1
|
Grau C, Dasu A, Troost EGC, Haustermans K, Weber DC, Langendijk JA, Gregoire V, Orlandi E, Thariat J, Journy N, Chaikh A, Isambert A, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Vaniqui A, Vitek P, Kopec R, Fijten R, Luetgendorf-Caucig C, Olko P. Towards a European prospective data registry for particle therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110293. [PMID: 38653379 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
The evidence for the value of particle therapy (PT) is still sparse. While randomized trials remain a cornerstone for robust comparisons with photon-based radiotherapy, data registries collecting real-world data can play a crucial role in building evidence for new developments. This Perspective describes how the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) is actively working on establishing a prospective data registry encompassing all patients undergoing PT in European centers. Several obstacles and hurdles are discussed, for instance harmonization of nomenclature and structure of technical and dosimetric data and data protection issues. A preferred approach is the adoption of a federated data registry model with transparent and agile governance to meet European requirements for data protection, transfer, and processing. Funding of the registry, especially for operation after the initial setup process, remains a major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Damien C Weber
- Proton Therapy Center, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Ester Orlandi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, F-14000, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Neige Journy
- National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Abdulhamid Chaikh
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SER/UEM, France.
| | - Aurelie Isambert
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SER/UEM, France.
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Dept. of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ana Vaniqui
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
| | - Pavel Vitek
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Rianne Fijten
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Pawel Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edvardsson A, Gorgisyan J, Andersson KM, Vallhagen Dahlgren C, Dasu A, Gram D, Björk-Eriksson T, Munck af Rosenschöld P. Robustness and dosimetric verification of hippocampal-sparing craniospinal pencil beam scanning proton plans for pediatric medulloblastoma. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100555. [PMID: 38405431 PMCID: PMC10891325 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Hippocampal-sparing (HS) is a method that can potentially reduce late cognitive complications for pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) patients treated with craniospinal proton therapy (PT). The aim of this study was to investigate robustness and dosimetric plan verification of pencil beam scanning HS PT. Materials and Methods HS and non-HS PT plans for the whole brain part of craniospinal treatment were created for 15 pediatric MB patients. A robust evaluation of the plans was performed. Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and measured field-by-field using an ion chamber detector at depths corresponding to the central part of hippocampi. All HS and non-HS fields were measured with the standard resolution of the detector and in addition 16 HS fields were measured with high resolution. Measured and planned dose distributions were compared using gamma evaluation. Results The median mean hippocampus dose was reduced from 22.9 Gy (RBE) to 8.9 Gy (RBE), while keeping CTV V95% above 95 % for all nominal HS plans. HS plans were relatively robust regarding hippocampus mean dose, however, less robust regarding target coverage and maximum dose compared to non-HS plans. For standard resolution measurements, median pass rates were 99.7 % for HS and 99.5 % for non-HS plans (p < 0.001). For high-resolution measurements, median pass rates were 100 % in the hippocampus region and 98.2 % in the surrounding region. Conclusions A substantial reduction of dose in the hippocampus region appeared feasible. Dosimetric accuracy of HS plans was comparable to non-HS plans and agreed well with planned dose distribution in the hippocampus region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneli Edvardsson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jenny Gorgisyan
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel Gram
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Radiotherapy, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark
- Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology – Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Björk-Eriksson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Regional Cancer Centre West, Western Sweden Healthcare Region, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Munck af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Handeland AH, Lægdsmand PM, Toussaint L, Stokkevåg CH, Lassen-Ramshad YA, Klitgaard R, Henjum H, Ytre-Hauge KS, Indelicato DJ, Tjelta J, Lyngholm E, Muren LP. Linear energy transfer-inclusive brainstem necrosis risk models applied to an independent paediatric proton therapy cohort. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1536-1540. [PMID: 37676670 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas H Handeland
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Mt Lægdsmand
