Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.4 mg single pills for treatment of Asian patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Comparative efficacy and safety of alpha-blockers as monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Despite the availability of various drugs for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), alpha(α)-blockers are the preferred first-line treatment. However, there remains a scarcity of direct comparisons among various α-blockers. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of α-blockers in the management of BPH. A comprehensive electronic search covered PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library until August 2023. The primary endpoints comprised international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual volume (PVR), while treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered as secondary endpoints. This NMA synthesized evidence from 22 studies covering 3371 patients with six kinds of α-blockers with 12 dose categories. IPSS has been considerably improved by tamsulosin 0.4 mg, naftopidil 50 mg and silodosin 8 mg as compared to the placebo. Based on the p-score, tamsulosin 0.4 mg had the highest probability of ranking for IPSS, PVR, and Qmax, whereas doxazosin 8 mg had the highest probability of improving QoL. A total of 297 adverse events were reported among all the α-blockers, silodosin has reported a notable number of TEAEs. Current evidence supports α-blockers are effective in IPSS reduction and are considered safer. Larger sample size with long-term studies are needed to refine estimates of IPSS, QoL, PVR, and Qmax outcomes in α-blocker users.

Cervi Parvum Cornu complex for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cervi Parvum Cornu, Angelicae Gigantis Radix and Glycyrrhizae Radix complex (CAG) in men with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Materials and methods

From November 2020 to January 2022, participants with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 12-19 in two centers were recruited and randomize into three groups: a CAG 500 mg/day group (CAG 500), a CAG 1000 mg/day group (CAG 1000), and a placebo group (PG). They were treated for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change of IPSS at the end of study from baseline. Secondary end points included change of prostate specific antigen (PSA), testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), maximum urinary flow rate (Q max), post-void residual volume (PVR), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and drug safety.

Results

A total of 103 patients were able to finish the study according to the study protocol. Total IPSS and sub-scores (residual urine sensation, frequency, weak stream, hesistancy, nocturia, and quality of life) in CAG 500 and CAG 1000 were significantly improved at the 12th week compared to those of the PG. Changes of serum PSA, DHT, and testosterone levels at the 12th week from baseline did not show significant differences among the three groups. Q max and PVR changes did not show significant differences among the three groups either. Total IIEF and sub-scores (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction) in CAG 1000 were significantly improved at 12th week compared to those in PG. No significant adverse events were found.

Conclusions

CAG is well tolerated in patients with moderate LUTS. Treatment with CAG for 12 weeks has a therapeutic effect on moderate LUTS.

Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as an initial dose in 1,219 Korean patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms: data from a phase IV study

Background

An initial dose of tamsulosin 0.2 mg is frequently prescribed for Asian men. We investigated the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as the initial dose in Korean men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) in everyday clinical practice.

Materials and methods

A phase IV study was conducted in South Korea. Eligible patients were prescribed tamsulosin 0.4 mg for 6 months. We excluded patients with previous exposure to LUTS drugs and patients with an international prostate symptom score (IPSS) < 8.

Results

The mean total IPSS, storage subscore, voiding symptoms subscore, and quality of life significantly decreased from 18.0, 10.8, 7.2, and 3.8 to 12.8, 7.5, 5.3, and 2.6, respectively, after 6 months of treatment. The number of nocturia episodes significantly decreased from 3.0 to 2.2 in patients who reported at least 2 nocturia events at baseline. A mean reduction in the IPSS was quantitatively equivalent in all age groups. The mean reduction in the IPSS was greater in the IPSS ≥ 20 group than in the IPSS < 20 group (mean reduction in the total IPSS: -2.6 in the IPSS < 20 group; -9.4 in the IPSS ≥ 20 group). All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild. The most frequently recorded treatment-emergent adverse event was dizziness, which was reported in 22 patients (1.8%).

Conclusion

Treatment of LUTS with tamsulosin 0.4 mg as the initial dose for 6 months in Korean men was effective in improving LUTS and showed a favorable safety profile in a real-life setting.

Quisqualis indica extract for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Quisqualis indica in men with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 135 subjects with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8-19 were randomized in 2 centers from June 2018 to April 2019. Patients were assigned into one of the three groups: a low-dose group (LG, 1,000 mg Q. indica), a high-dose group (HG, 2,000 mg Q. indica) or a placebo group (PG). The primary endpoint was the change of IPSS at the end of treatment from baseline. Secondary end points included the changes of prostate specific antigen, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), with drug safety.

RESULTS

113 patients were able to finish the study. Compared to the PG, total IPSS in the LG and the HG was significantly improved at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. For IPSS subscores, LG showed improvements in all except for urgency and quality of life at 6 weeks. HG showed improvements in incomplete emptying and frequency at 6 weeks and 12 weeks along with improvements in intermittency, straining, and quality of life at 12 weeks. For IIEF-5 subscores, orgasmic function and overall satisfaction improved in HG when compared to PG at 12 weeks. Lastly, increase of Qmax and decrease of PVR was observed at 6 weeks in LG.

CONCLUSIONS

12-week treatment with Q. indica has a therapeutic effect and is well tolerated in patients with LUTS.

Effect of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists on sexual function. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists or alpha-blockers are used in the treatment of hypertension, in the therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia and in medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones. These agents may affect the sexual function, with differences between drugs within the same class, depending on their selectivity for receptor subtypes. The aim of this review was to analyze the effects of alpha-blockers on sexual function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE and other databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting sexual adverse effects in patients treated with alpha-blockers. Odds ratios for sexual dysfunction were calculated using random effects Mantel-Haenszel statistics.

