Suboptimal adherence to daily growth hormone in a US real-world study: an unmet need in the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency

Impact of Daily Growth Hormone Adherence on Height Velocity Among Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD)

OBJECTIVE

To describe adherence to daily somatropin treatment and impact on height velocity within 1 year of treatment start among patients with pediatric growth hormone deficiency in a real-world US population.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients aged ≥3 years to <16 years with pediatric growth hormone deficiency prescribed somatropin by a pediatric endocrinologist at a US-based center of excellence between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. Patient data were collected using hospital electronic health records linked to a specialty pharmacy patient prescription records. Adherence, evaluated over 12 months, was measured using the proportion of days covered metric and patients were categorized as adherent if their proportion of days covered ≥80%. Height velocity was annualized to compare across adherent and nonadherent patients.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-one patients were identified and included in this study, of which 70.2% were male,73.5% were white, and mean age (standard deviation [SD]) at index was 12.1 (2.8). In the height velocity analysis, 174 patients were included and the mean (SD) annualized change in height was 10.2 (5.7) cm/y in the adherent group (n = 108) and 9.8 (7.6) in the nonadherent group (n = 66). The difference in height velocity between the groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Minor improvements in average height velocity were observed in the patient group who were adherent to somatropin therapy, although not statistically significant. Lack of observed significance may be due to small sample sizes, short observation period, a likely heterogenous population in terms of growth hormone prescribing, data bias due to single-center origin, or potential patient misclassification.

Health-related quality of life in pre-pubertal children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency: 12-month results from a phase 3 clinical trial of once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily somatropin

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) with daily injection of recombinant human growth hormone (somatropin) aims to increase height velocity and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaire was administered in a phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily somatropin in children with pGHD (ClinicalTrials.gov no NCT02968004).

METHODS

Treatment-naïve prepubertal children with pGHD received once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily somatropin for 12 months. The QoLISSY core module (physical/social/emotional subscales) was administered at baseline and 12 months after treatment initiation. QoLISSY-Parent was completed by parents/caregivers of children <7 years old and some parents/caregivers of children ≥7 years old; children ≥7 years old self-completed QoLISSY-Child.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (N = 117). Among children <7 years old, QoLISSY-Parent total and subscale scores showed similarly improved HRQoL at 12 months relative to baseline in both treatment groups. Self-reported QoLISSY-Child total and subscale scores in children ≥7 years old indicated HRQoL improvements at 12 months that were numerically better with somatrogon than somatropin (similar results with QoLISSY-Parent in this age group). At both time points, children reported better HRQoL than perceived by their parents/caregivers.

CONCLUSION

Treatment for 12 months with once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily somatropin resulted in comparable improvements in HRQoL among children with pGHD. Lower HRQoL perceived by parents/caregivers possibly reflect children's tendency to emphasize adaptation. These results suggest that evaluation of HRQoL could help support treatment decisions in children with pGHD treated with growth hormone.

Physician experience with once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily rhGH regimen in pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency: a cross-sectional survey of physicians from the global phase 3 study

Introduction

The standard of care for pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) is once-daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Somatrogon, a long-acting rhGH, requires less frequent, once-weekly, dosing. We describe physicians' preference for, experiences, and satisfaction with once-weekly somatrogon vs once-daily rhGH.

Methods

English-speaking investigators from somatrogon's global phase III study (NCT02968004) with prior experience using once-daily rhGH were included. Participants answered an online survey containing 14 closed- and open-ended items.

Results

Twenty-four pediatric endocrinologists (41.7% men; 79.2% practiced at public/private hospitals) from 12 countries with 25.8 ± 12.0 years' experience treating pGHD completed the survey. In terms of the time and effort required to explain device instructions, injection regimen, procedure for missed injection, and address patients'/caregivers' concerns, a similar proportion of physicians chose once-weekly somatrogon and once-daily rhGH; 62.5% physicians indicated that once-daily rhGH required greater effort to monitor adherence. Overall, 75% preferred once-weekly somatrogon over once-daily rhGH, 79.2% considered once-weekly somatrogon to be more convenient and less burdensome, and 83.3% were likely to prescribe somatrogon in the future. Overall, 50% felt that once-weekly somatrogon was more beneficial to patients, while 50% chose "No difference". Most physicians (62.5%) felt both regimens were equally likely to support positive long-term growth outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization. More physicians were "very satisfied" with once-weekly somatrogon (62.5%) than with once-daily rhGH (16.7%). Reduced injection frequency, patient and caregiver burden, increased convenience, and improved adherence were reasons for these choices.

Conclusion

Physicians had a positive experience with, and perception of, treating pGHD with once-weekly somatrogon.

Cost-effectiveness of somatrogon in the Spanish pediatric population with growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cost-effectiveness of weekly somatrogon compared to daily growth hormones (GH-d) in the pediatric population of Spain with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

METHODS

Markov model with two states (patients with or without GH-d or somatrogon treatment) in prepubertal children (3 to 11 years and 3 to 12 years in girls and boys, respectively) with GHD in isolation or as part of multiple pituitary hormone deficiency and without previous treatment, from the perspective of the National Health System. The simulation of the economic model ends at the age of 18. The costs of hormones and monitoring were obtained from Spanish sources. The utilities were obtained from the literature. Spanish clinical experts validated the assumptions of the model.