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Laura Toussaint
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Rasmus Klitgaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Johannes Tjelta
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Erlend Lyngholm
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ludvig P Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smulders B, Stolarczyk L, Seiersen K, Nørrevang O, Sommer Kristensen B, Schut DA, Thomsen K, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Høyer M, Muhic A, Vestergaard A. Prediction of dose-sparing by protons assessed by a knowledge-based planning tool in radiotherapy of brain tumours. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1541-1545. [PMID: 37793798 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2264482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bob Smulders
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Klaus Seiersen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ole Nørrevang
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bente Sommer Kristensen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Deborah Anne Schut
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karsten Thomsen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Aida Muhic
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy (DCPT), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Söderström H, Walfridsson A, Martinsson U, Isacsson U, Brocki K, Kleberg JL, Ljungman G. Neurocognition and mean radiotherapy dose to vulnerable brain structures: new organs at risk? Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:132. [PMID: 37568180 PMCID: PMC10416465 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02324-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with brain tumors are at high risk of neurocognitive decline after radiotherapy (RT). However, there is a lack of studies on how RT doses to organs at risk (OARs) impacts neurocognition. The aim of this study was to examine dose-risk relationships for mean RT dose to different brain structures important for neurocognitive networks. We explored previously established OARs and potentially new OARs. METHODS A sample of 44 pediatric brain tumor survivors who had received proton and/or photon RT were included. Correlations between mean RT doses to OARs and IQ were analyzed. Previously established OARs were cochleae, optic chiasm, optic nerve, pituitary gland, hypothalamus, hippocampus and pons. Potential new OARs for RT-induced neurocognitive decline were cerebellum, vermis and thalamus. RESULTS Mean RT dose to different OARs correlated with several IQ subtests. Higher mean RT dose to cochleae, optic nerve, cerebellum, vermis and pons was correlated with lower performance on particularly full-scale IQ (FIQ), Perceptual Reasoning (PRI), Working Memory (WMI) and Processing Speed Index (PSI). Higher mean RT dose to hippocampus correlated with lower performance on processing speed and working memory. For those receiving whole brain RT (WBRT), higher mean RT dose to the pituitary gland correlated with lower performance on working memory. CONCLUSION A high dose-risk correlation was found between IQ subtests and mean RT dose in established and potential new OARs. Thus, in the lack of validated dose constraints for vulnerable brain structures, a parsimonious approach in RT planning should be considered to preserve neurocognitive networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Söderström
- Present Address: Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Angelica Walfridsson
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulla Martinsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulf Isacsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Brocki
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johan Lundin Kleberg
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Ljungman
- Present Address: Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guardiola C, Bachiller-Perea D, Kole EMM, Fleta C, Quirion D, De Marzi L, Gómez F. First experimental measurements of 2D microdosimetry maps in proton therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:570-581. [PMID: 36066129 PMCID: PMC10087596 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empirical data in proton therapy indicate that relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is not constant, and it is directly related to the linear energy transfer (LET). The experimental assessment of LET with high resolution would be a powerful tool for minimizing the LET hot spots in intensity-modulated proton therapy, RBE- or LET-guided evaluation and optimization to achieve biologically optimized proton plans, verifying the theoretical predictions of variable proton RBE models, and so on. This could impact clinical outcomes by reducing toxicities in organs at risk. PURPOSE The present work shows the first 2D LET maps obtained at a proton therapy facility using the double scattering delivery mode in clinical conditions by means of new silicon 3D-cylindrical microdetectors. METHODS The device consists of a matrix of 121 independent silicon-based detectors that have 3D-cylindrical electrodes of 25-µm diameter and 20-µm depth, resulting each one of them in a well-defined micrometric radiation sensitive volume etched inside the silicon. They have been specifically designed for a hadron therapy, improving the performance of current silicon-based microdosimeters. Microdosimetry spectra were obtained at different positions