functional outcomes and measure characteristics associated with decline (eg, nutrition).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kah Poh Loh
- 1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Vivian Lam
- 2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Katey Webber
- 3School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
| | - Simran Padam
- 4Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- 4Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Vivek Musinipally
- 5Department of Adult and Family Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, California
| | - Madison Grogan
- 6Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Carolyn J Presley
- 6Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Janice Grandi
- 2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- 1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Daniel A Castillo
- 7Edward G. Miner Library, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; and
| | - Grace DiGiovanni
- 1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- 1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Louise C Walter
- 8Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, and.,9San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Melisa L Wong
- 2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,8Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, and.,9San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lund CM, Vistisen KK, Olsen AP, Bardal P, Schultz M, Dolin TG, Rønholt F, Johansen JS, Nielsen DL. The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO). Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1949-1958. [PMID: 33828260 PMCID: PMC8185087 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01367-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) experience chemotherapy dose reductions or discontinuation. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) predicts survival and chemotherapy completion in patients with cancer, but the benefit of geriatric interventions remains unexplored. METHODS The GERICO study is a randomised Phase 3 trial including patients ≥70 years receiving adjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy for CRC. Vulnerable patients (G8 questionnaire ≤14 points) were randomised 1:1 to CGA-based interventions or standard care, along with guideline-based chemotherapy. The primary outcome was chemotherapy completion without dose reductions or delays. Secondary outcomes were toxicity, survival and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS Of 142 patients, 58% received adjuvant and 42% received first-line palliative chemotherapy. Interventions included medication changes (62%), nutritional therapy (51%) and physiotherapy (39%). More interventional patients completed scheduled chemotherapy compared with controls (45% vs. 28%, P = 0.0366). Severe toxicity occurred in 39% of controls and 28% of interventional patients (P = 0.156). QoL improved in interventional patients compared with controls with the decreased burden of illness (P = 0.048) and improved mobility (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION Geriatric interventions compared with standard care increased the number of older, vulnerable patients with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy, and may improve the burden of illness and mobility. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02748811.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Margareta Lund
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Anne Pries Olsen
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pernille Bardal
- Nutritional and Dietetic Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Schultz
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.,CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels Gammeltoft Dolin
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.,CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Finn Rønholt
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Julia Sidenius Johansen
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Lisbeth Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Martínez AM, Ferrández MJA, Rello AP, Gimeno-Ballester V, Pueyo AE, Blanco OP, Malo S, Sazatornil MRA. Analysis of first-line treatment in older patients with metastasic colorectal cancer. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2021; 28:74-81. [PMID: 33430690 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220984229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCm) in older patients treated in a tertiary hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was an observational and retrospective study, including patients aged 75 years or older, with CRCm, who received chemotherapy treatment in 2017. The main variables studied were type of treatment, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), dose reductions, and treatment delays due to adverse events. RESULTS A total of 59 patients (71.2% men) with a median age of 76 years were enrolled in this study. About 70% presented colon cancer, with the left colon being the most frequent location. They were treated with 9 different schemes, in most cases using polychemotherapy and biological agents. The median PFS and OS was 12 and 30 months, respectively. A total of 23/59 of patients started treatment at doses lower than recommended in the clinical practice guidelines. In terms of safety, 34/59 of patients had at least one dose reduction, and 30/59 suffered one treatment delay. The most frequent adverse reactions were asthenia, peripheral neuropathy, diarrhoea, and palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia. CONCLUSION Our patients presented baseline clinical characteristics similar to the general adult population, with no tumour characteristics associated with advanced age. The efficacy and toxicity were similar to those in the clinical trials, although our patients had more dose reductions. Considering the heterogeneity of patients and in the absence of clinical trials in the older population, real-life studies can be very useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara Malo
- Departmento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Optimal duration of therapy in the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: single center experience. VOJNOSANIT PREGL 2021. [DOI: 10.2298/vsp200924053j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background / Aim. FOLFOX (5fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin)/CapOx
(capecitabine, oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI (5 fluorouracil,
folinic acid, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab are a standard treatment options
for a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). The
aim of this study was to compare overall response rate (ORR),
progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the groups of
patients with mCRC who were treated in the first line with FOLFIRI/bev
versus FOLFOX/bev. At the same time, it was compared the safety profile in
observed groups of patients and investigated optimal treatment duration and
characteristics of patients who had the best treatment outcomes. Methods. In
a retrospective-prospective study, patients with mCRC were treated with a
chemotherapy protocols for the first line in combination with bevacizumab
(FOLFOX/bev, respectively, FOLFIRI/bev). Treatment efficacy was evaluated on
the basis of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS)
and overall survival (OS), and the safety of treatment was evaluated by
monitoring adverse drug reactions. Results. ORR was 70% in the FOLFIRI/bev
group and 50% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Median PFS for FOLFIRI/bev (n = 30)
and for FOLFOX/bev (n = 30) was 15.6 months and 12.1 months respectively
(HR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.53; P = 0.5591). Median OS
for FOLFIRI/bev and for FOLFOX/bev was 24.7 months and 19.9 months
respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-1.23; P = 0.1552).
