The impact of antidepressant treatments on family functioning in adults with major depressive disorder: a post hoc comparison of vortioxetine and agomelatine

Vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and high levels of anxiety symptoms: An updated analysis of efficacy and tolerability

BACKGROUND

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) often experience comorbid anxiety symptoms. Vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating anxiety symptoms in patients with MDD; however, efficacy and tolerability have not been assessed across the entire approved dosage range.

METHODS

The efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day were assessed in patients with MDD and high levels of anxiety symptoms (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] total score ≥ 20) using pooled data from four randomized, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled studies (n = 842). Data from a randomized, double-blind study of vortioxetine 10-20 mg/day versus agomelatine 25-50 mg/day in patients with an inadequate response to prior therapy (n = 299) were analyzed separately. Mean changes from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), HAM-A, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores were analyzed by vortioxetine dosage.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis of fixed-dose studies demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship for vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day for improvements in MADRS, HAM-A, and SDS total scores. Vortioxetine 20 mg/day demonstrated significant effects versus placebo from week 4 onwards. In the post-hoc analysis of the active-controlled study in patients with an inadequate response to prior therapy, vortioxetine 10-20 mg/day was superior to agomelatine across all outcome measures from week 4 onwards. Up-titration of vortioxetine to 20 mg/day was not associated with an increase in adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Vortioxetine is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with MDD and high levels of anxiety symptoms, including those with an inadequate response to prior therapy. The greatest therapeutic benefits were observed with vortioxetine 20 mg/day.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01140906, NCT01153009, NCT01163266, NCT01255787, NCT01488071.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Mental Health Clinical Research: A Descriptive Review in Comparison with Clinician-Rated Outcome Measures

PURPOSE

To review how patient-reported outcomes measures in mental health clinical research complement traditional clinician-rated outcomes measures.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

Latest update of the literature search was conducted in August 2019, using a specified set of search terms to identify controlled and uncontrolled studies (published since 1996) of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions in adults (≥18 years) in hospital-based mental health care.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors extracted data independently using a pre-designed extraction form.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Among the 2962 publications identified, 257 were assessed by full text reading. A total of 24 studies reported in 26 publications were included in this descriptive review. We identified subjective and objective outcome measures, classified these according to the pharmacopsychometric triangle and compared them qualitatively in terms of incremental information added to the clinical study question. The data reviewed here from primarily depression and schizophrenia intervention studies show that results from patient-reported outcome measures and clinician-rated outcome measures generally point in the same direction. There was a relative lack of patient-reported outcome measures on functioning and medication side effects compared with patient-reported outcome measures on symptom burden and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported outcomes and clinician-rate outcomes supplement each other and at most times support identical study conclusions. Future studies would benefit from a more systematic approach towards use of patient-reported outcomes and a clearer rationale of how to weigh and report the results in comparison with clinician-rated outcomes.

Agomelatine for depression: expanding the horizons?

INTRODUCTION

Agomelatine is an antidepressant with unique pharmacological actions; it is both a melatonin agonist and selective serotonin antagonist. Both actions combined are necessary for antidepressant efficacy. Effects on melatonin receptors enable resynchronisation of disrupted circadian rhythms with beneficial effects on sleep patterns. Areas covered: The issue of use of an antidepressant for depression co-morbid with somatic disorders is covered by the authors. A review of the literature from 2000 to August 2018 was undertaken using Scopus and Web of Science with the key words: agomelatine, depression, medical illness. Depression in Parkinson's disease, cardiovascular illness and type II diabetes is reviewed with evidence of efficacy. Bipolar depression and seasonal affective disorder may also react favourably. Agomelatine may have specific efficacy on symptoms of anhedonia. Expert opinion: Despite approval in some major jurisdictions, the drug has failed to gain registration in the United States. A defining issue may be questions about longer term efficacy: unequivocal effectiveness in placebo-controlled relapse prevention studies has not always been demonstrated. Continuation studies suggest maintenance of clinical responsiveness. A major disadvantage of the drug is its' potential hepatotoxicity and the need for repeated clinical laboratory tests.