of the Bragg curve by using a water-equivalent phantom along an 89-MeV pristine proton beam generated in the Y1 proton passive scattering beamline of the Orsay Proton Therapy Centre (Institut Curie, France). RESULTS Microdosimetry 2D-maps showing the variation of the lineal energy with depth in the three dimensions were obtained in situ during irradiation at clinical fluence rates (∼108  s-1  cm-2 ) for the first time with a spatial resolution of 200 µm, the highest achieved in the transverse plane so far. The experimental results were cross-checked with Monte Carlo simulations and a good agreement between the spectra shapes was found. The experimental frequency-mean lineal energy values in silicon were 1.858 ± 0.019 keV µm-1 at the entrance, 2.61 ± 0.03 keV µm-1 at the proximal distance, 4.97 ± 0.05 keV µm-1 close to the Bragg peak, and 8.6 ± 0.1 keV µm-1 at the distal edge. They are in good agreement with the expected trends in the literature in clinical proton beams. CONCLUSIONS We present the first 2D microdosimetry maps obtained in situ during irradiation at clinical fluence rates in proton therapy. Our results show that the arrays of 3D-cylindrical microdetectors are a reliable microdosimeter to evaluate LET maps not only in the longitudinal axis of the beam, but also in the transverse plane allowing for LET characterization in three dimensions. This work is a proof of principle showing the capacity of our system to deliver LET 2D maps. This kind of experimental data is needed to validate variable proton RBE models and to optimize LET-guided plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Guardiola
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IJCLab, Orsay, France.,Centro Nacional de Microelectrónica (IMB-CNM, CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Diana Bachiller-Perea
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IJCLab, Orsay, France
| | | | - Celeste Fleta
- Centro Nacional de Microelectrónica (IMB-CNM, CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain
| | - David Quirion
- Centro Nacional de Microelectrónica (IMB-CNM, CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus Universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM LITO, Campus Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Faustino Gómez
- Departamento de FÃsica de PartÃculas, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heuchel L, Hahn C, Pawelke J, Sørensen BS, Dosanjh M, Lühr A. Clinical use and future requirements of relative biological effectiveness: survey among all european proton therapy centres. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:134-139. [PMID: 35605747 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) varies along the treatment field. However, in clinical practice, a constant RBE of 1.1 is assumed, which can result in undesirable side effects. This study provides an accurate overview of current clinical practice for considering proton RBE in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS A survey was devised and sent to all proton therapy centres in Europe that treat patients. The online questionnaire consisted of 39 questions addressing various aspects of RBE consideration in clinical practice, including treatment planning, patient follow-up and future demands. RESULTS All 25 proton therapy centres responded. All centres prescribed a constant RBE of 1.1, but also applied measures (except for one eye treatment centre) to counteract variable RBE effects such as avoiding beams stopping inside or in front of an organ at risk and putting restrictions on the minimum number and opening angle of incident beams for certain treatment sites. For the future, most centres (16) asked for more retrospective or prospective outcome studies investigating the potential effect of the effect of a variable RBE. To perform such studies, 18 centres asked for LET and RBE calculation and visualisation tools developed by treatment planning system vendors. CONCLUSION All European proton centres are aware of RBE variability but comply with current guidelines of prescribing a constant RBE. However, they actively mitigate uncertainty and risk of side effects resulting from increased RBE by applying measures and restrictions during treatment planning. To change RBE-related clinical guidelines in the future more clinical data on RBE are explicitly demanded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Heuchel
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany
| | - Christian Hahn
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, DCPT, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Manjit Dosanjh
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, UK; CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Armin Lühr