RESULTS

Out of 608 records retrieved, 75 eligible RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, alphablockers were associated with increased odds of ejaculatory disorders both in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (OR: 7.53, 95% CI: 3.77-15.02, Z = 5.73, p < 0.00001, I2 = 55%) and in patients with ureteral stones (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.50-5.44, Z = 3.19, p < 0.001, I2 = 31%). Uroselective alpha-blockers showed higher odds of ejaculatory disorders. Conversely, nonselective alpha-blockers were not associated with higher odds of ejaculatory dysfunction. Silodosin was associated with increased odds of ejaculatory dysfunction compared with tamsulosin (OR: 3.52, 95% CI: 2.18-5.68, 15 series, 1512 participants, Z = 5.15, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Naftopidil and alfuzosin showed lower odds of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to uroselective alpha-blockers.No statistically significant differences in the odds of erectile dysfunction were observed when alpha-blockers were compared to placebo.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Drugs for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in middle-aged and elderly men. The current drugs for treating this disease include α1-adrenoceptor antagonists (ABs), muscarinic receptor antagonists (MRAs), phosphodiesterase five inhibitors (PDE5-Is), and β3-adrenoceptor agonists (B3As). However, direct comparative studies analyzing different therapies are limited; therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of different drug regimens for treating BPH/LUTS. Methods: The PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different drug treatments for BPH/LUTS from January 2000 to April 2021. The NMA was performed using R 4.1 software. Results: Fifty-five RCTs were included among a total of 1639 trials. ① ABs + PDE5-Is, ABs + B3As, ABs + MRAs, ABs, and PDE5-IS were superior to the placebo in improving the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-Voiding, and IPSS-storage. ② For increasing the maximum flow rate (Qmax), ABs + PDE5-Is, ABs + MRAs, and ABs were more effective than the placebo. ③ Regarding reducing post-void residual urine (PVR), none of the six treatment plans had significant effects. Conclusion: Combination therapy showed greater efficacy than monotherapy, and ABs + PDE5-Is was the most successful treatment for improving the overall IPSS score. ABs are a primary therapeutic measure to increase Qmax, and ABs + PDE5-I may be a more suitable choice for enhancing Qmax. The combination of MRA and AB+ MRA may lead to an increase in PVR. Systematic Review Registration: [website], identifier [registration number].

Free combination of dutasteride plus tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in South Korea: analysis of drug utilization and adverse events using the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database

Objective

To assess the use and safety of free combination therapy (dutasteride and tamsulosin), dutasteride monotherapy, or tamsulosin monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

This non-interventional retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment-National Patient Sample database. Patients with BPH ≥ 40 years of age receiving combination therapy (dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily) or dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily dose between 2012 and 2017 were included. The frequency, duration of treatment and risk of any adverse event (AE) or serious AE (SAE) was compared for combination therapy versus each monotherapy using non-inferiority testing.

Results

Of 14,755 eligible patients, 1529 (10.4%) received combination therapy, 6660 (45.1%) dutasteride monotherapy, and 6566 (44.5%) tamsulosin monotherapy. The proportion of patients treated with combination therapy exceeded the pre-specified 3% threshold for ‘frequent’ use. Safety results indicated a similar risk of any AE and SAE irrespective of treatment group. The adjusted relative risk for any AE over the treatment observation period comparing combination therapy with dutasteride monotherapy was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.12), and with tamsulosin monotherapy was 0.98 (95% CI 0.95, 1.02) demonstrating non-inferiority. The adjusted relative risk for any SAE was 1.07 (95% CI 0.66, 1.74) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.56, 1.45), compared with dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapy, respectively. Although the SAE results did not statistically demonstrate non-inferiority of combination therapy based on pre-specified margins, the 95% CI for the risk ratio estimates included the null with a lower limit below the non-inferiority margins, indicating no meaningful differences in SAE risk between groups. Absolute SAE risks were low.

Conclusion

Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin is frequently used in real-world practice in South Korea for treatment of BPH and demonstrates a safety profile similar to either monotherapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-021-00941-1.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and food effects of a novel formulation tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule compared with a 0.2 mg capsule in healthy male volunteers

Tamsulosin, an alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist, has been used as a primary option for medical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. An open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, three sequence crossover study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of 0.2 and 0.4 mg tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) in the fed versus the fasted state. Subjects were randomly assigned to three sequences and received one of the following treatments at each period: tamsulosin HCl 0.2 or 0.4 mg in the fed state with a high-fat meal, or tamsulosin HCl 0.4 mg in the fasted state. Blood samples for the PK analysis were collected at pre-dose and up to 48 h post-dose. The PK parameters were calculated by a non-compartmental method. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the plasma maximum concentration (C_max) and area under concentration curve from time zero to last measurable concentration (AUC_last) were calculated. Twenty-two subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure of tamsulosin 0.4 mg decreased approximately 9% in the fed state compared to the fasted state, and the time to reach peak concentration was slightly delayed in the fed state. The dose normalized GMR and its 90% CIs of C_max and AUC_last for 0.2 and 0.4 mg tamsulosin in the fed state were within 0.8 and 1.25 range. Systemic exposure of tamsulosin was decreased in the fed condition compared to the fasted condition. Linear PK profiles were observed between 0.2 and 0.4 mg tamsulosin in the fed state.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529800.