Outcome and safety analysis of endometrial cancer patients treated with postoperative 3D-conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancers: A Dosimetric Study Focusing on Ileal Conduit Sparing

PURPOSE

To compare ileal conduit (IC) and other organ at risk (OAR) dosimetry between treatment techniques in a prospective cohort of patients planned for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after radical cystectomy and IC reconstruction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Computed tomography (CT datasets of twenty patients who underwent adjuvant RT were obtained and used prospectively for delineation of target volumes (primary and nodal) and OARs, including IC, uretero-ileal anastomosis and ileal stoma using a specified protocol for simulation including a delayed CT to identify IC. Three RT plans were generated for each patient for a dose of 54 gray (Gy) in 27 fractions (PTV V95% >95%): 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) with (3DCRT_S) and without (3DCRT_N) stoma shielding, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), with OAR constraints specified for VMAT plans (IC: Dmax<54Gy, V50Gy < 20 cc). Constraints were given for other pelvic OARs (bowel, rectum, femur heads) as per published literature. Plans were evaluated for target coverage as well as OAR doses; in particular, IC and ileal stoma). ANOVA test was used to compare medians of achieved doses, and a p-value <0.05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

The median IC volume was 63.34 (55.29-82.93) cc. The cranial end of IC was at L5 or L4 vertebral level in 95% of patients and caudal level at S2 or S3 in 80% of patients. In contrast, the ileal stoma spanned from L4 or L5 vertebral level cranially (100%) to L5 level caudally (80%). PTV V95% was similar for 3DCRT_N and VMAT plans while it was significantly lower for 3DCRT_S in areas of ileal stoma shielding (99.95% vs 99.01% vs 96.29%, p < 0.01). Median IC V50Gy was comparable in 3DCRT_N (38.81 cc) and 3DCRT_S (35.62 cc) while it was significantly lower in the VMAT plan (17.05 cc, p < 0.01). IC Dmax did not differ significantly between the three plans. On the other hand, when 3DCRT_N, 3DCRT_S, and VMAT plans were compared for ileal stoma doses, Dmean was comparable (11.93 Gy vs 7.41 Gy vs 9.54 Gy, p = 0.06) while Dmax was significantly higher for 3DCRT_N plan and least for VMAT plan (35.32 Gy vs 27.57 Gy vs 24.22 Gy, p < 0.01). VMAT plans fared significantly better than both 3DCRT plans for uretero-ileal anastomosis, bowel, and rectal dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

Ileal stoma shielding in 3DCRT compromises PTV coverage but does not spare IC effectively. Sparing IC with VMAT is feasible without compromising PTV coverage. Dosimetric gains with VMAT are expected to benefit patients needing higher pelvic RT doses and nodal RT by reducing the risk of anastomotic and mucosal complications. Clinical benefits should be evaluated in a prospective protocol.

The value of a multimodal approach combining radical surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy in the recurrence treatment of gynecological malignancies - analysis of a large patient cohort in a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies have a poor prognosis. In particularly, pelvic local recurrence after previous radiotherapy and/or positive resection margins during surgical treatment for recurrent disease result in low survival rates. Consequently, locoregional control is of utmost importance in this cohort of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes and determine prognostic factors for patients treated with surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for recurrent and locally advanced gynecological malignancies.