RESULTS

In the deterministic analysis, somatrogon would be cost-effective, compared to GH-d, with a cost per QALY (quality-adjusted life year) gained of €19,259 and a clinically relevant QALY gain (0.336). This result was confirmed in deterministic sensitivity analyses. According to the probabilistic analysis, somatrogon would be the dominant treatment, with a 61% probability of a willingness to pay of €25,000 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

Compared to GH-d, somatrogon is cost-effective in the Spanish pediatric population with GHD.

Efficacy, safety, quality of life, adherence and cost-effectiveness of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy compared to daily growth hormone in children with growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We evaluated the efficacy, safety, adherence, quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) vs daily growth hormone (GH) preparations in the treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to July 2022 on randomized and non-randomized studies involving children with GHD receiving LAGH as compared to daily GH. Meta-analyses for efficacy and safety were performed comparing different LAGH/daily GH formulations. From the initial 1,393 records, we included 16 studies for efficacy and safety, 8 studies for adherence and 2 studies for QoL. No studies reporting cost-effectiveness were found. Pooled mean differences of mean annualized height velocity (cm/year) showed no difference between LAGH and daily GH: Eutropin Plus® vs Eutropin® [-0.14 (-0.43, 0.15)], Eutropin Plus® vs Genotropin® [-0.74 (-1.83, 0.34)], Jintrolong® vs Jintropin AQ® [0.05 (-0.54, 0.65)], Somatrogon vs Genotropin® [-1.40 (-2.91, 0.10)], TransCon vs Genotropin® [0.93 (0.26, 1.61)]. Also, other efficacy and safety outcomes, QoL and adherence were comparable for LAGH and daily GH. Our results showed that, although most of the included studies had some concerns for risk of bias, regarding efficacy and safety all the LAGH formulations were similar to daily GH. Future high quality studies are needed to confirm these data. Adherence and QoL should be addressed from real-world data studies for both the mid and long term and in a larger population. Cost-effectiveness studies are needed to measure the economic impact of LAGH from the healthcare payer's perspective.

Relationship between adherence to growth hormone therapy and growth

Adherence to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children is variable and remains a problem which can significantly affect the response to GH treatment and future health and also have economic consequences. The response to GH treatment is not predictable at the start of treatment and depends on several factors, the main one being the diagnosis. Knowing the factors associated with poor adherence before treatment initiation can improve the response to treatment. © 2022 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

TransCon human growth hormone for children with growth hormone deficiency: a technology evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Standard-of-care treatment for growth hormone deficiency consists of daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human growth hormone, also known as somatropin. Although somatropin treatment is well established, the burden of daily injections can lead to poor adherence and quality of life. In this regard, a TransCon human growth hormone (lonapegsomatropin-tcgd) technology was developed to optimize the therapeutic effect of daily somatropin for the treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency.

AREAS COVERED

The authors reviewed the effects of lonapegsomatropin-tcgd in children with growth hormone deficiency.

EXPERT OPINION

Lonapegsomatropin-tcgd was found to be non-inferior to and superior to daily somatropin for annualized height velocity. In addition, the safety was comparable between them. As a result, the convenient dosing of lonapegsomatropin-tcgd has the potential to improve patient adherence, leading to increased efficacy and quality of life. Medication adherence, quality of life, long-term safety, and cost-effectiveness studies comparing lonapegsomatropin-tcgd and daily somatropin are required to confirm these possible benefits.

Persistence with daily growth hormone among children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency in the UK

BACKGROUND

Children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) are treated with daily somatropin injections; however, poor treatment persistence and adherence have been recognized previously and have been shown to negatively impact growth outcomes. A recent real-world study of a US pediatric GHD population found that a substantial proportion of children discontinued somatropin therapy, but similar data for a real-world UK population are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the discontinuation of, and persistence with, daily somatropin treatment among children with GHD in the UK.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of children (≥3 and <16 years old) with ≥1 medication prescription for daily injectable somatropin from 1 July 2000 to 31 December 2020 in the IQVIA Medical Research DATA (IMRD) database. Early persistence was defined as the proportion of children prescribed ≥1 somatropin refill (≥2 prescriptions). Discontinuation was defined as the first date at which a medication gap for somatropin (of >60 or >90 days between prescriptions) occurred. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate persistence (non-discontinuation) over time to assess time to first discontinuation event. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics and time to medication discontinuation.

RESULTS

Among the cohort identified in this study (n = 117), the majority (n = 84, 71.8%) had 48 months of available follow-up; 56.4% were boys and the mean (median) age was 8.6 (8.0) years. About 98% exhibited early persistence, but persistence over the follow-up period decreased with follow-up duration. Using the conservative 90-day gap definition of persistence, an estimated 72.4%, 52.8%, and 43.3% were persistent at 12, 36, and 48 months. Lower persistence rates were observed using the 60-day definition. No significant patient predictors of time to discontinuation were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high early persistence with somatropin, a high percentage of children with GHD were increasingly non-persistent over time. More than 1 in 4 were non-persistent at 12 months and more than 1 in 2 were non-persistent at 48 months of follow-up. These results suggest that strategies to support improved medication-taking behavior among children with GHD in the UK are warranted.