Are older patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving optimal care? A population-based study

A phase II study of weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in older adults with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LOGIK1902)

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is little evidence supporting its use in older adults. Low-dose daily carboplatin combined with thoracic radiotherapy is considered a standard regimen for this population. To establish a simple and feasible carboplatin administration method, we conducted a study of weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for older adults with locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial included patients aged ≥75 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients received chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions plus concurrent weekly carboplatin at an area under curve of 2 mg mL-1 min-1). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

From July 2020 to June 2022, 37 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and 36 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The ORR was 63.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6-77.5). Median PFS was 14.6 months (95% CI = 9.1-18.1). Median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI = 17.4-not reached). Grade 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in one patient (2.8%) each.

CONCLUSION

Weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy was safe in older adults with locally advanced NSCLC, and promising activity was observed.

Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe

Background and purpose

The aim of this study was to review the published studies on the utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer (both small and non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC) patients in European countries with a population-based perspective.

Material and methods

A literature search since January 2000 until December 2022 was carried out. Only English-published papers were included, and only European data was considered. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A scoping narrative review was undertaken due to the hetereogeneity of the published papers.

Results

38 papers were included in the analysis, with the majority from the Netherlands (52.6%) and the UK (18.4%). Large variability is observed in the reported radiotherapy utilisation, around 40% for NSCLC in general and between 26 and 42% in stage I NSCLC. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) shows a wide range of utilisation across countries and over time, from 8 to 63%. Similary, in stage III lung cancer, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilisation varied considerably (11-70%). Eleven studies compared radiotherapy utilisation between older and younger age-groups, showing that younger patients receive more CRT, while the opposite applies for SBRT. An widespreadlack of data on relevant covariates such as comorbidty and health-services related variables is observed.

Conclusion

The actual utilisation of radiotherapy for lung cancer reported in patterns-of-care studies (POCs) is notably lower than the evidence-based optimal utilisation. Important variability is observed by country, time period, stage at diagnosis and age. A wider use of POCs should be promoted to improve our knowledge on the actual application of evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival time and making treatment decisions for clinical stage IA NSCLC based on the SEER database

Background

The aim of this study was to establish and validate a nomogram model for accurate prediction of patients' survival with T1aN0M0 none small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The patients, diagnosed with the stage IA NSCLC from 2004-2015, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The variables with a P-value < 0.05 in a multivariate Cox regression were selected to establish the nomogram. The discriminative ability of the model was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index). The proximity of the nomogram prediction to the actual risk was depicted by a calibration plot. The clinical usefulness was estimated by the decision curve analysis (DCA). Survival curves were made with Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-Rank test.

Results

Eight variables, including treatment, age, sex, race, marriage, tumor size, histology, and grade were selected to develop the nomogram model by univariate and multivariate cox regression. The C-index was 0.704 (95% CI, 0.694-0.714) in the training set and 0.713 (95% CI, 0.697-0.728) in the test set, which performed significantly better than 8th edition AJCC TNM stage system (0.550, 95% CI, 0.408-0.683, P < 0.001). The calibration curve showed that the prediction ability of 3-years and 5-years survival rate demonstrated a high degree of agreement between the nomogram model and the actual observation. The DCA curves also proved that the nomogram-assisted decisions could improve patient outcomes.

Conclusion

We established and validated a prognostic nomogram to predict 3-years and 5-years overall survival in stage IA NSCLC.

Older patients more likely to die from cancer-related diseases than younger with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER database analysis

Background

Various reports showed some conflicting data on survival at different ages. This study aimed to investigate the main cause of death in older patients with lung cancer and to perform a comparison with younger patients in order to observe the differences between these two cohorts.

Methods

Outcomes of patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤3 cm who underwent lobectomy without induction therapy in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 (SEER-18; January 2004 to December 2016) database were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score-matched analysis.

Results

A total of 16,672 eligible NSCLC cases were found in the SEER database. The number of patients aged ≤60, 61–70, and ≥71 years was 3,930, 6,391, and 6,351, respectively. Among these patient groups, 527 (13.4%), 1,018 (15.9%), and 1,235 (19.4%) died of lung cancer during follow-up, while 357 (9.1%), 964 (15.1%) and 1,579 (25.2%) died of non-lung cancer diseases, respectively. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) rates of younger patients showed a significant survival advantage over older patients. After propensity-score matching (PSM) of patients aged ≤60 and ≥71 years using a ratio of 1:1, we found that 403 (12.9%) and 584 (18.7%) patients in the ≤60 and ≥71 years age groups died of lung cancer, respectively. The OS and LCSS rates of younger patients still exhibited a significant survival advantage over older patients.

Conclusions

Older patients with stage IA NSCLC have a worse prognosis compared with younger patients. Also, cancer-related causes were more frequent in older patients than non-cancer-related causes.