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mein S, Kopp B, Vela A, Dutheil P, Lesueur P, Stefan D, Debus J, Haberer T, Abdollahi A, Mairani A, Tessonnier T. How can we consider variable RBE and LET d prediction during clinical practice? A pediatric case report at the Normandy Proton Therapy Centre using an independent dose engine. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:23. [PMID: 35120547 PMCID: PMC8815260 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01960-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To develop an auxiliary GPU-accelerated proton therapy (PT) dose and LETd engine for the IBA Proteus®ONE PT system. A pediatric low-grade glioma case study is reported using FRoG during clinical practice, highlighting potential treatment planning insights using variable RBE dose (DvRBE) and LETd as indicators for clinical decision making in PT. Methods The physics engine for FRoG has been modified for compatibility with Proteus®ONE PT centers. Subsequently, FRoG was installed and commissioned at NPTC. Dosimetric validation was performed against measurements and the clinical TPS, RayStation (RS-MC). A head patient cohort previously treated at NPTC was collected and FRoG forward calculations were compared against RS-MC for evaluation of 3D-Γ analysis and dose volume histogram (DVH) results. Currently, treatment design at NPTC is supported with fast variable RBE and LETd calculation and is reported in a representative case for pediatric low-grade glioma. Results Simple dosimetric tests against measurements of iso-energy layers and spread-out Bragg Peaks in water verified accuracy of FRoG and RS-MC. Among the patient cohort, average 3D-Γ applying 2%/2 mm, 3%/1.5 mm and 5%/1 mm were > 97%. DVH metrics for targets and OARs between FRoG and RayStation were in good agreement, with ∆D50,CTV and ∆D2,OAR both ⪅1%. The pediatric case report demonstrated implications of different beam arrangements on DvRBE and LETd distributions. From initial planning in RayStation sharing identical optimization constraints, FRoG analysis led to plan selection of the most conservative approach, i.e., minimized DvRBE,max and LETd,max in OARs, to avoid optical system toxicity effects (i.e., vision loss). Conclusion An auxiliary dose calculation system was successfully integrated into the clinical workflow at a Proteus®ONE IBA facility, in excellent agreement with measurements and RS-MC. FRoG may lead to further insight on DvRBE and LETd implications to help clinical decision making, better understand unexpected toxicities and establish novel clinical procedures with metrics currently absent from the standard clinical TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anthony Vela
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Guillaume Le Conquérant, Le Havre, France.,ISTCT UMR6030-CNRS, CEA, Université de Caen-Normandie, Equipe CERVOxy, Caen, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), In Neuenheimer Feld (INF) 450, DE, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sørensen BS, Pawelke J, Bauer J, Burnet NG, Dasu A, Høyer M, Karger CP, Krause M, Schwarz M, Underwood TSA, Wagenaar D, Whitfield GA, Lühr A. Does the uncertainty in relative biological effectiveness affect patient treatment in proton therapy? Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:177-184. [PMID: 34480959 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Clinical treatment with protons uses the concept of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) to convert the absorbed dose into an RBE-weighted dose that equals the dose for radiotherapy with photons causing the same biological effect. Currently, in proton therapy a constant RBE of 1.1 is generically used. However, empirical data indicate that the RBE is not constant, but increases at the distal edge of the proton beam. This increase in RBE is of concern, as the clinical impact is still unresolved, and clinical studies demonstrating a clinical effect of an increased RBE are emerging. Within the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) work package 6 on radiobiology and RBE, a workshop was held in February 2020 in Manchester with one day of discussion dedicated to the impact of proton RBE in a clinical context. Current data on RBE effects, patient outcome and modelling from experimental as well as clinical studies were presented and discussed. Furthermore, representatives from European clinical proton therapy centres, who were involved in patient treatment, laid out their current clinical practice on how to consider the risk of a variable RBE in their centres. In line with the workshop, this work considers the actual impact of RBE issues on patient care in proton therapy by reviewing preclinical data on the relation between linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE, current clinical data sets on RBE effects in patients, and applied clinical strategies to manage RBE uncertainties. A better understanding of the variability in RBE would allow development of proton treatments which are safer and more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brita S Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Experimental Clinical Oncology - Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden; Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian P Karger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Dresden and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine C.G. Carus, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine C.G. Carus Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marco Schwarz
- Protontherapy Department -Trento Hospital, and TIFPA-INFN, Trento, Italy
| | - Tracy S A Underwood
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Dirk Wagenaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, UK
| | - Armin Lühr
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bergfeldt K, Nystrom H, Witt Nystrom P, Høyer M. Is there a Nordic solution for the 'proton-problem'? Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1137-1138. [PMID: 32852249 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1809705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - HÃ¥kan Nystrom
- Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Witt Nystrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|