METHODS

40 patients who underwent surgical treatment and IORT between 2010 and 2022 were eligible for inclusion. The median follow-up time was 22 months. The outcomes measured were locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and survival without distant metastases (DMFS). The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of patient variables and treatment factors on the endpoints mentioned. The following variables were analyzed: age at surgical treatment and IORT and initial diagnosis (< 65 vs. ≥65 years, each), disease-free interval (DFI) between initial diagnosis and first recurrence, DFI to surgical treatment and IORT, grading, histology, IORT dose (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) and technique (high dose radiotherapy (HDR) vs. IORT using electrons, (IOERT)). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The mean IORT dose was 13.8 Gy (range 10-18 Gy). Cervical carcinoma was most frequently found in 27.5% of patients followed by endometrial carcinoma and vulvar carcinoma in 25% respectively. The final histopathologic results after surgery with IORT showed no residual tumour in 24 patients (60%), microscopic residual disease in 5 patients (12.5%), resection status could not be evaluated in three patients (7.5%) and the resection status was unknown in eight patients (20%). Subsequently, 27.5% of patients also received adjuvant radiotherapy of the local recurrence bed. However, after IORT, 65% of the women suffered a recurrence. Of these, the recurrences were localized: in-field 32.5%, out-of-field 22.5% and margin-of-field 12.5%. The 3- and 5-year OS was 69% and 55% respectively. The 3- and 5-year LRC was 56% respectively. The 3- and 5-year DMFS was 66% and 49%. Whereas the comparison between groups by IORT dose level (≤ 13 vs. >13 Gy) showed a non-significant trend in favor of the higher dose only for OS (p = 0.094), but not in LRC and DMFS (p > 0.05). OS and DMFS, but not LRC, differed significantly between the HDR-IORT and IOERT groups (p = 0.06 and p = 0.03,) in favor of the HDR-IORT technique. For HDR-IORT technique a trend towards superior OS and LRC was observed in the univariate analysis: HR 3.76, CI 95%: 0.95-14.881, p = 0.059 and HR 2.165 CI 95%: 0.916-5.114, p = 0.078 CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate for pelvic recurrence in gynecological malignancies remains poor and comparable with historical data from the last two decades. Particularly HDR-IORT, appears to provide a long-term oncological benefit in carefully selected patients.

A comprehensive overview of radiation therapy impacts of various cancer treatments and pivotal role in the immune system

The cancer treatment landscape is significantly evolving, focusing on advanced radiation therapy methods to maximize effectiveness and minimize the adverse effects. Recognized as a pivotal component in cancer and disease treatment, radiation therapy (RT) has drawn attention in recent research that delves into its intricate interplay with inflammation and the immune response. This exploration unveils the underlying processes that significantly influence treatment outcomes. In this context, the potential advantages of combining bronchoscopy with RT across diverse clinical scenarios, alongside the targeted impact of brachytherapy, are explored. Concurrently, radiation treatments serve multifaceted roles such as DNA repair, cell elimination, and generating immune stress signaling molecules known as damage-associated molecular patterns, elucidating their effectiveness in treating various diseases. External beam RT introduces versatility by utilizing particles such as photons, electrons, protons, or carbon ions, each offering distinct advantages. Advanced RT techniques contribute to the evolving landscape, with emerging technologies like FLASH, spatially fractionated RT, and others poised to revolutionize the field. The comprehension of RT, striving for improved treatment outcomes, reduced side effects, and facilitating personalized and innovative treatments for cancer and noncancer patients. After navigating these advancements, the goal is fixed to usher in a new era in which RT is a cornerstone of precision and effectiveness in medical interventions. In summarizing the myriad findings, the review underscores the significance of understanding the differential impacts of radiation approaches on inflammation and immune modulation, offering valuable insights for developing innovative therapeutic interventions that harness the immune system in conjunction with RT.

Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Target Therapy

Endometrial cancer is one the most prevalent gynecological cancers and, unfortunately, has a poor prognosis due to low response rates to traditional treatments. However, the progress in molecular biology and understanding the genetic mechanisms involved in tumor processes offers valuable information that has led to the current classification that describes four molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancers, such as genetic mutations, defects in the DNA mismatch repair pathway, epigenetic changes, or dysregulation in angiogenic or hormonal signaling pathways. The preclinical genomic and molecular investigations presented allowed for the identification of some molecules that could be used as biomarkers to diagnose, predict, and monitor the progression of endometrial cancer. Besides the therapies known in clinical practice, targeted therapy is described as a new cancer treatment that involves identifying specific molecular targets in tumor cells. By selectively inhibiting these targets, key signaling pathways involved in cancer progression can be disrupted while normal cells are protected. The connection between molecular biomarkers and targeted therapy is vital in the fight against cancer. Ongoing research and clinical trials are exploring the use of standard therapy agents in combination with other treatment strategies like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy to improve outcomes and personalize treatment for patients with endometrial cancer. This approach has the potential to transform the management of cancer patients. In conclusion, enhancing molecular tools is essential for stratifying the risk and guiding surgery, adjuvant therapy, and cancer treatment for women with endometrial cancer. In addition, the information from this review may have an essential value in the personalized therapy approach for endometrial cancer to improve the patient's life.