In both patient groups, the patients who received more than 9 cycles of
induction therapy had better treatment response in comparison with patients
who received less than 9 cycles of therapy. In FOLFOX/bev group PFS was 16.9
versus 9.7 months and OS was 22.1 versus 17.6 months respectively. In
FOLFIRI/bev group PFS was 9 months for patients who received less than 9
cycles of therapy versus 18.8 months for patients who received more than 9
cycles, OS was 18.0 versus 27.7 respectively. The adverse drug reactions
grade 3 and 4 were 7% in the FOLFIRI/bev group versus 27% in the FOLFOX/bev
group. Conclusion. Patients who received FOLFIRI/bev had better ORR (70 %
versus 50 %), PFS (15.6 versus 12.1 months) and OS (24.7 versus 19.9
months). In both patient groups, better treatment response had the patients
who received induction therapy for 4-6 months (more than 9 cycles of
therapy).
Collapse
|
14
|
Effect of Exercise on Physical Function and Psychological Well-being in Older Patients With Colorectal Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy-A Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19:e243-e257. [PMID: 32828706 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases with older age. Cancer and treatment-related side effects often lead to physical decline, poor treatment adherence, and a lower quality of life. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of exercise reported by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on physical function, physical fitness (ie, aerobic capacity, muscle strength) physical activity, and psychological well-being in older patients with CRC undergoing chemotherapy. Eight RCTs with 552 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age across the RCTs was 58.5 years, and 2 RCTs excluded patients aged > 80 years. The meta-analyses showed a low level of evidence for a small beneficial effect of exercise on self-reported physical function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.48) and global quality of life (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.02-0.43) and low level of evidence for a moderate effect of exercise reducing fatigue (SMD, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.19) for patients receiving chemotherapy for CRC. We found no evidence for a beneficial effect of exercise on physical fitness. No adverse events related to the exercise interventions were reported. The evidence for the effect of exercise on physical outcomes and psychological well-being during chemotherapy for patients with CRC and especially for older patients is sparse. However, exercise during chemotherapy for patients with CRC is feasible and safe. We found a moderate to high risk of bias in most of the included studies, small sample sizes, and a low number of included patients. Moreover, all studies had excluded patients with comorbidities or walking impairment, a group of patients who would probably benefit the most from exercise. This positive result requires verification in larger trials of older and frail patients receiving chemotherapy for CRC.
Collapse
|
15
|
Aparicio T, Canouï-Poitrine F, Caillet P, François E, Cudennec T, Carola E, Albrand G, Bouvier AM, Petri C, Couturier B, Phelip JM, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Paillaud E. Treatment guidelines of metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG). Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:493-505. [PMID: 32029404 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.12.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several guidelines dedicated to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Since 2013 no recent guidelines are specifically dedicated to older patients and based on a systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary Task Force with digestive oncologists, geriatricians and methodologists from the SoFOG was formed in 2016 to update recommendations on medical treatment of mCRC based on a systematic review of publications from 2000 to 2018. Search strategy has followed a standardized protocol from the formulation of clinical questions and definition of a search algorithm to the selection of complete articles for recommendations. RESULTS The four selected key questions were: For which older patients with mCRC can we considered: (1) Any chemotherapy, (2) Mono or poly-chemotherapy, (3) Anti-angiogenic therapy, (4) Other targeted therapy. Main recommendations for older patients are: (1) Omission of chemotherapy should be discussed with a geriatrician for patients with severe comorbidities, advanced dementia, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or severe loss of autonomy. (2) If tumor response is not the main aim, a mono-chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil combined with bevacizumab is recommended as first-line. (3) For patients with symptoms related to metastases or with a planned metastasis ablation, a doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibody in the context of a RAS wild type tumor is recommended as first-line. Preliminary data suggest that regorafenib may be used, in its registered indication, in patients under 80 with a performance status of 0 and no autonomy alterations and that trifluridine-tipiracil may be used with a tight supervising of hematological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Caillet
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Center, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Tristan Cudennec
- Department of Geriatry, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, University Versailles - Saint Quentin, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Elisabeth Carola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Public Sud de l'Oise Hospital, Creil, France
| | - Gilles Albrand
- Department of Geriatry, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR1231 EPICAD University of Burgundy Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Camille Petri
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Bérengère Couturier
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint-Etienne Hospital, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P. Do we make progress in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1422-1426. [PMID: 30384805 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1535189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|