Treatment outcomes of early-stage endometrial cancer patients: A propensity score matching of vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to report the treatment outcomes of radiation therapy for early-stage endometrial cancer patients. In addition, this study intended to identify high-risk factors that require pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) in addition to vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with early-stage endometrial cancer receiving postoperative VBT alone or with PRT were included. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two study groups. The primary endpoint was locoregional recurrence (LRR). Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and substantial lymphovascular space invasion were selected for subgroup analyses to identify the benefits of PRT over VBT alone.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2017, a total of 288 patients underwent analysis following propensity score matching. Of these, 144 received VBT and 144 received PRT. There was no significant difference in 5-year LRR between VBT and PRT for both intermediate (0% vs. 0%) and high-intermediate risk patients (3.5% VBT vs. 5.4% PRT; HR 0.54: 0.05-6.00; p = 0.616). The subgroup analyses revealed no significant factors favoring PRT over VBT. Patients with high comorbidities may have higher risks of non-cancer death after receiving PRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative VBT alone is sufficient for early-stage intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients.

Ninety-degree angled collimator: a dosimetric study related to dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to ensure that the dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) were not exceeded while increasing the prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) from 45 to 50.4 Gray (Gy) with the dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. While trying for this purpose, a new dynamic IMRT technique named 90° angled collimated dynamic IMRT (A-IMRT) planning was developed by us.

METHODS

This study was based on the computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with postoperatively diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2 endometrial carcinoma. For each patient, conventional dynamic IMRT (C-IMRT, collimator angle of 0° at all gantry angles), A-IMRT (collimator angle of 90° at gantry angles of 110°, 180°, 215°, and 285°), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned. Planning techniques were compared with parameters used to evaluate PTV and OARs via dose-volume-histogram analysis using the paired two-tailed Wilcoxon's signed-rank test; p < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.

RESULTS

All plans achieved adequate dose coverage for PTV. Although the technique with the lowest mean conformality index was A-IMRT (0.76 ± 0.05) compared to both C-IMRT (0.79 ± 0.04, p = 0.000) and VMAT (0.83 ± 0.03, p = 0.000), it protected the OARs especially the bladder (V45 = 32.84 ± 2.03 vs. 44.21 ± 6.67, p = 0.000), rectum (V30 = 56.18 ± 2.05 vs. 73.80 ± 4.75, p = 0.000) and both femoral heads (V30 for right = 12.19 ± 1.34 vs. 21.42 ± 4.03, p = 0.000 and V30 for left = 12.58 ± 1.48 vs. 21.35 ± 4.16, p = 0.000) better than C-IMRT. While the dose constraints of the bladder, rectum and bilateral femoral heads were not exceeded in any patient with A-IMRT or VMAT, they were exceeded in 19 (95%), 20 (100%) and 20 (100%) patients with C-IMRT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

OARs are better protected when external beam radiotherapy is applied to the pelvis at a dose of 50.4 Gy by turning the collimator angle to 90° at some gantry angles with the dynamic IMRT technique in the absence of VMAT.

Pattern of practice for postoperative management of endometrial cancer in Korea: a survey by the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KGOG 2028-KROG 2104)

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the current status of postoperative management of uterine endometrial cancer (EC) in Korea.

METHODS

A mail survey was administered to members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and Korean Radiation Oncology Group. A total of 38 gynecologic cancer surgeons (GYNs) and 31 radiation oncologists (RO) in 43 institutions was responded. The questionnaire consisted of general questions for clinical decision and clinical case questions. The GYN and RO responses were compared using chi-square statistics.

RESULTS

The 2 expert groups had similar responses for clinical decision based on the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-249 and Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Carcinoma-III trials in the early-stage EC. In contrast, the responses based on GOG-258 results differed, as GYNs most frequently opted for sequential chemotherapy (CTx) and radiotherapy (RT), while ROs preferred concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced stage (p<0.05). Based on the GOG-258, GYNs preferred CTx alone for adjuvant treatment of serous or clear cell adenocarcinoma histology, whereas ROs advocated for combined CTx and RT (sequential or concurrent). Among the clinical case questions, GYNs were more likely than ROs to choose CTx alone rather than the combination of CTx and RT (sequential or concurrent) as the answers to case questions representing patients with locally advanced stage or unfavorable histology (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed several different opinions of GYNs and ROs regarding adjuvant treatment for EC, particularly for adjuvant RT in advanced stage or unfavorable histology.

Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: An American Society for Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

With the results of several recently published clinical trials, this guideline informs on the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and systemic therapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Updated evidence-based recommendations provide indications for adjuvant RT and the associated techniques, the utilization and sequencing of adjuvant systemic therapies, and the effect of surgical staging techniques and molecular tumor profiling.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a multidisciplinary task force to address 6 key questions that focused on the adjuvant management of patients with endometrial cancer. The key questions emphasized the (1) indications for adjuvant RT, (2) RT techniques, target volumes, dose fractionation, and treatment planning aims, (3) indications for systemic therapy, (4) sequencing of systemic therapy with RT, (5) effect of lymph node assessment on utilization of adjuvant therapy, and (6) effect of molecular tumor profiling on utilization of adjuvant therapy. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for quality of evidence grading and strength of recommendation.

RESULTS

The task force recommends RT (either vaginal brachytherapy or external beam RT) be given based on the patient's clinical-pathologic risk factors to reduce risk of vaginal and/or pelvic recurrence. When external beam RT is delivered, intensity modulated RT with daily image guided RT is recommended to reduce acute and late toxicity. Chemotherapy is recommended for patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I to II with high-risk histologies and those with FIGO stage III to IVA with any histology. When sequencing chemotherapy and RT, there is no prospective data to support an optimal sequence. Sentinel lymph node mapping is recommended over pelvic lymphadenectomy for surgical nodal staging. Data on sentinel lymph node pathologic ultrastaging status supports that patients with isolated tumor cells be treated as node negative and adjuvant therapy based on uterine risk factors and patients with micrometastases be treated as node positive. The available data on molecular characterization of endometrial cancer are compelling and should be increasingly considered when making recommendations for adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations guide evidence-based best clinical practices on the use of adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer.

Technological Advancements in External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT): An Indispensable Tool for Cancer Treatment

Recent technological advancements have increased the efficacy of radiotherapy, leading to effective management of cancer patients with enhanced patient survival and improved quality of life. Several important developments like multileaf collimator, integration of imaging techniques like positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), involvement of advanced dose calculation algorithms, and delivery techniques have increased tumor dose distribution and decreased normal tissue toxicity. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy (IGT), and particle therapy have facilitated the planning procedures, accurate tumor delineation, and dose estimation for effective personalized treatment. In this review, we present the technological advancements in various types of EBRT methods and discuss their clinical utility and associated limitations. We also reveal novel approaches of using biocompatible yttrium oxide scintillator-photosensitizer complex (YSM) that can generate X-ray induced cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, facilitating X-ray activated photodynamic therapy (XPDT (external beam) and/or iXPDT (internal X-ray source)) and azido-derivatives of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) as agents for site-specific radiation-induced DNA damage.

Clinical Efficacy of Treating Endometrial Cancer with Xiaoaiping Tablets under Comprehensive Nursing Intervention and Their Effect on Quality of Life

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of treating endometrial cancer with Xiaoaiping tablets under comprehensive nursing intervention and their effect on quality of life.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 endometrial cancer patients treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from February 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were split into the experimental group and the control group according to their admission order, with 60 cases each. Conventional treatment and Xiaoaiping tablet regimen were received by all patients, those in the control group accepted the general nursing, and those in the experimental group accepted the comprehensive nursing intervention for 12 months, so as to compare their clinical efficacy, quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT), negative emotion scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HAD), and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) scores between the two groups.

Results

No statistical differences in the patients' general information between the two groups were observed (P > 0.05); compared with the control group after nursing, the experimental group obtained a significantly higher objective remission rate (80.0%), significantly higher disease control rate (90.0%) (P < 0.05), significantly better QOL (P < 0.001), significantly lower negative emotion scores (P < 0.001), and significantly better MCMQ scores (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Adopting Xiaoaiping tablets under comprehensive nursing intervention can improve the negative emotions of patients with endometrial cancer, enhance their confidence in medical treatment, present better efficacy, and obviously promote their QOL. Therefore, comprehensive nursing intervention should be promoted and applied in practice.